User talk:DownFame

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 11:55, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. ratings

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. ratings, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Alex^TW 12:53, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating more templates, DownFame. Many of the ones you've already created have been listed for deletion for being too crowded and cramped, and you create ones identical in style to this. Please allow a WP:CONSENSUS to form before creating more. -- Alex^TW 11:39, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Vampire Diaries ratings

Template:The Vampire Diaries ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- Alex^TW 12:59, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DownFame, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi DownFame! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Arrow ratings

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Arrow ratings, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Alex^TW 11:41, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Could you please slow down with the rating templates until the matter is resolved? It's a lot to nominate and comb through all articles to see if they contain these tables/graphs. Callmemirela 🍁 ^talk 12:57, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Callmemirela: It seems that this user has no intent to comply with either of our requests, as they've continued to create more templates. Is there something that we can do about this? -- Alex^TW 14:47, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@AlexTheWhovian: Perhaps ask an admin to see if something can be done? I don't believe ANI is the right answer just yet. Callmemirela 🍁 ^talk 14:50, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Callmemirela: I reverted the user's additions of their templates into the articles; if they revert and begin an edit-war over the templates, I'll go to AN3 instead, citing the deletion and MOS discussions, as well as the edits by the IP editor, who's almost certainly the same person as the one behind this user. -- Alex^TW 14:58, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@AlexTheWhovian: Alright, let me know if you need my assistance. Also, if you do reach any AN boards, let me know. Callmemirela 🍁 ^talk 15:39, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sleepy Hollow ratings

Template:Sleepy Hollow ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 22:52, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nikita ratings

Template:Nikita ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 21:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Television ratings templates

April 2018

When you are creating a television ratings template using the {{Television ratings graph‎}}, please make sure you are using the correct capitalisation in the title of the page. As you can see at Category:Television ratings templates, the word "ratings" should not be capitalised. -- Radiphus 09:48, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

The width of the graph in the TV ratings templates is usually adjusted so that there is exactly a 2px space between the bars, unless another reason can be specified. In calculating the exact width of the graph, you will find this discussion helpful. For example, in the latest template you have created for Turn: Washington’s Spies, 40 episodes of the series have aired. In the discussion you will find that when the number of a series' aired episodes is between 20 and 49, then the width should be equal to 12 times the number of episodes, plus 98. In this case, it will be 12*40+98 which is 578. Using this method, i've changed the width of the graph from 600 to 578 and as you can see there is now a 2px space next to each bar. -- Radiphus 14:21, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed that you tried implementing my suggestions at {{Lucifer ratings}}. Thanks for that, but i would also like to point out a mistake in your calculation, so that you will not be confused with my instructions in the future. The mistake you made is that you did not include the last 2 episodes of the third season in your calculation, because they have not aired yet. You did 53*11+98=681, but you should have done 55*11+98=703. -- Radiphus 17:19, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. ratings

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. ratings, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Alex^TW 14:08, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Lucifer ratings

A tag has been placed on Template:Lucifer ratings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unused template

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Alex^TW 14:09, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Nikita ratings

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Nikita ratings, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Alex^TW 14:14, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lucifer ratings

Template:Lucifer ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- Alex^TW 06:16, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:12 Monkeys ratings

Template:12 Monkeys ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ballers ratings

Template:Ballers ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:12, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Legion ratings

Template:Legion ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:14, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wrecked ratings

Template:Wrecked ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:19, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Alex^TW 08:18, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. -- Alex^TW 08:19, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody is allowed to comment in a discussion that was closed by someone else. Nobody. The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). -- Alex^TW 15:44, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Legion ratings

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Legion ratings, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --wooden superman 15:42, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hell on Wheels ratings

Template:Hell on Wheels ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 15:23, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nashville ratings

Template:Nashville ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 15:23, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Younger ratings

Template:Younger ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 15:23, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Baby Daddy ratings

Template:Baby Daddy ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 15:24, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Melissa & Joey ratings

Template:Melissa & Joey ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 15:24, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Young & Hungry ratings

Template:Young & Hungry ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 15:24, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Code Black ratings

Template:Code Black ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 15:24, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Fosters (2013 TV series) ratings

Template:The Fosters (2013 TV series) ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 15:26, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ray Donovan ratings

Template:Ray Donovan ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 15:26, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Last Man on Earth ratings

Template:The Last Man on Earth ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 15:26, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bates Motel ratings

Template:Bates Motel ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 15:30, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Psych ratings

Template:Psych ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 15:31, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Z Nation ratings

Template:Z Nation ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 15:57, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that in this edit to Preacher (TV series), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 17:26, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Preacher ratings

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Preacher ratings, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --wooden superman 10:53, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. episodes. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Alex^TW 13:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. -- Alex^TW 14:01, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DownFame. You appear to be edit warring, since you keep re-adding the same thing and you won't wait for consensus. If you don't respond to the complaint it's likely you will be blocked. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:16, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of Gotham episodes, you may be blocked from editing. Esuka323 (talk) 15:06, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring about Template:Television ratings graph on multiple articles

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:42, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@EdJohnston: As the blocking admin, you may be interested in knowing that the editor has continued the behaviour that resulted in their block, with no further attempt to discuss. [1][2][3] -- Alex^TW 01:35, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@EdJohnston: And further. Should I be pinging you, or should I just file a new report? Cheers. -- Alex^TW 07:10, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of Power episodes. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Esuka323 (talk) 19:30, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Long term edit warring and apparent sockpuppetry.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

DownFame, you have been continuing the war since the 23 September AN3 complaint. For example, at List of Archer episodes on 10 October. I've issued an indefinite block, which can be lifted if you will promise to wait for consensus before making any similar edits in the future. See WP:GAB for how to appeal. I also take note you seem to have been using the range at Special:Contributions/138.190.132.0/24 for the same purpose. EdJohnston (talk) 18:15, 11 October 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

DownFame (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23174 was submitted on Nov 07, 2018 12:15:25. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:15, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]