User talk:Folkezoft

Welcome!

Hello, Folkezoft, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia or the Tutorial
Create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
How to add those all-important references
Simplified style guide

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, If you need help visit the Teahouse or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Sm8900 (talk) 18:54, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of non-noteworthy page

Proposed deletion of Mothin Ali

The article Mothin Ali has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not noteworthy

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mtaylor848 (talk) 09:48, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Participants disagree with the nomination and believe sources are sufficient to establish GNG. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:19, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mothin Ali

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-noteworthy. City councillors are not noteowrthy per se. Holds no higher office; just a ward councillor Mtaylor848 (talk) 09:59, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 12:02, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Simply not meeting WP:NPOL does not itself make a person non-notable. Can the nominator clarify how they think this subject does not met WP:GNG? Curbon7 (talk) 00:20, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly is the claim to notability? As far as I can see the page is about a city councillor; which in itself is not noteworthy. He has no other office or anything else which suggests noteworthiness. Mtaylor848 (talk) 01:03, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, despite not meeting NPOL, municipal politicians can still be notable through WP:GNG if there is sufficient significant coverage of them. Curbon7 (talk) 01:50, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would lean towards keep, since becoming a councillor just a couple of months ago he has made national headlines about two different incidents. Orange sticker (talk) 09:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I would add a couple more to the sources in the article [1][2]. In my opinion this is enough to pass WP:GNG. Tau Corvi (talk) 20:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree that not all councillors are notable, but I think GNG has been reached - this includes hid gardening (I'm sure he was on Gardener's World in the pandemic), but there is coverage here, here & here from 2022 Lajmmoore (talk) 18:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Nomination of Mothin Ali for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mothin Ali, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mothin Ali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You placed a speedy deletion tag on a draft article i am working on explain please

Request for Explanation on Speedy Deletion Tag Placement on Draft:Lobola Man

@Folkezoft

I noticed that a speedy deletion tag has been placed on a draft article I am currently working on, which is about a notable movie. I am writing to request clarification regarding the reason for this decision, as I believe the subject of the draft meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for films.

I believe that the draft aligns with Wikipedia's content policies and guidelines, including verifiability, neutrality, and notability.

I would appreciate it if you could provide more details as i am still working on the draft

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your response.

Best regards, Afro 📢Talk! 19:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IPs making test edits

Hi, I see you've been handing out WP:G2 notices to IP editors. There's a specific welcome in Twinkle for IP editors who have made test edits - I encourage you to use this instead of the default in these cases, since it is much better targetted to the actual editing the IP has done. Example here: User talk:68.33.53.77. -- asilvering (talk) 20:05, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Transparency Act moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Transparency Act. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. TarnishedPath^talk 01:58, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aquatic Paradise

Heya,
I saw you tagged Aquatic Paradise with a PROD tag, and I was just about to CSD tag under G11, I just wanted your thoughts on the matter, as their username also implies they may have a conflict of interest/paid interest in editing. Zippybonzo | talk | contribs (they/them) 18:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore the above, someone else has tagged it for G11. Zippybonzo | talk | contribs (they/them) 18:49, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of DAC Beachcroft

The article DAC Beachcroft has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ORGCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 23:22, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Landmines Act 1998 has been accepted

Landmines Act 1998, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:33, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of George L. Bakris

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on George L. Bakris requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Marcocanol (talk) 19:52, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Criminal Court (Scotland) Act 2001 has been accepted

International Criminal Court (Scotland) Act 2001, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RangersRus (talk) 02:39, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2024 Trump rally at Madison Square Garden for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Trump rally at Madison Square Garden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Trump rally at Madison Square Garden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CoconutOctopus talk 15:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi. I just received a message from you about an edit of mine being removed from Talk:2024_Trump_rally_at_Madison_Square_Garden, but I don't think I've ever made an edit to the talk page. Is this an error? Great Mercian (talk) 15:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Epic Homes, LLC

Hello Folkezoft, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Epic Homes, LLC, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Author has not requested deletion, or other users have added substantial content. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 23:35, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Folkezoft, in addition to the above I've declined a number of your G11s just now. Please ensure that you are fully aware of the CSD criteria before you add tags, as these were not correct. See my edit summaries for particular rationales. Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]