User talk:FretfulPorcupine

Your submission at Articles for creation: Black Awakening in Capitalist America (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Black Awakening in Capitalist America and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Black Awakening in Capitalist America, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 16:06, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FretfulPorcupine! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoingBatty (talk) 16:06, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Black Awakening in Capitalist America

Hello FretfulPorcupine, and welcome to Wikipedia! I saw over at WikiProject Books that your article was declined so I took a look. I think you made a great start. I found several excellent and useful articles on the book, so I went ahead and added a bit to the "reception" section. The article now demonstrates the "notability" of the topic, so if you wanted to resubmit it, I think it would be accepted. It's an often-annoying fact of wikipedia that many incredibly "notable" topics won't be accepted as such unless there are two different sources with detailed coverage, which, depending on the subject, aren't always easy to find. In this case, though, there is a lot to work with. If you wanted to keep working on the article, I think it could be really excellent, there's room to add more context about Internal Colonialism Theory, the book's relationship to the Black Power movement, etc. I would be happy to help with this article or any others that interest you, feel free to reply here or leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions as you edit. ~ oulfis 🌸(talk) 08:40, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Oh, I also meant to say, if you don't have access to this great special issue on Allen's work, let me know; my university library subscribes to that journal so I can help make that information available. ~ oulfis 🌸(talk) 08:46, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Appreciate the insight Oulfis and hope I'm using talk correctly. I did submit the article early hoping to assemble more sources as it sat for review and so appreciate your additions and your insight into what qualifies as notable seems like they will be invaluable as I continue editing more articles. I do have academic access but appreciate the offer. Thanks again for the insight as I get started here!FretfulPorcupine (talk) 21:37, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Black Awakening in Capitalist America accepted

Black Awakening in Capitalist America, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Alpha3031 (t • c) 04:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steven W. Tompkins has been accepted

Steven W. Tompkins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 19:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kevin Hayden

The article Kevin Hayden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just the type of local coverage one would expect, fails GNG and NPOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:32, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)