User talk:Fuziion

June 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Billboard Year-End Hot 100 singles of 1977 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Billboard Year-End Hot 100 singles of 1977 was changed by Fuziion (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85302 on 2017-06-15T23:25:43+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:25, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Billboard Year-End Hot 100 singles of 2001. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MPFitz1968 (talk) 01:01, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fuziion, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Fuziion! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:02, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Peter Criss, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:31, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of wars involving Lesotho

Hello, Fuziion. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, List of wars involving Lesotho, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meatsgains (talk) 01:37, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Chris Pratt, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:55, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of wars involving Slovakia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of wars involving Slovakia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of wars involving Slovakia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nightfury 10:19, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Austro-Hungary Wars

This has been tagged for several issues. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:20, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Austro-Hungary Wars

The article Austro-Hungary Wars has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Abandoned initial attempt at List of wars involving Hungary

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PRehse (talk) 16:57, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of wars involving the Maldives

Hello, Fuziion. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, List of wars involving the Maldives, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Turgan ^Talk 03:09, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Austro-Hungary Wars

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Austro-Hungary Wars. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of wars involving Hungary. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of wars involving Hungary. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Nightfury 10:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of wars involving Latvia

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of wars involving Latvia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Any suggestions on how to improve the article should be discussed at the article talk page. Thank you. ^Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\^Work 15:03, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop assuming ownership of articles as you did at List of wars involving Latvia. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ^Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\^Work 22:08, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding you assuming ownership of the article. The thread is User assuming article ownership. The discussion is about the topic List of wars involving Latvia. ^Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\^Work 22:25, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm an administrator on Wikipedia. On List of wars involving Latvia, I saw that you recently added, "This Page was created by Wiki user Fuziion, Make a change only if it is related to the subject matter". You're right that edits to the article should stay on-topic, but 1) you shouldn't add your own name to Wikipedia articles and 2) it's unnecessary to add warnings or rules to articles. Wikipedia's content policies apply everywhere, so you don't need to invent new ones. Adding your own name to an article can give people the impression that you believe you have special rights ("ownership"). Since Wikipedia articles are collaboratively written, this means people may edit the article in ways you dislike. We resolve this by discussion on the article's talk page, through which we hopefully find consensus. If you have trouble, you can check out Wikipedia's forms of dispute resolution. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:19, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: I note that the editor had added similar language to List of wars involving Lesotho and List of wars involving the Maldives. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:27, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, forgot to mention that those edits have been reverted, as have the majority of this editor's contributions. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:30, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:13, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What was unclear about NinjaRobotPirate's point #2 above? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:16, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not assume ownership of articles as you did at List of wars involving Latvia. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. BytEfLUSh ^Talk 22:18, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please stop assuming ownership of articles as you did at List of wars involving Latvia. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. byteflush _Talk 04:47, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Nick-D (talk) 07:37, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

From reviewing your edits, almost all of them are unhelpful. I note that you have been adding Poland as a combatant in battles in which no, or virtually no, Poles took place without providing references. Other edits have been straight vandalism, and edits such as this are unacceptable. Nick-D (talk) 07:39, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Fuziion (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20670 was submitted on Feb 19, 2018 20:31:49. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 20:31, 19 February 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Fuziion (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21291 was submitted on Apr 22, 2018 01:34:42. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:34, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]