User talk:The Train Master

November 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Spaceballs has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Spaceballs was changed by The Train Master (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952243 on 2016-11-17T23:25:08+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:25, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Spaceballs, you may be blocked from editing. - Mlpearc (open channel) 23:08, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Spaceballs. - Mlpearc (open channel) 21:17, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Spaceballs has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Spaceballs was changed by The Train Master (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.927552 on 2017-01-11T12:04:49+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:04, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Spaceballs has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Spaceballs was changed by The Train Master (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953462 on 2017-01-14T22:29:45+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:29, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shoppingtown Mall, you may be blocked from editing. Stop adding "xxx is an officially dead mall" to shopping mall articles; there is no such thing as an "officially dead mall" and we don't put things in Wikipedia without a WP:reliable source. JustinTime55 (talk) 13:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (film).
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (film) was changed by The Train Master (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873838 on 2017-02-10T01:26:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:26, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Boscov's has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Boscov's was changed by The Train Master (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870724 on 2017-02-20T20:08:26+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:08, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Morris Arboretum while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. It looks a bit like you might also be editing from 216.162.93.130 - can you please log in, or not, or something? It's just confusing having you swapping, if it is indeed you. Thank you. DBaK (talk) 20:56, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, The Train Master. You have new messages at Talk:A Close Shave.
Message added 07:35, 29 March 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please read what I have written at the Talk page. Thanks. DBaK (talk) 07:35, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Finding Nemo has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Finding Nemo was changed by The Train Master (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.868549 on 2017-04-12T20:33:49+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Stevietheman. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Boscov's, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not add unsourced puffery to articles. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 12:45, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Stevietheman. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Boscov's, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please stop adding the "5-star" puffery to this article. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 22:48, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at ICarly. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MPFitz1968 (talk) 01:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Centre Valley (SEPTA station)

Hello The Train Master,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Centre Valley (SEPTA station) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meatsgains (talk) 23:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sellersville, Pennsylvania, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:00, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are risking a block

The Train Master (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Hello The Train Master. You've been reported for long-term vandalism here at WP:AIV. Can you explain why you should not be blocked? People do question your edits from time to time (as I see on this page) and you never seem to respond. You have never left a comment on a talk page. Some of your edits have triggered the abuse filter and this is usually not a good sign. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:11, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reading station names

Why do you keep changing {{stnd|Reading|SEPTA}} to {{stnd|Reading Franklin Street|SEPTA}} and Outer Station to Reading Outer Station? You are only replacing one redirect with another. Useddenim (talk) 18:54, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To distinguish between the two. The Train Master (talk) 23:35, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hartranft station

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Hartranft station requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PK T(alk) 00:50, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Delray Beach Seaboard Air Line Railroad Station

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Delray Beach Seaboard Air Line Railroad Station requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 19:04, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, The Train Master. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hellertown station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hellertown station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hellertown station until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. South Nashua (talk) 17:50, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Flemington station

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Flemington station requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:52, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kneedler station

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Kneedler station requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:52, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Flemington station

The article Flemington station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. South Nashua (talk) 19:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Market–Frankford Line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spring Garden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:35, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Front Street station

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Front Street station requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 22:49, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your page creations

Please do not create short pages about existing train stations without first looking for reliable sources about the subjects. Virtually all of your page creations have been very short and unsourced. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 22:53, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Canal station

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Canal station requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:56, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Union Pacific Railroad Depot (Milford, Utah)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Union Pacific Railroad Depot (Milford, Utah) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Melcous (talk) 13:45, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:The Train Master continuously editing without sources. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 20:58, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:48, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond here if you'd like to be unblocked. Just continuing to edit as you have been will result in longer blocks. Wikipedia is a collaborative project and you need to communicate with other editors if they have concerns about your editing. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:52, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:30, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you need to communicate with us. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:31, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced articles

I have moved an article you created to Draft:Centre Valley (SEPTA station) - it is not ready for mainspace. Please add refernces, work on it and resubmit via WP:AFC. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:33, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Same for Perkasie. Boleyn (talk) 18:35, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

When can I edit again? The Train Master (talk) 16:51, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not until you address these old issues. See:

Useddenim (talk) 00:17, 12 January 2018 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wyomissing station

The article Wyomissing station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Septrillion (talk) 22:30, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Centre Valley (SEPTA station)

A tag has been placed on Centre Valley (SEPTA station) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Septrillion (talk) 22:35, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Perkasie station

A tag has been placed on Perkasie station requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Septrillion (talk) 23:48, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have declined the speed deletion of this page, but it still includes no real indication of notability. Do you intend to try to improve the article? DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 00:50, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Perkasie station

The article Perkasie station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Septrillion (talk) 01:02, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wyomissing station

The article Wyomissing station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dough4872 01:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wyomissing station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wyomissing station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wyomissing station until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dough4872 15:01, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User talk:The Train Master, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. @Anachronist: time to revoke talk page access. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 20:12, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Septrillion: Why are you pinging me? I didn't block this account, and as far as I can tell, your warning here is the only one Train Master has received about proper use of a user talk page while blocked. For the most part, Train Master's edits over the past few days have simply been responses to the comments of others; I'd say those edits are OK. The only non-legitimate one was posting a request to include an edit to another article.

To The Train Master: we don't edit by proxy here. You need to get yourself unblocked first improvements to other articles. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:17, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page access

I have removed your additions to this talk page. Please be aware that while you are blocked, your talk page access will be revoked if you continue to use it for any other purpose than appealing your block. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:27, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wyomissing Station

This page had an infobox, can you please bring it back? The Train Master (talk) 00:07, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Railway Stations in Pennsylvania

I would like to be unblocked so that I may add railroad stations to the lists. The Train Master (talk) 00:10, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Of course you'd like to be unblocked. The problem is that you haven't given any reasoning why you should be. Read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks and follow the instructions. In your appeal, you need to explain your understanding of why you were blocked (hint, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Train Master/Archive) and convince the reviewing administrator that the behavior that led to your block will not be repeated. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:18, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have given a reason. The Train Master (talk) 00:19, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have not followed the advice given to you. You have not shown any evidence that you have read or understood the information linked in my comment directly above. You have not appealed your block (if you had read the guide to appealing blocks, which you didn't, you would know how). Until you do those things, and demonstrate an understanding of how we work here and what we expect from you, no one will unblock you. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:30, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Train Master, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

→‎ GS →‎ ☎ → 06:35, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]