User talk:Fa21526

Your submission at Articles for creation: C.U. Shah Polytechnic (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ts12rAc was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:C.U. Shah Polytechnic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:C.U. Shah Polytechnic, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 12:09, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fa21526! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 12:09, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:C.U. Shah Polytechnic

Hello, Fa21526. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:C.U. Shah Polytechnic, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dnshostserver

Hello, Fa21526. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dnshostserver, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dnshostserver

Hello, Fa21526. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dnshostserver".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:13, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of HirenJS Code Editor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on HirenJS Code Editor, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Nythar (💬-🍀) 15:41, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Nythar (💬-🍀) 11:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 12:24, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{ unblock| Fa21526 (talk) 02:25, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fa21526 (talk) 02:25, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fa21526 (talk) 02:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fa21526 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing to request an unblock for my special Wikipedia account, which has been blocked due to the use of multiple accounts or sockpuppetry. I sincerely apologize for any confusion or violation of Wikipedia's policies that may have resulted from my actions.

I would like to provide a detailed explanation of the circumstances that led to the creation of multiple accounts. Due to an oversight on my part, I inadvertently ended up with two separate accounts. It was never my intention to engage in any deceptive or malicious behavior on Wikipedia.

The creation of the second account was entirely accidental, as I was unaware of the consequences of having multiple accounts. I understand now that maintaining multiple accounts is against Wikipedia's policies, and I deeply regret my mistake.

I assure you that I have learned from this experience and I am fully committed to adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies moving forward. I understand the importance of accountability and transparency within the community, and I will take extra care to avoid any future violations.

I value the principles of collaboration and knowledge-sharing that Wikipedia upholds, and I am eager to contribute positively to the platform. I am genuinely interested in contributing my expertise and helping to improve Wikipedia's content.

I humbly request that you consider unblocking my special account, taking into account my sincere apologies, the accidental nature of my mistake, and my commitment to full compliance with Wikipedia's policies. I assure you that I will strictly adhere to the guidelines and actively contribute to the community in a responsible manner.

Thank you for your understanding and for taking the time to review my request. I look forward to the opportunity to contribute once again to the Wikipedia community. Fa21526 (talk) 06:06, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please write a request in your own words without using a chatbot or AI. 331dot (talk) 07:14, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS appeal #75387

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fa21526 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, :My Wikipedia account has been blocked. I created multiple accounts by accident. I did not mean to violate Wikipedia's rules. :I have learned my lesson and will not create multiple accounts in the future. I am committed to following Wikipedia's guidelines. :I value Wikipedia's principles and want to make positive contributions to the platform. :I humbly request that you unblock my account. Thank you. Fa21526 (talk) 04:57, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your abuse of multiple accounts was clearly not an accident. You repeatedly switched accounts in order to edit the same articles. Yamla (talk) 11:11, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Deletion discussion about Merchant Engineering College

Hello Fa21526, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Merchant Engineering College, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Merchant Engineering College.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 16:19, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]