User talk:ElenaEt

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I need to know how can I approve the translation of this draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Donna_Wills_Scheeder which the original contribution was in spanish https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donna_Wills_Scheeder

The ElenaEt (talk) 13:48, 22 April 2020 (UTC) ElenaEt (talk) 13:48, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ElenaEt, all you need to do is add {{subst:submit}} to the very top of the article. It will then be added in to the queue for review - - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 14:01, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rich_Smith DO you mean in the draft? before the name of the person wich this entry it´s about? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElenaEt (talk • contribs) 14:26, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your attempt to notify Rich_Smith did not work because you did not sign your post with ~~~~ or use one of the other signing methods.

The {{subst:submit}} can go practically anywhere in the draft, but usually is placed at the very top or at the very bottom. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:44, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I guess this is all moot now, the article has been accepted and placed in article space already. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:48, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

user:jmcgnh Yes, it is. Thanks for your reply, it´s very helpfull for futures entries ElenaEt (talk) 22:09, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, regarding your sandbox draft for Ellen Tise, do you have any connection to the subject? Your username hints that it could be the case; if so, please read the following 'official' notice and make any necessary decalrations. If it is not the case please respond to this message accordingly. Don't forget to add {{ping|Eagleash}} to the start of your message and sign it with four tildes (~~~~) — all in the same single edit or it will not work. Thank you.

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, ElenaEt. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

A conflict of interest is a manageable issue if handled correctly and is not a reflection upon individual editors but is just one of the ways in which Wikipedia tries to ensure neutrality. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 17:34, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Eagleash: I don´t have any kind of conflict of interest with the Ellen Tise people or associations mencioned in Ellen Tise´s article ElenaEt (talk) 17:51, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks... I shall move the page to draftspace, which is the preferred location for AfC submissions. You can continue to develop it there and it will be reviewed in due course; (this may take several weeks as there is pretty heavy backlog). Eagleash (talk) 17:59, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ellen Tise in Milán 2009.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Ellen Tise in Milán 2009.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Whpq (talk) 17:43, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ellen Tise has been accepted

Ellen Tise, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zanimum (talk) 02:21, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Kay Raseroka, from its old location at User:ElenaEt/sandbox/Kay Raseroka. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 06:56, 24 May 2020 (UTC) (talk) Thanks!!ElenaEt (talk) 06:59, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christine Deschamps has been accepted

Christine Deschamps, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zeromonk (talk) 08:44, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Laurie Michelle Bridges

The article Laurie Michelle Bridges has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:NSCHOLAR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:53, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Laurie Michelle Bridges for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laurie Michelle Bridges is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurie Michelle Bridges until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:46, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]