User talk:Eric-Wester/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Eric-Wester. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
No subject
I'm his step-son, Austin Frye. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:580:8202:84A:3574:1116:AC13:5F7A (talk) 03:31, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- @2601:580:8202:84A:3574:1116:AC13:5F7A: Hi there. Please take a moment to review WP:NOR. In short, all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Cheers! Eric-Wester (talk) 03:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Jason Conger's father and Wikipedia edits
Hello Eric Wester
I am Jason Conger's itinerant father. The edits I made to his Wikipedia page are honest and verifiable. Am I angry about the way he treated his step-mother, the woman who was more than loving and a champion in his life, oh hell yes. I do not know why you are the guardian of this particular gate, but I do know that way down deep, Jason is very shallow. Do what you must and feel free to contact me for any further information you need.
Sincerely. Dennis Conger — Preceding unsigned comment added by D klamath (talk • contribs) 05:10, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- @D klamath: Hi there. Please take a moment to review WP:NOR. In short, all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Cheers! Eric-Wester (talk) 05:13, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Received a notification
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rob_Graham
I edited the page after someone mysteriously deleted pertinent information.
Here is one of many articles about his criminal acts-
Would that suffice for a reference for change? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamieWvegas (talk • contribs) 18:03, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- @JamieWvegas: Hello. Yes, I think you could certainly use that link as a citation for your addition of content. However, when you add the information back into the article, please refrain from using phrases such as "The original page was edited to remove a variety of Graham's personal information" as it's not really appropriate for an encyclopedia article. Just add the pertinent and relevant information from the news source. Happy editing! Eric-Wester (talk) 18:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Levent Yuksel
Hi Eric, the edit I made to Levent Yuksel's page is taken from a page which exits in Turkish page "Sebnem Ferah". I noticed this information was missing from his personal life page in English and I thought it was necessary to include it in the English page since Sebnem Ferah is a prominent music figure in Turkey. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ediz yildir (talk • contribs) 18:08, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Ediz yildir: Hello. Thank you for the information. Is the information cited from a reliable source in the Turkish version of the article? If so, I think it would be appropriate to add the content back to the English version and include the original citation from the Turkish version. If it's not cited in the Turkish version, we should probably try to find an appropriate, reliable published source for the information and include that. Thank you! Eric-Wester (talk) 18:21, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Question
Thank you for giving us another viewpoint. Quick question at Talk:Fake_news_website#Interlanguage_link_template. Sagecandor (talk) 18:53, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Sagecandor: I've responded on the article's discussion page. Thank you! Eric-Wester (talk) 19:25, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you ! Sagecandor (talk) 19:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- Have you seen before third opinions from previously uninvolved editors citing pages like WP:RED get disregarded so summarily like that? What is the usual next step when that happens? Sagecandor (talk) 20:31, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Sagecandor: The best step may be to remove yourself from the situation temporarily. Cooler heads tend to prevail if you shift your focus to something else. After a couple days if there's still no resolution you may want to request an additional third party opinion before escalating to another form of dispute resolution. Eric-Wester (talk) 21:27, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- Okay thank you. Good idea for a 2nd third party. Sagecandor (talk) 21:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Sagecandor: The best step may be to remove yourself from the situation temporarily. Cooler heads tend to prevail if you shift your focus to something else. After a couple days if there's still no resolution you may want to request an additional third party opinion before escalating to another form of dispute resolution. Eric-Wester (talk) 21:27, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- Have you seen before third opinions from previously uninvolved editors citing pages like WP:RED get disregarded so summarily like that? What is the usual next step when that happens? Sagecandor (talk) 20:31, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you ! Sagecandor (talk) 19:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
List of Surviving silent film stars
The edits were not vandalism. I was only re-adding an entry because of violation of BLP. I think you must be mistaken. 206.45.42.137 (talk) 23:42, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- @206.45.42.137: Hello. Thanks for your message. Are you able to support your changes with a citation to a reliable source? Eric-Wester (talk) 23:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- Not yet. 206.45.42.137 (talk) 23:51, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- @206.45.42.137: Once you're able to do so, I would encourage you to add the content back to the article. Until then, we probably don't want to add such content without a reliable source. Cheers! Eric-Wester (talk) 23:53, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- Not yet. 206.45.42.137 (talk) 23:51, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Phoenix Lights
Hello wikipedia community, I am new to this = I already broke some rules, but please forgive me, i had no idea, what I was doing was breaking rules, I assumed any edits would be vetted or discussed before being published. I just added what I knew about these situations and I also won an award for best new investigative documentary film - about the Phoenix Incident or phoenix lights case, I have reams and reams of fact and info that I would like to add to this article to make it more clear, or at least at some more points of view.
I would also like to add reference to my award winning DVD for listing as a source and list of films etc, on this subject matter. I pride myself on pulling facts in this case, so I would like to share all those references etc, I just need help with the actual grammar and methods etc.
I may also like to help with other articles in areas where my research can be of help.
I am still trying to figure out how to talk to Donner - I think I got banned, for editing - again - I have no idea what or how I am supposed to submit an edit - I assumed there was a process, I was not ignoring any one - i just saw the message and read them - but still not sure what or how to correct any of it.
I value and look forward to peer review of anything I publish and would love to a part of this community and make sure I learn the rules so we can learn... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.249.227.151 (talk) 00:03, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
- @96.249.227.151: Hi. Thank you for your detailed message. Here are a couple of things to keep in mind:
- - Any edits to articles go live (for the most part)
- - WP:NOR is a policy that you probably want to read up on. In short, all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source.
- - WP:CS includes information on the importance of citing sources for new information you add to an article.
- - Take a moment to review these guidelines about how Wikipedia should not be used for advertising or self-promotion. You'll want to be careful about adding links to a webpage selling DVD's.
- - Any edits to articles go live (for the most part)
- Lastly, it sounds like you have enthusiasm for helping to build Wikipedia - that's a great thing! You may want to take some time to review our guide to getting started before making additional edits. Cheers! Eric-Wester (talk) 01:19, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Flipora
Article:"Flipora" maybe I should not bother, just I suffered considerable harm from Flipora spamming everone in my address book. I think you better block me. Thank you! if you are a real person :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.250.105.66 (talk) 01:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
- @84.250.105.66: Hi there. Please take a moment to review WP:NOR. In short, all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Cheers!
Wesley King
Hi there I am writing in reply to a message sent...I am indeed a family connection of the subject but I was informed that many such profiles of less-known but still noteworthy individuals are written by such. How might I have that tag removed? Also I am not sure regarding the tag of writing like an advertisement...everything is factual in the article. Would that be because it requires more sources? I am new to this and am not quite sure how to correct some of those issues. Thank you for your time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.68.152.32 (talk) 19:23, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
- @142.68.152.32: Thanks for your message. Please take a moment to review WP:NOR which discusses how all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Original research you may have due to a biological relationship is not permitted. Editing about a family connection would also be considered a conflict of interest, so you'll want to steer away from that. You are, however, more than welcome to post your thoughts on the article's talk page about why the tags should be removed. Eric-Wester (talk) 01:40, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
No subject
Eric, the 35,000 attendance for the 2015 Celebration Bowl is the PR attendance figure (LIP STICK ON A PIG). The actual attaendance was less than half. You can verify the correct attendance from the Georgia Dome, they are the keeper of record. All you have to do is ask the the coorect question. The correct question to ask are as follows: . 1) What was the turn style count for the 2015 Celebration Bowl? 2) What was the net paid attendance for the 2015 Celberation Bowl? . Don't bother asking John Grant. He is going to put LOUD RED LIP STICK ON THE PIG. Due to the fact, that you can announce whatever attendance figure you want. It's is not illegal to announce a deceptive attendance figure. . I was at the game, counted each section at half time. Lower level section has about 1,000 seats each. The middle level holds about 250 seats. Just do the math and verify with the Georgia Dome. Now, if this game was for profit. You could ask what the paid tax number was and verify with the Georgia Department of Revenue. . The 2016 Celebration Bowl, will be lucky if it achieved an 6,000 to 7,000 paid attendance. The game is to expensive ($50.00 lower level from the 10 to the 10 - BAD TICKET STRATEGY - if we sale 10,000 tickets at $50.00 each we will gross $1,000,000.00), no real promotions that matter to the general public and failed leadership/competancy in the local team. . Additionally, you can add to the fact that ESPN, does not really care for ATTENDANCE, with both of it's HBCU football properties. They just want TV money for having two novelty acts in it's HBCU football properties. All you have to do is research the horrific attendance of the MEAC/SWAC Challenge. . The Celebration Bowl and the MEAC/SWAC Challenge made HBCU Football look deplorable. My friend, do your home work and tell the truth about the deplorable attendance of both the Celebration Bowl and the MEAC/SWAC Challenge. . A MAN WHO LOVES HBCU FOOTBAL AND BLACK PEOPLE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.141.193.162 (talk) 16:24, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- @207.141.193.162: Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Significant changes made without any verifiable sources will be reverted to help maintain the integrity of Wikipedia. Eric-Wester (talk) 17:26, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Ways to improve Des Moines Police Department
Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Eric-Wester, thanks for creating Des Moines Police Department!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article pays a lot of attention to officers killed, but neglects many other aspect that are of interest, such as the history of the department.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Mduvekot (talk) 02:01, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Mduvekot: Thank you for the input and suggestion. Eric-Wester (talk) 03:15, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Cha Cha Slide
Hi Eric-Wester–
I made adjustments to the Cha Cha Slide page reverting vandalism made at 14:37 August 26th. The user who made the 14:37 August 26th edit to this page vandalized two other articles that day. The article still contains its original source, which was not changed during the vandalism.
IlllIlIIOIlllIlII (talk) 21:59, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- @IlllIlIIOIlllIlII: Thank you for your message! Sorry about the mix up. I have restored the article back to the version after you removed the vandalism from August 26th. Eric-Wester (talk) 01:16, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Eric-Wester: Thanks!
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Nice work--seen your reverts quite a few times in the Huggle queue JustBerry (talk) 01:00, 16 December 2016 (UTC) |
- Thank you, JustBerry for the barnstar. I'm honored! I'm also glad I can play a small part in the fight against vandalism. Cheers! :) Eric-Wester (talk) 01:11, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Falsely Accused for Vandalized Edits
Hi Eric,
I just received a message from you saying I've made inappropriate edits on the Wikipedia pages for Douglas, Massachusetts and the Nintendo 3DS. I would just like to inform you that I have never been on either of those pages before and have never made an edit on Wikipedia. I'm not sure why I came up as the user who made those edits, but I promise you I did not do them.
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.189.63.253 (talk) 05:40, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- @207.189.63.253: Hello. Do you use a shared IP address where other people may be accessing Wikipedia as well? This could be common at a workplace, school, or even if there are multiple people in your household. If you didn't make the edits, it would have been someone else who is sharing your IP address. Please let me know if I can help further. Eric-Wester (talk) 13:11, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
@Eric-Wester: Yes I am currently on my university's WiFi so that would explain it. So was the message that I received sent to all users on this IP address that have accessed Wikipedia without having an account? That would explain a lot actually since the pages I've been notified about are random ones I have never accessed before.
- @207.189.63.253: The message would have been sent to anyone with the same IP address, although once you clicked the New Messages button it would not show for anyone else. However, if anyone clicks on Talk they will see the message. Eric-Wester (talk) 17:39, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Austin M. Carrillo
Austin is a person who lives in the USA. Austin likes food, football and other stuff. Austin goes to school. Austin knows his parents. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CE94:6EF0:C865:9FB:9E30:1D25 (talk) 20:07, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Why are you hating on what I am writing
First of all JME is a very well known friend of mine and u won't let me edit his page so please can you stop from restraining me from doing this M3xxi oz (talk) 23:19, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- @M3xxi oz: Hello. Please refer to this message left by Dane on your talk page. There's a lot of helpful information there. Please let me know if I can assist further. Thank you! Eric-Wester (talk) 23:28, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Just an FYI, a user has created this subpage with comments seemingly intended for your talk page. -- Dane talk 23:21, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, Dane, for letting me know! Eric-Wester (talk) 23:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Lil Bub
Greetings. I'm the one who made the changes on Lil Bub's page. I added those changes because i saw the film Nine Lives and that is her role in the film. Currently i can't add a source to prove it because that is a spoiler of the film and probably the forums doesn't want to spoil it. See the film yourself to see that i'm saying the truth. However i can prove that she appears on the film with this source:
http://tubitv.com/blog/2016/04/15/lil-bub-makes-cameo-nine-lives-trailer/
--187.145.111.60 (talk) 04:57, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- @187.145.111.60: Hi there. Please note there's no reason a spoiler can't be added to an article (refer to WP:SW for more information). Just remember to cite a reliable source for information added. Cheers! Eric-Wester (talk) 05:05, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
TRINITI's Next Generation MDM
Why do you think TRINITI's Next Generation MDM is inappropriate in this wiki? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lchinta (talk • contribs) 06:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Lchinta: Please refer to WP:SPAM for more information about not adding promotional external links to Wikipedia. Thanks! Eric-Wester (talk) 06:54, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Warning on User talk:Oldspeckledhen123
Hello. I believe you accidentally warned User:Oldspeckledhen123 about removing AfD tags from an article, when in fact this user removed a speedy deletion tag from an article they created. I removed your warning template and replaced it with a more accurate one. Please be sure to select the correct warning template when warning users, especially newer ones who may be confused if they receive warnings that don't seem to match up with anything they did. Thanks. –Grondemar 06:51, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- You are absolutely right, Grondemar! Thank you for catching that one that slipped through the cracks. Happy editing! Eric-Wester (talk) 06:57, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
No subject
Eric I ran across this article trying to search for history of the GM plant near Malvern Arkansas, it is not listed in the GM plants article, nor in jones hill, nor in Malvern http://www.malvern-online.com/content/malvernites-recall-move-50-years-ago... since you deleted it from wiki then please add the correct information... or put it back so someone else can — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.7.53.147 (talk) 07:03, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- @184.7.53.147: Hi there. Please note that external links should only be added to articles when they are directly relevant to the article. The link you mentioned wouldn't be suitable for that article. Please let me know if you have further questions. Thank you! Eric-Wester (talk) 07:08, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
No subject
Hi dear, it's about why removing that picture of president Ashraf Ghani. As I'm an afghan and he's our president, I just wanted to replace his picture with another one which I have with me in our cultural out fit. The second thing I wanted to edit on the Wikipedia page of President Ashraf Ghani was to change his name to "Muhammad Ashraf Ghani".the reason for this is initially when he was selected as president for Afghanistan his name was "Muhammad Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai". lately, he changed his name to "Muhammad Ashraf Ghani" cause Ahmadzai is a Pushton tribe in Afghanistan. and he removed Ahmadzai from his name cause he declared that I do not belong to Ahmadzai only I'm an afghan and I belong to afghanistan.
Anyways thanks for resorting the content I deleted cause I did not know how to upload his cultural picture. I'm new to Wikipedia that's why. - Said-Jalal (talk)
- @Said-Jalal: Thank you for your message. Please make sure that any information you are adding includes proper citations to reliable sources. Original research is not permitted on Wikipedia. Please review Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Citing sources for more information. I hope this information helps. If I can be of further assistance, please let me know! Thank you. Eric-Wester (talk) 20:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Hannu Takkula's sister living in Palestinian lands, occupied by Israel
Here is the link about Hannu Takkula's sister living in Israel, on the lands occupied from Palestinians: http://www.hs.fi/sunnuntai/art-2000002748844.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.181.4.180 (talk) 20:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- @82.181.4.180: Please feel free to add content back to Wikipedia, just be sure to include a citation to a reliable source. Cheers! Eric-Wester (talk) 20:56, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Chandrasekhar Singh
the birth and death day are listed as the same. The birth day cited in the article should be updated on the sidebar.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandrasekhar_Singh — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.138.39.45 (talk) 21:05, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- @69.138.39.45: Thanks for your message. I have restored the correct date of birth. Cheers! Eric-Wester (talk) 21:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
edits
Hi Eric, I am currently at Cor Jesu, and I was looking at our page and I just noticed some things were not updated. I have never edited a wikipedia page before, so that's why I didn't know how to do it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.133.171.115 (talk) 23:31, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- @75.133.171.115: Thanks for your message! I know that it can be very intimidating when you are first learning how Wikipedia works. I hope my message helped to explain that information added to articles must be able to be verified with an existing reliable source. Please let me know if you have any questions or need any assistance. Thank you! Eric-Wester (talk) 04:29, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
As a possibly accidental participant in the edit war at Christine Lagarde, I felt that you should nonetheless be aware that I have fully protected the article and have asked the main participants to take note of my message at Talk:Christine Lagarde#Full protection. Discussion has been started, and there is now no good reason for further reverts before consensus has been reached or dispute resolution completed. I hope it won't come to that, but if necessary, blocks will be issued. As you did not involve yourself too deeply in the conflict and seemed in fact to stand down from it, it is up to you whether you want to refrain from making further edits or reverts related to this conflict, or attend discussion and/or dispute resolution. Best regards, Samsara 04:07, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note, Samsara. The article didn't ring a bell to me, so I checked the history and can see that I made one rollback of an addition of unsourced information to the article. I will refrain from further discussion and would be content with the information being added, so long as it can be referenced with a reliable source. Cheers! Eric-Wester (talk) 04:26, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- I looked at that, and there was actually a citation in the article, they just hadn't moved it to the right place. Cheers, Samsara 11:39, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification! Eric-Wester (talk) 13:09, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- I looked at that, and there was actually a citation in the article, they just hadn't moved it to the right place. Cheers, Samsara 11:39, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
<3
<3
Michelhelps (talk) 00:59, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
David Irving
My reliable source is the 2016 season Bigdaddy915 (talk)
- Hey, Bigdaddy915. Thanks for the note. Please be sure to include a citation as noted on my previous message. It's important that the content you add can be attributed to published, reliable sources. Please let me know if I can help further. Thanks! Eric-Wester (talk) 01:08, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
About my edit for "pain au chocolat"
Hey,
I'm the one that made the edit a few minutes ago in the controversy section of the "pain au chocolat". https://www.google.com.mx/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/25/bun-fight-french-presidential-cost-pain-au-chocolat I provide you a link in which you'll be able to check that the information is actually true. Can you put my edit back and include the source for me?
Thanks187.185.71.34 (talk) 02:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- @187.185.71.34: Hello. Thanks for your message. I did check out the article that you posted for me about the French politician; however, I don't know if it's really fitting for the article on Pain au chocolat. I think the content you submitted would be more fitting for the article about the politician himself. The fact that he didn't know the price doesn't really have anything to do with Pain au chocolat being controversial. Do you agree? Eric-Wester (talk) 03:33, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Sequoioideae sorry
it was an accident sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:BD1D:72B0:7194:D15E:744A:7A60 (talk) 03:21, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- @2602:306:BD1D:72B0:7194:D15E:744A:7A60: No problem at all! Welcome to Wikipedia. :) Eric-Wester (talk) 03:24, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Shipyard joiner
Eric. My Grandfather's trade was first listed as a "loftman", then as a "joiner". He developed his trade in Sunderland, England back in the early 1900's, coming to the States in 1921. He worked in the Naval Shipyard in Boston. My understanding is that he basically created the "patterns" or blueprints for the ship's parts requiring carpentry work. Can you enlighten the Wiki site more on the Joiner's role in a shipyard setting, whether military or commercial? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.181.89.79 (talk) 00:26, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- @70.181.89.79: Thanks for your message! It's great to hear you're interested in contributing to Wikipedia. I've posted a message on your talk page with some links to more information that will be helpful in getting started. I should advise you, however, that original research is not a permissible source for new information that's added to Wikipedia. Content should be able to be cited to a published, reliable source. Please let me know if I can assist further as you get started. Cheers! Eric-Wester (talk) 05:18, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 December 2016
- Year in review: Looking back on 2016
- News and notes: Strategic planning update; English ArbCom election results
- Special report: German ArbCom implodes
- Featured content: The Christmas edition
- Technology report: Labs improvements impact 2016 Tool Labs survey results
- Traffic report: Post-election traffic blues
- Recent research: One study and several abstracts
Concerning Lemmy (Kilmister/Koopa)
I'm not that great yet at editing Wikipedia, so understanding how to put in a citation is a bit over my head. This article does have what I would consider the citation needed to validate the Lemmy Kilmister is the namesake of Lemmy Koopa in the Super Mario Bros. franchise.
http://kotaku.com/how-a-mario-character-was-named-after-motorheads-lemmy-1750180427
The original edit I put (while not logged in) was as follows...
One of the Koopa Kids in the Mario Bros. franchise, Lemmy Koopa, is named after Lemmy Kilmister.
C.D. Random (talk) 23:39, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 January 2017
- From the editor: Next steps for the Signpost
- News and notes: Surge in RFA promotions—a sign of lasting change?
- In the media: Year-end roundups, Wikipedia's 16th birthday, and more
- Featured content: One year ends, and another begins
- Arbitration report: Concluding 2016 and covering 2017's first two cases
- Traffic report: Out with the old, in with the new
- Technology report: Tech present, past, and future
The Signpost: 6 February 2017
- Arbitration report: WMF Legal and ArbCom weigh in on tension between disclosure requirements and user privacy
- WikiProject report: For the birds!
- Technology report: Better PDFs, backup plans, and birthday wishes
- Traffic report: Cool It Now
- Featured content: Three weeks dominated by articles
The Signpost: 27 February 2017
- From the editors: Results from our poll on subscription and delivery, and a new RSS feed
- Recent research: Special issue: Wikipedia in education
- Technology report: Responsive content on desktop; Offline content in Android app
- In the media: The Daily Mail does not run Wikipedia
- Gallery: A Met montage
- Special report: Peer review – a history and call for reviewers
- Op-ed: Wikipedia has cancer
- Featured content: The dominance of articles continues
- Traffic report: Love, football, and politics
The Signpost: 9 June 2017
- From the editors: Signpost status: On reserve power, help wanted!
- News and notes: Global Elections
- Arbitration report: Cases closed in the Pacific and with Magioladitis
- Featured content: Three months in the land of the featured
- In the media: Did Wikipedia just assume Garfield's gender?
- Recent research: Wikipedia bot wars capture the imagination of the popular press
- Technology report: Tech news catch-up
- Traffic report: Film on Top: Sampling the weekly top 10
The Signpost: 23 June 2017
- News and notes: Departments reorganized at Wikimedia Foundation, and a month without new RfAs (so far)
- In the media: Kalanick's nipples; Episode #138 of Drama on the Hill
- Op-ed: Facto Post: a fresh take
- Featured content: Will there ever be a break? The slew of featured content continues
- Traffic report: Wonder Woman beats Batman, The Mummy, Darth Vader and the Earth
- Technology report: Improved search, and WMF data scientist tells all
The Signpost: 15 July 2017
- News and notes: French chapter woes, new affiliates and more WMF team changes
- Featured content: Spectacular animals, Pine Trees screens, and more
- In the media: Concern about access and fairness, Foundation expenditures, and relationship to real-world politics and commerce
- Recent research: The chilling effect of surveillance on Wikipedia readers
- Gallery: A mix of patterns
- Humour: The Infobox Game
- Traffic report: Film, television and Internet phenomena reign with some room left over for America's birthday
- Technology report: New features in development; more breaking changes for scripts
- Wikicup: 2017 WikiCup round 3 wrap-up
The Signpost: 5 August 2017
- Recent research: Wikipedia can increase local tourism by +9%; predicting article quality with deep learning; recent behavior predicts quality
- WikiProject report: Comic relief
- In the media: Wikipedia used to judge death penalty, arms smuggling, Indonesian governance, and HOTTEST celebrity
- Traffic report: Swedish countess tops the list
- Featured content: Everywhere in the lead
- Technology report: Introducing TechCom
- Humour: WWASOHs and ETCSSs
The Signpost: 6 September 2017
- From the editors: What happened at Wikimania?
- News and notes: Basselpedia; WMF Board of Trustees appointments
- Featured content: Warfighters and their tools or trees and butterflies
- Traffic report: A fortnight of conflicts
- Special report: Biomedical content, and some thoughts on its future
- Recent research: Discussion summarization; Twitter bots tracking government edits; extracting trivia from Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: WikiProject YouTube
- Technology report: Latest tech news
- Wikicup: 2017 WikiCup round 4 wrap-up
- Humour: Bots
The Signpost: 25 September 2017
- News and notes: Chapter updates; ACTRIAL
- Humour: Chickenz
- Recent research: Wikipedia articles vs. concepts; Wikipedia usage in Europe
- Technology report: Flow restarted; Wikidata connection notifications
- Gallery: Chicken mania
- Traffic report: Fights and frights
- Featured content: Flying high
The Signpost: 23 October 2017
- News and notes: Money! WMF fundraising, Wikimedia strategy, WMF new office!
- Featured content: Don, Marcel, Emily, Jessica and other notables
- Humour: Guys named Ralph
- In the media: Facebook and poetry
- Special report: Working with GLAMs in the UK
- Traffic report: Death, disaster, and entertainment
The Signpost: 24 November 2017
- News and notes: Cons, cons, cons
- Arbitration report: Administrator desysoped; How to deal with crosswiki issues; Mister Wiki case likely
- Technology report: Searching and surveying
- Interview: A featured article centurion
- WikiProject report: Recommendations for WikiProjects
- In the media: Open knowledge platform as a media institution
- Traffic report: Strange and inappropriate
- Featured content: We will remember them
- Recent research: Who wrote this? New dataset on the provenance of Wikipedia text
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Eric-Wester. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 December 2017
- Special report: Women in Red World Contest wrap-up
- Featured content: Featured content to finish 2017
- In the media: Stolen seagulls, public domain primates and more
- Arbitration report: Last case of 2017: Mister Wiki editors
- Gallery: Wiki loving
- Recent research: French medical articles have "high rate of veracity"
- Technology report: Your wish lists and more Wikimedia tech
- Traffic report: Notable heroes and bad guys
The Signpost: 16 January 2018
- News and notes: Communication is key
- In the media: The Paris Review, British Crown and British Media
- Featured content: History, gaming and multifarious topics
- Interview: Interview with Ser Amantio di Nicolao, the top contributor to English Wikipedia by edit count
- Technology report: Dedicated Wikidata database servers
- Arbitration report: Mister Wiki is first arbitration committee decision of 2018
- Traffic report: The best and worst of 2017
The Signpost: 5 February 2018
- Featured content: Wars, sieges, disasters and everything black possible
- Traffic report: TV, death, sports, and doodles
- Special report: Cochrane–Wikipedia Initiative
- Arbitration report: New cases requested for inter-editor hostility and other collaboration issues
- In the media: Solving crime; editing out violence allegations
- Humour: You really are in Wonderland
The Signpost: 20 February 2018
- News and notes: The future is Swedish with a lack of administrators
- Recent research: Politically diverse editors write better articles; Reddit and Stack Overflow benefit from Wikipedia but don't give back
- Arbitration report: Arbitration committee prepares to examine two new cases
- Traffic report: Addicted to sports and pain
- Featured content: Entertainment, sports and history
- Technology report: Paragraph-based edit conflict screen; broken thanks
Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018
- News and notes: Wiki Conference roundup and new appointments.
- Arbitration report: Ironing out issues in infoboxes; not sure yet about New Jersey; and an administrator who probably wasn't uncivil to a sockpuppet.
- Traffic report: Real sports, real women and an imaginary country: what's on top for Wikipedia readers
- Featured content: Animals, Ships, and Songs
- Technology report: Timeless skin review by Force Radical.
- Special report: ACTRIAL wrap-up.
- Humour: WikiWorld Reruns
The Signpost: 26 April 2018
- From the editors: The Signpost's presses roll again
- Signpost: Future directions for The Signpost
- In the media: The rise of Wikipedia as a disinformation mop
- In focus: Admin reports board under criticism
- Special report: ACTRIAL results adopted by landslide
- Community view: It's time we look past Women in Red to counter systemic bias
- Discussion report: The future of portals
- Arbitration report: No new cases, and one motion on administrative misconduct
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Military History
- Traffic report: A quiet place to wrestle with the articles of March
- Technology report: Coming soon: Books-to-PDF, interactive maps, rollback confirmation
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
The Signpost: 24 May 2018
- From the editor: Another issue meets the deadline
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Portals
- Discussion report: User rights, infoboxes, and more discussion on portals
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Arbitration report: Managing difficult topics
- News and notes: Lots of Wikimedia
- Traffic report: We love our superheroes
- Technology report: A trove of contributor and developer goodies
- Recent research: Why people don't contribute to Wikipedia; using Wikipedia to teach statistics, technical writing, and controversial issues
- Humour: Play with your food
- Gallery: Wine not?
- From the archives: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
The Signpost: 24 May 2018
- From the editor: Another issue meets the deadline
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Portals
- Discussion report: User rights, infoboxes, and more discussion on portals
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Arbitration report: Managing difficult topics
- News and notes: Lots of Wikimedia
- Traffic report: We love our superheroes
- Technology report: A trove of contributor and developer goodies
- Recent research: Why people don't contribute to Wikipedia; using Wikipedia to teach statistics, technical writing, and controversial issues
- Humour: Play with your food
- Gallery: Wine not?
- From the archives: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
The Signpost: 29 June 2018
- Special report: NPR and AfC – The Marshall Plan: an engagement and a marriage?
- Op-ed: What do admins do?
- News and notes: Money, milestones, and Wikimania
- In the media: Much wikilove from the Mayor of London, less from Paekākāriki or a certain candidate for U.S. Congress
- Discussion report: Deletion, page moves, and an update to the main page
- Featured content: New promotions
- Arbitration report: WWII, UK politics, and a user deCrat'ed
- Traffic report: Endgame
- Technology report: Improvements piled on more improvements
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Africa
- Recent research: How censorship can backfire and conversations can go awry
- Humour: Television plot lines
- Wikipedia essays: This month's pick by The Signpost editors
- From the archives: Wolves nip at Wikipedia's heels: A perspective on the cost of paid editing
The Signpost: 31 July 2018
- From the editor: If only if
- Opinion: Wrestling with Wikipedia reality
- Discussion report: Wikipedias take action against EU copyright proposal, plus new user right proposals
- Featured content: Wikipedia's best content in images and prose
- Arbitration report: Status quo processes retained in two disputes
- Traffic report: Soccer, football, call it what you like – that and summer movies leave room for little else
- Technology report: New bots, new prefs
- Recent research: Different Wikipedias use different images; editing contests more successful than edit-a-thons
- Humour: It's all the same
- Essay: Wikipedia does not need you
The Signpost: 30 August 2018
- From the editor: Today's young adults don't know a world without Wikipedia
- News and notes: Flying high; low practice from Wikipedia 'cleansing' agency; where do our donations go? RfA sees a new trend
- In the media: Quicksilver AI writes articles
- Discussion report: Drafting an interface administrator policy
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Special report: Wikimania 2018
- Traffic report: Aretha dies – getting just 2,000 short of 5 million hits
- Technology report: Technical enhancements and a request to prioritize upcoming work
- Recent research: Wehrmacht on Wikipedia, neural networks writing biographies
- Humour: Signpost editor censors herself
- From the archives: Playing with Wikipedia words
The Signpost: 1 October 2018
- From the editor: Is this the new normal?
- News and notes: European copyright law moves forward
- In the media: Knowledge under fire
- Discussion report: Interface Admin policy proposal, part 2
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbcom
- Technology report: Paying attention to your mobile
- Gallery: A pat on the back
- Recent research: How talk page use has changed since 2005; censorship shocks lead to centralization; is vandalism caused by workplace boredom?
- Humour: Signpost Crossword Puzzle
- Essay: Expressing thanks
The Signpost: 28 October 2018
- From the editors: The Signpost is still afloat, just barely
- News and notes: WMF gets a million bucks
- In the media: Bans, celebs, and bias
- Discussion report: Mediation Committee and proposed deletion reform
- Traffic report: Unsurprisingly, sport leads the field – or the ring
- Technology report: Bots galore!
- Special report: NPP needs you
- Special report 2: Now Wikidata is six
- In focus: Alexa
- Gallery: Out of this world!
- Recent research: Wikimedia Commons worth $28.9 billion
- Humour: Talk page humour
- Opinion: Strickland incident
- From the archives: The Gardner Interview
removing my edit From Baripada
Actually you just removed my edit from Wikipedia, and it was your mistake because everything I wrote is true and he is now a notable person in our Baripada City. I know this because I am from the same town. I just Tried To help Wikipedia. Yaah source, currently there is no any written article or source I found, But he had some interviews with news channels. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SamitHotaIn (talk • contribs) 03:35, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space. Eric-Wester (talk) 03:39, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Alpine goats and peuberty vs parturition (aka kidding)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpine_goat you reversed my edit a short bit ago claiming it was "not constructive". This text has a serious error as goats cannot even lactate within 4-6 weeks of reaching peuberty much less reach peak production. Peak production is reached withing 4-6 of parturition (aka Kidding) this is clearly stated in the reference article and it has been misquoted at "peuberty" in the text. I fail to see how the correction of this is "not constructive"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhsminis (talk • contribs) 04:12, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note and the explanation of your edits. I do have to apologize for not realizing that “kidding” is another term for parturition. I see you’ve made the edit again, and I think that makes sense with how you have it listed now. Cheers! Eric-Wester (talk) 04:16, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Hyuna
Hi! Everything I wrote was true and Hyjna has been snatching wigs since 1992 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Looooser15 (talk • contribs) 14:05, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
WAFFLER
You have recently removed my edit. This is highly inappropriate as my only intent is to further the knowledge of those who seek. Please reverse your decision. Thanks, Thebignibba — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebignibba (talk • contribs) 19:47, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 December 2018
- From the editor: Time for a truce
- Special report: The Christmas wishlist
- Discussion report: Farewell, Mediation Committee
- Arbitration report: A long break ends
- Traffic report: Queen reigns for four weeks straight
- Gallery: Intersections
- From the archives: Ars longa, vita brevis
The Signpost: 24 December 2018
- From the editors: Where to draw the line in reporting?
- News and notes: Some wishes do come true
- In the media: Political hijinks
- Discussion report: A new record low for RfA
- WikiProject report: Articlegenesis
- Arbitration report: Year ends with one active case
- Traffic report: Queen dethroned by U.S. presidents
- Gallery: Sun and Moon, water and stone
- Blog: News from the WMF
- Humour: I believe in Bigfoot
- Essay: Requests for medication
- From the archives: Compromised admin accounts – again
The Signpost: 31 January 2019
- Op-Ed: Random Rewards Rejected
- News and notes: WMF staff turntable continues to spin; Endowment gets more cash; RfA continues to be a pit of steely knives
- Discussion report: The future of the reference desk
- Featured content: Don't miss your great opportunity
- Arbitration report: An admin under the microscope
- Traffic report: Death, royals and superheroes: Avengers, Black Panther
- Technology report: When broken is easily fixed
- News from the WMF: News from WMF
- Recent research: Ad revenue from reused Wikipedia articles; are Wikipedia researchers asking the right questions?
- Essay: How
- Humour: Village pump
- From the archives: An editorial board that includes you
The Signpost: 28 February 2019
- From the editors: Help wanted (still)
- News and notes: Front-page issues for the community
- Discussion report: Talking about talk pages
- Featured content: Conquest, War, Famine, Death, and more!
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Binge-watching
- Technology report: Tool labs casters-up
- Gallery: Signed with pride
- From the archives: New group aims to promote Wiki-Love
- Humour: Pesky Pronouns
The Signpost: 31 March 2019
- From the editors: Getting serious about humor
- News and notes: Blackouts fail to stop EU Copyright Directive
- In the media: Women's history month
- Discussion report: Portal debates continue, Prespa agreement aftermath, WMF seeks a rebranding
- Featured content: Out of this world
- Arbitration report: The Tides of March at ARBCOM
- Traffic report: Exultations and tribulations
- Technology report: New section suggestions and sitewide styles
- News from the WMF: The WMF's take on the new EU Copyright Directive
- Recent research: Barnstar-like awards increase new editor retention
- From the archives: Esperanza organization disbanded after deletion discussion
- Humour: The Epistolary of Arthur 37
- In focus: The Wikipedia SourceWatch
- Special report: Wiki Loves (50 Years of) Pride
- Community view: Wikipedia's response to the New Zealand mosque shootings
The Signpost: 30 April 2019
- News and notes: An Action Packed April
- In the media: Is Wikipedia just another social media site?
- Discussion report: English Wikipedia community's conclusions on talk pages
- Featured content: Anguish, accolades, animals, and art
- Arbitration report: An Active Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Mötley Crüe, Notre-Dame, a black hole, and Bonnie and Clyde
- Technology report: A new special page, and other news
- Gallery: Notre-Dame de Paris burns
- News from the WMF: Can machine learning uncover Wikipedia’s missing “citation needed” tags?
- Recent research: Female scholars underrepresented; whitepaper on Wikidata and libraries; undo patterns reveal editor hierarchy
- From the archives: Portals revisited
The Signpost: 31 May 2019
- From the editors: Picture that
- News and notes: Wikimania and trustee elections
- In the media: Politics, lawsuits and baseball
- Discussion report: Admin abuse leads to mass-desysop proposal on Azerbaijani Wikipedia
- Arbitration report: ArbCom forges ahead
- Technology report: Lots of Bots
- News from the WMF: Wikimedia Foundation petitions the European Court of Human Rights to lift the block of Wikipedia in Turkey
- Essay: Paid editing
- From the archives: FORUM:Should Wikimedia modify its terms of use to require disclosure?
An edit
Sorry, must have had a hack do this, was not me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.255.197.13 (talk) 16:58, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
The June 2019 Signpost is out!
- Discussion report: A constitutional crisis hits English Wikipedia
- News and notes: Mysterious ban, admin resignations, Wikimedia Thailand rising
- In the media: The disinformation age
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Traffic report: Juneteenth, Beauty Revealed, and more nuclear disasters
- Technology report: Actors and Bots
- Special report: Did Fram harass other editors?
- Recent research: What do editors do after being blocked?; the top mathematicians, universities and cancers according to Wikipedia
- From the archives: Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching
- In focus: WikiJournals: A sister project proposal
- Community view: A CEO biography, paid for with taxes
The Signpost: 31 July 2019
- In the media: Politics starts getting rough
- Discussion report: New proposals in aftermath of Fram ban
- Arbitration report: A month of reintegration
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Community view: Video based summaries of Wikipedia articles. How and why?
- News from the WMF: Designing ethically with AI: How Wikimedia can harness machine learning in a responsible and human-centered way
- Recent research: Most influential medical journals; detecting pages to protect
- Special report: Administrator cadre continues to contract
- Traffic report: World cups, presidential candidates, and stranger things
The Signpost: 30 August 2019
- News and notes: Documenting Wikimania and our beginnings
- In focus: Ryan Merkley joins WMF as Chief of Staff
- Discussion report: Meta proposals on partial bans and IP users
- Traffic report: Once upon a time in Greenland with Boris and cornflakes
- News from the WMF: Meet Emna Mizouni, the newly minted 2019 Wikimedian of the Year
- Recent research: Special issue on gender gap and gender bias research
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
The Signpost: 30 September 2019
- From the editors: Where do we go from here?
- Special report: Post-Framgate wrapup
- Traffic report: Varied and intriguing entries, less Luck, and some retreads
- News from the WMF: How the Wikimedia Foundation is making efforts to go green
- Recent research: Wikipedia's role in assessing credibility of news sources; using wikis against procrastination; OpenSym 2019 report
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
The Signpost: 31 October 2019
- In the media: How to use or abuse Wikipedia for fun or profit
- Special report: “Catch and Kill” on Wikipedia: Paid editing and the suppression of material on alleged sexual abuse
- Interview: Carl Miller on Wikipedia Wars
- Community view: Observations from the mainland
- Arbitration report: October actions
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Broadcast
- Recent research: Research at Wikimania 2019: More communication doesn't make editors more productive; Tor users doing good work; harmful content rare on English Wikipedia
- News from the WMF: Welcome to Wikipedia! Here's what we're doing to help you stick around
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
The Signpost: 29 November 2019
- From the editor: Put on your birthday best
- News and notes: How soon for the next million articles?
- In the media: You say you want a revolution
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Arbitration report: Two requests for arbitration cases
- Traffic report: The queen and the princess meet the king and the joker
- Technology report: Reference things, sister things, stranger things
- Gallery: Winter and holidays
- Recent research: Bot census; discussions differ on Spanish and English Wikipedia; how nature's seasons affect pageviews
- Essay: Adminitis
- From the archives: WikiProject Spam, revisited
The Signpost: 27 December 2019
- From the editors: Caught with their hands in the cookie jar, again
- News and notes: What's up (and down) with administrators, articles and languages
- In the media: "The fulfillment of the dream of humanity" or a nightmare of PR whitewashing on behalf of one-percenters?
- Discussion report: December discussions around the wiki
- Arbitration report: Announcement of 2020 Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Queens and aliens, exactly alike, once upon a December
- Technology report: User scripts and more
- Gallery: Holiday wishes
- Recent research: Acoustics and Wikipedia; Wiki Workshop 2019 summary
- From the archives: The 2002 Spanish fork and ads revisited (re-revisited?)
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- WikiProject report: Wikiproject Tree of Life: A Wikiproject report
The Signpost: 27 January 2020
- From the editor: Reaching six million articles is great, but we need a moratorium
- News and notes: Six million articles on the English language Wikipedia
- Special report: The limits of volunteerism and the gatekeepers of Team Encarta
- Arbitration report: Three cases at ArbCom
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2019
- News from the WMF: Capacity Building: Top 5 Themes from Community Conversations
- Community view: Our most important new article since November 1, 2015
- From the archives: A decade of The Signpost, 2005-2015
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan: a wikiProject Report
The Signpost: 1 March 2020
- From the editor: The ball is in your court
- News and notes: Alexa ranking down to 13th worldwide
- Special report: More participation, more conversation, more pageviews
- Discussion report: Do you prefer M or P?
- Arbitration report: Two prominent administrators removed
- Community view: The Incredible Invisible Woman
- In focus: History of The Signpost, 2015–2019
- From the archives: Is Wikipedia for sale?
- Traffic report: February articles, floating in the dark
- Gallery: Feel the love
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Opinion: Wikipedia is another country
- Humour: The Wilhelm scream
The Signpost: 29 March 2020
- From the editors: The bad and the good
- News and notes: 2018 Wikipedian of the year blocked
- WikiProject report: WikiProject COVID-19: A WikiProject Report
- Special report: Wikipedia on COVID-19: what we publish and why it matters
- In the media: Blocked in Iran but still covering the big story
- Discussion report: Rethinking draft space
- Arbitration report: Unfinished business
- In focus: "I have been asked by Jeffrey Epstein …"
- Community view: Wikimedia community responds to COVID-19
- From the archives: Text from Wikipedia good enough for Oxford University Press to claim as own
- Traffic report: The only thing that matters in the world
- Gallery: Visible Women on Wikipedia
- News from the WMF: Amid COVID-19, Wikimedia Foundation offers full pay for reduced hours, mobilizes all staff to work remote, and waives sick time
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
The Signpost: 26 April 2020
- News and notes: Unbiased information from Ukraine's government?
- In the media: Coronavirus, again and again
- Discussion report: Redesigning Wikipedia, bit by bit
- Featured content: Featured content returns
- Arbitration report: Two difficult cases
- Traffic report: Disease the Rhythm of the Night
- Recent research: Trending topics across languages; auto-detecting bias
- Opinion: Trusting Everybody to Work Together
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- In focus: Multilingual Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: The Guild of Copy Editors
The Signpost: 31 May 2020
- From the editor: Meltdown May?
- News and notes: 2019 Picture of the Year, 200 French paid editing accounts blocked, 10 years of Guild Copyediting
- Discussion report: WMF's Universal Code of Conduct
- Featured content: Weathering the storm
- Arbitration report: Board member likely to receive editing restriction
- Traffic report: Come on and slam, and welcome to the jam
- Gallery: Wildlife photos by the book
- News from the WMF: WMF Board announces Community Culture Statement
- Recent research: Automatic detection of covert paid editing; Wiki Workshop 2020
- Community view: Transit routes and mapping during stay-at-home order downtime
- WikiProject report: Revitalizing good articles
- On the bright side: 500,000 articles in the Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia
The Signpost: 28 June 2020
- News and notes: Progress at Wikipedia Library and Wikijournal of Medicine
- Community view: Community open letter on renaming
- Gallery: After the killing of George Floyd
- In the media: Part collaboration and part combat
- Discussion report: Community reacts to WMF rebranding proposals
- Featured content: Sports are returning, with a rainbow
- Arbitration report: Anti-harassment RfC and a checkuser revocation
- Traffic report: The pandemic, alleged murder, a massacre, and other deaths
- News from the WMF: We stand for racial justice
- Recent research: Wikipedia and COVID-19; automated Wikipedia-based fact-checking
- Humour: Cherchez une femme
- On the bright side: For what are you grateful this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Black Lives Matter
The Signpost: 2 August 2020
- Special report: Wikipedia and the End of Open Collaboration?
- COI and paid editing: Some strange people edit Wikipedia for money
- News and notes: Abstract Wikipedia, a hoax, sex symbols, and a new admin
- In the media: Dog days gone bad
- Discussion report: Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy
- Featured content: Remembering Art, Valor, and Freedom
- Traffic report: Now for something completely different
- News from the WMF: New Chinese national security law in Hong Kong could limit the privacy of Wikipedia users
- Obituaries: Hasteur and Brian McNeil
The Signpost: 30 August 2020
- News and notes: The high road and the low road
- In the media: Storytelling large and small
- Featured content: Going for the goal
- Special report: Wikipedia's not so little sister is finding its own way
- Op-Ed: The longest-running hoax
- Traffic report: Heart, soul, umbrellas, and politics
- News from the WMF: Fourteen things we’ve learned by moving Polish Wikimedia conference online
- Recent research: Detecting spam, and pages to protect; non-anonymous editors signal their intelligence with high-quality articles
- Arbitration report: A slow couple of months
- From the archives: Wikipedia for promotional purposes?
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
The Signpost: 1 November 2020
- News and notes: Ban on IPs on ptwiki, paid editing for Tatarstan, IP masking
- In the media: Murder, politics, religion, health and books
- Book review: Review of Wikipedia @ 20
- Discussion report: Proposal to change board composition, In The News dumps Trump story
- Featured content: The "Green Terror" is neither green nor sufficiently terrifying. Worst Hallowe'en ever.
- Traffic report: Jump back, what's that sound?
- Interview: Joseph Reagle and Jackie Koerner
- News from the WMF: Meet the 2020 Wikimedian of the Year
- Recent research: OpenSym 2020: Deletions and gender, masses vs. elites, edit filters
- In focus: The many (reported) deaths of Wikipedia
The Signpost: 29 November 2020
- News and notes: Jimmy Wales "shouldn't be kicked out before he's ready"
- Op-Ed: Re-righting Wikipedia
- Opinion: How billionaires re-write Wikipedia
- Featured content: Frontonia sp. is thankful for delicious cyanobacteria
- Traffic report: 007 with Borat, the Queen, and an election
- News from Wiki Education: An assignment that changed a life: Kasey Baker
- GLAM plus: West Coast New Zealand's Wikipedian at Large
- Wikicup report: Lee Vilenski wins the 2020 WikiCup
- Recent research: Wikipedia's Shoah coverage succeeds where libraries fail
- Essay: Writing about women
The Signpost: 28 December 2020
- Arbitration report: 2020 election results
- Featured content: Very nearly ringing in the New Year with "Blank Space" – but we got there in time.
- Traffic report: 2020 wraps up
- Recent research: Predicting the next move in Wikipedia discussions
- Essay: Subjective importance
- Gallery: Angels in the architecture
- Humour: 'Twas the Night Before Wikimas
The Signpost: 31 January 2021
- News and notes: 1,000,000,000 edits, board elections, virtual Wikimania 2021
- Special report: Wiki reporting on the United States insurrection
- In focus: From Anarchy to Wikiality, Glaring Bias to Good Cop: Press Coverage of Wikipedia's First Two Decades
- Technology report: The people who built Wikipedia, technically
- Videos and podcasts: Celebrating 20 years
- News from the WMF: Wikipedia celebrates 20 years of free, trusted information for the world
- Recent research: Students still have a better opinion of Wikipedia than teachers
- Humour: Dr. Seuss's Guide to Wikipedia
- Featured content: New Year, same Featured Content report!
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2020
- Obituary: Flyer22 Frozen
The Signpost: 28 February 2021
- News and notes: Maher stepping down
- Disinformation report: A "billionaire battle" on Wikipedia: Sex, lies, and video
- In the media: Corporate influence at OSM, Fox watching the hen house
- News from the WMF: Who tells your story on Wikipedia
- Featured content: A Love of Knowledge, for Valentine's Day
- Traffic report: Does it almost feel like you've been here before?
- Gallery: What is Black history and culture?
The Signpost: 28 March 2021
- News and notes: A future with a for-profit subsidiary?
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Monuments
- In the media: Wikimedia LLC and disinformation in Japan
- News from the WMF: Project Rewrite: Tell the missing stories of women on Wikipedia and beyond
- Recent research: 10%-30% of Wikipedia’s contributors have subject-matter expertise
- From the archives: Google isn't responsible for Wikipedia's mistakes
- Obituary: Yoninah
- From the editor: What else can we say?
- Arbitration report: Open letter to the Board of Trustees
- Traffic report: Wanda, Meghan, Liz, Phil and Zack
The Signpost: 25 April 2021
- From the editor: A change is gonna come
- Disinformation report: Paid editing by a former head of state's business enterprise
- In the media: Fernando, governance, and rugby
- Opinion: The (Universal) Code of Conduct
- Op-Ed: A Little Fun Goes A Long Way
- Changing the world: The reach of protest images on Wikipedia
- Recent research: Quality of aquatic and anatomical articles
- Traffic report: The verdict is guilty, guilty, guilty
- News from Wiki Education: Encouraging professional physicists to engage in outreach on Wikipedia
The Signpost: 25 April 2021
- From the editor: A change is gonna come
- Disinformation report: Paid editing by a former head of state's business enterprise
- In the media: Fernando, governance, and rugby
- Opinion: The (Universal) Code of Conduct
- Op-Ed: A Little Fun Goes A Long Way
- Changing the world: The reach of protest images on Wikipedia
- Recent research: Quality of aquatic and anatomical articles
- Traffic report: The verdict is guilty, guilty, guilty
- News from Wiki Education: Encouraging professional physicists to engage in outreach on Wikipedia
The Signpost: 27 June 2021
- News and notes: Elections, Wikimania, masking and more
- In the media: Boris and Joe, reliability, love, and money
- Disinformation report: Croatian Wikipedia: capture and release
- Recent research: Feminist critique of Wikipedia's epistemology, Black Americans vastly underrepresented among editors, Wiki Workshop report
- Traffic report: So no one told you life was gonna be this way
- News from the WMF: Searching for Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: WikiProject on open proxies interview
- Forum: Is WMF fundraising abusive?
- Discussion report: Reliability of WikiLeaks discussed
- Obituary: SarahSV
The Signpost: 25 July 2021
- News and notes: Wikimania and a million other news stories
- Special report: Hardball in Hong Kong
- In the media: Larry is at it again
- Board of Trustees candidates: See the candidates
- Traffic report: Football, tennis and marveling at Loki
- News from the WMF: Uncapping our growth potential – interview with James Baldwin, Finance and Administration Department
- Humour: A little verse
The Signpost: 29 August 2021
- News and notes: Enough time left to vote! IP ban
- In the media: Vive la différence!
- Wikimedians of the year: Seven Wikimedians of the year
- Gallery: Our community in 20 graphs
- News from Wiki Education: Changing the face of Wikipedia
- Recent research: IP editors, inclusiveness and empathy, cyclones, and world heritage
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Days of the Year Interview
- Traffic report: Olympics, movies, and Afghanistan
- Community view: Making Olympic history on Wikipedia
The Signpost: 26 September 2021
- News and notes: New CEO, new board members, China bans
- In the media: The future of Wikipedia
- Op-Ed: I've been desysopped
- Disinformation report: Paid promotional paragraphs in German parliamentary pages
- Discussion report: Editors discuss Wikipedia's vetting process for administrators
- Recent research: Wikipedia images for machine learning; Experiment justifies Wikipedia's high search rankings
- Community view: Is writing Wikipedia like making a quilt?
- Traffic report: Kanye, Emma Raducanu and 9/11
- News from Diff: Welcome to the first grantees of the Knowledge Equity Fund
- WikiProject report: The Random and the Beautiful
The Signpost: 31 October 2021
- From the editor: Different stories, same place
- News and notes: The sockpuppet who ran for adminship and almost succeeded
- Discussion report: Editors brainstorm and propose changes to the Requests for adminship process
- Recent research: Welcome messages fail to improve newbie retention
- Community view: Reflections on the Chinese Wikipedia
- Traffic report: James Bond and the Giant Squid Game
- Technology report: Wikimedia Toolhub, winners of the Coolest Tool Award, and more
- Serendipity: How Wikipedia helped create a Serbian stamp
- Book review: Wikipedia and the Representation of Reality
- WikiProject report: Redirection
- Humour: A very Wiki crossword