User talk:Enormous Efreet

Enormous Efreet, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Enormous Efreet! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Enormous Efreet (talk · contribs) has been paid by Berozgaar Professors.

Speedy deletion nomination of Berozgaar Professors

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Berozgaar Professors, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CUPIDICAE💕 20:15, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 20:47, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Enormous Efreet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Greetings! My all illegitimate actions revolves around Berozgaar Professors and nothing else. I just want the reason why it is being constantly deleted while it shouldn't be. I've backed up it with citations and references, and they aren't written in the form of an advertisement. If you think the language can be improved, why not improve it?? on WikiProject companies it clearly states that "No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted", then why aren't you guys following your own policies? Enormous Efreet (talk) 20:51, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It looks like an advertisement to me, and I don't think the subject is notable. The guidance at WikiProject companies is not policy. It is on you as a paid editor to understand our policies and to abide by them. That also means recognizing that not all subjects can be written about. There are some jobs paid editors should not take, or at least not take without a wisely crafted contract. Since you seem unwilling to understand the rules, you will remain blocked until such a time as when you can explain why the article is inappropriate, stop creating socks, and explain how you are going to be a productive editor that isn't wasting our time. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 21:03, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disappointment

Every other editor says that the page is an advertisement. If you feel so, improve the page, why delete it altogether. Not being a paid editor, but being the owner of the company it really hurts seeing that some random video game from two decades ago has a page and its citations and references is just a dude that played it once and gave it a review. I understand Wikipedia has its guidelines and I respect that, what disappoints me is getting your page deleted every time you make an effort to improve it. The last time I created the page I had no press coverage, so I halted a little while to gather PR. Now that I've brought new references, I still get CSD tagged for G11 and A7. It pains seeing when something you create has potential but it goes unnoticed while the most absurd of things remain in the mainspace. I didn't create a sockpuppet to spread vandalism, every contribution of mine other than that of Berozgaar Professors has been constructive. I had to create this account because I had no other way to contest the deletions. Some 6 months ago while on an AfD discussion, I was told by a kind admin that my article was written from a neutral view and that if I bring more sources, my article will be kept. That's what I did in there 6 months; I gathered PR. Yet here we are; Blocked till infinity. Great CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓. Enormous Efreet (talk) 21:34, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Enormous Efreet PR is not reliable coverage. Our processes exist exactly so companies can't game the real world to get puffed up coverage of themselves and then a Wikipedia page. We do not exist so you can promote yourself. Contact an advertising agency if you want to be known. You'll get better bang for your buck. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 21:54, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓, that seems the only viable option now. I appreciate your efforts and apologize for the inconveniences. Enormous Efreet (talk) 21:57, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]