User talk:1992 FARHAAD

Welcome

File:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-600px-en.ogv

A video showing the basics of verifiability and neutral point of view policies.

Welcome!

Hello, 1992 FARHAAD, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 02:09, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Update alexa ranking

Hi! You don't really need to do it – OKBot automaticly does it monthly. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 09:40, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I know but i like to keep duckduckgo alexa ranking up to date. ویرایشگر-1 (talk)

shakira /best selling album list /laundry service

hi, [1] this link shows shakiras "laundry service" sold 20 million , therefore to include on "best selling album" list, I have had problems putting it on the list, do you have a minute to look at this thank you--65.8.187.140 (talk) 00:01, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, that link is invalid and don't provide any clear stats; I also searched with google and can't find any similar claim. ویرایشگر-1 (talk) 04:59, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NetBSD, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SMP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NetBSD, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GCC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Xfce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BRD. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Editor-1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You caught me

How perspicacious of you! I thought my joke/easter-egg/vandalism would stay for at least a few days. Yeah I was repelled by the pro-proprietary software userbox IN THE FREE SOFTWARE USERBOX SECTION. I've never seen sin lauded so brazenly! I'm being about 67% facetious. :P It's funny because silly user comments in wikispaces are tolerated in the form of templates and userboxes. I should make one that says: "This user thinks the above userbox is evil".--Monochrome_Monitor 17:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did create the "non-free software" section and moved those templates under it. Editor-1 (talk) 14:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thankya!--Monochrome_Monitor 16:10, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Holy crap! Looked at your talkpage and you're a fellow traveler. Except you use gnome 3 :P I started with GNOME 3 but switched to MATE, and recently switched to Xfce. I'm probably going to switch to openbox (with nitrogen and tint2) next, but my first endeavor in that effort ended in a broken rc.xml file and something about root menu not existing. So I went back to Xfce. Might I ask what distro you use?--Monochrome_Monitor 18:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Currently I use Debian, BUT I want to switch to ~~lovely~~ Fedora within next two weeks. Editor-1 (talk) 04:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I love Debian for its community and philosophy, and of course its huge repository of packages. It is unique in its sincere yet utilitarian adherence to free software ideals. By default no non-free software, but you have the option to make parts of your computer work if they run on non-free firmware. While I love the stability of Debian I'll admit the release cycle is exhausting. I've never been one to favor rolling releases and the bleeding edge (*cough* Arch) or even the cutting edge, I just like the percieved novelty of changed. In actuality the software could be older as long as it's not static. But of course, the staticness of stable is a point of pride. When I first installed Debian I thought I didn't care about having newish software, but that was only because I didn't know of any new software that I wanted. With the openness of the FOSS community and the ease of installing via package manager, I have discovered a lot of shiny new things I'd like to try. I'm particularly excited about ring and sagemath in stretch. Also neoscreenfetch, heh. I know I could upgrade now but I'm thinking stretch will be stable around my birthday. As for Fedora, I'm curious about it. What is different from Debian, besides yum and I think SELinux? I know its more "chill" about libre and I think Linus uses it. He is not a GNOME 3 fan.--Monochrome_Monitor 09:31, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What is different from Debian, besides yum and I think SELinux?

Dear "User:Monochrome Monitor", for various reasons, I do not like to carry on this conversation.

Thank you and good luck. Editor-1 (talk) 13:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saving Emily, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Thriller and Douglas Jackson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cinnamon (software), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Media player. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Master (2013 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Master (2013 film). Since you had some involvement with the The Master (2013 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 06:46, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Post-metal userbox

Neurosis in 2008

Cult of Luna in 2015

Russian Circles in 2015

Hey, thanks for making a userbox! However, I think it would be better to include a more representative image since Caspian are more often associated with post-rock than post-metal and the image focuses on a church, which has little significance to the genre. I would propose either one of the three on the right.

What do you think?--MASHAUNIX 13:07, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mashaunix (?!), yes I know that it is a bad image and I had plan to replace it, actually I don't know Caspian, I just selected that image because I thought it is nice looking, first I selected this image of ISIS but it is very dark and is invisible in the user box, so I searched for 1 good and bright image and selected that image very hastily. I think that image of Russian Circles is good enough, this band is also a good example in this genre. Good luck. Editor-1 (talk) 05:39, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, I replied as to my name on my talk page. Also changed the image to Russian Circles now.--MASHAUNIX 10:49, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Editor-1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MPV

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to mpv (media player), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 84.250.17.211 (talk) 00:49, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PostmarketOS

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PostmarketOS. --RaviC (talk) 12:45, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yooz

You left a message on a WP:AFD talk page, asking me to nominate Yooz. Its not the best page to speak to another editor. Their own talk page is the best place to leave a message. Yooz seems ok, and doesn't need deleted. scope_creep (talk) 07:25, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hatnotes

Hello. Please stop adding the hatnote to mpv (media player). First, as WP:EL says, external links should not be used in the body of an article. They should also not be used in "See also" sections (which should only contain internal wikilinks) and in hatnotes (in fact, external links are explicitly mentioned as improper use of hatnotes). Secondly, and more generally, when someone reverts your change, do not keep restoring it. As the standard BOLD, revert, discuss cycle explains, you should discuss the change on the talk page instead of edit warring. If you want to add an external link, you should do it properly (typically as a reference).—J. M. (talk) 18:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About your edit request on Curiosity

I agree with you that the info you'd like to be added to the Curiosity (rover) article is notable, and given that my English is alright (though it isn't my first language either) I can hopefully help with that. However:

I know nothing about the subject.
Writing isn't my forte.
I'm not sure where to place the info. The computers subsection of the specifications section? The coverage, cultural impact and legacy section? A different article?

For these reasons, if you can write something so all I have to do is improve the English—or at least tell me roughly what you want it to look like—I'd appreciate that.

By the way, if you ever have any questions or requests regarding English, feel free to ask me! As long as I'm still active, anyway. Professor Proof (talk) 21:29, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Professor Proof: Thanks for trying to help me, just mention or copy-paste the paragraphs that Sun Microsystems SPARC processors were used in this rover, it is not a hard work but because that article is sensitive and important, I thought that it is better to get help from others instead of making a wrong edit. It should be placed in The "Specifications" section, "Computers" paragraph. Thanks. Editor-1 (talk) 05:28, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-pasting would create copyright issues, but I tried to do something. Please have a look at the article and tell me if you like it. Professor Proof (talk) 12:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's good, although it was better if dear Sun Microsystems was mentioned! :) -- Thanks, now we can close that edit request. Editor-1 (talk) 03:06, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources and linkrot

Please don't cite the IMDb or copy its content into Wikipedia. It's user-generated content, which means it's not a reliable source. Also, please don't remove reliable sources merely because the link goes dead. There are sites, such as the Wayback Machine, that can sometimes retrieve archived versions of these pages. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:01, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Sheridan article

My bad, I stupidly didn't know we weren't allowed to remove the commons category, and I guess misunderstood what it was for. Not sure what I was thinking but it's obvious to me now. So sorry for trying to remove it! I was questioning its relevance, and saw that it had a photo of dog meat, but it turns out that was indeed taken by this Rob Sheridan (even though at the time before I just edited it now, on the page it misspelled his name as Sherridan, but it is him because it links to his Flickr page.) So I think maybe I had a bit of a shock regarding dog meat. And being unsure if I wanted unverified to me at the time dog meat associated with the article. Bias for dogs on my account and I apologize, things like that wont happen again, even though I didn't meant to cause harm. Regardless, sorry again for trying to remove that for what was ultimately a weird reason to begin with. Thank you for adding the note on your revision to NOT DELETE COMMON CATEGORY, I get it now! --ihatecrayons (talk) 09:24, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ihatecrayons: Hello Ihatecrayons, no problem dear Mrs, it was a small unconscious mistake with very little importance. Good luck. Editor-1 (talk) 13:17, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Looking for Alexander poster.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:19, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Born Villain

I know you are interested in films and I would greatly appreciate it if you would review the (very short) article for Born Villain which I nominated for GA. Thanks so much!MagicatthemovieS (talk) 22:55, 22 October 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

@MagicatthemovieS: Hello, I really like to help you but because I have not done that before and don't have its skill, and also I am engaged in personal works, I can't do that. Sorry and good luck. Editor-1 (talk) 06:07, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Give In to Me - Music Video.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:06, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Editor-1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A positive note

Hey, thank you for thanking me! Also, after visiting your page I now also believe that Trent Reznor is a musical genius 😎 Kbenayak (talk) 11:52, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kbenayak: Hi! you're welcome, I always appreciate the work of others, special in the field of free software. Yes, Trent is a god damn musical genius! Editor-1 (talk) 13:16, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Power Linux distributions has been nominated for discussion

Category:Power Linux distributions, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 99Electrons (talk) 03:01, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Page layouts and relevance

Moved to Talk:CDemu § Page layouts and relevance

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander Scheer (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia can not be the source - see WP:CIRCULAR. We need multiple independent, reliable sources that talk bout the sMr Scheer in depth and in length. Pls also provide inline citation - see WP:REFB for info and instructions. Pls also click on the blue highlighted text on grey panel above for further info of what are needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alexander Scheer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alexander Scheer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:57, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Red Hat Logo 2019-en.svg

Hi. What were you trying to do Hat Logo 2019-en.svg&diff=896847696&oldid=896675466 here? The {{ShadowsCommons}} notice was just a maintenance tag which can be removed simply by editing the page if it no longer applies. If you just wanted to force the page to update for some other reason then see WP:PURGE. What you actually did was to revert the image to a version with W3C validation warnings which I'd corrected. Even if you'd done that to force a purge I'd expect you'd have re-reverted to the newer, corrected version afterwards, so I confess I'm mystified why you did that. I'm probably missing something really obvious though - and if so, my apologies. -- Begoon 10:38, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Begoon: Hello, sorry for late response, I was too busy. There was 1 image in Wikimedia Commons with same title as the File:Red Hat Logo 2019-en.svg in this wiki: c:File:Red Hat Logo 2019.svg because it was a modified version, I have moved it to the correct title: c:Special:Diff/350033373, but as explained by {{ShadowsCommons}}, ""Due to bug T30299, if the Commons file is renamed, it will override the local file."" the local file has been override!! then I thought that if I revert this local file to a previous version maybe it solve the problem, and reverted it and explained in the "file comment" or "Reason form" that ""Commons file is renamed, maybe this revert fix the problem"" (page log) I think you haven't seen my comment!. That revert didn't solve the problem and I forget to restore the image to its latest version! |: then I checked the bug page and saw the last comment which explained that:

""Breaking the redirect on the remote shared repository page restores the local projects access.""

so I found the solution and nominated the page in W.Commons which had become a redirect by mentioning the above comment and the bug page, and it was deleted the same hour: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=File%3ARed+Hat+Logo+2019.svg. Sorry again for late answer and the wrong revert and forget to restore it! |:, I'm sure you understand. Good luck. -- Editor-1 (talk) 14:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded reverts

Please try and remember https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ownership_of_content as your reverts are unneeded. MindlessLeadership (talk) 10:46, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Debian 10 Screenshot

Moved to Talk:Debian § Debian default desktop

Your GA nomination of Sunshine (2007 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sunshine (2007 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 04:20, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sunshine (2007 film)

The article Sunshine (2007 film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sunshine (2007 film) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 11:00, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You did see this, right? Not too much stuff to do...Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:12, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Casliber: Hello, yes I have seen it, but I am so busy, you should either wait for atleast 1 week or fix those problems by yourself. Thanks--Editor-1 (talk) 03:52, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll wait for a week - that is no problem Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:20, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Casliber: Hello, I'm sorry! I can't help! because I am too busy and my English is not very well, maybe in the future! good luck and thanx for your attention and review. Good luck 🙂. -- Editor-1 (talk)

That's no problem. These things happen from time to time. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:28, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unorthodox edits on GNOME Web

Hello,

I saw you reverted the last of my 3000 character edits on GNOME Web, which, as you can see in the edit subject was composed of many points, last but not not least refactoring references markup, which at this point I believe you are not aware of (maybe because you use visual editor and not source editor?), because in the last of those I wrongly deleted a paragraph (which I had edited myself some hours before).

You also did not reply to my message of the 1st October on the talk page.

I believe both your English writing skills, technical knowledge of the subject and approach to collaboration are such that (presently) we should really reach an agreement on your edits on the talk page before submitting them.

I see from your talk page that we share a lot of common interests so it should not be an issue discussing more easily! For example, I am a GNOME developer :)

Actually I would even need to write a Wikipedia page for the 1.0 release of Daty (which will hopefully be renamed GNOME Data or Data for short) but I do not have the time to do it, so I would be glad if you could write a stub for it if you have it.

EDIT: I retract what I said about your language skills, this time I really liked your last edits :D

Ogoorcs (talk) 14:16, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ogoorcs: Hello, sorry for answering late, laziness and lack of time and energy!

I have explained detaily in the edit summary box why I did revert your changes:

""I really don't understand why the full stop has been removed!!? -- you have removed a good ref for reader mode and replaced it with something that don't mention or even link to it! -- very odd wording, what does mean "as much as" in that place?! and the GNOME Human Interface Guidelines is something that should be followed not integration -- please read its FAQ, the mention of GTK was for comparison with Firefox in providing support for GTK major versions""

When one editor makes wrong changes + some useful changes all in one edit, other editors are not responsible to fix those wrong changes and keep the correct changes! I hadn't time and energy to manually revert only wrong parts of your edits and restore correct ones, so reverting whole edit was the only option!

Please always do single-purpose edits on every article, if you want to change and improve the refs, do it in one edit, and if you want to change the article's text, do it in another edit! mixing all the changes in only one edit is a very bad approach, because there is always the risk of wrong changes, also large changes to wiki-text makes it unclear and very difficult to compare with old revision, so other users have to spend a lot of time to understand what changes you have made!

I don't have time and energy to make an article for `GNOME Data`, I don't use it and I think it is not notable and does not have enough sources, if you wish to create an article for it, start it in Wikipedia:Article_wizard and follow the instructions. -- Editor-1 (talk) 05:51, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

""You also did not reply to my message of the 1st October on the talk page.""

Because I thought that it was solved in this edit, is not solved?!Editor-1 (talk) 10:28, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sunshine (2007 film)

The article Sunshine (2007 film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Sunshine (2007 film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 09:42, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tango Desktop Project Website

In my last edit, I suggested that you should create a section on the article's Talk page instead of reverting my edits. Since you didn't do this, I created https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Tango_Desktop_Project#Official_Website. I would appreciate if you could comment there. --Martey (talk) 05:11, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at the appropriate venue.--Editor-1 (talk) 09:00, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklist

Please don't intentionally circumvent the spam blacklist; there's a reason "famousbirthdays" is on there. If you feel that it has suddenly become a reliable source, then please start a discussion at WP:RSN. Kuru (talk) 12:56, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kuru: Hello, I usually don't do such edits because I don't edit act(ors/ress) articles, but Annie Bovaird was an exception due to Saving Emily that is created by me; in that edit I also added several more reliable sources and "famousbirthdays" was the las source, I thought it is better than nothing. Regards--Editor-1 (talk) 15:30, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia cannot be used as a source for Wikipedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Avidemux, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. In particular, please do not use Wikipedia as a source. See WP:CIRCULAR. Thanks.—J. M. (talk) 10:13, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ChristianRock.Net

In this edit, you make the claim that "ChristianRock.Net is the most notable Christian rock radio station in the world and even its name is the same as this genre because its focus is Christian rock, there are not "other music sites that have articles and are not listed" exactly same as ChristianRock.Net, if there are really such cases, just add them, not having them is not valid reason to not adding this one". I don't think it is the most notable. Can you provide sources to support that? I prefer RadioU when listening to a station, and I stream most of my Christian rock from Spotify, which is far more notable than ChristianRock.Net. In short, we do not create WP:COATRACKs, we list MOS:SEEALSO related topics in see also sections, and a commercial station isn't that related. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Walter Görlitz: It was a dark and stormy night here in that time and I was so tired and sleepy! maybe ChristianRock.Net is not most notable (my mistake!) but it surely is one of top 5. The same last night shortly after my edit was reverted by another user, I recognized that my edit was wrong, there was no need to this comment but I will remember that. I don't consider Spotify as a radio station which are (usually?!) register-free and easy/fast-access. Regards--Editor-1 (talk) 09:14, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bruce Payne in 2001.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Bruce Payne in 2001.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:31, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your note on the file talk page but I am responding here as the file talk page may get deleted before you see the response. You wrote there "... the article lacks an image for more than 15 years, and the image is very old from 2001, and the image comply with Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Image_resolution, so what is the problem? just because it is from Getty Images?" Yes, the immediate reason for deletion is because it is from Getty Images. See WP:F7 point b, and WP:NFCC#2. As well, Bruce Payne is a living person so a non-free image (whether it be from Getty or some other source) is also not compliant with WP:NFCC#1 (replaceabbility). From Wikipedia:Non-free content, " Non-free content should not be used when a freely licensed file that serves the same purpose can reasonably be expected to be uploaded, as is the case for almost all portraits of living people." (emphasis added). That the article has lacked an image for more than 15 years is not a factor in the use of non-free content. One never knows when one might stumble across a free image. For example, I've looked around for a free image of Ken Read pretty much since I joined (ages ago). It wasn't until a few months ago that I found one. The funny thing was that I stumbled across it by accident looking for something else. -- Whpq (talk) 14:31, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: Thanks for the explain, I have uploaded many film/videogame posters but this was much different and I did it in a hurry, my mistake. A few weeks ago, I saw the article Anders Behring Breivik and noticed it uses a digital sketch for the infobox while in many years ago there was a real photo which seems it is deleted, also in the c:Category:Emma Watson there are some painting of her, so! can I do the same?! specifically can I convert this deleted cropped image to a sample mono color/BW sketch or paining and then upload it to Wikimedia Commons?--Editor-1 (talk) 16:08, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Converting a copyrighted image to a sketch based upon it would be a derivative work. There would still be the issue that the original work is copyrighted. You might want to consider reaching out to Payne's agent/publicist to see if they would be willing to donate a freely licensed image. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. -- Whpq (talk) 16:49, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: unfortunately I don't have an IMDb pro account, also Tweeter and Facebook, so currently I can't ask himself or his manager for an image, but I will remember this for the future, the only work I could done was sent a request at c:Commons:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop to create a sketch for him: c:https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop&oldid=428634135, if no one answered, I perhaps will draw something for him, but don't promise, also at the past I have added a template to his talk page to request a photo to be taken for him: Special:Diff/891079771. In any way thanks for your attention.--Editor-1 (talk) 13:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I expect this company might be a contact point. -- Whpq (talk) 13:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: oh thank you so much, I will contact them tomorrow morning and will tell you its result, also the link has a good resume for him, so I will extend the lead section of the article using it; thanks again.--Editor-1 (talk) 18:44, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comments (Newsbeuter)

Hello! Thank you for your contributions to the Newsbeuter article (and well-composed desktop screenshots, as well--unrelated).

Are you able to assist in resolving a dispute concerning the article?--GJM (talk) 19:01, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GJM: Hello, I just have one contribution to that article and it was "adding Category:Software that uses ncurses using HotCat", I have never use it and don't care about that article but to answer your request I have read your link right now and IMO you are the one who made wrong edits, you can't add links to another software/project/anything to the "External links" section of any article unless *explain about it in the article's body first*.--Editor-1 (talk) 05:21, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback! Does this not count as an explanation in the article's body?--GJM (talk) 07:25, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GJM: Sure! but nobody don't have the articles in the memory! you should mention it in the edit summary and improve the explanation as far as you can.--Editor-1 (talk) 07:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Thank you very much for the advice!--GJM (talk) 14:52, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GJM:

You're welcome! -- Editor-1 (talk) 14:04, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Your recent editing history at Elisabeth Moss shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please use the talk page when two other editors have disagreed with your change. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 04:33, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Template:Fa" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:Fa. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 28#Template:Fa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Uanfala (talk) 19:13, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EMUI 11

Hi please tell us what you meant by editing the EMUI 11 page Hossein norouzi 306 (talk) 17:37, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't ruin the EMUl 11 page because I'm going to expand it soon Hossein norouzi 306 (talk) 17:49, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This page will have useful articlesHossein norouzi 306 (talk) 17:49, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hossein norouzi 306: Hello, don't worry I don't know you and didn't follow your edits, I noticed about your page (EMUI 11) because in this edit you made a link to one page which was created by me, so I received a notice about it. Please use and follow Wikipedia:Article wizard before creating a new article. -- FMM-1992 (talk) 18:15, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nine Inch Nails discography

Moved to Talk:Nine Inch Nails discography § US Mainstream Rock Chart

"Fedora Linux‌" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Fedora Linux‌. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 28#Fedora Linux‌ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:42, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fedora Linux

Hello, FæɹHaad,

Please do not empty categories and then tag them for deletion. This is called emptying categories "out of process" and is considered disruptive editing. If you believe a category should be deleted, renamed or merged, please make a proposal at Categories for Discussion where your proposal can be considered. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:10, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To editor Liz: Hello, OK, thanks for this note, I won't do that anymore. -- FæɹHaad (talk) 04:17, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"GNOME Tour" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect GNOME Tour has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 30 § GNOME Tour until a consensus is reached. Wiktorpyk (talk) 19:54, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Game data" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Game data has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 29 § Game data until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:26, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]