User talk:Elevatorsarefun

Welcome!

Hello, Elevatorsarefun, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Bisbis (talk) 20:47, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello, I'm Mtpaley. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to King of Prussia (mall)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Mtpaley (talk) 20:48, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Walt Whitman Shops, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. →‎ GS →‎ ☎ → 06:57, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Train Master, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

→‎ GS →‎ ☎ → 06:35, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Belvidere and Delaware River Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Phillipsburg

Central Railroad of New Jersey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bullet train

Lois Comes Out of Her Shell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Peter

Tuckahoe station (New Jersey) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tuckahoe

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:21, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Great Northeast Plaza

Hello, Elevatorsarefun,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you:-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Great Northeast Plaza, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept, either in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. At any case, please consider improving the page to address the issues raised or it may be deleted later anyway.

If you have any questions, leave a comment here and ping me.

Meatsgains^(talk) 02:53, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Please recreate it though for me. I worked hard on it. Elevatorsarefun (talk) 15:51, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Great Northeast Plaza

Hello Elevatorsarefun,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Great Northeast Plaza for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meatsgains^(talk) 02:54, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Goodman Co.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Goodman Co. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kb03 (talk) 18:57, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

==railroad stations-- Thereis no point in adding articles without references. They will almost surely be deleted. If you do not have references immediatel yat hand for the very first edit, write the article in Draft space, whichwill give you 6 months to do it

Hatfield, PA station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hatfield, PA station, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:46, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please recreate the page!!!! Elevatorsarefun (talk) 03:49, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sellersville station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sellersville station, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:47, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider recreation of the page!!!!!! Elevatorsarefun (talk) 03:49, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moscow station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Moscow station, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nick Moyes (talk) 00:32, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please Recreate it for me. I don't know how to create a new page. Elevatorsarefun (talk) 03:50, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wall Street (train) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Wall Street (train), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nick Moyes (talk) 00:33, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cresco station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cresco station, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nick Moyes (talk) 00:35, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider recreating this page. I worked very hard on it. Elevatorsarefun (talk) 03:50, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gouldsboro station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gouldsboro station, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nick Moyes (talk) 00:36, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The National Park website was the most reliable source I could get. Elevatorsarefun (talk) 02:19, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please take your time

Hello. I feel terrible in having to move a number of very recently pages from the mainspace back into draft form. I'm sure you are disappointed and a bit frustrated too. You clearly know your stuff - but that's not sufficient when creating an encyclopaedia page. Put simply, please spend a bit of time adding references (citations) before you move on to create the next one or two line page. Whilst each one probably has the makings of an interesting article in the fullness of time, they simply aren't good enough unless a reader can Verify that the subject actually exists. To help them do that, you must include references to support the 'facts' you are adding. See this guide on adding citations. If you don't do this- all your new pages will simply be moved into draft form when you can either work on them there, or, of course, you can just allow them to be deleted in due course if you don't bother to improve them. When you're ready to resubmit them, you can click the big blue 'Submit your draft for review' button, and an experienced editor will ensure it meets our requirements of notability and verifiability before moving it back into the encyclopaedia. Regards from the UK, 00:45, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

I added citations to each of them. Elevatorsarefun (talk) 02:18, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cresco station (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by David.moreno72 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cresco station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cresco station, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 00:55, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elevatorsarefun! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 00:55, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gouldsboro station (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by David.moreno72 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gouldsboro station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gouldsboro station, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 00:55, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moscow station (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by David.moreno72 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moscow station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Moscow station, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 00:55, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The National Park website was the most reliable source I could get. After all, it is the National Park Service. Elevatorsarefun (talk) 02:20, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Boyertown, Pennsylvania. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 01:43, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Elevatorsarefun (talk) 16:08, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wall Street (train) (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has no references. Notability cannot be established without references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wall Street (train) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wall Street (train), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cresco station (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Whispering were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cresco station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cresco station, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispe ring 13:06, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The National Park website was the most reliable source I could get. After all, it's the National Park Service. Elevatorsarefun (talk) 02:17, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gouldsboro station (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Gouldsboro station instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gouldsboro station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gouldsboro station, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 20:54, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please create this page for me. The station is currently in use a railroad museum Elevatorsarefun (talk) 16:06, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Salamanca (city), New York, you may be blocked from editing. Nick Moyes (talk) 22:39, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your creation/recreation of poor quality articles is verging on disruptive behaviour

Hello. A few days ago (see here) I asked you to slow down when you create articles. I apologised to you for converting a number of your uncited micro-stubs to drafts. I expected you to improve these and resubmit them for review. Instead, you totally circumvented this and simply created a duplicate page, added one single source to meet WP:V, and failed to add any category and failed to communicate with me over my concerns about your poor editing. (e.g.: Moscow station versus Draft:Moscow station; Gouldsboro station versus Draft:Gouldsboro station). This is not the correct way to behave here.

You currently have a sock-puppet investigation open against you (which I will pass by) but I am concerned that you are WP:NOTHERE to legitimately improve this encyclopaedia, and simply think you can do what you like. That couldn't be further from the truth. So, please, DO NOT not create any more uncited pages; DO NOT create any more duplicate copies of pages that have previously been draftified, but edit and improve them; and please address concerns raised about the qaulity of your editing. Cite all your sources; add categories; not making minor disruptive edits (as at Salamanca (city), New York), etc. Should you fail to address these shortcomings, I'm afraid you risk being taken to WP:ANI, or facing a block for disruptive editing. I genuinely think that would be a shame. So, work on the drafts, improve them, and submit them for review, rather than create new copies from scratch. If you don't understand my concerns, just reply and explain what you don't understand. I will gladly expand upon my concerns about your editing in the hope that in future you will edit in a better and more constructive manner. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 23:05, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Carbondale Station (Pennsylvania) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Carbondale Station (Pennsylvania), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispe ring 17:39, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of The Train Master (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. GAB^gab 18:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I want to be unblocked. Elevatorsarefun (talk) 02:15, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please recreate the pages I created.

Please recreate the pages I created. I worked very hard on them. And I added a citation to each one of them. Elevatorsarefun (talk) 02:11, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:20, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]