User talk:Ebyabe/Archive 31

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ebyabe. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 25

←

Archive 29

→

Ian Harding

Please keep an eye on this one, if you wouldn't mind. It's currently on semi-protection, so I've taken the opportunity to clean it up, but we still have some autoconfirmed editors that don't get that Wikipedia ≠ IMDb... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Certainly! It's been on my watchlist for a while. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Border Town ‖ 16:07, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Lucas Black

11 April 2017 Sean Boswell, played by Lucas Black, will have a role in The Fate Of The Furious. http://comicbook.com/popculturenow/2016/12/12/the-fate-of-the-furious-features-return-of-tokyo-drift-character/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aat000 (talk • contribs) 07:00, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for providing a reference so the information can be included. This has been done. Interestingly, there is no mention of him being in the movie on IMDB. That's not a reliable source, but it is interesting. It's possible that since that article got published he has been taken out of the movie. Until then, it's included. Cheers and happy editing! --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Health and Welfare ‖ 09:17, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Ok thanks for understanding me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aat000 (talk • contribs) 14:24, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

I also have another interesting article.

http://movieweb.com/fast-8-fate-of-furious-tokyo-drift-character-sean-boswell/

http://www.cinemablend.com/news/1599662/a-familiar-fast--furious-face-definitely-will-be-back-for-the-fate-of-the-furious

http://www.ibtimes.com.au/fate-furious-theory-lucas-black-replace-paul-walker-1536844

Btw, please sign your posts. Thank you. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - State of the Union ‖ 17:05, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Jude Law

About your reverting of my editing on the Jude Law page. The current Personal life section contains this statement: "In 2015, Rafferty was named one of GQ's 50 best dressed British men." So, who's Lafferty? And why was he named one of the best dressed British men? What's that got to do with Law's personal life? The statement feels entirely random because the page is missing the crucial information about this "Lafferty" person. My editing provided a simple answer by indicating the name of the previously mentioned, unnamed son (and for the sake of equality, the other two offspring mentioned in the same sentence), and the reasons why he would ever appear on GQ. It wasn't extraneous information at all. On the contrary, the only other option is to remove that part entirely. Either that, or explain it the way I did. Kumagoro-42 12:39, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Correction made. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Opposites Attract ‖ 17:39, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Many thanks

Hi E. Thanks for getting the rest of these. Much appreciated and it gave me chance to stop by and say I hope you are well and enjoying the new DW eps that started last night. Have a great week and cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 19:16, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

You are quite welcome. :) I think I actually like Class better than the new Who episode. All the callbacks on who were great tho. And what a hoot to see these guys again. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 06:21, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

It sure was!! I bought the UK DVD of Class and have watched all of it. I won't mention any spoilers but I will say that I think that when Katherine Kelly and/or her agent read the scripts they must have thought "This is great because I get to steal every scene that I am in" :-) MarnetteD|Talk 17:30, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

I've watched reactions on YouTube to all the Class episodes, since I didn't know when they'd be available here. The part when they all turn their backs and what happens after, I was crying. Not really, but you know what I mean. :) --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - General Health ‖ 17:42, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

It is emotional. I am so old school (not Coal Hill though :-)) that I try to avoid all social media and even WikiP articles so that I can be as surprised as possible when watching our fave TV shows and films. Even with having watched the fan reactions I think you will enjoy the rest of Class. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 17:51, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Lolzersaurus!

Doesn't get much more painfully insecure than that[1] XD The appalling Wiki troll (talk) 14:23, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

I am unfamiliar with that species, and I am something of a dinosaur expert. Oh, and pot, please to meet kettle. I hope you have a happy life together. Have a pleasant day. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Repel All Boarders ‖ 17:50, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Bret Hart

There is nothing to discuss on the Bret Hart talk page. This is clearly a disruptive editor attempting to twist policy to ruin an article and remove 10 years of work.★Trekker (talk) 06:29, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

I was just being diplomatic. I hope this latest sock gets blocked soon. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 06:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

MGM Home Entertainment

As far as I can tell, this edit was blanking from the Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. It was reverted by an IP sock of Nate Speed (talk · contribs). I reverted the blanking by the first vandal, but you restored it because Nate Speed also reverted it. Am I missing something? If you think the content is incorrect, I could try to source it, but I honestly don't like working on film studio/distributor articles all that much despite being one of the most active admins in this topic. The only reason I edit them is because they attract so many socks and long-term vandals, and it took me a while to figure out this 2001:8003 IP was also one of them. I've had already range blocked it several times without realizing it was an LTA. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:28, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

See the rant two sections above. It's the stuff that the IP wants added. It all is a bit confusing. I may be wrong on this, I'll trust your better judgement. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Border Town ‖ 05:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw the rant. It's typical for Nate Speed, and I've blocked him several times. If he bothers you again, you can leave me a message on my talk page, and I'll block his latest sock. As far as this content goes, Nate Speed wants it in the article. The Teenage Fairytales Dropout vandal wants it out of the article. I'm curious why you choose to support the edits of the first vandal over those of Nate Speed. Do you think the content is wrong? This source lists an MGM Home Entertainment film distributed by Shock DVD, and Warner Home Video is already cited in the article (but it looks like it may not be to a very reliable source). From my cursory work in trying to figure this out, it looks like the content is probably correct. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:12, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

So there are two vandals involved? I was unaware. I generally don't support edits of people that called me Nazi Commmunist KKK etc. Others were reverting the vandalism for some time as well (User:Sro23 and User:Materialscientist, for example). I guess there's overlap between the two vandals. If you think it's ok to restore Nate Speed's edits, then that's enough for me. I just hate seeing any vandal's edits 'approved'. I thought that's what WP:DENY was for. Maybe remove the info from both of them? The http/https thing over the wsj link is completely looney tho. It resolves to https. I guess that's why I'm not an admin, I don't have to deal with these kind of headaches. Cheers and thanks for keeping Wikipedia going. :) --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 17:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

I just undid your edit as that version appeared to be the last stable one, regardless of Nate Speed's involvement. Hope you don't mind. Sro23 (talk) 18:35, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

No, that's fine. I'm sure he'll return to gripe at me for something else. *lol* --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 18:57, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

STOP CALLING ME A "VANDAL" AND "NATE SPEED", YOU BUTTF*CKING LIAR OF A WIKIPEDIAN, NINJAROBOTPIRATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'M NOT A VANDAL, I'M TRYING TO EXPAND THIS STUPID WEBSITE WITH MORE INFORMATION, YOU'RE THE ONE WHO DESTROYED THE F*KING List of MGM films AND RoboCop (2014 film) PAGES, AND MY FRIGGIN' NAME ISN'T "NATE SPEED" ANYMORE, IT'S "NATE SPIDGEWOOD"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SO STOP LYING ABOUT ME AND LET ME EDIT OR ELSE I'LL WHOOP YOUR @SS, YOU BULLSH*T BARFER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! D:<

@Ebyabe STOP CALLING ME A "VANDAL" OR I'LL KICK YOUR F*CKING @SS, YOU DOG SH*T-EATING @SSHOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! D:< 109.199.139.38 (talk) 22:03, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

So you're not Nate Speed? Sorry, I get you vandals confused. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - State of the Union ‖ 22:05, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

@NinjaRobotPirate:, apparently you're confused. See above. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Health and Welfare ‖ 22:07, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

But you'll always be Nate Speed to me, not Nate Spidgewood. I hope you don't mind, Nate Speed. Have a good day, Nate Speed. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Health and Welfare ‖ 22:10, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Nah, I think you're more of a spork. So have a great day, Nate Spork. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Opposites Attract ‖ 22:12, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

- - STOP LYING ABOUT ME AND CALLING ME A "VANDAL" AND "SPORK", YOU BULLSH*T BARFER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'M NOT A VANDAL, I'M A F*CKING EDITOR WHO HAS KNOWLEDGE OF THINGS, AND MY LAST NAME ISN'T "SPEED" ANYMORE, IT'S SPIDGEWOOOD NOW, YOU THICK F*CK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dx 148.255.205.249 (talk) 22:15, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello Miss Spork, how are you today? --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 22:17, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Protection

Hi Ebyabe, I've semi-ed your talk page for 3 days and move protected it indefinitely. Please let me know if you would like any of the durations adjusted. Cheers, --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:27, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! That should be good for now. Cheers. ;) --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 22:29, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't get your earlier ping, or I'd have done the same. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:29, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

It's all good. :) --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - General Health ‖ 06:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Looney Tunes

Look on the page "Warner Bros. Cartoons, Inc." and on the "History of animation". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.34.194.199 (talk) 17:39, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Feel free to add it back then. And please sign your posts. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - State of the Union ‖ 17:54, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Ok, sorry and thank you. --81.34.194.199 (talk) 18:25, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

That's Ok. Cheers! --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Health and Welfare ‖ 23:57, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Barnstar

	The BLP Barnstar
	For your continued dedication to removing potential WP:BLP violations. This is one of, if not the most important task that needs to be done, and you don't receive nearly enough recognition for your work. Sro23 (talk) 21:38, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Bless your heart. Thank you. Right back atcha. ;) -‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 04:42, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

if you would back off and let the usefull info stay there would be no edit war

get my view,

--31.51.108.173 (talk) 07:39, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Not edit warring if reverting vandalism. If you were genuine, you would discuss on article talk pages. Reverted comments were trivial and not constructive to articles anyway. Thank you. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Border Town ‖ 07:44, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

You're blocked. Happy now? Oh, you can't respond here because you are blocked. Cheers. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Inspector General ‖ 07:46, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Untitled

The statistic I've added is noteworthy, verifiable and comes from a trustworthy source. Leave as is and do not revert. Sean 2015 (talk) 02:37, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Please do not tell others what to do or not do on Wikipedia. Your commentary could be loosely construed as a personal attack. Your move of the information to the Economy section is an improvement, as it goes with the other similar commentary. I relocated it a bit further down, so it won't be confused with the Forbes ref and it is chronological order.

Btw, I am from Miami originally. And I think that section understates how bad Miami has become. I wouldn't want to live there again. Visit, yes, live there, no. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Health and Welfare ‖ 05:20, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

The idea that others could have construed such mild words as a "personal attack" is silly. On that note, one of the other editors did the exact same thing to me (look at the History page), and in the past I've been on the receiving end of this type of thing plenty of times from editors of other articles.

In any event, I'm perfectly fine with my passage being located in the Economy section (in my original response I mentioned that I had moved it to the Economy section thinking that it would be a better "fit" there than in the Introductory section). I think the other editors could have shown a little more effort and consideration by relocating the passage rather than arbitrarily deleting it.

I had typed a longer and more detailed response on the Talk page and I thought I had saved it, but it did not appear when I went back to check. I'm not sure what I did wrong. Incidentally I'm not from South Florida originally, but I spent a few years living there, so I agree about Miami's economic woes and I'm more than happy to add verifiable and reputable information to this section. While we're on the subject, I'd like to call your attention to the last paragraph of the section which I believe contains some continuity errors and redundancies, particularly the section which I've highlighted in bold:

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in 2004, Miami had the third highest incidence of family incomes below the federal poverty line in the United States, making it the third poorest city in the USA, behind only Detroit, Michigan (ranked #1) and El Paso, Texas (ranked #2). Miami is also one of the very few cities where its local government went bankrupt, in 2001.[87] However, since that time, Miami has experienced a revival: in 2008, Miami was ranked as "America's Cleanest City" according to Forbes for its year-round good air quality, vast green spaces, clean drinking water, clean streets and citywide recycling programs.[14] In a 2009 UBS study of 73 world cities, Miami was ranked as the richest city in the United States (of four U.S. cities included in the survey) and the world's fifth-richest city, in terms of purchasing power.[15]

The paragraph begins with a mention of Miami's poverty rate and prior bankruptcy, and then attempts to refute this by mentioning Miami's clean air and drinking water (two completely different issues: economic and environmental). Also, that last sentence (regarding Miami being the fifth-richest city in terms of purchasing power) already appears in the introductory paragraph of the article, so I would like to go ahead and delete it. Your thoughts? Sean 2015 (talk) 06:42, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Sean 2015 (talk) 06:42, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Donald Trump Demagogue Edit

Hello, I would like to please have more information on why my addition of Donald Trump to the demagogue page was removed, it was not a test.

Thanks,

DovicKnoble (talk) 15:48, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Since I am not the one who reverted your edit, you should ask the person who did. You can do so at User talk:Moe Epsilon. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Repel All Boarders ‖ 18:20, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

You might also wish to read Talk:Demagogue#RfC_on_Donald_Trump_inclusion for further information. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Border Town ‖ 18:21, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

James Marster, Other Work, Dresden Files

If you are not going to let me update the section on his dresden files work, then you need to do it. The current section makes ZERO sense as its a series of disconnected statements that contradict themselves. James is the narrator for ALL 15 dresden files novels, he has gone on to narrate an entirely new series of books as well. Please correct this section or find someoe who will. It is ridiculous than such an incredible actor, and wonderful person should have such a jacked up wiki page Lorethiel (talk) 19:15, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

The current information is correct and properly referenced.. All you have to do is provide sources for the new information. Also, articles must be written in neutral tone. "The book was released and fans rejoiced" is far from that. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a fan page. How 'incredible' or 'wonderful' a person may be is beside the point, and not impartial. One's opinion of a subject (and I think Marsters is great) must not be allowed to colour the coverage of the subject. Thank you. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Opposites Attract ‖ 05:27, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Ginnifer Goodwin Page

Hi, this is 172.250.87.105. I am sorry for any confusion I might have caused, but I think it does not cause any harm to add an upcoming project to an actor's page, and a theatre run isn't all that different. I wasn't trying to promote anything at all, I'm not affiliated with Ginny so it was kind of blunt and surprising when others made it that way. I was just adding another production she participates in onto her page alongside her other projects. Please state why the edit doesn't belong on the page. Thank you! - rosmaries19

It is promoting the play. That's not what Wikipedia is for. There are other avenues and websites to advertise. Also, there should be coverage in secondary sources to prove the notability. There is no hurry for this information to be added. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Opposites Attract ‖ 04:59, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

let

the quacking grow louder.Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:52, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Aw, I was looking forward to Peking duck. :) --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Welfare State ‖ 05:01, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Phoebe Tonkin

Weird stuff is potentially going on at Phoebe Tonkin. Please keep an eye on it. TIA. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:26, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

You mean Talk:Phoebe Tonkin? Got it. ;) --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Border Town ‖ 05:42, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Well, so far it's stayed to the Talk page. But I'm not expecting that to last... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:52, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

I also did this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alec Gray (actor). Feel free to check it out. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - State of the Union ‖ 05:56, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Katheryn Winnick

Could probably use you over at Katheryn Winnick... I've tried to explain the issue to the editor, but I'd rather another editor reverted again... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

I reverted and nominated for deletion. The source given is imdb, for criminy's sake! :) --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 23:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

WikiCommons

Some helpful IPs seem to want to remove a comment from my talk page on WikiCommons. Two different ones have helped. I find it entertaining so I prefer it to stay. I've put a note there to that effect. If anyone wants to see what the fuss is about, it's the first comment on the page. I wonder why this happened all of a sudden? Could it have anything to do with this or this? Cheers! --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Health and Welfare ‖ 18:35, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

fascist extremist

poda pateee — Preceding unsigned comment added by Courage12345 (talk • contribs) 03:04, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

No personal attacks please. Thank you and have a pleasant day. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Inspector General ‖ 04:04, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Btw, are you 23.235.227.106 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) or 134.157.13.126 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)? Inquiring minds. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - General Health ‖ 04:07, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Vic Elmes

I am new to wikipedia, so please forgive if I may be wrong to writing here. I already added more times that Vic Elmes has passed away and people still erase the news. Well I am his friend, colleague, played and recorded with him. Unfortunately he is dead. He wanted privacy, so the new of his departure had not place on major newspapers. But you can easily find records on the sources I provided: his manager website, and his ex band member tribute (Paul fenton and Lem Lubin) on Jeff Christie's facebook page. A tribute will be made on Jeff official page in the next days. His death was so unexpected and kept private by his wife that, as you see, even his mates had no news until today. Sorry again if I'm wrong to write here. Regards. V.E. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vic elmes (talk • contribs) June 20, 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)Well, we shouldn't go violating his privacy on Wikipedia, should we.Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:15, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Your username is Vic elmes, you sign your post V.E. That would lead one to believe you are Vic Elmes. If you are, then you are not dead. If you aren't, then that is a poor choice of username. When reliable sources post news of Elmes' death, the information can be added. Our policies on living and recently deceased persons are very strict on that matter. If Elmes has truly passed away, I am sorry for your loss. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Border Town ‖ 14:15, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

You might or might not want to rejoin...

...the discussion at Talk:Megyn Kelly regarding her Putin interview. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:35, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

It looks like for now it's reached a conclusion. Also good to see that others are reverting the IP vandalistic edits. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Welfare State ‖ 14:31, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Enjoy, you deserve it!

-- Alex^TW 16:21, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you so much! I have a virtual and a real cup of coffee, so I'm doing good. Now I can start my spaghetti for lunch. :) --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 18:17, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

The Crown

Saw your difficulties with the Canadian IP. Don't let yourself get blocked over it. I'm watching, and I'm sure Alex the Whovian is, too. ----Dr.Margi ✉ 16:00, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Since it is a series of socks of User:Cebr1979, it should come under the reverting vandalism of socks guidelines. However, thanks for the concern, it is appreciated. Cheers! :) --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 16:07, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) I requested page protection for The Crown articles; perhaps it'd an idea to request it for the other pages that the editor is attacking also. -- Alex^TW 16:16, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

I added that to your request. They said they were going to do stuff. Let's hope that's true so we can have a break for a bit. I haven't even had my first cup of coffee yet! *lol* --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Health and Welfare ‖ 16:18, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

They put the protection on, then removed it, given it's the one IP who's IP hopping. I don't think a couple weeks would do any harm given the program isn't going to stream new episodes for several months, but there we go. ----Dr.Margi ✉ 19:24, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

One to keep an eye on...

Hi Ebyabe. You may want to keep an eye on User:Aries326 – they're making a lot of changes to various Filmographies: some of the changes are improvements, but a number of them can be considered questionable (e.g. adding an appearance on Entertainment Tonight, etc.). Also, their edit summaries are consistently somewhere between vague to somewhat misleading. Oh, they're also massively over-stuffing the 'occupation' parameter in a number of actor bios. Just so you know... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:47, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

I did sort of notice. Something to occupy me until the next vandal overreaction attack. :) --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 05:04, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

This one is still driving me somewhat to distraction – they refuse to italicize titles (after I've already left them a message about it), among other things. They also insist upon including "short films" in Filmography-listings despite the fact that most short films will not be notable and we're NOTIMDB, etc. Anyway, still needs to be monitored, unfortunately... 00:47, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

It does seem like some of their edits are good and some are... not. I'll look more carefully at them. ;) --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Repel All Boarders ‖ 02:06, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

And still problematic – close to edit warring unsourced content into Shelley Hennig (and pretty much actual edit warring on Jill Wagner). I don't know what to do about this one – they don't seem to be getting better. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:10, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

I'm reverting. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Inspector General ‖ 05:46, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Ebyabe, do you know if Aries326 was the one who added that series of broken-URL references to Holland Roden? If so, we have a serious WP:CIR case on our hands, IMO... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Looks like it. I'm wondering if their productive editting is outweighed by all the non-useful edits they make. :( --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 19:09, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

That's my thinking as well – between the continued addition of "pre-production" projects to the inability to use italics when required to these completely FUBAR'ed attempts at adding references, I'm thinking the minuses outweigh the pluses. I'm not ready to go to WP:ANI yet. But if this keeps up... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:05, 20 June 2017 (UTC)