Jump to content

User talk:Dutchy85/Archive 10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5←Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11

Nomination of Story of a Woman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Story of a Woman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Story of a Woman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nerd1a4i (talk) 16:22, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ray Danton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ice Palace (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Touch Me Not (1974 film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Touch Me Not (1974 film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 15:30, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Rearview Mirror moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rearview Mirror, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 15:30, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rearview Mirror (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:NFILM - none of the references are able to be verified. IMDb is not an acceptable or reliable source.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 02:40, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Dutchy85! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:40, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Operation (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Key party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:20, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Babette Goes to War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page And God Created Woman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Shadow on the Wall (1968 film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shadow on the Wall (1968 film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 16:33, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Benny Thau (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sidney Franklin
Mr. Belvedere Goes to College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Variety
No Sun in Venice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to And God Created Woman
The Attack (1966 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to George Mallaby
The Decision (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to George Mallaby

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:08, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jungle Jim (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King of the Jungle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:26, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Mulligan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rich and Famous (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Could you please stop adding links to Filmink. Please see WP:REFSPAM for more details. I am removing them, and will continue to do so. Edwardx (talk) 10:51, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Hey Edward - thanks for contacting me - I only ever add links to articles which I think are relevant to a particular entry - I absolutely have no financial link with Filmink. But I will keep a closer eye on this in future. All the best. Dutchy85 (talk) 10:56, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Looking at more of your edit history, I see that you are adding links to other sources as well, so perhaps I was a little hasty. My apologies. However, this sort of rapid editing, adding citations for the same publication or author to multiple articles, especially labelling them all "minor edit" (they are not - please read Help:Minor edit), is typical of COI citation spamming activity here on Wikipedia. Edwardx (talk) 11:02, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Totally get it! Sometimes what I do seems like spamming, but it isn't (at least I don't feel it is) - I'll read an article or a book and just quote from it to different entries because I go "this is the one time I'll read this book/article I want to get it down. I should be better on the minor edit thing - thanks for that and for your prompt response. Dutchy85 (talk) 11:14, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. Good that we can both see how such an unfortunate misunderstanding arose. I will look at restoring the edits that I reverted, and have removed the COI notice below. Edwardx (talk) 11:35, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Edwardx, appreciate it. And all the work you do for Wikipedia!! Have a great weekend and hope you're not in a Coro-affected zone Dutchy85 (talk) 11:38, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

You are too kind. Have rollbacked my edits. COVID is here in London, and is now officially a pandemic, so will be pretty much everywhere soon enough. Should be at a film showing now, but decided against it, especially with it being a 2.5 hour movie. Anyway, I have plenty of unwatched DVDs, Wikipedia editing and real work to do. Keep safe! Edwardx (talk) 12:02, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited W. J. Lincoln, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:56, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of I Shot Down the Red Baron, I Think for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I Shot Down the Red Baron, I Think is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Shot Down the Red Baron, I Think until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - The9Man (Talk) 17:07, 30 March 2020 (UTC) Thanks for letting me know!Dutchy85 (talk) 00:40, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Gallows on the Sand

Hello, Dutchy85,

Thank you for creating Gallows on the Sand.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

WP:NBOOK calls for the book to be the subject of two or more non-trivial published works. The Gordon Stewart review probably qualifies, but the Maurice Dunlevy one just gives it a passing mention. Some more sources would allay this concern.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Girth Summit}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

GirthSummit (blether) 12:46, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Kundu (West novel)

Hello, Dutchy85,

Thank you for creating Kundu (West novel).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The only source gives it a passing mention only - this needs more sourcing

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Girth Summit}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

GirthSummit (blether) 12:49, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Morris West, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sandy Webster

Notice

The article Sandy Webster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 21:58, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Magic Shoes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:29, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ken Wayne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One Step Beyond (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:02, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Peter Draper (writer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Peter Draper (writer), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 05:21, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Busty Cops

Notice

The article Busty Cops has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film, can only find blog reviews, per WP:NF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 18:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dutchy85

Thank you for creating Michael Forlong.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:17, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

"The Everlasting Secret Famiy" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Everlasting Secret Famiy. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 6#The Everlasting Secret Famiy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 07:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Summer of the Seventeenth Doll (1959 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cry Tough (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:46, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

John Croyston

Thanks for creating this article. I'm intending to include Croyston in an expansion of the Sydney Push article and will be searching for more sources on him. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 15:29, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Doomsday at Eleven

Notice

The article Doomsday at Eleven has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM. Cannot find any coverage except as being listed in a film catalogue

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 23:19, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Who Killed Kovali?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashley Cooper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:06, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TV ad for The Last Call 17 Oct 1958.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TV ad for The Last Call 17 Oct 1958.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 9 June 2020 (UTC) The item is in here isn't it... Last Call (1958 film)Dutchy85 (talk) 22:00, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Last Call (1958 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Richard Pratt
The Public Prosecutor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Elusive Pimpernel

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of One Shocking Moment

Notice

The article One Shocking Moment has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with no known actors, and with no reliable third party coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:58, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve The Kid Ranger

Hello, Dutchy85,

Thank you for creating The Kid Ranger.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for this new article, but see WP:EXIST and WP:NFILM. The article would be more useful to Wikipedia readers if it did more than simply announce the film's existence

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:45, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alice in Russialand

Notice

The article Alice in Russialand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with nothing to support it having its own article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:27, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wanted for Murder (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bad Bizness

Notice

The article Bad Bizness has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable direct to video film, does not meet WP:NF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 23:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

The End Product moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The End Product, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 07:40, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bulldog Drummond Strikes Back (1947 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bulldog Drummond at Bay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Common Law Wife (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Common Law Wife (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common Law Wife (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:29, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

The Weak and the Wicked (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Sun
Wide Boy (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Sun

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dutchy85

Thank you for creating The Queen's Bishop.

User:Whiteguru, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

The Premise section on this page deserves further material

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Whiteguru (talk) 02:28, 12 July 2020 (UTC) Thanks will look atDutchy85 (talk) 03:44, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Leslie Norman (director) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to The Cruel Sea and The Long and the Short and the Tall
A Boy, a Girl and a Bike (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Sun
Diana Dors (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Blythe
For Better, for Worse (1954 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Western Mail
The Last Page (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Western Star
The Weak and the Wicked (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Sun

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Highbury Studios
added a link pointing to The Sun
Penny and the Pownall Case
added a link pointing to The Sun

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rearview Mirror (film) has been accepted

Rearview Mirror (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 02:15, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Highbury Studios, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sun.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:49, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Love, the Italian Way moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Love, the Italian Way, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mcampany (talk) 04:39, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Soul Brothers of Kung Fu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Soul Brothers of Kung Fu, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 18:51, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Smoke 'Em If You Got 'Em (film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Smoke 'Em If You Got 'Em (film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 09:01, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Smoke 'Em If You Got 'Em (film) has been accepted

Smoke 'Em If You Got 'Em (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:08, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Slaughter of St Teresa.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Slaughter of St Teresa.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 8 August 2020 (UTC) Hello the image was with an article - I changed its designation to its own article maybe that was the point of confusion? Will try to fix up Dutchy85 (talk) 01:23, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Touch Me Not (1974 film) concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Touch Me Not (1974 film), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:27, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roundabout (1957 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Sterling.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pharaoh (Wilbur Smith novel)

Notice

The article Pharaoh (Wilbur Smith novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOOK. Only reviews I can find are in predatory journals.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vincent Ball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sun.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of How Willingly You Sing

Notice

The article How Willingly You Sing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 21:00, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Have a Nice Weekend

Notice

The article Have a Nice Weekend has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing other than a Letterbox entry for sourcing, no entry at RottenTomatoes, no indication of meeting WP:GNG or WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 22:57, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Jerrold Freedman moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jerrold Freedman, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 11:41, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Converting infoboxes

When converting articles from using {{Infobox film}} to {{Infobox television}} please do not just rename the infobox. This usually results in errors as some of the parameters are different and some film parameters do not exist in the television infobox. To properly convert the infoboxes, replace "{{infobox film" with "{{subst:Infobox television film/Cleanup" and save your changes. Thank you. --AussieLegend (✉) 04:29, 26 August 2020 (UTC) Fair enough thanks for the noteDutchy85 (talk) 08:45, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of No Decision (film)

Notice

The article No Decision (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 15:20, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Late Edwina Black (TV play)

Notice

The article The Late Edwina Black (TV play) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 15:25, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dutchy85/Archive_10&oldid=986820267"