Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 May 17

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 17

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Author request Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:06, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As the module itself claims, this module is not intended to be used in Wikipedia articles, and isn't usable there anyway, as there is no means of turning the SVG code into a graph within wikitext. Therefore, this module does not belong on Wikipedia. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 22:49, 8 May 2018 (UTC) (edited 19:04, 12 May 2018 (UTC))[reply]

  • Move - if it is possible. The module is useful in creating SVG files for charts. Commons, which is all about files, would no doubt be a better place for it. But (correct me if I'm wrong) commons has no Module: namespace that accommodates Lua-based templates. Obviously I'm biased here - I wrote the module, and at the moment I think I'm the only one to have used it. I was hoping this would change with (a) the recent upgrade and (b) as I use it to create charts for articles, I'd hope others notice its utility. BTW: the documentation for the module does clearly explain how to turn the SVG code into a graph, which is to create an SVG file which can be uploaded and is then used in articles. Innesw (talk) 00:03, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Innesw: Commons has a module namespace (e.g c:Module:Arguments) Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:02, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks. Fairly obviously I couldn't easily find evidence for the namespace on commons, but now I know it's there I'll move the module - just give me a bit of time. Once I'm done I'll request deletion from en: myself. Innesw (talk) 00:37, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 22:18, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The module has now been successfully moved to commons. Unless there is any further discussion I'm happy for the module page, and its /doc sub-page, to be deleted. Innesw (talk) 00:37, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 May 28. Primefac (talk) 00:28, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 May 28. Primefac (talk) 00:27, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 May 28. Primefac (talk) 00:27, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 May 28. Primefac (talk) 00:27, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 May 28. Primefac (talk) 00:29, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 May 28. Primefac (talk) 00:29, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:42, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Was used by the now-deleted {{Mapframe}} (which now redirects to another template). Gareth (talk) 16:29, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:42, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template, general consensus of WP:TV is that ratings graphs aren't required -- AlexTW 06:16, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:43, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The band's navigational template consists of one valid link, the band's article, and 13 redlinks of album articles that were deleted as being non-notable four years ago, therefore this is a navigational template that does not navigate anywhere. Aspects (talk) 01:59, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).