User talk:Doldrums

Welcome!

Hello, Doldrums, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! - Banyan Tree 14:03, 2 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bihar

I just fixed Bihar in devanagri. It would now appear as िबहार. Thanks

TV 20:11, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

edit summary on Benny Hill

hi CBT, regarding ur edit[1] of Benny Hill, the edit summary reads "remove stupid literally". i just wanted to bring to your notice that such a judgmental tone in edit summaries is deprecated (pretty strongly) in wikipedia and is best avoided. cheers, Doldrums 15:16, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, yes. I remain of the opinion that "his Television show has literally been seen" is absolutely awful, appalling use of language, but I'll concede that there were probably less iritable ways to point this out.--Cherry blossom tree 15:39, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

no arguments about "absolutely awful, appalling use of language", just don't say so in the edit summary. :) Doldrums 15:51, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deal. --Cherry blossom tree 15:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violation

Could you please explain to me what is the violation. All the contents from the page you have tagged has come fromthe same source (Mr. Arthikaje's History of Karnataka, at the web page shown). Please remove this tag ASAP

Patient

If you read the image's talk page, you won't be troubled regarding consent. Rklawton 15:45, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the welcome

I saw your welcome at wikinews first. Thanks Pronoun Pronoun 15:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFC Response

hey, thanks for taking the time to respond to the RFC for Fox News. Any help you would be willing to offer to cleanup the project (and keep some people from burying/ignoring controversy) would be appreciated. I might try to setup some more structured organization soon. Also, I accidentally posted this to your User page (instead of user talk). i couldn't move it across namespace, so I blanked your user page and moved it here. End result: you now have a created (but blank) user page instead of none at all (redlinked username). I'm really sorry about that, just wasn't paying attention. :( /Blaxthos 22:29, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA FNC

Cbuhl79 has opened a Request for Arbitration about the Fox News Channel intro wording. Somehow he forgot to notify you. I am requesting you visit the RfA and add your $0.02. Current RfA Page. Thanks! /Blaxthos 20:17, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I did not notify every editor who made a single comment in the dispute. Cbuhl79 03:15, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hi, Doldrums! I just wanted to thank you for your very kind welcome to me, which I only just stumbled across. (Who knew you could have a user discussion page without actually having a user page?) –Little Miss Might Be Wrong 03:50, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Army Act, 1911

Hi. Back in August you put a comment on the talk page for the List of Acts of Parliament of the United Kingdom Parliament, 1900-1919 that the Indian Army Act, 1911 appeared to be missing from the list. Just to let you know that this wasn't actually a British Act of Parliament, but rather legislation enacted in India by the Governor General. Cheers, Silverhelm 17:01, 20 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Jennifer Ann's Group

Thank you for your impartial and helpful comments. I've taken what you said and will work to get more articles about the group in print. You can read further on the talk page for the group if you'd like. Drew30319 00:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

April Fool's Main Page 2007

Hi Doldrums. April Fool's Main Page 2007 project affects all five changeable sections on the mainpage. To have an April Fool's featured article appear on the mainpage on April 1st, some of the Wikinews mainpage rules may need to be bent. Thus, the project may need the approval and agreed upon cooperation from those running the Wikinews main page section. If would be great if at least one of the Wikinews administrators agreed to be a point person for the Wikinews aspect of the April Fool's Main Page 2007 project. Mostly, this would involve deciding which Wikinews mainpage rules could be bent, reviewing proposed Wikinews mainpage content to ensure it meets Wikinews mainpage requirements, and ensuring that this content made its way to the mainpage on April 1st. Please respond here. Thanks. -- Jreferee 18:22, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can do. Doldrums 03:35, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great! I added your name here.-- Jreferee 23:25, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Salim Ali postage stamp.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Salim Ali postage stamp.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:56, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Press coverage

Beat you by a minute! ;-) Weird, eh? Angmering 18:33, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Women's College pic

Thanks for letting me know... it's just a shame it isn't such a spectular pic. Nephron T|C 22:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

image

Hi! Thanks for uploading it to Commons! I should have done that before actually :) Regards, Todor →Bozhinov 16:07, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Woolmer image

Feel free to use in any way you wish - same applies to all of my images on Wiki. Is there any easy way for them all to be transferred to Commons? PaddyBriggs 09:56, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nadine Gordimer

Hi Doldrums - nice approach on the Nadine Gordimer article. Maybe it will help to resolve the longstanding dispute between those of us (like me) who found this incident non-notable and those who thought that the race of the parties made it notable. --Lquilter 19:21, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is fair to say that the discussion on what to include (if anything) about the robbery of [Nadine Gordimer] has gone on for several months and has gotten us nowhere. Each side is still arguing its original points, and there seems to be no spirit of cooperation here, or willingness to compromise on key issues. Lquilter has repeatedly mentioned that mediation might be a good idea, and I must agree with her. Mediation is a voluntary process, and its results are non-binding. If both sides do not agree to the mediation, then it will not occur, for its results would then be meaningless. It is, however, the next step toward Arbitration, which is binding. The goal of mediation is to arrive at a solution that is acceptable to all parties. It is not to force one viewpoint on others. It is very important that all sides agree to this mediation. I am in the process of drafting the Request for Mediation. If you have a problem with mediation, or do not wish to participate, please speak up now at Talk:Nadine Gordimer#Mediation. Andyparkerson 23:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Nadine Gordimer, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.

Imposter

this user was not created by me, most likely another fruitless attempt by Tooj117 (talk · contribs) to cause trouble. Feel free to permaban the account as a sockpuppet/imposter. Thanks, OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About Image:India CG3.jpg

Hi, You had disputed a fair use rationale of this image, but according to the apparent source, that image is in PD now, so I have removed your tag, please go to the page and make sure you are happy with my change. Thanks --Spundun 19:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Romila Thapar

Ok, but I must tell you that the para has caused atleast one edit war on this page :) Please do delete it if you must. I have no interest in searching for a quote to re-add in its place either. --h y dka t 05:32, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work cleaning up the article btw... --h y dka t 06:17, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, That's fine by me. --h y dka t 07:27, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I read through the whole thing and did not find supporting material. Would you mind showing me a quote where the material is supported in the reference?

Thank You, I have gone through the policy and do accept that my initial post (it was unsigned) may have not adhered to the guidelines in the strictest sense of the word.

However, I am clear enough that my other insertions were all in line with the policy. Infact, it convinces me that the current page, which you all have so zealously protected isn't what it should have been, if guidelines were to be implemented in toto.

As far as re-insertion is concerned, it was only a logical response to mindless edits. The talk continues on the page but the responses in no way answer the queries which I have raised203.112.84.138 13:42, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ankush 135

Have reported my block for arbitration

Guess should have added it http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Involved_parties

Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Nadine Gordimer.

For the Mediation Committee, ^demon^{[omg plz]}

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

This message delivered: 08:19, 12 April 2007 (UTC).

Gordimer and policy

Hi. I've taken a strong line over the last few hours in relation to the BLP, NOR, and NPOV violations at the Gordimer entry. As a consequence the entry has been blocked for a week by user Durova (who did not take a position on the dispute). If you read through the section "BLP and notability" on the Gordimer talk page, you will see how I understand the policy issues. It is my belief that, having established the violations, it is up to editors to insist on enforcing policy correctly. I thus do not favour mediation, in particular given the lengthy history of the dispute. I have also referred the entry to the BLP noticeboard. I hope you will examine my arguments, find them convincing, and support enforcement of policy at this entry. FNMF 09:49, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

images on Wikinews article

hi, thanks for contributing to Wikinews. however, there is a bit of a problem with your edits to the Turkish rally article. see n:Talk:Pro-secular Turks rally against Erdogan's possible presidential candidacy. best, Doldrums 20:11, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to you there. -- Cat ^chi? 20:17, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Global perspectives task force

Hi Doldrums. I noticed your recent and excellent work on the Fox News article, and wanted to alert you to a task force that I thought might be up your alley. As part of the Project on countering systemic bias, a task force is getting underway to ensure that key articles (espeically politically controversial ones) reflect a truly global perspective. Discussion about the task force is here. If you're interested, please drop by, share your thoughts, and consider getting involved. Cheers! --Mackabean 06:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance Requested

Dear Doldrums,

I am requesting your assistance as a eurocentric user is taking a colonial view of indian history and biasing indian articles. The worst example is on the indo greek page where that user knitted together 3 maps (2 of which are inaccurate and mischaracterized) and stated that it was representative of the Indo Greeks[[2]]. He is commandeering indian history and aggrandizing greek influence by using obsolete and discredited sources.

He created a map showing all of northern India (upto maharashtra and as far as bengal) under the Indo greeks.
He has wrongly credited foreign influences ranging from astronomy (he originally wrote that the greeks gave india astronomy) to mahayana buddhism
He wrote that the greeks helped chandragupta conquer the nandas (contradicted by eminent scholars)
He has routinely committed original research by interpreting primary sources as he sees fit (i.e. kushan empire map)[[3]]
He attacks users who try to reason with him and violates agreements

I do not want a biased indian nationalist version of history. I want a fair treatment of it that is representative of mainstream views--something which is difficult considering the colonial views that have hurt it (AIT, etc). As such, I have appealed to wikipedia administration. Please consider adding to the indo greek talk page as a show of support. Users vastu, pavanapuram,windy city dude, and mahitgar have already called that contributor's practices into question. Your assistance and voice would be welcome. Thank you for your time.

Regards,

Modified

WP:BLP does not talk about sarcastic remarks on talk pages. But since you think that it violates BLP, so i have removed my sarcastic remark. The bit about missionary organisation is true and further explanation is given in the main article of Californian Hindu textbook controversy. But since you have objected, so i have commented out that too.--nids (♂) 18:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Army Act,1911

Hi, I noticed you'd put a message some time ago regarding this act. I have just created this article. If you know anything, could you please at to it. Cheers.Rueben lys 22:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Richmal_crompton_on_Woman_Behind_Just_William_book_cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Richmal_crompton_on_Woman_Behind_Just_William_book_cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 18:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

charlie rose/arundhati roy

Hi Doldrums,

I just revised and restored a piece about rose and roy under controversies on Roy's entry. I hope you are satisfied with the changes, but if not, I request that you please modify the entry instead of outright deleting it. Censorship of a writer -- especially an Indian writer -- by an interviewer from a former (some would say current) Empire is a significant controversy and I was honestly aghast when you wrote that the notability of the event wasn't clear. What could be more controversial in writing or in subjects relevant to Roy's life (democracy, free speech, activism) than censorship?

Best, md

Thapar

Doldrums, That referenced info does not contain any thing offensive, so there is no use shouting BLP , BLP again and again. -Bharatveer 12:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And what is so questionable about that comment and cited source???-Bharatveer 13:02, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That she got mentioned by name is in itself a great recognition.what is your big problem in that?-Bharatveer 13:25, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I request Doldrums to read the book review of Thapar at : http://www.indiastar.com/venkat1.html. -VJha 15:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

India RfC, controversial tag

Hi Doldrums, I noticed from the India talk page that you're opinion is that the controversial tag be removed because this is unneccessary. I have reinstated the tag, without offence, for reasons I have outlined in the talk page. I do not wish to appear an Oxymoron, byt the Indian independence movement is a slightly controversial topic, with different people and organisations holding the opinion that contributions of those outside the congress have largely been ignored. Also, the current version is highly favourable of the Congress only view point, as well as reduces an enormous movement into five lines. You will also see that past attempts by editors to improve this section in an NPOV and reliable way has been opposed strongly, I believe for the same reasons I have cited above. As such, I'd like the tag to stay because this will invite a discussion and resolve the RfC. Hope you see my point. With regards.Rueben lys 10:49, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of George Vasilakos

A tag has been placed on George Vasilakos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Gavin Collins 07:49, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adam's Bridge

Ref your recent edit on Adam's bridge article. Sorry I missed exact quote in the newspapers. However you may be interested to know that NASA has stated its statements are not official and however maintained satellite data is not sufficient enough to prove that Bridge is manmade or otherwise.[4]. This statement also appears in few more websites/newspapers. This prompted me to make edit regarding NASA statement. --Indianstar 15:45, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OIT

I think there are numerous pages in the history of the page which better represent the theory than Dab's whitewashing. Please look through the history to pages around December-January 2006-2007. Like this version had loads of information which was rejected because apparently it was written by authors that don't deserve a mention. But the OIT is a fringe theory and fringe authors are the only ones who have anything good to say about it, so surely their say should be considered in an encyclopaedia. Darrowen (talk) 04:58, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indus valley civilisation unreliability tag

i just noticed that u verified the reliability of Witzel's article. Could you please let me know what you verified? If you dont give me an answer in a reasonable time, i am going to keep the tag back. Thanks. vcpk (talk) 05:44, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But you know witzel is the Editr-in-chief of electronic Journal of Vedic studies. That means he has absolute control over what he wants to publish. That qualifies it to be WP:SPS. Secondly, even if i agree with you that it is a scholarly journal, that is only if others publish in his journal, not himself.vcpk (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 05:54, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

duplicated von Mansfeld biography?

Hi, Doldrums. Yes, I my opinion Peter Ernst, Graf von Mansfeld the elder refers to Peter Ernst I von Mansfeld-Vorderort. He had a son Ernst von Mansfeld, also called Peter Ernst II von Mansfeld-Vorderort. So, the usage of "the elder", and "the younger" is obvious.
Regards, User:Filiep. —Preceding comment was added at 19:36, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

It is a known fact that Indian history is heavily negated to wash away genocides that were brought down by foreign invasions ( especially Islamic conquests ) I think this should be a part of Negationism / Revivelsim....no?

Jon Ascton (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 01:05, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Religious violence in India

I am just being puzzled with User:B Nambiar's edits in Religious violence in India. Fox News Channel is not reliable source to him [5]. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 13:16, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tehelka-The Truth Gujarat 2002-video footage screenshot.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tehelka-The Truth Gujarat 2002-video footage screenshot.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:17, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Romila Thapar

Regarding your edits at Romila Thapar , Please first "remind" yourself -Bharatveer (talk) 05:15, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:David-Daiches-on-cover-of-Two-Worlds.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:David-Daiches-on-cover-of-Two-Worlds.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RDF media group logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RDF media group logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:41, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tehelka-The Truth Gujarat 2002-video footage screenshot.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tehelka-The Truth Gujarat 2002-video footage screenshot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:27, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Indian space program" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Indian space program. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 15#Indian space program until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 05:44, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sheepinthebigcity.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sheepinthebigcity.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]