User talk:Drowningseagull

Drowningseagull, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Drowningseagull! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States presidential election in Illinois, 1964, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democrat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Austenasia

Hi there,

As your deletion nomination for Austenasia just reiterated arguments previously made, it was closed as speedy keep. If you wish to initiate a review process of this and prior decisions, please do so at WP:DRV.--Newbiepedian (talk · C · X! · L) 22:02, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:52, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, United States presidential election in Washington (state), 1944

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, United States presidential election in Washington (state), 1944. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – United States presidential election in Washington, 1944. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at United States presidential election in Washington, 1944. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. JTtheOG (talk) 18:26, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What was that?

Hi, I wonder if you could explain this edit? --bonadea contributions talk 13:47, 21 September 2018 (UTC) Oh god I actually posted that I'm very sorry[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Drowningseagull

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that User:Drowningseagull, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 09:45, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Jimbo Wales.

Wikipedia is not a playground. bonadea contributions talk 09:45, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because i got rid of all the irreverent info--Drowningseagull (talk) 10:09, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Screwyouoscar.png

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as File:Screwyouoscar.png, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:01, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:03, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Drowningseagull (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sorry i vandalized i wont do it again Drowningseagull (talk) 13:13, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've already shown we can't trust you. This is not convincing. Best we leave you blocked. Yamla (talk) 13:30, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Second Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Drowningseagull (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i made the mistake only twice and i have a history of productive edits can you at least reduce the block before blocking me indefinably Drowningseagull (talk) 13:34, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There is a large amount of trolling and overt vandalism coming from this account. The indefinite block seems appropriate until you can explain your long-term behavior, and your recent dishonest requests. I can't imagine what that explanation would be. Kuru (talk) 14:02, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A mistake? Only twice? Come on, stop lying. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and that's just the eight I looked at. You have no chance of being unblocked while still actively trying to mislead us. --Yamla (talk) 13:43, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request the third

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Drowningseagull (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

im sorry i vandalized all i am want is a second chance to make productive edits Drowningseagull (talk) 14:24, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time as you have lost the trust of the community and exhausted the patience of the block reviewers. In light of constructive edits you have made, I will invite you to abstain from Wikipedia for 6 months including unblock requests and then request the WP:standard offer. You may present specific examples of your constructive edits at that time, explain the actions that led to the loss of editing privileges, and explain how you will edit in the future.. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:59, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access revoked to stop you wasting even more of our time. --Yamla (talk) 14:25, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

User has engaged in block evasion as of November, 2018. --Yamla (talk) 15:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC) And January, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 12:17, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An invitation to discussion

I kindly invite you to the discussion on Template talk:Infobox election#The Bolding issue to decide whether to bold the winner in the election infobox. Lmmnhn (talk) 19:23, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]