User talk:EditGodGuru45

May 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at R. K. Singh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Why did you remove all the tags? Bishonen | tålk 16:57, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There was no need to remove all my edits. I made some good edits though some were bad. I know R. K. Singh personally and better than you. Sorry for removing the tags but rest were all good edits. Please restore my version and add the tags EditGodGuru45 (talk) 17:03, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And one more thing to add i have no intention of constituting vandalism. If you go through the page it is mentioned as career and political career so i did it as bureaucrat Career and Politicial career there is nothing wrong in that and i added a tag to the word government of India what's and how is it wrong?? Please tell me. EditGodGuru45 (talk) 17:29, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, EditGodGuru45. These were the problems with your edits, in order:

First edit: You removed three informative tags which are useful to the reader. Why? You also linked "Government of India", which was already linked in the same paragraph. Please only link a term the first time it appears.
Second edit: You removed "of State" in "Minister of State". Why?
Third edit: You changed the header "Career" to "Bureaucrat Career". That was a good change; I'll give you that. (Although Wikipedia uses sentence case for headers, i. e. it should be "Bureaucrat career". I've changed it.)
Fourth edit: You removed tags about problems with the article, without fixing those problems. Why? And why, now that I've reverted you, have you again removed them? Are you sure you want to edit war about tags against an experienced user?

I understand that your edits were all well meant, and I'm sure you'll be an asset to the encyclopedia, mr God Guru! Though I'm still worried about your removal of tags, especially that you have removed them again after I restored them, without ever explaining your reason (I have asked you twice). Bishonen | tålk 19:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC).[reply]

First edit:- I said I'm sorry for removing tags actually (disambiguation) is shown at the bottom of the page in suggestion that's why i removed them. And the other tag was of r.k singh patel so anyone can easily differentiate between rk singh and rk singh patel that's why i removed that tag. Second edit- He is not a minister neither a minister of state rather he is a minister of state independent charge so mos i/c is also a minister. Third edit- Thank You for correcting me. Fourth edit- I read the whole article and found them true I also did a research about the facts that i didnt know and found them also true. That's why I decided to remove the multiple issues tag. If there are any issues please enlighten me. And Sir, By no means i want to fight you or engage in an edit war with you. Please tell me where am i wrong. Thank You. EditGodGuru45 (talk) 00:47, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Buddy, I have added thebest tag according to the position he is in. You must check it EditGodGuru45 (talk) 02:56, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. An edit that you recently made to Bhojpur district, India seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:13, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Yamaguchi先生 You should have only restored the multiple issues link if u think I made a mistake. There was no need to revert the edit. I know this place better than you bcoz i know this place personally. My work is to make articles better. And i am sure you know nothing about this place. I am re-editing some of the things which are correct and adding some links to the places of the names mentioned Thank you EditGodGuru45 (talk) 06:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yamaguchi先生 EditGodGuru45 (talk) 06:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Arrah, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 15:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EditGodGuru45, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi EditGodGuru45! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Keelan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Chirag Paswan. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Nitesh003 (talk) 14:53, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Lok Janshakti Party, you may be blocked from editing. Nitesh003 (talk) 03:05, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Bajrang Dal. -- DaxServer (talk) 09:45, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, as you wish. I have again made some little changes you can see them. They are no major changes and are just made to make the article look good EditGodGuru45 (talk) 06:21, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Bajrang Dal, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- DaxServer (talk) 12:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:14, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How can you block me without any warning. The admin who was keeping a watch on my work served me with the notice that i will be blocked If I do something again and i dignity do it and even the last edit that i made i told the concerned admin to review it and tell me where am i wrong so why did you block me without any warning from your end. Please tell me. Bbb23 EditGodGuru45 (talk) 16:45, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bbb23 EditGodGuru45 (talk) 16:45, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EditingGodguru. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. --Blablubbs (talk) 08:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--Blablubbs (talk) 08:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]