User talk:ForTupan

This is ForTupan's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hi ForTupan! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maria-Ana Tupan (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is almost entirely unreferenced, the first citation comes in the 'Bibliography' section! Please note that in articles on living people, every material statement, anything potentially contentious, and all private personal details must be clearly supported by inline citations to reliable published sources, or else removed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maria-Ana Tupan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ForTupan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, ForTupan. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Maria-Ana Tupan, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like to repeat myself! I don't use multiple accounts, I don't make controversial edits! I posted without being logged in because the name I chose is similar to the name of the edited article (I chose it out of respect for the author), and inexperienced Wikipedians thought it was self-promotion, which is FALSE. Check MY IPs, logged in, not logged in, because I'm telling the truth. And, tell me, is it mandatory to be logged in when I edit an article? I think not. I have visible IP, that's enough!ForTupan (talk) 15:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Maria-Ana Tupan. Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 13:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please stop. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Maria-Ana Tupan, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 15:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 18:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Maria-Ana Tupan. Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 09:28, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Please stop. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at Talk:Maria-Ana Tupan, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 14:53, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 17:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just so we are clear - you are repeatedly logging out of your account and leaving messages for people/making edits about a subject that you are editing about while logged into your account. That is inappropriate - log in to edit, so that people know who they are talking to. If you continue to make edits while logged out during the duration of this block, the block may be extended to be of indefinite duration. Girth Summit _(blether) 17:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Girth Summit uh... I think they've continued – here and here. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 00:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. ForTupan, seriously - knock it off. Go and do something else for a week, or appeal the block if you are willing to commit to not editing disruptively. If you persist in just ignoring the block, we will likely end up blocking this account indefinitely, and blocking the IP ranges that you're using. Or just protecting the talk page so that you can't edit it. Girth Summit _(blether) 11:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Girth Summit and again... here and here. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 00:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ForTupan, you need to abide by our editing policies - if you are unwilling to do so, or to spend time finding out what they are, you may not contribute here. I have made the block indefinite, and have protected that talk page so that IPs cannot edit it. Instructions for appealing the block may be found at WP:GAB. Girth Summit _(blether) 09:42, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]