User talk:Ebe123/Archives/Archive 3
- The following talk page is closed. This page is for an archive. Please do not modify it.
Closed 20110909103937.
I am officially retiring after this message,
This has been a bit over 1 year where I edited wikipedia. I do have tons ofWikistress from a couple months ago. Yesterday, the 17 June 2011, I finally realized that I am no good here. It would be better if I wasn't here at all so that others don't have to spend that much time here. I do like to new page patrol, and help out but I am no good at either. People might now think that I read the messages on my talk page or anywhere else but I do. I do keep attention on all of my messages. Even very uncivil comments such as Promethean (talk · contribs)'s editor review comments. I admit it, I am just a "power hungry flag-whore". I will be on other wikis but here there are too many people (48,255,242) and too many policies. We could merge many together. en.wikipedia is overcomplicated. I am way better at translating on meta. Good bye, ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs11:35, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. I may come back to make some projects.
- Oups, forgot to say. I will be screwing up my userpage. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs11:37, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Best wishes and good luck with whatever you choose to do next. I have gone ahead and removed your rollback and reviewer rights since you will no longer be using them.28bytes (talk) 15:07, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed, good luck. I don't think that you're "no good" here. I can't speak for anyone else, but I kept an eye on your edits from time to time, not becuase I thought you were "no good" but because I thought you showed potential and obviously wanted to help out. You did make some mistakes, but I think that was partly because of the areas you chose to focus on, which perhaps were more the domain of more experienced editors. That said, there's absolutely no point being here if it causes you stress or if it's not fun for you. You seemed to like the "meta" side of things here, so maybe Meta will be better for you. --BelovedFreak 15:40, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. I am here now to make a wizard for getting new users to learn the ropes fromstrategy:Proposal:Accelerating the learning curve for new editors. Thanks for removing the privileges, I know that I will not use them anymore but if I come back completely refreshed, could I re-request them? ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs15:54, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure, WP:PERM is just a click away. 28bytes (talk) 15:58, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Whoa, there's no need to retire, most of us started out as rights-hungry, I myself was guilty of this myself. But that doesn't mean we can't turn over a new leaf and focus on other things. I do hope you come back out of retirement in 1 or 2 months, you always did your best to follow policy. A retirement/wikibreak will help alleviate your burdens. —James (Talk • Contribs) •10:34pm • 12:34, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure, WP:PERM is just a click away. 28bytes (talk) 15:58, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. I am here now to make a wizard for getting new users to learn the ropes fromstrategy:Proposal:Accelerating the learning curve for new editors. Thanks for removing the privileges, I know that I will not use them anymore but if I come back completely refreshed, could I re-request them? ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs15:54, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Ebe123. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ethnikos Gazoros F.C., a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. —GFOLEY FOUR—16:00, 19 June 2011 (UTC), Logan TalkContributions 16:00, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. You have a new message at Logan's talk page. Logan TalkContributions 16:04, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you request unporotection of that article at RfPP? Firstly, you're clearly not aware of the background (it was protected because of serious BLP violations, not because of some worthless ruling by a body that didn't have the power to make it) and secondly, the instructions and the policy clearly state that you should consult the protecting admin (for which you could pick myself, SlimVirgin or Cenarium) first, all the more so when you're not familiar with the previous issues. HJ Mitchell| Penny for your thoughts? 19:37, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I think that an admin should fix the article, not just protect it. By just protecting it, you are just protecting the article from improvement. Just add an edit-notice to read WP:BLPbefore editing the article. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs19:44, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I do agree with you that WP:ArbCom or as you call "GovCom" did not have the power to do it. It wasn't even worth the Wikimedia Foundation to host it. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs19:18, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Apart from that, could you also explain what you mean by saying the arbcom ruling has "expired"?— Carl (CBM · talk) 03:13, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Read for yourself. WP:ARB/N. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs19:44, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Wrong ruling. I apologise for the delay in replying, I've been busy, but that article is the subject of a completely different ruling. Requesting unprotection of articles, especially those where there are serious BLP issues (that would not be negated by asking people nicely to read a policy), without consulting the protecting admin is a very bad idea and very discourteous. And doing it without the slightest bit of research beyond a quick glance at the protection log is an even worse one. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:01, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Shouldn't an sysop or someone else that can edit protected pages try to fix the problems? ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs22:30, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The version that's protected is not the one with problems. If you have an edit you'd like to make, use the {{editprotected}} template and an admin will be along. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:36, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- So why is the article protected if the version dosn't have any problems? ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs23:00, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Because there has been a history of BLP problems. If we leave it unprotected, those problems are likely to continue. —GFOLEY FOUR—16:08, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- So why is the article protected if the version dosn't have any problems? ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs23:00, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The version that's protected is not the one with problems. If you have an edit you'd like to make, use the {{editprotected}} template and an admin will be along. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:36, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Shouldn't an sysop or someone else that can edit protected pages try to fix the problems? ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs22:30, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Wrong ruling. I apologise for the delay in replying, I've been busy, but that article is the subject of a completely different ruling. Requesting unprotection of articles, especially those where there are serious BLP issues (that would not be negated by asking people nicely to read a policy), without consulting the protecting admin is a very bad idea and very discourteous. And doing it without the slightest bit of research beyond a quick glance at the protection log is an even worse one. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:01, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Read for yourself. WP:ARB/N. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs19:44, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Bans aren't called "blocks" on ACC. Cheers, —GFOLEY FOUR—20:23, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
May I ask why you're removing the dead links on IPhone? WP:DEADLINK says "do not delete a URL solely because the URL does not work any longer." Is there some other reason for the removal of the references? Replacing dead links with citation needed tags is contradicted by WP:DEADLINK, which says "WP:Verifiability does not require that all information be supported by a working link, nor does it require the source to be published on-line." -SudoGhost™ 23:15, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I didn't know WP:DEADLINK. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs19:18, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, my apologies then. I'm trying to find archived versions, hopefully to save the references.- SudoGhost™ 21:30, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, at least that I stopped myself. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs21:35, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, my apologies then. I'm trying to find archived versions, hopefully to save the references.- SudoGhost™ 21:30, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
For someone who's apparently semi-retired, you still seem to be making lots of edits... Anyway, can you decide whether or not you want to continue with this nomination? Not responding to comments for some weeks does tend to suggest that you've lost interest. If you want to withdraw it, no problem, just let me know. BencherliteTalk 08:44, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't want to continue. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs19:18, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, just letting you know I've undone your adding of a new section link to this page, as it defeats the purpose of having the page, which is to use the button to add a new section, as we are trying to add some structure to the page. But thanks for setting up auto archiving. Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 21:53, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for saying that the auto-archiving is good. I thought that the new section link was good because that on other pages like that one, there are those links. You cannot have all is what I say in this situation. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs21:57, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a common feature on most boards, but is counter-productive to the purpose of the new board, which is to keep discussions focused and on topic. Allowing people to bypass the form that they need to fill out in order to give us an understanding on the issues they are bringing to the board kinda defeats the purpose of the board, so I've removed the section link. Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 22:03, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I guess that you're right. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs22:05, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a common feature on most boards, but is counter-productive to the purpose of the new board, which is to keep discussions focused and on topic. Allowing people to bypass the form that they need to fill out in order to give us an understanding on the issues they are bringing to the board kinda defeats the purpose of the board, so I've removed the section link. Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 22:03, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Whisperback
[edit]Hello. You have a new message at ReelAngelGirl's talk page.
About your Admin Coaching request
[edit]
|
Hello Ebe123. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Soulscraper (album), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A9 only applies where the artist has no article. This may well fail WP:NALBUMS, but it can't be speedied. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 12:18, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
When changing section titles it is helpful to check if there are links to the title, and update them. When (correctly) appending the question mark to the section title it broke the link from CENT. I have now updated CENT. SilkTork *Tea time 18:29, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Oups, I didn't know that it was on CENT. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs19:51, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Ebe123. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Neil Munro (footballer), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern:playing for Scotland is certainly a sufficient claim of importance to pass A7. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 11:12, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, just letting you know I have reviewed "The Real Housewives of Fat Tony". It is currently on hold for seven days. Sanders11 (talk) 17:49, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Flash info: Failed. That is what I think will happen. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs17:51, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There's really no need to feel like that. There are only a few points remaining, I would just appreciate it if you only said points were done when you had actually changed them.Sanders11 (talk) 21:51, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article in question does in fact exist. The link wasn't working because of a typo. I would assume that it is not standard to mark things for deletion without the slightest hesitation. The show is easily found through Google and through the Wikipedia search bar anyways. I was also in the middle of editing the page from scratch. Looking at your talk page I see several speedy deletion declines... CrocodilesAreForWimps (talk) 20:58, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It is not a speedy deletion, also, sorry for the misunderstanding, I looked at Almost Heroesand other names because I thought that it must be a typo. Well sorry for the misunderstanding. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs22:18, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Ebe 123,
I saw your note on my talk page. Thank you. I appreciate your help and can sure use any mentoring possible. I am interested in sincerely contributing to Mr. Gutierrez' biography. I am afraid I went in to the biography and inserted changes, and it caused a whole lot of problems, which I apologize. If you have time, would you mind helping me add to Mr. Gutierrez' biography. I would like to work to make it the best site possible and contribute as a team. Fluffermutter established a talk page. I incorporated his suggestions and wrote additional information. Your help is greatly appreciated. And, I will be glad to pay you for your time to help me edit. Thank you.--Maryphillips1952 (talk) 18:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC) My email is maryphillips52yahoo.com[reply]
- Okay, Also, you do not have to say your e-mail because that in your prefs, you may do it and also, please put "{{@}}" instead of "@". ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs22:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please explain this edit? I asked a perfectly valid question, and you simply removed the thread, most likely because you just wanted WP:DRAMAwith your so-called retirement. Are you actually retiring, which could hurt your adoptees, or was it just a way to get attention? Honestly, I don't appreciate what you did.Logan TalkContributions 00:51, 1 July 2011 (UTC) What, I am not retiring but I will not have ethernet or Wi-fi for 7 days. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs11:27, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you need to refer the above page to an AfD? --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:14, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I am making an AfD for the article. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs17:17, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, I read that and I'm still wondering why it needs an AfD? Don't have a problem with it really, but just wondering why it needs the AfD --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:31, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Notability, and possible vandalism. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs17:33, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok. I guess policies will be followed either way. Thanks for clearing that up for me :)--Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:41, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Notability, and possible vandalism. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs17:33, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, I read that and I'm still wondering why it needs an AfD? Don't have a problem with it really, but just wondering why it needs the AfD --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:31, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Ebe123, please stop writing on La goutte de pluie's talk page and nominating her files for deletion. This is starting to border on harassment, in my opinion. I don't know if this image should be deleted, as I try to keep away from the file namespace, but even if it were, it's really not appropriate of you to nominate it, after being so vocal on La goutte de pluie's talk page. Please, disengage and start ignoring her; there are many other editors who will be ready to intervene, should she break any rules. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:45, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Image here also is copyrights violation. I don't know how to nominate it for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by202.156.13.247 (talk) 16:45, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- As you commented the last time this situation was at ANI, giving you due notice that it's back at ANI now and you may wish to review the situation. WP:ANI#La goutte de pluie's personal agenda. Strange Passerby (talk •cont) 01:36, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there Ebe123, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I [1] some files I found on User talk:Ebe123. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or yourtalk page.
- See a log of files removed today here.
- Shut off the bot here.
- Report errors here.
Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:05, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to inform you that Wikipedia:Wikiproject Abandoned Drafts has been created. You indicated during the proposal that you would like to join, so please do so. We would really appreciate any help you could give. SilverserenC 05:22, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. You have a new message at Abril-horpel's talk page. Message added 15:28, 14 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:51, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Message added MorganKevinJ(talk) 13:28, 23 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]
Hello. You have a new message at Raegenhare's talk page.
Hi. How is Wikipedia:WikiProject_Abandoned_Drafts/Virtual_Tales a G7 candidate?--v/r -TP 14:48, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Nevermind, figured it out.--v/r - TP 14:49, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not engage in typo-fixing on talk pages, noticeboards, and the like. See WP:TPO. Thanks, –xenotalk 19:06, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure if xeno had this edit in mind, but it is certainly a WP:TPO vio. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:41, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ebe123 you added a banned=yes to tree shaping. diff Slowart and Blackash (myself) had our topic ban changed to being allowed to edit the article and related subjects. We have a ban about the title only, we are not to discuss the title of the art-form except for under prescribed circumstances. Please read[2]. Please remove or change the banning section of the banner, as the way it is now is misleading. Blackash have a chat 10:12, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Whisperback
[edit] Hello. You have a new message at Raegenhare's talk page.
Unless better sources are found, I'm probably going to PROD Janni Lee Simner or take it to AfD. At it's current state, it is doubtful it will pass it. May I suggest moving it back into the user namespace instead so it can be worked on and all this trouble can be avoided? Thanks.--Yaksar (let's chat) 07:14, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Heya Ebe - first of all, welcome to the Project, and more specifically to the August drive. However, just so you know, the drive doesn't "officially" start until 0:00 UTC time on August 1st, so I've removed the articles you had listed. Again though, thank you for participating, and happy wikifying. :) NoleloverTalk·Contribs 23:20, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the clarifying. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs10:37, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm wondering if you would want to participate in the Abandoned Drafts Drive. My experience with abandoned drafts show that lots need to be wikifyed. We also don't have that many participants. I thought you might be interested in participating. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs14:00, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- "Abandoned drafts"? What exactly is that? Sounds interesting - can you give a link?Nolelover Talk·Contribs 14:33, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts is the WikiProject link and WP:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts/Drive is the drive link. Abandoned Drafts are userspace drafts which were not edited for a long time (see WP:STALEDRAFT) or that the editor is retired. We take the pages, improve them to wikipedia's standards (includes wikifying) and then we get them to mainspace. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs14:39, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Huh...that's an interesting one. I'll be happy too, but I'm just so incredibly busy right now that I can't make any promises. Thanks for the link though! Nolelover Talk·Contribs 14:45, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Its okay to not participate. Its your call. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs14:48, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Huh...that's an interesting one. I'll be happy too, but I'm just so incredibly busy right now that I can't make any promises. Thanks for the link though! Nolelover Talk·Contribs 14:45, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts is the WikiProject link and WP:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts/Drive is the drive link. Abandoned Drafts are userspace drafts which were not edited for a long time (see WP:STALEDRAFT) or that the editor is retired. We take the pages, improve them to wikipedia's standards (includes wikifying) and then we get them to mainspace. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs14:39, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- "Abandoned drafts"? What exactly is that? Sounds interesting - can you give a link?Nolelover Talk·Contribs 14:33, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I also estimated about 500 to 1000 userspace drafts are abandoned. Enormous. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs14:54, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations! You have been accepted to the Abuse Response team. Welcome! I"ll see you around!=)--Damirgraffiti |☺Say Yo to Me!☺ 21:00, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks so much. ~~EBE123~~talkContribs21:23, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
TUSC token fa54f106a474719cf54f61dfbf8bbafa
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
I have released the article Skybot Scheduler to the article space, placed a new FUR on thelogo page and fixed the article names. Now I winder if all is allright now. --Henk.Wiersema (talk) 21:48, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Please refrain from adding non-free files on user talk pages. Put a colon before. Also, don't go off topic. You start by talking about the company before the product which is the subject. ~~010001010100001001000101|123~~talkContribs(binary) 21:56, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's really impressive the drive you've set up for the Wikiproject. You're really invested in this. :3 SilverserenC 00:37, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you going to join the drive? ~~EBE!@#~~ talkContribs12:06, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Another thing, for the August 1 2011 Signpost, there will be an announcement! ~~EBE!@#~~ talkContribs14:27, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh? I'm surprised I wasn't contacted about that. And, yes, i'll be joining the drive. SilverserenC 04:41, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I tried contacting you but something went wrong. You might get a notification in a couple of days though. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs10:27, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh? I'm surprised I wasn't contacted about that. And, yes, i'll be joining the drive. SilverserenC 04:41, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please insert the pointer to the related WP:COMPUNITS talk page as you see fit. Reverted text reproduced below.
- See WP:COMPUNITS–89.204.153.166 (talk) 10:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Oups, sorry for that. It just appeared very strange and like vandalism. Sorry. ~~Ebe123~~ talkContribs10:56, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- No problem, admittedly the title is very far from a NPOV, maybe use something better.–89.204.153.166 (talk) 11:41, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Oups, sorry for that. It just appeared very strange and like vandalism. Sorry. ~~Ebe123~~ talkContribs10:56, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Ebe, just wanted to drop you a quick note about your work on the August Wikification drive. While I most certainly appreciate your work there, I just want to ask you to make sure that you're only taking credit for articles that you really work on and actually finish wikifying. For example, diff shows that all you did to your first credited article was remove a gallery and the wikify tag. If you think that an article doesn't need to be wikified at all, and there are plenty of those, then please just remove the tag and go on. However, Ryan Vesey wasable to do a good bit more. Also, this article andthis one (especially the lead and Honors sections) aren't fully wikifed. If you need any help, drop me a note. Cheers, Nolelover Talk·Contribs 14:28, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Wikify's August Newsletter
[edit]
|
Message added 16:29, 5 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]
Waterfox ~talk~ 16:29, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Message added Nathan2055talk). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Nathan2055talk 22:10, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am so so so so so sorry about the vandalism. I had to go to the toilet and my brother got on my computer -.- Im telling my mum and dad and he may get grounded. I am so so so so sorry ); — Preceding unsignedcomment added by 115.70.71.7 (talk) 10:56, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, thanks for the apology but that reason is in the arguments to avoid. I searched yourWHOIS, all is fine. Sorry but I'm not an admin so I can't decide whether to block or not. Just don't take it personally. You may go back in about 1 week. ~~Ebe123~~talkContribs11:01, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This guy's lying, ignore him. WP:BROTHER is the oldest excuse in the book and this IP doesn't have any constructive edits that would suggest his computer was hijacked. Hut 8.5 11:11, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I know that. Also, I said that to him. Just like I was watching my computer screen and refrehing every second. Each time, I used rollback immediately. ~~Ebe123~~talkContribs11:14, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This guy's lying, ignore him. WP:BROTHER is the oldest excuse in the book and this IP doesn't have any constructive edits that would suggest his computer was hijacked. Hut 8.5 11:11, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've come across an article called Caustic humour. I was wanting to report it but i have absolutly no idea how to. also could you please tell me if it's worth reporting and what is classed as worth reporting. thanks. Naomib1996 (talk) 15:39, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- What by report? ~~Ebe123~~ talkContribs19:53, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ebe, I'm willing to join the August drive but clueless what I've to do; guidelines ain't helping much. Would you please help me by giving some demo? — Bill william comptonTalk 08:39, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry that the guidelines arn't helping much, I will do like screenshots to show better. ~~Ebe123~~ talkContribs10:01, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the screenshots, now things are much clearer, I'll proceed gradually. —Bill william comptonTalk 03:40, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- If you still don't understand a part, feel free to ask. ~~Ebe123~~talkContribs10:14, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- What we've to do with those drafts which are nothing but just edit testing pages?, like one I nominated for speedy as it only contained eulogizing content for some erotic actor (possible non-existing). — Bill william comptonTalk 11:04, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There are some drafts that aren't tests and are abandoned. For the test pages, just nominate for deletion. Like there are lots of pages that are called "Enter your new article name here", nom them, maybe even G6 them. ~~Ebe123~~talkContribs11:17, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- What we've to do with those drafts which are nothing but just edit testing pages?, like one I nominated for speedy as it only contained eulogizing content for some erotic actor (possible non-existing). — Bill william comptonTalk 11:04, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- If you still don't understand a part, feel free to ask. ~~Ebe123~~talkContribs10:14, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the screenshots, now things are much clearer, I'll proceed gradually. —Bill william comptonTalk 03:40, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/User_talk:87.228.147.68
Hi Ebe123,
Wondering why you thought the changes weren't constructive.
- Just a mistake, I make errors, I must of been thinking of another edit, I will revert. ~~Ebe123~~ talkContribs17:14, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Is there some reason why you want this article to link to the book Bad Astronomy instead of the web site Badastronomy.com? -- 202.124.72.139(talk) 10:37, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I reverted myself after finding that you had a good rationale. ~~Ebe123~~talkContribs10:39, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Okey dokey. No harm, no foul. -- 202.124.72.139(talk) 10:41, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
With everything you've been doing lately for the Wikiproject, you're pretty much in charge at this point. And i'm completely fine with that. I have college coming up in two weeks, so I won't be on nearly as often as I am, so it's up to you to keep things moving along swimmingly. I know you can do it. ^_^ SilverserenC 10:20, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- My objective was not to be in charge but thanks anyways. ~~Ebe123~~talkContribs10:21, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I replied at User talk:Multichill#WikiProject Images and Media.multichill (talk) 20:18, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:30, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I signed up (I think) for the drive you created to move files to the Commons - great idea! :) Thank you for spreading the info and letting folks know about it - keep up the good work! --Varnent (talk) 23:58, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I just like organizing events. Next up, I will request it for the signpost (bar) at the right time. Also, mass uploads are not allowed. Can you belive it, more images than the articles needing to be wikified? ~~Ebe123~~talkContribs09:46, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What happened there? lol Walrus068 (talk) 10:17, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I slipped. I meant the next button but I accidentaly pushed the revert and warn button. I reverted myself right away.
- Lol, okay, I've done it before elsewhere. Walrus068 (talk) 10:30, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I created your admin coaching page here: User:Ebe123/Admin coaching. Be sure to add that page and any of its subpages I may create in the future to your watchlist. For your first task, please answer the RfA questions linked to from your admin coaching page. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:55, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Message added 05:30, 20 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
OpenInfoForAll (talk) 05:30, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WikiBook.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 17:57, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File: BronxMap_1868.jpg Can you tell me in plain English not Wikispeak what I am doing wrong with this image. It is a scan of a map from 1868 which I purchased from historicalmapsrestored.com and it is copyrighted in 2005. Thankyou the article description will change.
SorryTheBronxNYC (talk) 19:42, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rich forgot to sign my post
- It is copyrighted and could be replaced by a free image easily. ~~Ebe123~~talkContribs19:45, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
GOCE drive newsletter
[edit]Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors
The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their September 2011 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy editing backlog. The drive will begin on September 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and will end on September 30 at 23:59 (UTC). We will be tracking the number of 2010 articles in the backlog, as we want to copy edit as many of those as possible. Please consider copy editing an article that was tagged in 2010. Barnstars will be given to anyone who edits more than 4,000 words, with special awards for the top 5 in the categories "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". See you at the drive! – Your drive coordinators: Diannaa, Chaosdruid, The Utahraptor, Slon02, and SMasters. |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 16:20, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Template:Abandoned Draft problem has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other(talk) 09:29, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Message added 20:04, 25 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]
Alan the Roving Ambassador (User:N5iln) (talk) 20:04, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 29 August 2011 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive-->
to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:02, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've added your name to the AR Volunteers list. Fill in the boxes as necessary. Congrats and my apologies for missing your nomination, I've been busy recently and only just regained activity. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 9:16pm • 11:16, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I was asking when I would be added! ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs11:23, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]- Remember if you ever need any assistance please ask any of the team members, myself included. I look forward to working with you. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 6:14pm • 08:14, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs10:03, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
- Remember if you ever need any assistance please ask any of the team members, myself included. I look forward to working with you. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 6:14pm • 08:14, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for opening the abuse response request for me. Much appreciated. -- Luke (Talk) 14:24, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- You're welcome. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs16:00, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-FASTILY (TALK) 23:06, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Per the relevant ANI discussion, a topic ban has been enacted on this editor - seeUser_talk:Thisthat2011#Topic_ban. A number of editors including yourself offered to mentor the user during their topic ban, hence this notice. I have informed all these editors and will place a list of those willing to mentor on the user's talkpage. Thanks, Black Kite (t) (c) 23:54, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
An editor who is granted an account via ACC would not need IPBE as the block is anon. only. Thought I'd let you know. —GFOLEY FOUR!—01:17, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The transfers to Commons that you made today are all good images to transfer, and the licensing information and descriptions are all good. An appropriate category has been added, which is also great. However, they have not yet been botchecked. As I stated in the guide I wrote, images moved to Commons need to be botchecked in order to pass all criteria. If you do that for the images you uploaded, I'll be glad to review them as good moves. All the best, – Quadell (talk) 13:39, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- What is "botchecked", is it a bot on commons checks the image? ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs13:41, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]- No, I'm sorry, I should explain. At the top of the page on Commons there will be a yellow-orange box that begins with "This file was moved to Wikimedia Commons from en.wikipedia using a bot script." Clicking the "Check now!" link opens up an editing window that may fix some issues, and at the very least will remove the yellow-orange box after you click save. That way, Commons will know that the move has actually been seen by a human being, who confirms that the transfer occurred without a problem. – Quadell(talk) 13:43, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I will do it, I used to do it. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs13:45, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]- Great. Thanks for all your work on the "Move to Commons" drive! –Quadell (talk) 13:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It was hard but I like challenges. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs13:51, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It was hard but I like challenges. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
- Great. Thanks for all your work on the "Move to Commons" drive! –Quadell (talk) 13:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I will do it, I used to do it. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
- No, I'm sorry, I should explain. At the top of the page on Commons there will be a yellow-orange box that begins with "This file was moved to Wikimedia Commons from en.wikipedia using a bot script." Clicking the "Check now!" link opens up an editing window that may fix some issues, and at the very least will remove the yellow-orange box after you click save. That way, Commons will know that the move has actually been seen by a human being, who confirms that the transfer occurred without a problem. – Quadell(talk) 13:43, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I"ll be the investigator and contactor on this[3].--Damirgraffiti |☺Say Yo to Me!☺ 15:05, 1 September 2011 (UTC). I just saw the abuse response box case on the IP talk page. Anyway, keep up the good work!--Damirgraffiti |☺Say Yo to Me!☺ 15:07, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay... Why are you telling me this? Well, I admit to have said that the report was going to be accepted. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs15:09, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]- Sorry for the bothering. I though this was your report. Sorry about that.--Damirgraffiti |☺Say Yo to Me!☺ 20:03, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It wasn't bothering. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs20:12, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]- I understand. Thanks. I just didn't know!--Damirgraffiti |☺Say Yo to Me!☺ 21:47, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It wasn't bothering. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
- Sorry for the bothering. I though this was your report. Sorry about that.--Damirgraffiti |☺Say Yo to Me!☺ 20:03, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Message added 17:12, 2 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]
–Drilnoth (T/C) 17:12, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
For MfD closes, such as Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Thryduulf/Arrows, the closure result should be bolded. The bolding allows One bot (talk · contribs) to correctly record the result atWikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Archived debates/September 2011. I have[4] part of your closure for Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Thryduulf/Arrows for One bot. Cunard (talk) 03:23, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I just forgot. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs09:23, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Message added 09:29, 4 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]
123Ħeðŋeħøŋ456 09:29, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I now accepted the case and did the contact to the school.--Damirgraffiti |☺Say Yo to Me!☺ 04:23, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just tossing a "there's a thread at WP:AN you are involved in" comment onto the most watched user talk page on WP ain't very useful. A link to the actual discussion at WP:AN would have been a start (I've done that) and given it was Jimbo's talk, a link as to why Jimbo was involved would have been more beneficial for the obviously large target audience. (- Redacted some bits) Sorry -don't mean to come over as aggresive, but you do need to add links for these kind of things.Pedro : Chat 20:13, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
...was unnecessary, and just shows your bias. Deletion discussions should be factual and dispassionate. Aligning yourself with "team Jimbo" just undermines your credibility.ɳorɑfʈTalk! 03:19, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs09:20, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]- You know what? Me too. I could have said that in a nicer way. I apologize.ɳorɑfʈTalk! 10:39, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The WikiProject Wikify Badge | ||
This Wikification badge is given toEbe123 for their sixth-place appearance on the leaderboard in theAugust 2011 Wikification drive. Congratulations! Nolelover Talk·Contribs 20:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
This Working Wikipedian's Barnstar is also given toEbe123 for completing 35 articles in the August 2011 Wikification drive. Thanks, and keep up the great work!Nolelover Talk·Contribs 20:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
Hello Ebe123, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Prince Amitabh Rose Mukherjee, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7: the awards being claims in this (poor quality stub) make this unsuitable for this CSD category. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 10:33, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I meant to PROD. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs 10:35, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]