Jump to content

User talk:Eva Verplaetse

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Eva Verplaetse! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Eva Verplaetse. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Unifiedpost Group, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Eva Verplaetse. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Eva Verplaetse|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unifiedpost Group (March 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:09, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Eva Verplaetse! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:09, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unifiedpost Group (March 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:33, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unifiedpost Group (March 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 17:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
I changed the article 4 times now, I added a bunch of independent, reliable sources and it's still an advertisement? Can you say which parts are not neutrally written? There is the history (that's just stating facts), what we offer (that's the core of every company) and the IPO (which again, are facts).
It's not because I'm an employee of the company, that I want to write an advertisement. We're a listed company on the Belgian stockmarket so we should have a Wikipedia page just to explain who we are.
Thanks for sharing the insights so I can get this article online.
Eva Eva Verplaetse (talk) 07:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Unifiedpost Group has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Unifiedpost Group. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unifiedpost Group (March 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Chetsford (talk) 06:09, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Unifiedpost Group has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Unifiedpost Group. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:41, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did not publish anything since the end of March as I don't use the correct sources apparently. The purpose is not the advertise, just to give a list of facts Eva Verplaetse (talk) 12:38, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unifiedpost Group (August 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CFA were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
C F A 💬 16:43, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Alice Amin Siman Israel

[edit]

Hello! I like your work on wikipedia!

Could you please review this article for me?

www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Alice_Amin_Siman_Israel Techxpertgirl (talk) 17:43, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]