Jump to content

User talk:Estheim

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Estheim! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Working on stubs is fun! But what happens next?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Clive Y. Thomas has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Clive Y. Thomas. Thanks! Cairo2k18 • (talk) • (contribs) 03:18, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Desmond Hoyte—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 18:00, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Materialscientist. I'm pretty new, if you have specific concerns about my edit, please let me know so I can improve. My aim was to use more neutral-phrasing, but if I over-stepped or misjudged I'm happy to step away from BLPs. (And for the record, I am not Guyanese nor at all affiliated with Guyanese politics, which are indeed as terrifying to me as US politics.)Estheim (talk) 18:28, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You need to leave a detailed edit summary when you delete large sections of text. Sometimes it may even need a detailed explanation on the article's talk page. I also agree with you about US politics; the thought of Joe Biden running the country is terrifying indeed. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:10, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Random comment

[edit]

Looked at Mining in Guyana, liked it. Quick comment, oil data is a little stale, wondered if the woes of Petrobras had affected production. Also wondered: there was an offshoot of Operation Car Wash that had something to do with swindling indigenous gold miners in Northern Brazil. I don’t suppose you have heard of that? Portuguese Wikipedia is pretty mysterious. input welcome Elinruby (talk) 17:22, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing that to my attention, Elinruby. All I've read is that there are Brazilians that have obtained small and medium scale mining contracts along the borders; areas which suffer from lack of infrastructure and regulation, so comprehensive and accurate reporting just isn't there. A quick search of Stabroek News didn't reveal any stories linking Car Wash to domestic mining activities, but maybe I'll 'dig' into Brazil-centric sources to see if there's information worth adding.
As far as the table data, yeah, I hate how old it is and from one source. I'm not at all confident adding data to existing tables unless the source is identical and strongly reliable/consistent. Integrating numerical data into articles is on my personal to-do list, but I think a lot of number data seems so... useless? It should always serve to support information in the article (as evidence for growth or comparison), but a lot of times it looks arbitrary.
On a related note regarding oil- the industry is so new. Like, super new. There's an amazing treemap here to show how this is shaping Guyana's economy: Exports (2018) vs. Product Exports (Jun 2020) is gearing up to be a substantial shift. Since it's such a blissfully quiet corner of the anglophone world, it's prone to neglect, so I'm cautious and conservative in adding oil-related content. And that's saying something since I also fixed up petroleum industry in Guyana. So you can see why I'd get fussy over a related NPOV claim, lol. Cheers, Estheim (talk) 11:29, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
you didn’t come across as fussy, merely interested. The other questions: Petrogras had a lot of foreign contracts, and also had something to do with offshore platforms. I just wondered if there is some there there, given it’s a neighboring country. On the gold question, there are a lot of offshoots so I do not remember the name of that one, but I noticed it because its link to the other cases is not obvious. I will probably be going through those pages soon and will follow up with whatever was used as a reference, but that will almost certainly be in Portuguese since the articles are mostly translated. Still there may be some particulars that you may know something about. I think the name of the indigenous people was mentioned, for one thing Elinruby (talk)<
Elinruby, I don't think I've run across any off-shore issues pertaining to Brazil. There's the Venezuela and Suriname territorial disputes, and drilling drama has been mostly confined to Exxon plus a little China-US spillover due over CNOOC's involvement (similar to Guyana's Bauxite industry, where the major players are Russian and Chinese owned quarries). There's a lot of (paywalled) academic papers I haven't gotten to that discuss mining among Amerindian communities but I've been working from the (free) low-hanging fruit. I've collected a lot of seemingly good paywalled links in my main sandbox: sort of a mess, but there could be more about dealings with Brazilian mining ops among those sources. Estheim (talk) 13:08, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit has been reverted

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm HouseBlaster. I noticed that you recently removed content from Najuma Fletcher without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. HouseBlaster (talk) 17:14, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HouseBlaster, I don't see a revert on this article. I moved existing sentences and added additional content. If you're seeing something I'm not, kindly advise. Cheers, Estheim (talk) 17:49, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Estheim You know what must have happened - I intended to leave the thank you for doing xyz welcome message, not the don't do xyz message. I never reverted your edit - thanks for catching it! Below, is the message I was trying to give you:
HouseBlaster, whew. Thanks for clearing that up. Cheers, Estheim (talk) 18:30, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Estheim! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! HouseBlaster (talk) 18:07, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clive Y. Thomas has been accepted

[edit]
Clive Y. Thomas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cairo2k18 • (talk) • (contribs) 01:17, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Estheim/sandbox/Energy in Guyana

[edit]

A tag has been placed on User talk:Estheim/sandbox/Energy in Guyana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

CSD U1 - per comments on this page and at the teahouse

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Pahunkat (talk) 12:20, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged and bagged! Thanks for your help at the TH, Pahunkat.

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Estheim! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Botched Redirect (Electricity Sector of Guyana), has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Estheim! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, What to do first when there's an article of the same name?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

[edit]
Happy new year 2021 !
Estheim, Wish you and your family a very Happy and prosperous New Year! best regardsRV (talk) 08:41, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Estheim! Your additions to Sydney Allicock have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:22, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP South America / Guyana and WP Guyana are the same

[edit]

You do not have to have add WikiProject:Guyana if WikiProject:South America is present. The reason is that there are hardly any people on WP:Guyana, and therefore South America with Guyana=yes is preferred, because that way the articles also show up at WP:South America.

BTW: Thanks for all your contributions: I see you've been quite active lately. KittenKlub (talk) 22:12, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you msged KittenKlub, I've been sort of wondering how it works as a group/subgroup. I 'sort' of get it, as I've noticed the Guyana=Yes, but somehow it just seems off? Like it doesn't register in the WP 1.0 lists (or could just be me confusing myself?). If it's a barely notable permastub, I don't mess with it, but it's when I feel like I'd be stepping on another projects' toes by making a big change in importance/type that I'm inclined to add the group separately. HOPEFULLY I'm just being persnickity about the whole thing but not making double work? There's always potential to fall down the rabbit hole of useless tasks on Wikipedia, hahah.
Sort of on that note, is there any sort of decent system for higher assessments? I think I understand the B criteria enough, but I think it was made with an active group in mind, and not just an individual (me) with too much time on their hands. I don't have designs on getting FAs, but I'd like to see 'stronger' articles on the important Guyana topics.
I dig your ticker-tape of Covid info- Caribbean and then... Bhutan. Quite a geographic difference! Estheim (talk) 00:14, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Some WPs like Seychelles are changed to Africa by bot (if you type WP:Seychelles it will be changed to WP:Africa), however Guyana still has two systems, and there is no bot changing it. I assume that WP:Guyana is obsolete. It makes no differences for the stats or robots which one you use.
I would stay with Stub, Start, C. B-Class need an assessment on points and on most bigger articles the references and grammar aren't quite there yet. The highest level is Good class, however that needs a nomination and a thorough review ( Wikipedia:Good article nominations ).
There is a lot of difference between countries, however the numbers can not always be compared. Guyana has a lot less cases than French Guiana, however the deaths are much higher (170 vs 74), therefore the ratio of infection in French Guiana, Suriname and Guyana are about the same. It's not as bad as the USA, Europa or Brazil, however it's quite high nevertheless. KittenKlub (talk) 08:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barima Neighbourhood Democratic Council

[edit]

Hello, Estheim,

I just deleted the article you PROD'd. Next time, please add in the edit summary that you tagged it with a PROD (or a CSD tag or a AfD tag, etc.). In case an article is DePROD'd and gets PROD'd again, admins need to check out an article to see if it has already been PROD'd before and the simplest way is to scan edit summaries. This is made very simple if you use Twinkle which automatically fills out the edit summary and sends a notification to the page creator. Thanks! Liz Read! Talk! 17:14, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

LizThank you, will do. Estheim (talk) 17:36, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

El Dorado Rum

[edit]

Hi, thanks for your message regarding improving this article. Taking a look at Special:WhatLinksHere/El_Dorado_Rum, I can see the article is mostly orphaned. Adding links from other relevant articles can help. Cheers 162.208.168.92 (talk) 18:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

[edit]

Hello, Estheim,

I saw your note on that talk page of Category:Catholic schools in Guyana. It wasn't tagged with a PROD, it was tagged CSD C1 which is a speedy deletion tag for empty categories. Except for a few exceptions, empty categories are deleted on Wikipedia. BUT they can be restored should there be a need for them and they will no longer be empty.

The official guidance on categories is Wikipedia:Categorization but for your questions, I would just look at similar small countries to see what is done in their case. The important thing to remember with categories is that there is a category structure or hierarchy, like a tree. If there is a category that states "Private colleges in country X" than there will be similarly named categories in countries Y & Z. We do have some advice against small categories so I would just go one level up...if there aren't many articles for Category:Catholic schools in Guyana, put them in Category:Education in Guyana or Category:Higher education in Guyana instead. You can also ask questions at Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion if you need more help. Liz Read! Talk! 17:30, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About the Singhs in Lusignan

[edit]

I've removed that story before, but the story seems to have been reinserted. I left a warning, but I think it's about his (grand)father. I tried searching for it back then as well, and found nothing either. KittenKlub (talk) 21:18, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

KittenKlub, I was genuinely expecting it to be in the Stabroek article, but alas. Also surprised it wasn't referenced to some NYC-based alumni/philanthropy blog. I'll follow the page since it's probably one of those well-meaning yet misguided types. Sort of breaks my heart to remove ol' Stella: unsourced, but a great ass. Estheim (talk) 22:32, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Estheim

Thank you for creating Egbert Martin.

User:Ashleyyoursmile, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating the page. I have copy-edited the article thoroughly to trim the direct lines that were taken from the sources and Earwig's tool picked up a pretty high score of copyvio. I'd still advise you to get the article copy-edited at the WP:GOCE, since it is possible to rephrase the prose without having to copy it directly from the supporting source.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ashleyyoursmile}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ashleyyoursmile! 18:33, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Estheim, since the article is interesting and new enough, I nominated it at WP:DYK. You can find the nomination entry here. Ashleyyoursmile! 18:45, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Georgetown, Guyana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. George's Cathedral. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Banking in Guyana (March 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ezlev was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ezlev.talk 20:54, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Estheim! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ezlev.talk 20:54, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Egbert Martin

[edit]

On 28 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Egbert Martin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 19th-century Guyanese poet Egbert Martin, who died at the age of 29, is considered to be the country's first major poet? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Egbert Martin. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Egbert Martin), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Women in Guyana

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Women in Guyana you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Guettarda -- Guettarda (talk) 14:41, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guettarda, thanks for taking on this review. I hope to also learn a bit about editing for higher-quality tiers. I don't want my noob-ness to be a burden, so please let me know if there's any tedious errors I can help fix. Cheers, Estheim (talk) 16:33, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm happy to help, and given that this is close to home (spiritually, if not physically, as a Trinbagonian resident in the US). Guettarda (talk) 00:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Women in Guyana

[edit]

The article Women in Guyana you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Women in Guyana for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Guettarda -- Guettarda (talk) 23:20, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guettarda, thank you for taking the time to examine Women in Guyana. I agree with your assessment, in that the content is insufficient to adequately address this timely and important topic. I graciously ask for you to fail my GA attempt, since it demonstrates that I'm not quite up to snuff when it comes to building an article. I think a good deal of critique relies on having a second pair of eyes to gauge my ability to summarize sources, but hand-holding doesn't seem to be a part of the WP culture. Since I only add content based on sources I read, I can't promise to 'find' the kind of content that would satisfy most of these issues (and my own preferences) within a timeframe that would be fair/respectful to others waiting on GAN reviews either. I hope you don't feel like you wasted your time: I'm really grateful anyone at all could be bothered to look at this article and I'll be taking your words to heart. Cheers, Estheim (talk) 01:31, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much for your improvement to the article. I've looked at these "women in..." articles before and struggled to figure out where to go with them. Your work on this article was really good - you created an excellent structure. It's always easier to get a narrower topic up to GA, but it's more important to expand and improve bigger topics.
I'm more than happy to help however I can. Please stay in touch. Guettarda (talk) 14:22, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Have a barnstar instead

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For all your contributions on Guyana KittenKlub (talk) 14:06, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen improving all those Guyana articles, and the articles were a bit mediocre... and they have improved a lot. Good articles are very difficult, so don't feel bad. I've never bothered to submit, because I'm aware of my poor grammar... I use the excuse that it's my second language even though my Dutch also suffers from poor grammar...

You are receiving the barnstar especially for Georgetown, because it had an ugly template on top which was related to an immense history which seems correct, but had no sources whatsoever. I looked at it a couple of times as well in the past, and the page just made me sigh. You've found smart solution to the Georgetown problem. KittenKlub (talk) 14:06, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

KittenKlub, I know that 'sigh' feeling, especially with older articles that 'look' good, but have source issues. I'm not terribly surprised to botch a GAN considering my short editing experience, ("road to hell" and all that). I was very pleased to see someone nominate Egbert Martin with a DYK recently, so I feel like it's worth the effort to improve article quality and exposure. I'll just choose articles of a tighter scope for GANs and heed the advice until something sticks.
Ah grammar, the most fussy of arts. I've been around English in so many EFL and ESL contexts that I tend to abuse it even though it's my only fluent language (article? tense? Psh, who needs those?). Even though that's not very encouraging, I'm happy to do a quick language check if you'd like a second read-through for something. Estheim (talk) 01:39, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Estheim It is not just about experience. The Guyana articles are in a very quiet backwater without vandalism, edit conflicts, people nitpicking about a single line. Highly controversial people like Forbes Burnham (and his Surinamese counterpart Desi Bouterse) can be edited without triggering edit wars while even minor American politicians are the scene of battlegrounds with locks, sanctions, and endless discussions on the talk page.
I think DYK or ITN (I focused on ITN last year) are nicer and don't put the threshold too high, because the article has to be in reasonable condition and does not have to be perfect. KittenKlub (talk) 07:32, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Women in Guyana

[edit]

The article Women in Guyana you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Women in Guyana for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Guettarda -- Guettarda (talk) 14:41, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Guyana copyedit

[edit]

Miniapolis, Thank you so much for taking on this ce; even if the article is eons away from an upgrade, I'm grateful for a second set of eyes on my attempt at regurgitating large amounts of socially-sensitive content. Cheers, Estheim (talk) 22:06, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I enjoyed copyediting this article; I always learn something. Thanks for your efforts and all the best, Miniapolis 22:13, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Banking in Guyana has been accepted

[edit]
Banking in Guyana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:15, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ariunaa

[edit]

Hello, Estheim. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ariunaa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:30, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Estheim&oldid=1080422908"