Jump to content

User talk:Dvj1992

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Dvj1992, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 12:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amar Jit Singh Sandhu moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Amar Jit Singh Sandhu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 11:49, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amar Jit Singh Sandhu (July 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 12:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Dvj1992! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amar Jit Singh Sandhu (August 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 00:28, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amar Jit Singh Sandhu

[edit]
Notice

The article Amar Jit Singh Sandhu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP: Notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 15:38, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi
I have made several changes to the article. Have added a lot of information. Indian military history has hardly any mention on Wikipedia. I would like to change that starting with this article. This figure has played a very important role in the Indian Air Force history he deserves a article. Dvj1992 (talk) 06:45, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amar Jit Singh Sandhu for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amar Jit Singh Sandhu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amar Jit Singh Sandhu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 TT me 11:41, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amar Jit Singh Sandhu (August 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Amar Jit Singh Sandhu instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 04:40, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AJS (August 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Submission has not content and has been declined several times.
S0091 (talk) 20:07, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Dvj1992! Your additions to Vinod Neb have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Storchy (talk) 09:57, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have understood your point have made changes to the article. Will be keeping copyright issues in mind. Dvj1992 (talk) 12:14, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amar Jit Singh Sandhu

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amar Jit Singh Sandhu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amar Jit Singh Sandhu. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dvj1992,
This article was just deleted through an AFD discussion. Recreating it will just lead to its deletion under CSD G4 criteria. The only way to overcome an AFD "Delete" decision is to write a draft and submit it to AFC for review and, hopefully, approval. But putting it directly into main space will result in deletion.
If you have questions about article creation and Wikipedia's deletion policies, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 06:15, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amar Jit Singh Sandhu (January 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I note from the prior AfD which closed as delete: "Awarded two mid-level awards. If WP:NSOLDIER had not been deprecated has being too vague, would not even meet that." from the nomination. I have reached the same conclusion
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:59, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see you have attempted to delete this submission. Since you are not the sole editor we may not take action on this. However, of you leave the draft unedited for six months it wil be deleted anyway. Alternatively you may use the WP:MFD route. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Don’t really understand you. You don’t want this article to be published. You don’t want this article to be deleted. Anyways, No hard feelings.
I am the solo creator and content contributor to this article. Dvj1992 (talk) 15:48, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The originator does not appear to be you. They appear to be TheJivestTurkeyIII 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:49, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
He restored the deleted draft on my request.Please see the history of the draft. I added the content.
please feel free to see remove the notability tags which make it possible to publish the article. Dvj1992 (talk) 10:50, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To do this they would have needed to be an administrator. They are not. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 18:59, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Amar Jit Singh Sandhu where your contributions to the discussion will be welcomed. I recommend brevity. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:10, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amar Jit Singh Sandhu has been accepted

[edit]
Amar Jit Singh Sandhu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 10:49, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dvj1992&oldid=1187217147"