User talk:Fiextqbe

Welcome!

Hello, Fiextqbe, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 03:07, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jehovah's Witnesses by country

Your claim that there is no territorial dispute regarding Taiwan is false, so your edit has been reverted. See Foreign relations of China#International territorial disputes. Any further opinion about whether the dispute is valid is irrelevant to the fact that the dispute exists.--Jeffro77 (talk) 07:24, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hi Fiextqbe! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Meters (talk) 19:26, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, I'm Sinoam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shenzhen have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please do not remove information under the guise of a different reason (adding images). 祝好，Sinoam^(聊天) 14:56, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive].

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Again, please read WP:MINOR. Your edits are not minor. Meters (talk) 16:52, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Anti-Korean sentiment in China, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 16:55, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Anti-Korean sentiment in China. This content has been in the article for years. Per WP:BRD it is up to you to get consensus for a challenged edit. Don't restore your edit, and certainly don't call it a WP:MINOR edit when it has already been challenged. Meters (talk) 17:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For the fourth time, please read WP:MINOR. Your edits are not minor. Meters (talk) 08:30, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello, I'm ShadowWarfare. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kylin (operating system) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ShadowWarfare 20:47, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the edits to "See Also" which you made on Kylin (operating system) was reverted as not a promotion. Please refrain from removing it again. Regards, ShadowWarfare 20:48, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello, I'm HaeB. Your recent edit(s) to the page Google China appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Also, do not mark such meaning-changing edits as minor, see WP:NOTMINOR. HaeB (talk) 11:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello, I'm 虹易. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dragonfly (search_engine) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Petal Search is accordingly released in 2020. And it has not been available in China until the end of 2021. So it can not be mentioned "by Google CEO" "in 2018" as added in Special:Diff/1040122757.

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cyber manhunt in Hong Kong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Weibo. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Petal Mail (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Petal Mail and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Petal Mail, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 22:07, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fiextqbe! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 22:07, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hi Fiextqbe! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Meters (talk) 23:25, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Hi Fiextqbe! I noticed that my edit to the page Zyxel has been removed by you. I'm pretty sure the info I fine-tuned was correct and neutral so I restored the version. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Leping0514 (talk) 06:19, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello, I'm 虹易. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Internet censorship in China have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. 虹易 (talk) 05:27, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Fiextqbe. Please refrain from adding Petal Search or other specific websites to different articles in an unconstructive way. I believe it is against the rule of Wikipedia. Thank you. 虹易 (talk) 04:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Petal Search is a Chinese search engine and Bing is an American search engine. Fiextqbe (talk) 23:17, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 22:17, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chatime receiving 2014 World Branding Awards is a very very notable award. Do not continuously engage in aggressive, bullying, deliberate, malicious, willfull behavior and vandalize Chatime awards. Do not start an edit war and get other editors to be banned from editing. Your behavior constitutes blatant and total disrespect for Wikipedia rules.

Taiwan's Chatime wins 'Brand of the Year' at World Branding Awards - Focus Taiwan

Chatime - World Branding Awards (brandingforum.org)

Chatime wins Brand of the Year | News on Taiwantrade

Chatime named tea brand of the year at international branding awards (theborneopost.com)

Chatime Malaysia wins ‘Brand of the Year’ award | Malaysian Franchise Association (mfa.org.my) Fiextqbe (talk) 16:29, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

99 Ranch Market is considered as a Taiwanese and Asian supermarket. Doing a www.petalsearch.com for 99 Ranch Market shows 99 Ranch Market listed as a Taiwanese supermarket. The customer base is mostly Asians.

Craving for Taiwanese Night Market Food? 99 Ranch Market has you covered！ | 99 Ranch Market

Roger Chen, the founder and CEO is a Taiwanese born American.

99 Ranch Market Recognized As One Of 2022’s Best Managed Companies (yahoo.com)

Removing the awards that companies receives is considered as aggressive, bullying, criminal, deliberate, malicious, willfull behavior. Do not start an edit war and get other editors to be banned from editing. Your behavior constitutes blatant and total disrespect for Wikipedia rules. Fiextqbe (talk) 16:45, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If I'm so terrible, the place to report that is at WP:ANI. Personal attacks are no way to resolve a content dispute. MrOllie (talk) 16:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a personal attack. The evidence has been provided. Your behavior must change and do not again engage in this type of babyish nonsense behavior. Chatime and 99 Ranch Market issue is resolved. DO NOT VANDALIZE AGAIN!!!! Fiextqbe (talk) 17:04, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to add nonnotable awards, or mislabel an American company as from Taiwan, I will absolutely revert you again. I am not intimidated by your toothless threats. Either engage in dispute resolution or just stop. MrOllie (talk) 17:06, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Didetaexe per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Didetaexe. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 18:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]