User talk:Mtpaley
|
Mtpaley, it's nice to have you on Wikipedia!
- ~Kylu (u|t) 04:36, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Please consider adding LynxInAntarctica.jpg to commons
[edit]Hi. Would you please consider adding LynxInAntarctica.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons and the category Westland Lynx there? That way all the wikipedia-projects can benefit from your photo and more photos of this subject can be found at the same place. Kind regards Hebster (talk) 16:45, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
GR 11
[edit]Hello Matt- I got your e-mail and tried to reply, but it bounced back. Let me know if you want the error details. Regarding the GR 11 question, take a look here on my talk page: User_talk:Eric#GR11_in_France, and note the separate sections for France and Spain on the GR footpath article. -Eric talk 14:29, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Disability on the internet
[edit]Hey Mtpaley, I am conducting social science research that is funded by the ESRC and I wonder whether you would like to contribute by answering a few simple questions? I am interested in the role of the Internet in dialogue surrounding disability, and I see that you have contributed towards the article on Down's syndrome. I feel that you will be able to make a valuable contribution towards this research, the results of which are to be published in a peer-reviewed journal. The questions should be relatively straightforward and will be sent in stages, by email. Feel free to contact me (either on- or off-the-record) should you have any questions, queries or comments about the 'e-interview' and/or broader research process. My contact details can be found on my Wikipedia userpage. Faithfully, Nicholas (talk) 14:02, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I was reading your usertalk and found this. I am the one wanting the change on the ignition timing page, and I assumed you were just being insensitive. I apologize for that, after seeing this, but I still support the edits I made. Thanks, Mike — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.28.251.208 (talk) 23:18, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
No I was not 'just being insensitive' just practical but I still support the reversions I made. You should not try to remove all references to a word that has acquired a negative connotation. There certainly are cases where such references should be removed but where a word has a perfectly valid and currently used meaning it should be documented as it currently is. I should also admit to feeling a little guilty about your comments above because my contributions to the 'Down's syndrome' page were very dull and not worthy of the original request from Nicholas Cimini. Mtpaley (talk) 23:32, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:51, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
August 2011
[edit]
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Shire (Middle-earth). While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Carl Sixsmith (talk) 05:18, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Mobile Phones SAR List for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mobile Phones SAR List is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobile Phones SAR List until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mtpaley (talk) 21:24, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit] Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:52, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Gottlieb Priber will live on!
[edit]Hey, I feel like it is notable, and so I added a reference where all the information in the article comes from and I gave it some extra context etc. Buenos dias Dudanotak (talk) 04:35, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Please don't add stub tags to articles like this which already have subject-specific stub templates, it just wastes other editors' time. And please also note that {{stub}} goes at the end of an article, not the top - see WP:ORDER. Thanks. PamD 08:49, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Spoilers
[edit]Reason I changed the Iwan Rheon article was to avoid any spoilers that people who aren't familiar with the source material may find. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.22.144 (talk) 21:09, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Spoiler - policy is spoilers stay and readers beware. Mtpaley (talk) 21:29, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Deletion review for Mobile Phones SAR List
[edit]An editor has asked for a deletion review of Mobile Phones SAR List. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:50, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
File:TwinOtterInAntarctica.jpg
[edit]Hi, Your image File:TwinOtterInAntarctica.jpg has been nominated for deletion as it does not have a license template. I cannot add it (and my images are from an earlier era at Halley - all slides). If you are happy, will you edit it on Commons. Any problem, reply here. Thanks. Finavon (talk) 22:28, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Let it die. It has been orphaned for ages and it is not a especially good scan of the slide. Mtpaley (talk) 23:18, 4 September 2013 (UTC):
- Thanks but a shame. The same now applies to File:PublicTMB.jpg
- PublicTMB is a live page so hopefully I have applied a valid license. Can you confirm that this is OK. 19:04, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Disruption by Kahastok
[edit]
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. (See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Kahastok is disrupting a GA attempt) Martinvl (talk) 00:00, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Formalising the status of WP:FALKLANDSUNITS
[edit]The page WP:FALKLANDSUNITS has not yet been formally adopted as an offical guideline. I have created a proposal to regularise the position. Please feel free to comment Wikipedia talk:WikiProject South America/Falkland Islands work group/Units#Proposal for acceptance as a formal guideline. If the proposal is accepted, then the page will indeed be part of Wikipedia policy, otherwise it will be tagged a "failed proposal". Either way the uncertainty that has dogged this page for the last three years will be resolved. This message is being sent to every editor of good standing who has contributed here or here. Martinvl (talk) 05:47, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:29, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Why did you reinstate the vandalism on L.H.O.O.Q.?
[edit]It's a strange piece of vandalism that got introduced for the first time just a few days ago. It's obviously wrong, as anybody can see. So why did you reinstate it? Did you even think about it for half a second? -- 64.131.244.143 (talk) 02:18, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Inert gas fire suppression (May 30)
[edit]
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Inert gas fire suppression.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Mtpaley,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
|
This edit was dead anyway. I had found Gaseous_fire_suppression and used that instead. Mtpaley (talk) 18:03, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 00:18, 25 July 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
JDDJS (talk) 00:18, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
Macrophge
[edit]Hellow. The problem is that I am not good at english. Not single macroohage contain that amount but total body macrophages. I have the book but i dont have internet just surf wikipedia freely without any charges. Regards--1339861mzb (talk) 07:50, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hi brother. I tell you that im not good at english but i read this information and i want to tell it for all people through wikipedia because i think it is agood information but because i am not that god at english may i but it in the false partition of the article. You are an english man? Aren't you So you can search about it and may have a source on internet rathar than read it in the book. Regards--1339861mzb (talk) 15:17, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of International reactions to the 2013 North Korean nuclear test for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International reactions to the 2013 North Korean nuclear test is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International reactions to the 2013 North Korean nuclear test until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) may the force be with you 21:24, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Younge8
[edit]Hi Matt- Just wanted to let you know that my post on the above user's talkpage was not auto-generated. I placed the template there (via Twinkle) when I noticed that he'd blanked your userpage. Also wanted to make sure you knew that you posted to him on his userpage, not his talkpage, in case that was not your intention. Eric talk 02:40, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Rollback granted
[edit]
Hi Mtpaley. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 05:13, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Congrats
[edit]Congratulations on becoming a rollback. :D The Ninja5 Empire (Talk) 09:39, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
PL/M External Link Submission
[edit]Hi, Today I added an External Link to the PL/M page on Wikipedia. It was for PL/M to C Translator Tools & Services. However, you rejected the link as advertising. This link is informational and is in exactly the same category as the following PL/M External Links that Wikipedia has always permitted:
• Development Assistant for PL/M (DA-PL/M) – Commercial PL/M IDE from RistanCASE GmbH • PLM2C - PL/M to C Translator – Commercial product from Alternative Solutions • XTRAN Demonstration: Translating PL/M to C – Commercial product from Pennington Systems, Inc.
Please review our link and add it back to the External Links page. Thanks.
Avi Nudelman ```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avinudelman (talk • contribs) 20:16, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- If it was just on the PL/M page then the link might well have survived but it was on about 17 articles which makes it look far more like a advert than a reference . There is also the conflict of interest aspect where you are "strongly discouraged" from contributing to articles where you might not have a neutral point of view. The example edits you compared it would probably have had the same problem if they were applied to multiple pages. Just for completion I did not actually delete anything, I just tagged your page to say that these edits require consideration. Mtpaley (talk) 21:09, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Pair production discussion
[edit]Re: Pair production: There is no frame of reference where the electron and positron are back to back. Such a frame would have no net momentum. But the incoming photon must have momentum - it cannot ever be found to be stationary. There are many frames where the electron and positron have angles between them almost 180 degrees down to zero degrees.
Anyway the frame of reference of the article is the one where the photon is measured in the laboratory, where the nucleus is not moving very much. In this frame the electron and positron are found to be moving almost in the same direction.
Chris P.S. I have a PhD in Particle Physics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CKBowdery (talk • contribs) 00:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
My PhD in (non particle) Physics is almost certainly much older and rustier than yours but surely there is a frame of reference where the e+ and e- are back to back, it is the FOR where this is true. I agree that the originating photon must have momentum which must be conserved by the resulting y and y- +catalyzing other so it comes down to a frame of reference issue. In the frame of the gammas the e and e- combined have zero net momentum.
Just to be clear this conversation is in no way a edit war - just a enjoyable discussion on my(rusty) physics. Mtpaley (talk) 00:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Mtpaley. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
A cookie for you! (For sending a request for page protection on "The Lion Guard".)
[edit]
Jiklo1569 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Mtpaley. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
jacko blacko
[edit]my edits were justified and helped spice his page up.
Lizzkavanagh (talk) 01:21, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Spice is not required. Accuracy is. Mtpaley (talk) 01:23, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
I appreciate what you're doin my guy but he IS the Kung Fu Panda and should be recognized as such. thanks xoxox.
Lizzkavanagh (talk) 01:33, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Re: Bro-country
[edit]Don't worry. On the majority of my edits, I have provided sources. --Salemleo89 (talk) 21:51, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: The above user is a sock of Jack Gaines (talk · contribs)/User:Superpassword, who has vandalized many other song articles over the years and has a vendetta against Alan Jackson. Most of their content is patently false, and is "sourced" either to personal blogs or to an also vandalized setlist.fm list (which is not reliable anyway). Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:52, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Not particularly helpful
[edit]Thanks for your work. [1] – it's not particularly helpful to add warnings after a level four warning has been given, especially after a block, and especially granting recognition for simple vandalism (see WP:DENY). Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 23:27, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Mtpaley. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
March 2019
[edit]Thank you for reverting my edits to Kathleen Kennedy (producer). As you mentioned, my edit appeared to be rather nonconstructive, and I apologies for any inconvenience my disruptive edit may have caused.
Yours truly,
ur mum lmao — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigdixie (talk • contribs) 22:28, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Apology accepted - we all make mistakes sometimes. I wish you a future of well considered edits in the future. Mtpaley (talk) 22:34, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you
[edit]
|
Barnstar of Existence |
| For existing (you can't contribute if you don't exist). - Ɔ\ꓕ ⱯƎꓶZ 22:50, 1 April 2019 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Aug 2020
[edit]Hello Matt,
I am confused by your deletion of my edits, which I just found out about in my notes today. I am new to Wiki and was under the impression that it was important to keep that subject pages up to date with the latest developments in a particular field. I am interested in Gerald Bull and the HARP Project and ballistic launch. Recently I found an article about a company that was continuing his launch methodology. As a fan of this technology I thought others who share my interest might want to know about it too. Thank you (talk) BrigidBurgan (talk) 23:50, 28 August 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrigidBurgan (talk • contribs)
Halley Bay
[edit]Hi Mtpaley - many thanks for your comments about this article. I have amended it accordingly and also changed the image for what I assume is one of yours. Cheers, Maias (talk) 00:25, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Pending changes reviewer granted
[edit]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
Anarchyte (talk • work) 15:03, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Serial Peripheral Interface#SPI NAND
[edit]Serial Peripheral Interface#SPI NAND needs a better explanation. .... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 23:58, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
- I think it actually needs deleting. It is just a mention of a specific memory type that can use SPI and tells the reader nothing about SPI itself. Why tell me about this? Mtpaley (talk) 14:04, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Experience
[edit]Degree in Physics PhD in Physics Specifically micrometeorite impacts on satellites in low Earth orbit. Did 2 winters in Antarctica as a physicist studying the aurora. 20+ years in industry designing control systems for bioreactors Mtpaley (talk) 01:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)