User talk:Flickyard

D'Amato

Thanks for adding sources to the Joe D'Amato article. I'm glad its being expanded outside the few English book sources I could find through amazon and google. Is the book source you are using Italian by any chance? If it is, I just want to note that in the article. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:12, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for appreciating my work. Yes, it is in Italian. I will have to rearrange some of the information in the article in order for it to make sense, so I'll put Porno Holocaust back with the Carribean films where it belongs. I'm adding more sources and content as I go. I feel passionate about D'Amato, I'm a collector, have seen most of his movies. It makes me sad that much of the information on the web and even in books is so full of mistakes that are perpetuated. I hope to remedy that by using what I perceive to be trustworthy sources.

I would suggest sticking with what sources state and bring up inconsistencies on the talk page. Be sure to add sources at the end of every sentence so we know what we are referring too. Some sources can not be possibly including information you are talking about such as Best Worst Movie, which was sourced to a book from 1995. Over a decade before that film came out. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:43, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I think I'll give up on this. It is frustrating to have one's changes reverted every other sentence. If you need a source for establishing a link between a film about a cult movie and the movie itself, then I'll give up this wiki-ing.

I'm only editing content where you have not provided a source. I encourage you to add information where you can, but just make it source you stick to the sources and avoiding original research. The links I have provided present some rules here. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:00, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the links to the rules. They explain your deletions and corrections. I will abide by them henceforth.

No problem! Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:50, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Go away! Trinity has arrived in Eldorado (September 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aguyintobooks was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of films, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Go away! Trinity has arrived in Eldorado and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) - 14:38, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Flickyard, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) - 14:38, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

D'Amato

Thanks for your hard work on the D'Amato page. Your work is greatly valued having sourced that are not readily available to others. Just a few suggestion on how to tidy up some of your wiki edits.

Don't forget to call all movies films.
Try not to use contractions or short forms (i.e: Say United States or United Kingdom instead of US or UK) and say "D'Amato did not..." instead of "D'Amato didn't".
When citing page number. Try to be specific. There are large chunks of edits where the pages strum between 186-192. Its better to suggest individual pages where this information comes from.

That's about it! Keep up the good work! Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Go Away! Trinity Has Arrived in Eldorado has been accepted

Go Away! Trinity Has Arrived in Eldorado, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:43, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good work! Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:44, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

deleted

I think some guy deleted all the copyright dates and other info you added to the umberto Lenzi page recently. It looks like every one of the dates you added to the page were all vandalized in one swoop. You might want to take a look.68.129.15.71 (talk) 16:56, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

oops just noticed above that you already had some bad experiences with the same person. Now your Lenzi contributions are erased. I feel bad for the people who spend so much time trying to make wikipedia better only to see all their work deleted in 2 seconds. It's heartbreaking.68.129.15.71 (talk) 19:12, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Smell like WP:GOAT. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:28, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Emanuelle's Revenge

Do any of your books have any information on Emanuelle's Revenge? I'm particularly interested in a release date if possible. I have tried expanding that article in the past without much luck outside a Monthly Film Bulletin review. :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:41, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some information from my sources; sadly, a release date is not indicated. All my sources have 1975 as date, though, so that might have been the release date - probably in November or December, after the film passed censorship. But no certainty. Flickyard (talk) 10:58, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Flickyard. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Death Smiles

Good edits on the Death Smiles on a Murderer page. My only suggestion would be to shorten the plot. Per WP:FILMPLOT, film plots should be under 700 characters long. Yours currently is a little over 2000. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:45, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In the case of this film, I would invoke an exception. As it says on the page you linked, "The summary should not exceed the range unless the film's structure is unconventional, such as Pulp Fiction or Memento's non-linear storylines, or unless the plot is too complicated to summarize in this range." That is actually the case with this film, as the plot is completely disjointed by its numerous disorienting flashbacks, and full of different plot ideas that are not followed up upon. It seems like several movies have been crammed into one. In this case, I think there is real value in a more lengthy write-up. Still, thank you for pointing out the irregularity. I will attempt to shorten a few parts where I think it is possible.--Flickyard (talk) 12:33, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antonio Leonviola, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Robinson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Osvaldo Civirani, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Ireland, George Hilton and Gabriele Tinti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Deep Blood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Wakan and Exploitation

Images in a Convent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mother Superior

Joe D'Amato (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Interzone

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deep Blood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wakan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Barbara Cupisti in StageFright.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Barbara Cupisti in StageFright.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:25, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Luciana Ottaviani.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Luciana Ottaviani.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:32, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mark Shannon Actor 1979.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 21:34, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caligula - The Untold Story has been accepted

Caligula - The Untold Story, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 05:36, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Flickyard. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Caligula... The Untold Story

Thanks for creating Caligula... The Untold Story.

A New Page Patroller Rosguill just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Good work, just needs some minor copyediting

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:06, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Black Emanuelle

Hello - I removed the {{split dab}} tag at Black Emanuelle because the page is not a disambiguation page. You might try {{split}} instead. See Wikipedia:Splitting. Regards, Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:21, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for pointing this out. I will follow the option you mention and use {{split}} instead. Regards, flickyard (talk) 08:45, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mondo cane

Bye, Your request is comprehensive. I've various paper certificate related as Cavara principal director of Mondo cane: David of Donatello, Cineriz subscrission in which Cavara is mentioned as unique director (the same for Donatello's). I've necessity of time, to scanner these documents and reproduce them in this page. Neverthless see Fogliato's biography "Paolo Cavara, gli occhi che che guardano il mondo" and "Il Mondo cane di Paolo Cavara" in Loparco's biography of Jacopetti. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.156.195.167 (talk) 18:10, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for the time to make your point. You do not need to reproduce, scan or upload documents. You simply have to source your information with a citation in the article (including page number if possible). Since this is a controversial issue, the more sources you give, the better. Flickyard (talk) 06:51, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Flickyard, if you are agree I can make here (in this page) different citations "word to word" for private documents of 1 page and the same for citations on books. So you can tell me if all it's ok for editing, and how to make new inserts for Cavara'biography. Or would you prefer another solutions? I wait your answer. Thanks to you and pardon my english. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.38.4.99 (talk) 17:12, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, "word by word" citations are not necessary, but would be helpful if the sources are hard to access or find. If you plan to provide them, I recommend using the article's talk page here: Talk:Paolo_Cavara (If you post them here on my personal talk page, people interested in Cavara will not find them.) If you want, and if you do not want to do it yourself, I can then include your sources in the Paolo Cavara article for you. Your English is perfectly fine. Do not worry too much about language if the information you want to cite is relevant; if there are mistakes, people will correct them. This is the great thing about wikipedia collaboration. Flickyard (talk) 08:18, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks indeed! Yes, Not too long I'll write on address you evidence for my request. Then I'd prefer if you can discuss and include sources on Cavara's article for me. Best wishes. Pietro — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.39.181.59 (talk) 15:03, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Filmirage

Hello, Flickyard. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Filmirage".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. SITH (talk) 21:59, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Venice in media, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gabriele Tinti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:43, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Flickyard/sandbox

Hello, Flickyard. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:Flickyard/sandbox.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:23, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Filmirage concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Filmirage, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Filmirage

Hello, Flickyard. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Filmirage".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 18:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Filmirage concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Filmirage, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Filmirage

Hello, Flickyard. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Filmirage".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:19, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Filmirage

Hello, Flickyard. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Filmirage".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Squeeps10 ^{Talk to me}_{My edits} 01:34, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fanny Gaïda

Hello, Flickyard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fanny Gaïda, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]