User talk:Dutchman Schultz

April 2010

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on Talk:Alfred R. Bosco, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Codf1977 (talk) 09:05, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, mother. Dutchman Schultz (talk) 02:21, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Century Gothic, 20th Century, ephemera, &c.

Heh. Criticizing something as "ephermeral" because it's digital seems like an odd argument to make on Wikipedia, of all places. Anyway, I don't totally get your logic; it's like saying because we have an article on Jerry Lewis, we shouldn't have one on Sammy Petrillo.

By the way, I noticed your other work on typography-related articles. Nice job. Glad to see the new stuff especially.—Chowbok ☠ 02:39, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rachel's Vineyard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rachel's Vineyard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel's Vineyard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SummerPhD (talk) 17:45, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:01, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Dutchman Schultz. You have new messages at Roscelese's talk page.
Message added 21:39, 5 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

–Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:39, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Douglas Karpen

Is Roscelese a POV editor? She seems fixated on deleting multiple articles dealing with abortion. Most of her contributions are on the topic of abortion... I haven't had time to go through and read them all.

This article was placed on the dispute resolution board due to some questionable edits. I assume she became aware of the article once there was a see also link on the Kermit Gosnell article.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#douglas_karpen

Surpise, surprise... it's now up for deletion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Douglas_Karpen

Thoughts and suggestions?

Lordvolton (talk) 08:55, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's pretty obvious that Roscelese has an agenda. Most of my work on Wikipedia is aon fairly uncontroverversial stuff (like type designers and foundries), so I've never had a problem like this before. R.M. Schultz (talk) 18:55, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hi, some time ago you participated in the discussion about Czechia, short-form and geographical name of the Czech state. Two weeks ago, I wrote an article about history of the problem with comparison of statements and oppinions from both sides in the dispute, but the article ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Czechia_-_the_name_dispute ) was immediately deleted by some admins. Then, on repeated demands, it was reverted by some rational person and now the voting about deletion of the article (initialized by it erasers) is in process. If you want, help to keep the article, you can vote here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Czechia_-_the_name_dispute#Czechia_-_the_name_dispute Askave (talk) 14:36, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Berthold Type Foundry

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Berthold (company) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Berthold Type Foundry. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. -- Trevj (talk) 11:30, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frederic Warde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bruce Rogers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emily Stimpson

The article Emily Stimpson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. WWGB (talk) 11:31, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Foundry Type Foundries

Category:Foundry Type Foundries, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. David Condrey ^{log talk} 01:44, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		A barnstar for all your hard work in the font topic area, especially on Goudy and Benton. We're in your debt. Blythwood (talk) 21:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Britannic (typeface)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Britannic (typeface), Dutchman Schultz!

Wikipedia editor Knobbly just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

An obscure but interesting topic for an article, good uses of references and picture.

To reply, leave a comment on Knobbly's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dutchman Schultz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Mary Tyler Moore Show opening sequence, title card, font

The Mary Tyler Moore Show
The Mary Tyler Moore Show opening sequence
Can you document the font of the first title card of the The Mary Tyler Moore Show opening sequence ?

Thanks, Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 10:50, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean "document?" It's pretty self-evident what the font is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dutchman Schultz (talk • contribs)

Same... it's right there in the 2nd linked article already, after the lead section. —Locke Cole • t • c 17:17, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dutchman Schultz. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Americana (typeface)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Americana (typeface), Dutchman Schultz!

Wikipedia editor Atsme just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I restored the redirect, see the edit summary.

To reply, leave a comment on Atsme's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

^{Atsme📞📧} 17:23, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dutchman Schultz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dutchman Schultz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Letterpress font foundries

Please stop and read WP:SUBCAT Rathfelder (talk) 16:31, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sonderdruck

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sonderdruck requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Oerasete (talk) 18:14, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fritz Müller (typographer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Fritz Müller (typographer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 17:20, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Karl Hermann Schaefer moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Karl Hermann Schaefer, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 17:21, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Schelter & Giesecke Type Foundry, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kolibri and Liane. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karl Hermann Schaefer (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Chicdat were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karl Hermann Schaefer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Karl Hermann Schaefer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 11:19, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dutchman Schultz! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 11:19, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciation

Thanks for all your hard work with typography articles on Wikipedia!

If you didn't know already, I recently discovered that your work has an unexpected fan. A pageviews analysis suggests this got the article 30,000 views in one day. Blythwood (talk) 22:07, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fritz Müller (typographer)

Hello, Dutchman Schultz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fritz Müller".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 03:50, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Karl Hermann Schaefer

Hello, Dutchman Schultz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Karl Hermann Schaefer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Karl Hermann Schaefer

Hello, Dutchman Schultz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Karl Hermann Schaefer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:17, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Estro" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Estro has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 12 § Estro until a consensus is reached. Based5290 :3 (talk) 04:08, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Ideal Grotesque(typeface)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Ideal Grotesque(typeface) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 28 § Ideal Grotesque(typeface) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]