Jump to content

User talk:Eno Lirpa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
A cup of warm tea to welcome you!

Hello, Eno Lirpa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to continue. Some useful pages to visit are:

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. We're so glad you're here! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:57, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Norfolk case

[edit]

FYI. Cheers. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See also

[edit]

The {{See also}} tag does not go at the end of sections. I've reverted your edit on Communist Party of the Soviet Union. The template didn't belong at the end of the section and doesn't belong in the article. Adding sentences about Lenin enrollment might be ok, but not a "random link" that talks about a two year period in an article the summarizes 60 years of history. Bgwhite (talk) 21:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (List of schools in Cambodia) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating List of schools in Cambodia, Eno Lirpa!

Wikipedia editor Prof tpms just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Add a few more schools, please

To reply, leave a comment on Prof tpms's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A Barnstar for You!

[edit]
The Barnstar of Diligence
For near-singlehandedly clearing out all of the Orphaned articles from Octiober 2008, I award you this Barnstar, and hereby dub thee Orphan-Breaker. Keep up the great work! Gimubrc (talk) 16:30, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Gimubrc: Thank you. (only 129,000 to go!) Eno Lirpa (talk) 10:18, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

[edit]
Thank you for creating a wonderfully complete list of Cambodian schools. Prof TPMS (talk) 10:10, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks but it is by no means complete yet. Eno Lirpa (talk) 10:17, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion at Wyeth.

[edit]

FYI: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Edit_warring_and_disruption_by_Andy_Dingley, where I tangentially mentioned your reversion of Jytdog (which he has now restored). Andy Dingley (talk) 00:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re WP:NCRIC

[edit]

No problem. Having made a single first-class cricket or List A cricket appearance makes the notability threshold. Note that the "1 match" notability also applies to lots of other sports, including but not limited to, football, baseball and American football. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:15, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited International Federation for Family Development, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Morgan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Essential factors model
added links pointing to Environment, Production, Incident and Equipment
LBO valuation model
added a link pointing to Liabilities

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply] 

The DAB links were deliberate because the context could actually be many of the things on the DAB pages, not just one of them.  Eno Lirpa (talk) 11:36, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:39, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doc James. I was relying on the references in the link target article, Vitaxin. I have now moved a relevant reference over to Colorectal cancer too. I hope that is okay? Eno Lirpa (talk) 12:38, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
We are looking for review articles. I will look. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:10, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


beg to differ

[edit]

by your recent edits obviously you go for non consultative grabs and go edits - your moving 2004 icons to the main wa article is a bit brash.

Western australia has a separate centenary article, and a 150th - it doesnt take much if you review them, that the 2004 icons article does not have to stand by your definition. try a bit of consultation perhaps ? JarrahTree 13:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[1] that edit goes against the fact that there is already Centenary of Western Australia and WAY 79, as well as other articles that can be interdependent about heritage in western australia...JarrahTree 13:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

JarrahTree. Yes it was bold. And you reverted it and did a better job in the end. Thanks. I see deorphaning one way or the other as a means of getting the wikicommunity's attention to articles and it has worked a treat this time. Thanks again. It was a considered action, knowing the policy behind boldness.

No I am not a gab and go editor. Only two such in my recent edits does not define a trend, and the other one earned me a thank you. Rest assured I do not do such very often.

Cheers Eno Lirpa (talk) 11:09, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply - JarrahTree 11:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding "See Also" section for Radio Adelaide Article Page

[edit]

Hello! Thanks for contributing to the Radio Adelaide Wikipedia page. I have removed your "See Also" section due to its irrelevance as such a section does not fit well with the rest of the article. I have created content with a hyperlink and a reference for The Wire in the opening paragraph of the article near the top. I hope this would suffice for you. Cheers!(KittyLover (talk) 04:38, 5 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

KittyLover. I see deorphaning one way or the other as a means of getting the wikicommunity's attention to articles and it has worked a treat again. You did a better job than I on this one. Thanks. Eno Lirpa (talk) 12:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Society of Guardians wiki page

[edit]

Thank you very much Eno for your intention to tidy up the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_of_the_Guardians wiki page. I am very happy that someone else is now looking after this; And more than pleased to not longer have this concern. If you have any query, please don't hesitate to contact me. Warmly Lenny (aka Jean de Cabalis) Facebook https://www.facebook.com/BrotherTeyth Again thank you for attending this matter and resolving its issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.109.208.118 (talk) 02:36, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I am not looking after it. Indeed I may never look at it again. It is an isolated article with many issues, and may well attract negative attention eventually from the wikipedia community. It needs a lot work to bring it up to standard. Eno Lirpa (talk) 12:38, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eno, can you please reconsider and look after this page (or find someone whom is willing). Any one who is a member has conflict of interest, so cannot do it. And I clearly do not have the skills nor the ability to do this to the standard required by Wiki. Also the page is not up to date as you can tell by http://www.guardians-sanctuary.org/ various pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.109.211.18 (talk) 22:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but it is not my area of interest, at least at this time. You can edit if you have a CoI although is it highly discouraged. The key thing for you to do is declare your CoI on the article's talk page, and, critically, make sure any edits and article text and statements you do and make are referenced back to sources independent of you and the organisation, see WP:RS. You also must make sure your edits are balanced and have a neutral point of view, see WP:NPOV, that is you cannot just pick out only prefect and good things about your organisation if there are also things that could be perceived by others as negative, embarrassing, or controversial. Eno Lirpa (talk) 12:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your work at the List of villages in Bangladesh

[edit]

Just wanted to tell you I love the way you formatted that article, to the point that I've used it as a model for both List of villages in The Gambia and List of places in Afghanistan. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:49, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. But it was by no means original, and it has been modified since by others. Eno Lirpa (talk) 11:01, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ah well, it was the first I saw of it, so I just assumed. Anyway, very cool. And also, I see we have similar de-orphaning goals :) Glad to see someone else slogging around in the crusty depths. It's amazing, sometimes, what manages to avoid getting noticed and deleted for so many years. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:25, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again PMC.

On this subject you might also be interested in the formatting of List of multilingual bands and artists and List of historians, in particular the multiple alphabetic lists in the one article.

Regards. Eno Lirpa (talk) 14:22, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, those are really slick! I love that it doesn't make the ToC massive and unwieldy. That's my biggest problem with some lists. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:27, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I will take the credit for these! Eno Lirpa (talk) 11:03, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
PMC. I have set these up as templates at {{alpha sect}}. Please let me know if there are any issues. Eno Lirpa (talk) 13:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your new article "List of country groupings"

[edit]

Hi, I noticed you created List of country groupings. I created List of business region acronyms a while back. Why do you think there needs to be another article about basically the same thing? Bonomont (talk) 23:13, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did realise they potentially overlap somewhat, but I do see them as different things. You will note I have mutually see alsoed them. I am also not sure about the title, List of business region acronyms. Many of them are not regions as all. And some are not related specifically to commerce as such. It might be better called List of international acronyms as it stands ? And I think such is needed. I was thinking of moving it accordingly. And which would include many that are not related to countries as such at all. Also I am working to move !my article away from acronyms to the full name as the primary reference point. Eno Lirpa (talk) 11:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I get where you're coming from, but I think your list is a bit of a mixed bag. Some of the entries are first and foremost organizations, not country-groups, like AU, OECD, OPEC, the UN, and the EU. For those, we already have an article, List of intergovernmental organizations. So you should remove these. Others are first and foremost trade blocs, like ECO and Mercosur, for which we already have the category Category:Trade blocs, which I suggest you also remove. Bonomont (talk) 13:53, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm. I am also seeing your point. The whole area is a bit of a mish mash I think. I would like to come back to you with a proposal to collaborate on a tidy up, but it might take me a couple of days to get my thoughts together and then written down. Eno Lirpa (talk) 13:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, looking forward to it! :-) Bonomont (talk) 11:04, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mary Gabrielse

[edit]

Hello, Eno Lirpa. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mary Gabrielse, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Mary Gabrielse to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Eddie Blick (talk) 23:42, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie Blick The article might be unsavable. There is material out there but it appears to be either off-line and-or behind paywalls. I did not really create the article content. I just split it out from Johannes Gabrielse. The content looks as though it should be notable. I will see what I can do. Eno Lirpa (talk) 13:40, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Ortalis (ulidiid)) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Ortalis (ulidiid), Eno Lirpa!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating this. Can you please add your sources?

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 15:51, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but all I did was deorphan all of them into what was an existing redlink. Each article already has its own references, so I do not see the need to duplicate what would then be redundant material. Eno Lirpa (talk) 13:35, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
All articles need to have sources, and the WP:BURDEN is on you to add them. I'm disappointed you've continued to create unreferenced articles -
please stop. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:44, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prod

[edit]

Yes it seems fake or an error so will revert my deprod, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 15:25, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of English writers

[edit]

Thorough work! Thank you. Best, Brian Bmcln1 (talk) 10:20, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bmcln1. Thank you for the feedback. Eno Lirpa (talk) 11:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of lakes in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern

[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Eno Lirpa, thanks for creating List of lakes in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your source(s).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 18:29, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boleyn. Done. When deorphaning and creating lists of linked to articles I normally rely on the linked to article being already sourced, as it should be anyway, and hence re-adding the same reference for the same item seems to me to be redundant and cluttering. Regards. Eno Lirpa (talk) 22:38, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
PS For example, surely you are not suggesting that everyone of these has its own duplicated reference? Eno Lirpa (talk) 22:41, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Eno Lirpa, thanks for responding to my message. If you look at WP:SOURCELIST: Lists, whether they are stand-alone lists (also called list articles) or embedded lists, are encyclopedic content just as paragraph-only articles or sections are. Therefore, all individual items on the list must follow Wikipedia's content policies: the core content policies of Verifiability (through good sources in the item's one or more references), No original research, and Neutral point of view, plus the other content policies as well. Although the format of a list might require less detail per topic, Wikipedia policies and procedures apply equally to both a list of similar things as well as to any related article to which an individual thing on the list might be linked. Having the reference there would not feel redundant or cluttering to a reader or editor who is just looking at the list without examining all articles. The List of English writers is a very different list article to this one. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 06:14, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I am aware of what the guideline says. I think it is telling that it seems you agree the some lists will not benefit from sources or would at least be very difficult to source in a practical way. So the question is then where and how is the line drawn. I do realise that the best place for a discussion such as this should be in a much wider forum, but none the less I think there is an issue here? Eno Lirpa (talk) 09:02, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see an issue - the list you linked to is an irregular one, and is more like a strange kind of dab linking to several lists, rather than a list in itself. I think the basic issue is that information on WP - whether in a list article or any other sort of article - needs to be verified and clearly so. Boleyn (talk) 13:25, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I did actually mean the whole list of (lists of) English writers. It is really one list, just split over four pages due to its size. None of these pages have any references and there would need to be many many hundreds per page. Eno Lirpa (talk) 13:38, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'd suggest that material needs referencing in any list of pages (the lists of English writers are such) if it does not appear on the page that constitutes an entry. Oh dear, that doesn't sound very clear, does it? So Helen Zimmern doesn't need referencing in List of English writers (R-Z) because her dates and her description appear on her own page. Bmcln1 (talk) 16:04, 28 October 2017 (UTC)0[reply]
I think you and I are saying exactly the same thing, but Boleyn is saying no. Yes the guideline is clear but that does not mean it is correct, in terms of feasibility and practicality. I would think that if a reader is at all interested in a list entry they are going to go to that article. I very much doubt that a reader, at all interested in the subject matter, would only want to verify why a list entry is there, without going to the entry. (But, this is not really the place to have this discussion if we want anything to come of it. And, I must admit, it would not be one of my priorities for my wikitime.) Eno Lirpa (talk) 00:30, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SOURCELIST is clear and fits perfectly with WP:V - all articles need their information to be referenced, not somewhere else on Wikipedia, but in the article the reader is looking at. Boleyn (talk) 18:27, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of lakes in Ludwigslust-Parchim

[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Eno Lirpa, thanks for creating List of lakes in Ludwigslust-Parchim!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references to this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 14:18, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Eno Lirpa (talk) 22:40, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Odisha cricketers for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Odisha cricketers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Odisha cricketers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rhadow (talk) 14:03, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

Hi, Eno Lirpa. Can you please stop creating lists without sources, and please add your source(s) to List of mines in Peru. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:51, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boleyn. Done. I will try not to if there are article references to be had. Eno Lirpa (talk) 13:16, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Hiatus (fly)) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Hiatus (fly), Eno Lirpa!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Redirected per WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA. Generally when a genus has only one species and no common name, the article is under the genus, but in cases like this where the genus has a disambiguation term, it's more natural to simply use the binomial, as in Calculus bicolor. Cheers

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 17:18, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - noted. Eno Lirpa (talk) 21:43, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (List of Nepalese Politicians) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating List of Nepalese Politicians, Eno Lirpa!

Wikipedia editor Diptanshu Das just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add references.

 Done a while ago. Eno Lirpa (talk) 14:20, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To reply, leave a comment on Diptanshu Das's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Diptanshu 💬 11:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lists

[edit]

Hi there, Thank you for your kind suggestion. :) I think we do need to start working on club lists given that our project is being destroyed. Here and now is probably not the time, we need to let things blow over first. I'm not very happy at all right now that this is happening and that thirteen years of work is going down the drain.

First-class players' lists by team would be useful - although I'm not quite sure if that's true now that people are going to be super-keen to remove redlinks. I think we need to let things settle first and let the deletionists have their way first. I'll get back to you when this blows over. Bobo. 13:12, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indian cricket lists

[edit]

Hi, for some unknown reason I missed your previous message on my talk page. Re completing the lists started by you, I am providing CricketArchive links below.

The links have complete lists of cricketers grouped by the first letter of their last names. The lists are in the format of P. Adams 1984/85-1985/86 (the years indicate the span of the player's career with that team). Copy-paste the entire list to Notepad, and replace delimiters such as tabs and spaces with "* [[" and "]], " to get the list in Wikipedia list format of * [[P. Adams]], 1984/85–1985/86. The only thing you'll need to type is the player's first name. I followed these simple steps to create long lists such as List of Maharashtra cricketers.

CricketArchive is now behind a paywall, but there are browser extensions/tricks which you can use to breach the paywall and access the site. Dee03 14:46, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What are they? How is this legitimate? Eno Lirpa (talk) 14:06, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of deputy members of the Storting

[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Eno Lirpa, thanks for creating List of deputy members of the Storting!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your source(s).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 18:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Boleyn. I know we have disagreed on this before. Do you really want 817 references added to this one page, when they are already on each linked article page ? It will turn this 50kB page into a 100kB page without adding any information that is not already easily and directly accessible in this wikipedia ? Eno Lirpa (talk) 12:57, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are lots of other options, for instance they are likely to all be listed together in a source elsewhere, or at least some of them. As it stands, it's just WP:OR and WP:Wikipedia is not a reliable source (assuming you got the list just from entries to a category or through Wikipedia). Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 14:05, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some references. Eno Lirpa (talk) 14:43, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Still having a problem with Wikipedia search?

[edit]

I've written a script to enhance search results, including a workaround for the annoying intitle bug. In addition to that built-in (default) feature (which I call "TrueMatch"), the script also provides some menu items for doing various things (like sort the search results, strip out details, add * [[]] list item formatting for easy copy/paste, and more).

It's not ready for general announcement yet, but I thought you might want to give it a test drive.

If so, let me know on its talk page how well it works for you, any problems you come across, ways to improve it, and so on.

The script is SearchSuite.js, and its discussion area is at the bottom of that talk page. Hope to see you there.

Have fun,    The Transhumanist 17:26, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of populated places in North Sumatra

[edit]
Notice

The article List of populated places in North Sumatra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary list - also extremely incomplete.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Juxlos (talk) 22:25, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Alpha sect

[edit]

Template:Alpha sect has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 21:52, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

[edit]

Hello Eno Lirpa! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 17:04, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Patience is a virtue but it is not always paying

[edit]

Hello, if you are still here I responded to your thread in Talk:List of mountains of Switzerland. It went off my radar and on top of that I cannot even give you a satisfying answer, I feel sorry for that. Next time do not hesitate to put a link on my talk page. Zach (Talk) 17:36, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tks - replied there. Eno Lirpa (talk) 13:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eno_Lirpa&oldid=1142989319"