User talk:Eshaan11

I prefer using Bing Search for web searches and would pleased if times are put in EST (Eastern Standard time; US and Canada

Eshaan11, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Eshaan11! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aisha Heddou

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Aisha Heddou requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SL93 (talk) 22:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not remember making such page.Eshaan11 (talk) 14:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the page log:

(diff) 18:09, 3 July 2019 . . Eshaan11 (talk | contribs | block) 24 bytes (←Created page with 'Born 1864. Living?')

So it was nearly a year ago, but you did create it. —C.Fred (talk) 21:16, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eshaan B Patel moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Eshaan B Patel, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GirthSummit _(blether) 12:07, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eshan - thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. I'm afraid that the article you wrote, which looks like an autobiography, is not really suitable for the project because it doesn't have any reliable sources to show that you are a notable person. If you really are notable, and there are sources to demonstrate that, you could add them to the article and resubmit it via the articles for creation process, but you're not really supposed to create articles about yourself directly. Thanks GirthSummit _(blether) 12:11, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Binilnillium

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Binilnillium requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 12:34, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Binilnillium

Hello, Eshaan11,

Thanks for creating Binilnillium! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for several issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 16:03, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Binilnillium listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Binilnillium. Since you had some involvement with the Binilnillium redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ComplexRational (talk) 19:41, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Colonization of trans-Neptunian objects, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 08:32, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion nomination of Exclamation comma (main article)

Hello,

I wanted to let you know I just set Exclamation comma (main article) for deletion because it seems to be nonsense. Thank you. Arthurfan828 (talk) 22:27, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Exclamation comma (main article) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Exclamation comma (main article), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Also, please note that it should be placed at Exclamation comma and the redirect currently present removed. Barkeep49 (talk) 22:32, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Base 11 Numeral System for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Base 11 Numeral System is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Base 11 Numeral System until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. From AnUnnamedUser ^{(open talk page)} 02:08, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion. Praxidicae (talk) 12:50, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Base 11 numeral system. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 23:25, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at IPhone. ZH8000 (talk) 11:35, 27 September 2019 (UTC) I am sorry, Wikipedia.[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of E11 (search engine)

Hello Eshaan11,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged E11 (search engine) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JSFarman (talk) 20:06, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Exclamation comma (main article) (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It needs better and more sources. A blog is not good enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Exclamation comma (main article) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Exclamation comma (main article), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 23:04, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Exclamation comma (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Punctuation. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is still inadequately sourced. It also does not add significantly to what is in the existing article on Punctuation. Whether a separate article for Exclamation comma is justified should be discussed at Talk:Punctuation. Please do not resubmit this draft without first discussing at Talk:Punctuation.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Exclamation comma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Exclamation comma, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:49, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm Eggishorn. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of micronations have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Please see the list criteria. Please also see Wikipedia is not for things made up one day Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:31, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Color photography

There is a thread that concerns you at the Administrator's Noticeboard. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Move_help_needed. Thank you. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know that there is a policy about "colour" versus "color"? This is covered by the Manual of Style, Specifically Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National varieties of English: Stay with established spelling -- If an article has been in a given dialect for a long time, and there is no clear reason to change it, leave it alone. Editors should not change the spelling used in an article wholesale from one variant to another, unless there is a compelling reason to do so (which will rarely be the case). Other editors are justified in reverting such changes. Please stop trying to "correct" the spelling of color to colour without first discussing it at the relevant talk pages. I hope this helps. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:40, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Eshaan11! You created a thread called Trigonometric Functions article at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of BestPenguin Quantum

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BestPenguin Quantum, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —{ Cryptic Canadian } 02:17, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Eshaan11. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:51, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm Ost316. I noticed that you recently removed content from Jay Sadguru Swami without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Restoring content; editorial concerns should be discussed on the talk page or the page should be nominated for WP:AFD if the article should not exist. Deleting content and moving is not the appropriate way address content concerns. Ost (talk) 15:40, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eshaan, blanking and moving pages like you did is disruptive to say the least. If you believe information is incorrect, cite better sources or start a talk page discussion pointing to good sources. – Thjarkur (talk) 15:53, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. You've built up a history of bad moves and it's becoming pretty disruptive. If you think a page should be moved, please start a requested move discusssion, rather than moving it yourself. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:14, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 13:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The section is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Eshaan11 –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 13:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

June 2020

Hello, I'm Wham2001. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Micronation have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Wham2001 (talk) 15:22, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Exclamation comma

Draft:Exclamation comma, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Exclamation comma and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Exclamation comma during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BSMIsEditing (talk) 12:59, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Exclamation comma

Hello, Eshaan11. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Exclamation comma, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]