User talk:ArifVlog782

This is ArifVlog782's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hi Fashionstore2023! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:14, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arun Gopan (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arun Gopan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 15:37, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Arun Gopan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Arun Gopan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because This is a prime example of WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arun Gopan (October 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a prime example of WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder. It cannot be reviewed further until you have chosen your references

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arun Gopan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:14, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fashionstore2023! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:14, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arun Gopan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Arun Gopan, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:45, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Fashionstore2023. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:49, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello Fashionstore2023. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Fashionstore2023. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Fashionstore2023|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Uhai (talk) 09:03, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rayees Poyilunkhal

Hello, Fashionstore2023. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rayees Poyilunkhal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rayees Poyilunkhal

Hello, Fashionstore2023. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Rayees Poyilunkhal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Arun Gopan

Hello, Fashionstore2023. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Arun Gopan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Interval Learning Platform

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Interval Learning Platform, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 10:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please help with this. Fashionstore2023 (talk) 10:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because your username is a clear violation of Wikipedia's username policy – it is obviously offensive, profane, violent, threatening, sexually explicit, disruptive, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to Wikipedia. Please see our blocking and username policies for more information.

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but users are not allowed to edit with accounts that have inappropriate usernames, and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, or would otherwise like to explain why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the following text to the bottom of your user talk page: {{unblock-un|new username|your reason here ~~~~}}

Deb (talk) 12:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir/Madam. I understand why I am blocked, also I won’t repeat or create any damage to Wikipedia’s policy. I apologise.

Please approve my request and unblock me.

Thanking you Fashionstore2023 (talk) 12:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

ArifVlog782 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

ArifVlog782 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Dear Sir/Madam. I understand why I am blocked, also I won’t repeat or create any damage to Wikipedia’s policy. I apologise.

Please approve my request and unblock me.

Thank you.

Accept reason:

I have renamed and unblocked your account. Welcome back. PhilKnight (talk) 17:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb: - courtesy ping to let you know I have renamed and unblocked this editor. Hope that's okay with you. PhilKnight (talk) 17:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I really don't think he understands. But we'll see. Deb (talk) 08:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ArifVlog782. Thank you for your work on Alphy Panjikaran. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

IMO and edge case regarding wp:notability but I'm marking as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:25, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sabi Christy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sabi Christy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. bonadea contributions talk 12:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:ArifVlog782, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ArifVlog782|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 12:58, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ArifVlog782. Thank you for your work on Nipin Niravath. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I'm marking as reviewed but it needs substantial rewording. All of the text/prose part is written like an advertisement. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sabi Christy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sabi Christy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Thilsebatti (talk) 03:26, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Please help this article. this is genuine article and eligible for approve wikipedia page. please re-edit and approve this page. ArifVlog782 (talk) 03:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove deletion box ArifVlog782 (talk) 03:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mathangi Ajithkumar moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mathangi Ajithkumar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 14:27, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shareef Muhammed

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shareef Muhammed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Thilsebatti (talk) 05:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He is an indian film producer of Marco (2024 film). please help to develop this page. Don't delete this page ArifVlog782 (talk) 05:12, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cubes Entertainments for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cubes Entertainments is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cubes Entertainments until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thilsebatti (talk) 06:53, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Cubes Entertainments, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:ArifVlog782, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ArifVlog782|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Thilsebatti (talk) 07:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Thilsebatti dear,

This is not a paid or promotional. This is a production house based in Ernakulam. The production house is set to release the film Marco worldwide.

Thank you. ArifVlog782 (talk) 07:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shareef Muhammed (producer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shareef Muhammed (producer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shareef Muhammed (producer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thilsebatti (talk) 16:20, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hats off!

So many Malayalam articles you made that are worthy! DareshMohan (talk) 08:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ArifVlog782 (talk) 08:52, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain your "acceptance" of draft articles

Your use of AFC templates is perplexing, the more so since you only hand 167 edits counted here. I refer to this pair of edits 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ArifVlog782. Thank you for your work on Kadha Innuvare. Another editor, GrabUp, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please add more available critical reviews, like I added from New Indian Express. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|GrabUp}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GrabUp - Talk 09:53, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ijaaz Ebrahim Ikbal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ijaaz Ebrahim Ikbal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ijaaz Ebrahim Ikbal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DareshMohan (talk) 06:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create minor film articles, lowering the standard of Wikipedia. DareshMohan (talk) 06:29, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okk, I understand. ArifVlog782 (talk) 06:37, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 17:11, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir/Madam,

I sincerely understand the reason behind my account being blocked and deeply regret any actions that may have violated Wikipedia’s policies. I assure you that I will not repeat such mistakes or cause any harm to the community's guidelines in the future.

I humbly request you to reconsider and approve my request for unblocking.

Thank you for your time and understanding.

Sincerely,

User:ArifVlog782. ArifVlog782 (talk) 04:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please approve my request and unblock me.

Thank you. ArifVlog782 (talk) 16:13, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ArifVlog782 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I sincerely understand the reason behind my account being blocked and deeply regret any actions that may have violated Wikipedia’s policies. I assure you that I will not repeat such mistakes or cause any harm to the community's guidelines in the future.

I humbly request you to reconsider and approve my request for unblocking.

Thank you for your time and understanding.

Sincerely, ArifVlog782 ArifVlog782 (talk) 06:57, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not speak to the reasons for the block, we need you to demonstrate your understanding of those reasons by telling us what they are, what you will do differently, and what edits you intend to make. My checker says you may have used an AI to write some of your request, please don't; we want to hear from you, not an AI. Please write in your own words without the aid of an AI. 331dot (talk) 08:37, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ArifVlog782 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Sir/Madam, I apologise. I undestand why i am blocked. I won’t repeat or create any damage to Wikipedia’s policy. Please unblock me. I will ensure all details are thoroughly reviewed before publishing Wikipedia articles. Thanks.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:44, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Mathangi Ajithkumar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mathangi Ajithkumar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathangi Ajithkumar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 05:12, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]