User talk:Zacharie Grossen

This is Zacharie Grossen's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Cima della Bondasca

Hi Zacharie, On Swisstopo the height for this peak is given as 3267m not 3289m, which you changed it to. Could you shed any light on this? Thanks, Ericoides (talk) 08:20, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I saw your changes. Thanks, Ericoides (talk) 08:57, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While I'm here, I'd appreciate your input – as a regular contributor to mountain articles – to this discussion. Ericoides (talk) 12:29, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Zacharie Grossen! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Category:Highest points of Swiss cantons

Category:Highest points of Swiss cantons, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. __meco (talk) 08:57, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bristen

Hey Zacharie

Sorry, I was a know it all... you seem to be right stating that Bristen belongs to the Glarus Alps. I was obviously influenced by my "patriotism" (too strong a word, but couldn't find another one suiting better)... It seems to me though that these definition of different parts of the alps is a little bit spongy. Using political names for these is a bit unfortunate... As I am not in the position to change that I will have to leave it this way... ;-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serafina marteen (talk • contribs) 19:37, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your hint. You're right of course! I changed it just now. Obviously I still have to learn a lot about wikipedia and how to apply my research knowledge correctly... Serafina marteen (talk) 16:50, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

With a height of x

Can I just make the small point that the construction "With a height of 3,328 metres above sea level, X is the highest peak in Y" that appears in many of your articles sounds very much like a direct translation from the German (?) and doesn't sound right in English. We would write "X (3,228 metres) is the highest peak in Y". The "with" phrase sounds very strange! Thanks, Ericoides (talk) 07:36, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. I think "reaching a height of" would be better, although I think that simpler constructions are usually superior, zB, "The Hornenhorn is 3,000 m high and is the highest mountain in Hornland", rather than "Reaching a height of 3,000 m, the Hornenhorn is the highest mountain in Hornland". But that is just my personal preference. Incidentally, isn't "mit eine Hōhe von 3.000 m" a German construction? I thought it was, hence my thinking that yours was a direct translation!) Ericoides (talk) 12:10, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Swiss space systems S3 in french/german

Hello Zacharie, yesterday I've tried begining to translate your article about S3 to french and german. They were both not accepted by the admin's. It's a pitty for swiss people to have to read english. They should have the option to choose their native language. In particular if it's the language where such a company is located. Perhaps you have a idea how we can handle this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bpf72 (talk • contribs) 09:48, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Sorry I have no idea of what are the inclusion criteria of French and German wiki. But probably the best thing you can do is to start an article about Payerne Airport (there are no French nor German versions of it) and include there all relevant information. Then you could do a redirect. IMHO that would be better than nothing at all. ZachG (Talk) 19:23, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Barrhorn

A tag has been placed on Barrhorn, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

The page is not informative and does not describe the mountain at all.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Aaron Araujo 03:33, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Waldisee may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| area = 0.052 km²<ref>Area retrieved from [[Google Earth]] (July 20139</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:19, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of mountains of Switzerland accessible by public transport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Birg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alps list

Thanks for doing the redirect! Don't know why I kept delaying that; perhaps I was afraid being drawn into completing it down to 2000 m, which would be a lot of work again. Afasmit (talk) 21:14, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jazzi Peak listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jazzi Peak. Since you had some involvement with the Jazzi Peak redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Laun chba ller 13:58, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of highest paved roads in Europe

You might be interested in reading the comments about some of your contributions (and yourself) that I made on the talk page of that article. Aguarda (talk) 16:23, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Schwarzhorn v Brienzer Rothorn

Sorry, my bad. You are correct, the Schwarzhorn is the taller. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 17:36, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! ZachG (Talk) 17:39, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rhaetian Railway

This revert is correct. The confusion arises because in continental Europe a comma is used whereas in UK we use a decimal point. Mjroots (talk) 23:46, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ankogel height

Hello Zacharie and Happy New Year, A user asked me to help with a new page on the Ankogel but I notice that the Summitpost height of 3,246 m is not the same height as on your table of Alpine peaks nor the height found elsewhere. Do you have an RS with the correct height? Thanks, Ericoides (talk) 10:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that link, just what I was looking for. Regards, Ericoides (talk) 11:59, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creux du Van

Wikipedia is not a travel guide, content such as how to get to places is not encyclopedic, and does not belong here--Jac16888 ^Talk 15:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure but I read carefully WP:NOTGUIDE and it doesn't say anything about what you mentioned (how to get to a place). In mountain articles you normally find a description of the normal and other routes to the summit. ZachG (Talk) 16:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That list is not exclusive, it is saying that content you would find in a travel guide may not belong here. A section on "how to get to us" is clearly something you would find in a brochure or guide (or indeed on the tourist website for that location, [1]), it is not something you should have in an encyclopedia article--Jac16888 ^Talk 16:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was mainly a style issue, but I think it's ok now. I'll see if I can improve the article further. ZachG (Talk) 16:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, you might want to use the template{{travel guide}} next time you see something similar. I think it's a better option than simply deleting the content, especially when it's just a writing style issue that can be fixed easily. ZachG (Talk) 20:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Nice work on all that Crete Seche stuff. :-)Anythingyouwant (talk) 08:37, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In Crête Sèche (Mont Blanc massif), see the footnote. Is the "Col" the same one that goes to Gele?Anythingyouwant (talk) 08:39, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you appreciate. Yes I noticed there is another "Col de Crête Sèche" in the Mont Blanc massif (the term is quite common I think). Totally different place, I will add a link to the Swisstopo map, so you can check for yourself. ZachG (Talk) 08:45, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks.Anythingyouwant (talk) 08:58, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Hello Zacharie, I'd like to use your picture "Avalanche_Vanil_Noir" in a flyer for a non-profit opera. There is lots of volunteer work and not much money. If I understand you correctly, I can use the picture, but I have to acknowledge you as the photographer. I would put "Foto Zacharie Grossen" on the flyer. Is this ok with you?. Thank you, 85.7.129.3 (talk) 21:14, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Absolutely, like all the content at Wikimedia Commons you are free to use it, even commercially. You can check this newspaper article for an example. I'm always delighted to see my pictures used outside Wikipedia... ZachG (Talk) 15:54, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! If you like, I will show you the result. But I don't know, how this can be done. 85.6.241.225 (talk) 23:14, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Matterhorn

Good afternoon!

I noticed that you'd started a conversation regarding improvement of Matterhorn article and hope you can help me :) I'm trying to enhance the quality of the Matterhorn article in Russian Wiki and I have one quick question. Do you know some good sources (web, books, magazines, etc.) where I can find detailed description of Matterhorn geography: faces, ridges, glaciers, nearby places, etc.? There is good section in en-wiki but there is no sourses for that part. Thank you in advance for your answer in any case! Have a good rest of the day! :) --KpokeJlJla (talk) 16:56, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and greetings from Pakistan!

I just came back from K2 base camp, hence the late answer. In the article infobox you will find a link to a detailed topo map (1347 matterhorn). If you can wait one more week i will give you other sources. Zacharie — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.36.215.251 (talk) 02:56, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For sure I can! Thank you! --KpokeJlJla (talk) 08:19, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here we are:

Base maps: Topographic map, Journey through time maps, Primary surfaces

Elevation: Slopes over 30°

Geology: Geol. Atlas of Switzerland, Main lithological groups, Last glacial max, Origin of rocks, Tectonic map 500

Soils: Potential permafrost distribution

Hydrology: 2km2 sub catchment areas, 40km2 sub catchment areas

NB: Make sure your browser is compatible with map.geo.admin.ch. Most maps are clickable but with Google Chrome it doesn't work...

Hope this will be helpful to you. It is only one website, but there is lot there. There are also some interesting books (though mostly for history) available online: Tour of the Matterhorn: A Trekking Guide (only partially available), The Matterhorn, The Ascent of the Matterhorn and The Valley of Zermatt and the Matterhorn: A Guide. ZachG (Talk) 15:28, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning! Thank you so much! Actually I knew about map.geo.admin.ch but I couldn't even imagine that there are so many maps. For sure it will help me. Thank you again and have a nice time!! Regards, --KpokeJlJla (talk) 05:39, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bavarian mountains

Hi Zacharie, thank you for your support with the Mountains of the Alps project. I just saw your comment on Mountains of Bavaria and we do need to add the Alpine ones. But as you may know, not all Bavarian mountains are in the Alps, e.g. those in the Bavarian Forest, Bavarian Rhön, Fichtelgebirge and so on. They're all part of Germany's Central Uplands. Cheers. --Bermicourt (talk) 16:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I actually meant "Alpine mountains" (fixed). I scanned the category:Mountains of Bavaria and I found more than 400 not in the category:Mountains of the Alps, with about 2/3 (based on a quick sampling) in the Alps. Maybe you can have a look. ZachG (Talk) 16:36, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WPMotA

Hi Zach, Thanks for the message. I've had a look at the thread but I don't feel I have anything constructive to add. Apologies! It's good some people are keeping the project alive. Ericoides (talk) 17:54, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article assessments

Hi Zacharie - I noticed you've been romping through, adding gradings to the Alps pages, which is brilliant. The chart on the Project page is really starting to get populated and is making some sense now. I've a question for you -are you at the same time also making any assessment of the quality of the articles, or just adding the alps-importance status?

I'm not very familiar with making these quality assessments, so have held off contributing. However, if you are doing a quality assessment, could you take a look at the Aiguille de Bionnassay article which I've been working hard to upgrade this month. It's gone from a one sentence stub for the last five or more years, to hopefully something a lot more useful. Even if I could, I'm sure I shouldn't be assessing my own work, anyway. Cheers. Parkywiki (talk) 02:07, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm mainly rating the importance. But I assessed your article anyway, thanks for the improvement. ZachG (Talk) 12:52, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of volcanoes in Europe

The article List of volcanoes in Europe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't serve a purpose. There is already "List of volcanoes in (insert European country)". This is just a very incomplete list.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EstrellaSuecia (talk) 14:53, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Zacharie Grossen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

M. Grossen, vos belles photos sur des régions Suisses sur wikipedia semblent "un brin remodelées", tout a l'air trop vrai... Bravo pour ce travail — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:120B:2C75:DDE0:DCFC:B0DD:3A5C:2104 (talk) 20:32, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merci. Je suis content de voir que mes photos sont appréciées. Bonnes fêtes à vous. ZachG (Talk) 16:14, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

De-orphaning your articles

Hi,

I'm going through the big February 2009 orphan backlog and I've noticed a fair few of them are articles you've created on mountain-related topics like passes in the Alps. Could you de-orphan your articles please?

Thanks,

DrStrauss talk 12:15, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I indeed started a lot of pages about mountains from 2008 onwards, many of them of regional/local interest and not included in lists. Let me see if I can de-orphan them in an effective manner. ZachG (Talk) 13:18, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Zacharie Grossen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Zacharie Grossen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ASTRID (reactor)

The article ASTRID (reactor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

this project was cancelled and there is no interesting information about it to report, as such it makes no sense to have an article on it

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ysangkok (talk) 18:13, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of references to the Matterhorn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franz Weber. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lysjoch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gressoney.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:40, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming of cantons

Please be sure to update the templates on the bottoms of the page as well . Thank you. Starzoner (talk) 13:29, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure I'll do. Thanks for the advice. Zach (Talk) 14:55, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Villars Maître Chocolatier SA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alpine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kambly (disambiguation)

Please learn how to create disambiguations. I am not sure if this one is correct, there is no Oscar Kambly page.Xx236 (talk) 09:15, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I only made it because interwiki links were impossible to correct (I first linked Kambly to the de-wiki dab) and I forgot to complete the page. Feel free to delete it. Zach (Talk) 13:50, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I found another Kambly: Johann Melchior Kambly. So I put link the dab page. As always, feel free to modify it. Zach (Talk) 14:07, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People associated with the Matterhorn has been nominated for renaming

Category:People associated with the Matterhorn has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:13, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Col de Chermotane for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Col de Chermotane is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Col de Chermotane until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

{{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 05:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mont Blanc

Hi. I'm sure you didn't mean to say this, did you? Nick Moyes (talk) 22:04, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I'm working there right now. :-) Zach (Talk) 22:11, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The barrier placed by the French has been removed. The Act of 1860 is official for both countries. NATO maps are based on IGM. Thank for your help in editing the article.82.51.125.166 (talk) 10:02, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All French attempts to order orders have failed and now there is an investigation by the court of Aosta. You can read it in the references. The article risks to slide in fantasy.82.51.125.166 (talk) 08:21, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That is why citations are needed, or statements clearly marked as 'needing citations' if they do not. To me (as a UK citizen) the French position seems ridiculous. But both sides will undoubtedly have an official position on this. I would certainly wish to avoid a long list of citations being added for no good reason (especially if they're all from one nation), as seems now to be happening with the last sentence of the 'Ownership' section. Ten at the last count! Nick Moyes (talk) 09:59, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, the French position has no solid foundation. I have posted clear articles from which it is clear that the activity of the French mayors on Italian territory is nothing. It seems that they want to lengthen a ridiculous story.82.51.125.166 (talk) 11:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I'm going to rewrite that part with the sources you provided. Quite clearly, you won't be able to provide a quote (even from a non-neutral source) for "under the control of the...". Please also note that removing maintenance tags without addressing them, like you did, may lead to a block. Zach (Talk) 15:28, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wait until you find consensus before writing. There is too much fantasy in that article. Marshal Viglione of the Guardia di Finanza is keeping the area and the border case under control as reported in the latest source.The words of Marshal Viglione are clear and also the position of the prosecutor of Aosta who is investigating. According to official treaties and official NATO maps, the border line is the watershed.All this is reported in the quotes. The rest is chauvinism.82.51.125.166 (talk) 08:27, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of references to the Matterhorn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of references to the Matterhorn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of references to the Matterhorn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:04, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Date Format for Sources

I've started a discussion on the list of chocolate bar brands about date format for sources. Any input is welcomed. It is at Talk:List of chocolate bar brands/Archive 1#Date Format for Sources. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 23:36, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agriculture in Switzerland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moratorium.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Swiss customs" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Swiss customs has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 5 § Customs redirects until a consensus is reached. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 03:53, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion - Chocolate content

There is a discussion at Talk:List of chocolate bar brands#Chocolate content. This was never brought up in the inclusion discussion. It's about the percentage of chocolate in a bar to be considered for inclusion in the list. Your thoughts and comments would be appreciated. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 01:52, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Biodiversity Monitoring Switzerland

Dear Mr Grossen, the link to Pro Specie Rara is very misleading, as the Biodiversity Monitoring Switzerland BDM in its current form no longer analyses genetic diversity and in particular the diversity of farm animals and plants. The focus is on the diversity of species and habitats at various scales. The Z1 indicator "Change in the number of all domesticated livestock breeds and agricultural plant varieties recognized in Switzerland" was discontinued in 2014 due to cost-cutting measures (see https://www.biodiversitymonitoring.ch/index.php/de/archiv). Please respect the removal of the link! Thank you! Milkwort (talk) 08:50, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why was pršut split from prosciutto?

This split was apparently made without any explanation on the talk page. Your edit summary says another dry-cured ham, not called "prosciutto", which is false: what is called "pršut" in South Slavic languages is invariably referred to as "prosciutto" in English, and therefore it belongs in the article for prosciutto per WP:COMMONNAME.

South Slavic "pršut" is simply a variant of prosciutto and it does not warrant its own article, just like we don't have four separate articles for sofrito, sofregit, soffritto and refogado. Un assiolo (talk) 16:40, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. If you read the pršut and Njeguški pršut articles, then you will not see any reference to "prosciutto" other than "it is similar to it", hence the split. If those specialties are actually called "prosciutto" in English (in WP:RS), then I think it should be first clearly stated in their introduction (like: "Njeguški pršut is a type of prosciutto..."). And then there will be no problem with having them in the Prosciutto article. So, feel free to merge again the pages, but not without serious references. Zach (Talk) 14:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey :)

So happy to see another member of chocolate cabal here. I'm looking at getting types of chocolate up to featured list and good topic, by getting all the subpages to good article. Would love to have your help ~ I also hope you enjoy the history of chocolate page that just got to good article, and chocolate in savory cooking that is likely about to also be promoted. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 11:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will certainly enjoy reading all your work (especially chocolate in savoury cooking). Unfortunately I'm not really active this year, since I've been busy with other activities, including ...making chocolate. Very fun and time consuming activity, to say the least! Happy editing! Zach (Talk) 12:37, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]