User talk:DotServer

This is DotServer's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saraikhet (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NGEO, requires significant coverage in multiple secondary sources. Wikimapia is not an acceptable or reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saraikhet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Saraikhet, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 00:48, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir don't lift this page if you find something wrong then edit it DotServer (talk) 09:09, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DotServer! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 00:48, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bharatpedia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bharatpedia, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://owiki.org/wiki/Wikipedia. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:50, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir don't lift this page if you find something wrong then edit it DotServer (talk) 09:09, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian Freedom Fighters has been nominated for deletion

Category:Indian Freedom Fighters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Hemantha (talk) 09:31, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs to be re-written to adhere to WP:NPOV. It could also use more citations from reliable and independent sources. (?) Information that can't be neutral should be removed (neutrality is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 23:25, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you translate from another Wikipedia, then you need to follow Help:translation. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 23:28, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank You So Much TheManishPanwar (talk) 12:45, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've advised the user not to barnstar themselves/their alternate accounts in the section below and on their main account — DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:13, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rajput clans of Uttarakhand moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rajput clans of Uttarakhand, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 03:29, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate accounts

Hi. I understand that this is an alternate account WP:VALIDALT of TheManishPanwar (talk · contribs), disclosing that on your userpage is a good practice [1]. I'll remind you that using alternate accounts for illegitimate purposes is not allowed WP:SOCK. This is cross-posted on TheManishPanwar's talk page as well — DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:03, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. If you have more alternate accounts, I'd advise disclosing them as well — DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:04, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-posting, this edit from TheManishPanwar giving barnstar to DotServer is wierd and I'd say personally that it's borderline illegitimate. Please do not repeat it again — DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:12, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheManishPanwar. I believe your use of multiple accounts has more than crossed the line 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:51, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

South Asian social groups

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:49, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello DotServer. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Uttarakhand Power Corporation Limited, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:DotServer. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=DotServer|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
It is abundantly clear that you are Manish Panwar, of the Uttarakhand Power Corporation Limited, and that you are, broadly construed, engaged in paid editing 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:22, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:DotServer, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=DotServer|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:06, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For Free Not a Paid Article It My Contributions DotServer (talk) 17:53, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence has been presented to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheManishPanwar which suggests differently. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:17, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You might not be "paid" to edit the article, but in case it's not clear, if you work for the Power Corporation, then you ARE a "paid editor" by Wikipedia's definition. I think the language or wording is maybe confusing you here. 73.127.147.187 (talk) 06:46, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DotServer Pinging for the above. 73.127.147.187 (talk) 06:47, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:25, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Pritam Bhartwan has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Email

To your email on 31 May asking for my [phone] number, no. Please keep discussions on the talk pages here — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:33, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kalpana Chauhan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kalpana Chauhan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 10:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi DotServer! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, This is the user's total time behind me., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalpana Chauhan (June 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DIVINE was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kalpana Chauhan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kalpana Chauhan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DIVINE 📪 19:48, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.rajputcommunity.in/t/chandra-singh-garhwali-chauhan-soldier-who-refused-to-fire-on-unarmed-people-and-became-a-freedom-fighter/953. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 21:33, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali

The page Draft:Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.rajputcommunity.in/t/chandra-singh-garhwali-chauhan-soldier-who-refused-to-fire-on-unarmed-people-and-became-a-freedom-fighter/953

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jay (talk) 02:01, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #60203

is closed. Let's discuss unblocking on your original account. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:51, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

You'll need to use the template

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

to request unblocking, but you should request unblocking on your original account, user talk:TheManishPanwar. This account is blocked as a WP:sock puppet per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheManishPanwar. Thanks, --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:29, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, DotServer

Thank you for creating Gadkhark Malla.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

please add a source for the population

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:56, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rajput clans of Uttarakhand

Hello, DotServer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rajput clans of Uttarakhand, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:10, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kalpana Chauhan

Hello, DotServer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kalpana Chauhan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kalpana Chauhan

Hello, DotServer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kalpana Chauhan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:07, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]