User talk:DoctorHell
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, DoctorHell, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Alientraveller 08:49, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Deletion discussion
[edit]Article which you created but haven't evidently seen this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Israeli Violations of the Ceasefire of 21 November, 2013 CarolMooreDCđ˝ 17:20, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Violations of the Ceasefire of 21 November, 2012 for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Violations of the Ceasefire of 21 November, 2012 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Violations of the Ceasefire of 21 November, 2012 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jalapenos do exist (talk) 19:09, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
- Just a heads-up on some further improvements. Page presentation, the aesthetic impression, is important for stray eyes looking over it to evaluate the quality. One instance:
- âA 20-year old Palestinian was shot dead and 10 other farmers were wounded, notwithstanding the UN-brokered ceasefire. The incident took place near Khan Younis while the men were reportedly endeavouring to reach their farmland.
- -ref Ayman Mohyeldin, Andy Eckardt, âIsraeli forces kill Gaza man despite cease-fire,â at NBC News, 23 November 2012 /ref
- You harvest the essential details from the report (here for example farmers at Khan Younis, and link where possible).
- For example Isabel Kershner,(first note) Maan News Agency. The point about such links is that they indicate the source or its authors are 'reputable' or at least well known, and their status can be checked by looking at the page. Compare the page I did at List of Israeli price tag attacks. I'd of course have done this myself to save you the trouble, but for the fact I am self-suspended from article editing for a month for inadvertently violating the 1R rule. Good luck. Nishidani (talk) 15:09, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- Just a heads-up on some further improvements. Page presentation, the aesthetic impression, is important for stray eyes looking over it to evaluate the quality. One instance:
Nomination of List of Israeli Violations of the Ceasefire of 21 November, 2013 for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Israeli Violations of the Ceasefire of 21 November, 2013 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Israeli Violations of the Ceasefire of 21 November, 2013 (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, DoctorHell. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
References
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to the wikipedia. I hope Help:Citation Style 1 will help your with your future editing. Lmmnhn (talk) 22:59, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 18
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anti-corruption campaign under Xi Jinping, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page In the Name of the People. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ ⢠Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
July 2017
[edit]Your addition to Hong KongâMainland China conflict has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or imagesâyou must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. â Diannaa đ (talk) 20:44, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
[edit] Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from SovietâAfghan War into List of foreign political events with the interference of Communist Party of China. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. â Diannaa đ (talk) 13:20, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
The article CUHK democracy wall standoff has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unsourced news item - no indication of notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 17:59, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 7
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CUHK democracy wall standoff, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lingnan University and New People's Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ ⢠Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 14
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ ⢠Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- CUHK democracy wall standoff (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Independent Commission Against Corruption and Article 23
- List of foreign political events with the interference of Communist Party of China (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Conservative Party
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Re: List of foreign political events with the interference of Communist Party of China
[edit]Dear DoctorHell,
Thanks for editing the said wiki article. (List_of_foreign_political_events_with_the_interference_of_Communist_Party_of_China You may be aware that the article has been proposed for deletion. I hope you can express your idea hereby. I have voted against deletion and I have a sense that the one who propose deleting has a fairly strong Pro-China background.
Thanks a lot!! Universehk (talk) 21:06, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Clearly the person who suggested that this  List of foreign political events with the interference of Communist Party of China page to be deleted is a anti-Chinese person, hates China as they want history to be censored and doesn't want to display China's great historical record.
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, DoctorHell. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Rape/sexual slavery during the Vietnam War
[edit]See Talk:South Korea in the Vietnam War#Alleged rape/sexual slavery where your recent edits are being discussed. Mztourist (talk) 11:08, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
There is no need for further discussion as I'm not the one denying facts, claiming the majority rape/sexual slavery Lai Äấi HĂ n were "consensual sex" as well as dismissing the entire Lai Äấi HĂ n page's references as hearsay or unreliable. These statements shows someone is trying to deny and cover up certain war crimes as well as lacking humanity.
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, DoctorHell. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, DoctorHell. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)