User talk:Doc James/Archive 93

Mediterranean diet

Hi, Doc James.

If you are so kind, I would like you to give your opinion on this issue:

This text, included on revision of 14 December 2015 [1] was removed on this revision of 28 April (→‎Health effects: rv conjecture per WP:FRINGE & WP:NOTOPINION)

I reworded it [2] and it was again modified by "curious" reasons (→‎Health effects: copyedit and trim for balanced perspective, WP:NPOV; trim per WP:OVERCITE), with a result not supported by the source: "Depending on the bread products selected". Where does it figure on the source???

Mention about gluten was removed at this revision [3]

IMO, to confer really neutrality to the section "Health effects", we must state both beneficial and negative effects, even in a minority of people, which is an indiscutbile reality, perfectly supported by many reliable sources.

If you agree, can you review and reformulate from these texts?: [4] [5]

Best regards. --BallenaBlanca (talk) 10:05, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

In Spain right now. Will look in a bit. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Doc James. What do you think about this? Best regards. --BallenaBlanca (talk) 16:01, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Head lice infestation

Hi, I already added a reference, I'm sorry I couldn't find one in English, I guess in Spanish is ok, if it's taken from the Sociedad Argentina de Pediatría web. Please talk to me before reverting my edit. --RoRo (talk) 20:25, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

A Spanish source is not great. I am not seeing it as supporting the content in question per here [6] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:53, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Ok, no Spanish sources: you may like to know every biologist who worked with insects and other arthropods knows ethanol kills all of them, I could find many sources for that affirmation alone, i.e. this one: "...It has been shown that at concentrations higher than 95%, commercial alcohol preserves DNA (Nagy 2010), but the use of highly concentrated commercial alcohol as a killing solution may be prohibitively expensive when needed in large quantities, such as in large-scale biodiversity sampling. In Brazil, for example, it is illegal to carry large amounts of commercial alcohol on long journeys, which could hinder its use in extensive field expeditions. Here we propose the use of ethanol fuel as a cheaper and logistically feasible alternative..." Szinwelski, N., Fialho, V. S., Yotoko, K. S. C., Seleme, L. R., & Sperber, C. F. (2012). Ethanol fuel improves arthropod capture in pitfall traps and preserves DNA. ZooKeys, (196), 11–22. Advance online publication. http://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.196.3130 So what do you think, it's ok to put that claim in a pediculosis article? --RoRo (talk) 17:17, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Lets continue on the talk page. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:30, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Glioblastoma multiforme

Hello Doc James: I want to become a more experienced Wikipedia editor, and therefore would like your feedback on why you cut my text (“intranasal drug delivery”) on the Glioblastoma multiforme page on May 7, 2016. In particular:

(i) The original, primary scientific publications describe 2 clinical studies. One study was performed with recurrent GBM patients, the other study included primary patients. In GBM this distinction is important, because recurrent patients are usually treatment resistant (after having undergone radiation plus temozolomide), whereas primary patients are treatment-naïve. So, IMHO, it would be relevant to mention both studies, whereas you reduced these 2 studies to “A small study…”. Agreed to mention both studies?

(ii) The two studies included several hundred patients. Malignant glioma (grade III+IV) is a rare (orphan) disease; therefore, several hundred patients should not be considered a “small” study. Agreed?

(iii) I realize that Wikipedia prefers MEDRS-type articles, and several references of this type had been added, in addition to the respective primary articles. However, you deleted all of the primary articles. Would it not be okay to have at least one primary reference of the original clinical studies?

(iv) You also deleted any reference to the fact that clinical trials have been initiated here in the US (the first two trials were done in Brazil). You don’t think that this is worthy of mentioning? [Several other sections on this page do mention clinical trials (with reference to ClinicalTrials.gov).]

Looking forward to your feedback and learning from it. I would like to add back in some of the deleted text, but want to avoid back-and-forth editing. Thank you. Ossky (talk) 21:46, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Yes trimmed the primary studies. Do the reviews you added comment on them?

We do not typically use clinical trials.gov to comment on what trials are ongoing. There are of course a lot of trials ongoing in the US for GBM https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=glioblastoma+&Search=Search The ref does not make it clear why this one was important.

Best

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:52, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

talkback

Hello. You have a new message at Baffle_gab1978's talk page. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:39, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:50, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Inconsistent statements

Hi James. Denny states on May 2 2016 "I voted for James’ removal from the Board because of his perceived reluctance to cooperate with the formal investigation, his withholding of information when asked for, his secrecy towards other Board members, even once the conspiracy was lifted, and him never convincingly taking responsibility for and ownership of his actions and mistakes." Lorente says on 31 Dec 2015 that "Over the course of the past few months, the Trustees had multiple conversations around expectations for Trustee conduct, responsibilities, and confidentiality. Ultimately, the majority of the Trustees came to the opinion that we were not able to reach a common understanding with James on fulfilling those expectations." I originally read Lorente's statement as referring to your breach of confidentiality. But Denny's statement suggests it was the other way round. You were being too confidential, as it were. Or is Lorente referring to another set of discussions? Peter Damian (talk) 08:22, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Hey User:Peter Damian, I was involved with providing the new investigating committee an in depth report of the concerns we had discovered. I do not believe that me providing specific emails added to what was in that report and was also hesitant to provide them since some of the concerns were collected in confidence. The degree of transparency around the long term strategy of the WMF should be very different from that of private communications with staff.

With respect to Denny's request that I take "ownership" of my actions, I assume he is referring to the claim by some members of the board that I misled staff regarding how the board was going to vote in November. I do not believe I mislead staff. And this has been corroborated by at least some staff.[7] I never guaranteed that the board would make a specific decision or claimed that I spoke for more than 10% of the board. I was open about the fact that I took staff concerns very seriously and voted along the lines of that position. So yes I refused to take ownership for something I do not consider I did.

With respect to Lorente's claim that I breached confidentiality, I am not entirely sure to what he refers. When Lorente made this semi public statement commented on by Oliver here "my concern is that when staff reached out the Board replied with a letter indicating they had full and unanimous confidence in our leadership" he did so without my consent. I did privately clarify this statement and my position to the staff who reached out to me, so he may be referring to my clarification.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. I need to think about this. Peter Damian (talk) 06:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

User page

User:İnternion My request has been marked for deletion --İnternion (talk) 17:17, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Not exactly sure why the request User:İnternion Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:19, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Please be aware of this issue.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This entire article, and all of the articles on the drugs involved, are riddled with significant errors:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H1_antagonist

This is incredibly detrimental to human health. I've been making some edits to attempt to reflect the research as of 2016:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diphenhydramine#Mechanism_of_action

Diphenhydramine is an inverse agonist of the histamine H1 receptor.[38]

That was an edit I made, because I am not good at making more sophisticated changes with the tables and so forth. Another person(s) read my edit and changed the article to reflect the current research. It is worth noting that that drug has been used in the United States and abroad for 70 years before I came along and made that edit. This is extremely distressing.

Of course the scientific article I cite must be studied, at least for a moment, but there is no paywall and I will provide the text so it can be quickly examined:

Since all H 1-antihistamines examined to date have shown inverse agonists, it is suggested that the term "H 1-receptor antagonists" be replaced by "H 1-antihistamines." [41],[42]

Constitutional activity is also demonstrated at H 2 receptors. Many H 2 receptor antagonists, such as cimetidine, ranitidine, tiotidine, and famotidine, described previously as pure H 2 antagonists, actually behave as inverse agonists and diminish basal cAMP levels. By using transfected Chinese hamster ovarian (CHO) cells expressing different densities of wild-type H 2 receptors or uncoupled H 2 (Leu124Ala) receptors, considerable agonist-independent H 2 receptor activity was found. [43] Ranitidine and cimetidine acted as inverse agonists (both induced H 2 receptor upregulation), whereas burimamide was shown to be a neutral antagonist.

Cumulative anticholinergic use is associated with an increased risk for dementia.[28][29]

I am willing to take some time in carefully edit some or many articles, studying each drug to make sure my accuracy is as good as can be expected. On that Benadryl article, I replaced a paper that was published in 1994, kind of distressing since the human genome project was completed in 2003.

The problem is that the organizational structure supporting all these drugs is something that I cannot edit. I am a novice user.

This next bit is a little more theoretical and will certainly not be reflected in my editing:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_epigenetics#Learning_and_memory

Studies in rodents have found that the environment exerts an influence on epigenetic changes related to cognition, in terms of learning and memory;[4] environmental enrichment correlated with increased histone acetylation, and verification by administering histone deacetylase inhibitors induced sprouting of dendrites, an increased number of synapses, and reinstated learning behaviour and access to long-term memories.[1][28] Research has also linked learning and long-term memory formation to reversible epigenetic changes in the hippocampus and cortex in animals with normal-functioning, non-damaged brains.[1][29] In human studies, post-mortem brains from Alzheimer's patients show increased histone de-acetylase levels.[30][31]

Alzheimer's disease accounts for over 60% of dementia.

This suggests the potential for Anticholinergic drugs may be involved in epigenetics. Maybe.

I've been to Southeast Asia and China and people develop allergies due to the pollution (epigenetics have been linked) and treat them with antihistamines, which could potentially lead to more epigenetic changes that are very harmful.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_information_on_Wikipedia#Other_views

Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales has said that lack of health information increases preventable deaths in emerging markets and that health information from Wikipedia can improve community health.[29] Wales presented the Wikipedia Zero project as a channel for delivering health information into places where people have difficulty accessing online information.[29]

I myself use Longvida Curcumin to prevent cognitive dysfunction that may come with aging. Very powerful HDAC inhibitor.

In any case, please be aware that I have also forwarded a variant of this message to:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Seppi333

But I am really trying to get things moving along, because we've been using this for 70 years already. Benadryl came out in 1946. We need to crap or get off the pot already.

Hello from the East coast, I see you are from the West, getting hot 'ere by', just switched from winter to summer in one day. Wish we had spring here, dying from the heat.

Regards Salvia420 (talk) 19:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Hey User:Salvia420 they main thing we need to do is make sure we stick with high quality sources per WP:MEDRS. Which issue are you most concerned about? Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:30, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

The change I want to make

All of H1 antagonists (Benadryl, etc) are inverse agonists. Also some H2 are inverse agonists as well.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11972592

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3195115/

That is what I want to change.

To be perfectly clear,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diphenhydramine#Mechanism_of_action

This article above is right because I editted, and would still be wrong right now if I did not.

The rest are all wrong save a few.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H1_antagonist

I cannot do anything except edit sections, and am not willing to learn.

Salvia420 (talk) 01:48, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Inverse agonist and antagonists overlap. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:06, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

So we just call everything antagonists? If we have a bag of circle shapes and square shapes, do we call them all squares? Assuming that what you are saying is right (we are talking specifically about H1 receptor here, we are dealing with the H1_antagonist article on Wikipedia. The literature states: "Since all H1 -antihistamines examined to date have shown inverse agonists, it is suggested that the term “H1 -receptor antagonists” be replaced by “H1 -antihistamines.”" In that case, they do not overlap and you could even rename it H1_Inverse_agonist. But I think that is counterproductive and we should adhere to the literature in moving away from characterizing them by their reception actions. These are dirty drugs and labeling them antagonist or inverse agonist and so forth is inappropriate. There are some crossovers once you start looking at the H2 receptor sites. Or if the literature is wrong and not all H1 antagonists are inverse agonists as it states, I find it very hard to believe its a good idea to name them all antagonists or inverse agonists. It's completely misleading and inaccurate, and harms the credibility of Wikipedia. I cannot be wrong here. By the way, this results minor increased rates of Alzheimer's disease with cumulative use, and you would expect these receptor sites to be up-regulated if they were antagonists. But that does not happen. Regards Salvia420 (talk) 20:34, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Doc James just to jump in here - I don't know how much you have dug into this but the background here is that folks used to think antihistamines were just antagonists - that they temporarily blocked the active site of the receptor so the receptor couldn't be activiated by histamine. But histamine receptors are GPCRs and like lots of GPCRs (and other receptors) they are moving all the time, shifting between "off" and "on", and they have a low level of constitutive "on" activity that is actually important to normal health. What the antihistamines do via this "inverse agonism" is that they bind off the receptor site and stabilize the receptor in the "off" position so that they kill even the background constitutive "on" activity, and folks think this is what causes some of the side effects of anihistamines. This does seem to be the current view. I don't agree that it is as urgent as it is being framed but it does seem useful to update articles to reflect this. Perhaps folks at WT:PHARM would be willing to help this person? I can post there about this if you like. Jytdog (talk) 20:45, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

User:Jytdog sounds reasonable. If this is the current terminology happy to see it updated. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:51, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

There is no doubt that many of the 'antagonists' for G-protein-coupled receptors are actually inverse agonists, but the function difference between an inverse agonist and an inverse agonist is very subtle for native receptors which usually have little intrinsic activity. Most of the studies showing signficant effects occur in cell lines (like CHO cells) in which many receptors are forcibly expressed (over-expressed); showing important effects in real tissues is tricky. That's why the IUPHAR nomenclature still lists many such drugs as both "antagonists" and "inverse agonists" (see, for example, the listing of drugs that act at the H1 receptor). So, I don't think that there is a need for a title change, nor should Wikipedia be leading nomenclature change ahead of industry-recognised guides. Klbrain (talk) 21:47, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

User:Klbrain thanks also sounds very reasonable. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:51, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Jytdog it is worth mentioning that these have been linked to with a minor increased risk in dementia. In Alzheimer's patients epigenetic factors can be observed which are also important in things such as reinstating learning behaviors, long term memory, sprouting dendrites etc. Therefore it may influence humans on a very subtle level. At a level we may never understand, actually, we will never be able to obtain human brain tissue or experiment on humans. Rodent students are not something that is particularly valuable when a human with an education and life experience, etc, is losing their mind to Alzheimer's. The research is almost always going to be cor-relational and not directly indicating causation. No one else will do anything, all of these organizations have people in them connected with companies, lobbiests, etc, etc, these drugs make a lot of money. We can barely get the fact up there that these drugs can effect the minds of old people. I mean if I take bendaryl, it will effect my mind. This stuff is a no brainer. But the fact is, is that a word has to mean something. There are drugs that are actual antagonists. You can say that they are antagonists and be honest when you say that. I don't understand why we are waiting for some corrupt organization to allow us to tell others that an antagonist is not an inverse agonist. You will find cures with epigenetics but never the causes of disease. Never will we find the causes and establish a solid link. But words lose their usefulness when the word does not connect with the idea. How can anyone say that H1 antagonist connects to the idea of a receptor site being antagonized? Inverse agonism is there, we admit it's happening. It doesn't matter if that has any effects, what matters is that the word is completely accurate, and if it is inaccurate, then it doesn't matter what anyone else says, because a square is not a circle, and we are intelligent people. This is not a crazy rant, if words don't work anymore then we are screwed, honestly. It's not just an antagonist. And anyones opinion of what an inverse agonist is irrelevant. If it causes epigenetic problems, we'll all be dead from old age before we ever know. And why does the mechanics section of diphenhydramine still say it is an inverse agonist if it didn't matter? I don't understand this at all. I have a liberal arts degree, so I don't understand the medical sophisms here, and that is not to be rude, but I did learn Latin, and that was used for all the medical terminology, and I know that a word is supposed to be accurate and do something. These are not H1 antagonists, the word is obsolete thanks to modern research, the research in this medicines citations are garbage, from 1994, that's 9 years before the human genome project was ever completed. It seems urgent to me, the fact that we take drugs and we have no idea what they do. We never will. The cause of autism is epigeneticly related and the rates are skyrocketing. We should be worried to at least provide objective and accurate names for the functions of drugs, and be the source of change instead of waiting for people to tell us that a square is not a circle. An antagonist is not an inverse agonist. Really all it comes down to is that single sentence, for the basic fact is, is that a word is a word. A light is either on or off. It's ridiculous that anyone thinks they need permission to be told what "on" means. This is a bit of a rant, but no matter how educated you are, you will never be able to tell me an antagonist is an inverse agonists, or someone needs to wait to approve that. That is not how words work, are things so complicated now that on can also mean off? We might as well start barking at each other like dogs, words just are abstract sounds at this point. It's the truth. More than my opinion when it comes to that point I'm afraid, regardless of anything else said. I'm either right or the mechanisms of action section in Diphenhydramine ought to be rewritten as antagonist, so the word connects to the idea it represents.

References

Salvia420 (talk) 08:26, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

user:Salvia420 Doc James has made it pretty clear that this is not something he is going to get into (he is more of an MD than a pharmacologist so that makes sense) - you really should take this up at the thread I opened at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Pharmacology#Update_content_on_antihistamines. I am going to close this thread so it doesn't keep burgeoning. Jytdog (talk) 08:33, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

DMT1

Very disappointed to see the only doctor to be removed from the Wiki Trustee. Anyway, could you please take a look at Talk:Diabetes mellitus type 1, regarding "comorbidities with other autoimmune disease", I'm a bit surprised there's nothing included there 1.129.97.52 (talk) 23:59, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the words of support. I will run again. Will take a look in a bit. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Edit Request

Hi Doc James,

I'll address this edit request to SlimVirgin as well since DocJames is on vacation. Would you please add a sentence to the finasteride "society and culture" section about the ongoing product liability issues? I have not added this in the past because I expected it would be rapidly removed due to the degree of tension on that article. Nonetheless, I think it is notable and WP:MEDORDER specifies that legal issues should be included in the "society and culture" section.

I recommend a simple sentence that closely mirrors the company's quarterly report. "As of March 31, 2016, approximately 1,385 product liability lawsuits have been filed by plaintiffs against Merck who allege that they have experienced persistent sexual side effects following cessation of treatment with finasteride." The source should be their latest financial report at http://s21.q4cdn.com/755037021/files/doc_financials/quarterly/2016/Q1/1Q16-Form-10-Q.pdf.

I also think the first paragraph of the section about the historical finasteride ban is no longer notable since it the drug has been re-instated. I would like to have that paragraph deleted as well but mostly just see it as trivial information.

JYTDog has offered to "walk away from the article" if I refrain from editing indirectly, so this is my effort to uphold my part. Thanks - Doors22 (talk) 22:27, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

James and Doors22, I've copied this request to Talk:Finasteride so that others can comment on it. SarahSV ^(talk) 02:45, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Answered on the talk page. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:17, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Cholera Edit Page Request

Doc James,

We are coming to you as three anthropology students at the University of Kansas and doing a class project on Cholera. We would like to edit the cholera page for class and we are going to include scholarly information . We are new users so making edits can be difficult but the information we have is strong and we would like to contribute this information to the cholera page.

Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Culvesam (talk • contribs) 14:16, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Certainly User:Culvesam. Make sure you read WP:MEDMOS and WP:MEDRS. Also User:Doc James/Students provides advice to new users. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:58, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Fetal tissue transplantation

Hello I cant find my article pertaining to Fetal tissue transplantation.please help and clarify a bit about moving the article.

````` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bajechele (talk • contribs) 19:49, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

I have moved the content to your talk page as an article on that topic already existed. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:51, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

The article Fetal Tissue Transplantation shouldn't have been moved to Fetal tissue implant not correct

Hello, You shouldn't have done that when the article contains the first of its kind of work done by some eminent researchers supported by the government. The article is more related to stem cell and its implications in cell therapy with a view of fetal cell therapy on a wide scale basis in cases of different ailments. If you look into the content of it is surely describes a lot more than what fetal tissue implant actually describes. Not correct absolutely not correct. A lot of care was taken to make that article informative with a view of modern medicine and now it has been moved to Fetal Tissue implant an article which doesn't contain anything at all.Not correct absolutely not correct. It was nothing but years of experience of different researchers in this field.

Bajechele (talk) 19:52, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Fetal tissue transplantation is the same as fetal tissue implantation. We do not need to separate articles on the same thing. Please read WP:MEDRS and you may edit that article and add the content supported by appropriate sources. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:57, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

ar Wikipedia

Dear Doc James,

I had been banned from editing because of machine translations, and pulled the editing powers and and was stripped of my powers. Iam a contributer in ar.wikipedia.

My User ID: 272235

My Total edits: 12,703

Number Of Articles 288.

is that happened to me legal according to wikipedia policies ,or exceeding the arbitrariness of administrative powers.

I hope I receive an explanation,

Execuse me for interrupting you.

--نبيل عبدالقادر عبدالوهاب (talk) 21:08, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

User:نبيل عبدالقادر عبدالوهاب you have lost your ability to edit ar.wikipedia? Have you reached out to the blocking admin? Did this go through a community process? Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:10, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

(talk · contribs

Yes I had lost my ability to edit ar. Wikipedia . No I did not reach out to the blocking admin. No this was not gone through a community process.

today while I am editing the artiele إصابة الرباط الصليبي الأمامي Anterior cruciate ligament injury in ar.wikipedia, I been blocked.

--نبيل عبدالقادر عبدالوهاب (talk) 23:10, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Would be good to ask them for justification. I am course struggle with following up as my ability to read Arabic is very low. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:34, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

TS speculation

Hey, Doc ... could you keep an eye on this? Just saying hi, Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks User:SandyGeorgia. Will watchlist it. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:35, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Intranasal drug delivery/glioblastoma

Hello Doc: I am new at editing and have asked for your feedback before. Am trying again here. I envision that I can make sensible and valuable contributions here and there, but I am still stuck with my very first edit, where I simply do not understand why your reversions. I have read walls of text about how to edit, and have read lots of pages as examples to get a feel for WP style. Yet, of course, you are vastly more experienced than I am, and therefore I am trying to receive useful guidance from you. So, with regard to my edit on Intranasal Drug Delivery on the Glioblastoma page:

(i) Glioblastoma is a rare/orphan disease; a clinical phase I/II trial with hundreds of patients is unusually large. It is simply incorrect of you to label that study on intranasal perillyl alcohol a “small” study. Why do you insist on “small”? (ii) It seems to be rather trivial to have a statement that “a study has been conducted” — without adding a brief informative comment on the outcome (e.g., “encouraging results” — so stated in the referenced secondary literature). Other similar sections I see on WP do provide such a note on outcome. Why do you deem it inappropriate here? Why do you object to adding a referenced comment on the outcome? (iii) The section on Gene Therapy (directly above) as well as many other WP pages, has extensive text descriptions and details of ongoing clinical trials — why do you deem it inappropriate to mention (+ link) the clinical trial on intranasal delivery here in the US?

Sorry if I keep banging on this issue. I’d like to move on, but feel that my approach via succinct, attempted neutral, referenced statements is not working. It seems I am lacking basic understanding of WP policies, and I’d like to find out why. It would be great if you had the time to briefly address each of the 3 points above. I’d appreciate it. Thank you. Ossky (talk) 21:49, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Question for you. Why did you remove "Direct nose-to-brain drug delivery is being explored as a means to achieve higher, and hopefully more effective, drug concentrations in the brain."

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Fair question. My answer: After my first edit, editor Jytdog deleted my text and commented “we don’t know if it works yet or not.” My interpretation of his comment was that he was referring to the “direct nose-to-brain” mechanism. In response, I did some reading on this issue. My interpretation of the literature is this: it is indeed unclear, at least in the case of perillyl alcohol, how it gets into the brain. The clinical studies do show that intranasal perillyl alcohol works for brain cancer; however, they do not show the underlying mechanism of transport into the brain that is responsible for the therapeutic outcome. It could be: (i) direct nose-to-brain transport (circumventing the blood-brain barrier), or (ii) uptake by the mucosa into the systemic bloodstream and from there into the brain (across the BBB), or (iii) since it is inhalation: uptake into the lungs, from there into the systemic bloodstream, and from there into the brain (across the BBB). Based on these unresolved possibilities, I thought that perhaps it could be misleading to start this section by emphasizing “nose-to-brain drug delivery”. Therefore, while there seems to be a therapeutic effect, I thought that Jytdog had a point in stating that we don’t yet know the mechanism of it. Thanks. Ossky (talk) 22:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC) I'd be happy to see that comment back in, though. I only tried to be super objective and critical. Ossky (talk) 22:24, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

The two refs are specifically about nose to brain drug delivery.[8][9] thus IMO mentioning that is important.

Which comment do you wish to see back in? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Appreciate the feedback, Doc. Have re-inserted 1 earlier sentence. Hope it is succinct, informative, and objective to meet WP standards. At least from my perspective, presentation style and format is no different than comparative text passages on this same site and many other WP sites. Hope these 2 sentences will stand for a while. Thanks again for the feedback. Ossky (talk) 04:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

References

Recent changes to Hypercholesterolaemia

Hi Doc James,

Thank you for checking over my work, it is always an honour to work with you!

With regard to your first comment,

"You cannot format like this "Diet has an important effect on blood cholesterol, but the size of this effect varies substantially between individuals.[15] About 50% of nonesterified cholesterol is absorbed in the intestine,[16] but interindividual variations in the efficiency of uptake, and the effect of other dietary components such as plant sterols and fiber content affect absorption.[16] Moreover, when dietary cholesterol intake goes down, production (principally by the liver[17]) typically increases, though not always with complete compensation, so that reductions in blood cholesterol can be modest. "

This was the original formatting from the wikipedia article before I began editing it, I merely moved this content from one section to another without changing it. For the sake of my own learning, however, were the errors that reference 16 was used twice within the one sentence, and reference 17 was before rather than after the punctuation?

User:Nren4237 Looking at your edits more closely [10]

Before you edit the ref was formatted as "Diet has an important effect on blood cholesterol, but the size of this effect varies substantially between individuals.<ref>{{cite journal|date=June 1997|title=Plasma lipid and lipoprotein responses to dietary fat and cholesterol: a meta-analysis|url=|journal=Am. J. Clin. Nutr.|volume=65|issue=6|pages=1747–64|doi=|pmid=9174470|author=Howell WH, McNamara DJ, Tosca MA, Smith BT, Gaines JA}}</ref>"

After it was formatted as "Diet has an important effect on blood cholesterol, but the size of this effect varies substantially between individuals.<sup>[15]</sup>"

Not sure what happened. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:18, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Ah, apologies, I didn't realize this is what happened. It may have been an issue with the visual editor when I cut and paste the text, I'll be more careful next time! Thank you for picking this up. Also, thank you for taking the time to clean up the article, I feel it looks much better now. I'll keep working on adding new information to these sections and other articles. My pet topic is primary and secondary prevention, so expect to see more of me on those pages! Nren4237 (talk) 21:29, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

No worries. Yes I am not sure if cut and paste works in VE. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:32, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Answering your second comment,

"What ref supported this? "Dietary modification to improve blood cholesterol levels include reducing dietary cholesterol, reducing saturated fats, increasing plant stanol and sterol esters, increasing fiber, and maintaining a healthy weight."

This sentence was intended to serve as an introductory sentence, listing the dietary interventions which would be discussed in more detail below. In this kind of situation, should we add references to each part of the introductory sentence as well?

The question of whether or not dietary cholesterol affects blood cholesterol is unclear. Per "evidence shows no appreciable relationship between consumption of dietary cholesterol and serum cholesterol" [11]

Will update Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Updated here Hypercholesterolemia#Diet_2

Added a ref for the other bit Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for including this source! I thought the rest of the paragraph was implying that dietary cholesterol is a cause of hypercholesterolaemia, but on closer inspection it doesn't seem to state though. My apologies! Nren4237 (talk) 21:32, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Answering your third comment,

"This content is a source from 1986? That is too old."

I agree with you on the age of the source, but this is what UpToDate used as their reference on the topic: "PLANT STEROLS — Plant sterols are similar in chemical structure to cholesterol, differing in their side chain configuration. The mechanism by which they lower cholesterol is thought to involve inhibition of cholesterol absorption [101,102]. " (http://www.uptodate.com/contents/lipid-lowering-with-diet-or-dietary-supplements?source=see_link#H13). Reference 101 was the one I listed, whereas reference 102 is from 1997 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=9164705). Would this be more acceptable? I had assumed that the reason that UpToDate used these references is that, like most drug mechanisms, they are a fairly non-controversial point of basic science and therefore are not frequently re-explored once earlier papers have established their validity.

Thank you for taking the time to re-integrate the new information into reverted article. However, I note that your reversions have still left substantial sections on active interventions in the "causes" section, which is one of the problems I was trying to fix. I feel that the "causes" section should be limited only to information on etiology, and should not contain sections like "The inclusion of 2 g per day of plant stanol or sterol esters and 10 to 20 g per day of soluble fiber decrease dietary cholesterol absorption.[6] Dietary changes can typically achieve reductions of 10 to 15% in blood cholesterol.[6]". Please let me know your thoughts! Nren4237 (talk) 11:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

User:Nren4237 Agree belongs in the treatment section and have moved.[12]

Let me know if I missed anything. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:32, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

"...good faith ... spam account..."

How are these two statements consistent? "(Reverted good faith edits by User:Grace Wildt (talk): Appears to be a spam account. (TW))" This taxes my meager intellect. Grammar's Li'l Helper <sup>Discourse</sup> 22:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

I imagine they are doing it in good faith. But they are working to add links to a single website. user:sfarney your thoughts? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:50, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I see the problem. I originally saw it as obvious spam, but then the idea occurred to me that the editor stumbled over the site with many subjects, and thought, "Hey, I bet Wiki could use this too!" And then went about sowing the links. But the user is now banned -- by you -- for this action (judging by the user's page), so it would seem you have made up your mind that the edits were not "good faith". I am puzzled that the user does not have a personal page. So I am out of my depth. I wish the user were available for consultation. And I presume that the source has previously been considered and rejected as RS. (I moved the reftalk notes up the page) 23:13, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Basically I reverted assuming good faith. Than noticed all the prior warning and reviewed that this issue was ongoing. So I blocked them to hopefully facilitate discussion. Maybe overhanded. I have no concerns with them being unblocked. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your time. Grammar's Li'l Helper <sup>Discourse</sup> 23:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 May 2016

• News and notes: Affiliates' nomination of WMF trustees announced; FDC's straight talking to WMF

• Op-ed: Swiss chapter in turmoil

• In the media: Wikimedia's Dario Taraborelli quoted on Google's Knowledge Graph in The Washington Post

• Featured content: Two weeks for the prize of one

• Traffic report: Oh behave, Beyhive / Underdogs

• Arbitration report: "Wikicology" ends in site ban; evidence and workshop phases concluded for "Gamaliel and others"

• Wikicup: That's it for WikiCup Round 2!

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of Echostage

While I understand that it was not yet accurately paraphrased and cited, you deleted the article too suddenly while I was editing it for me to fix the errors. Though marked for discussion about possible deletion, I was asked to edit and fix the article, which I was doing, when you deleted it. Is it possible for you to undo the deletion, so that I may accurately repair the errors in the article so that at least it can be discussed before the sudden deletion as is usually the case for the deletion of articles. In the very least it could have been marked as a stub. Thanks for your help.

--Soccerfray (talk) 02:39, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

The article was more or less copied from the source http://www.echostage.com/about/

And that source is not independent of the subject in question.

Please use independent sources and paraphrase. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:43, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

BacDive links

Hello! I see you've noticed users AnnaVetci and L.C.Reimer adding tons of links to BacDive to microbe articles (contributions: 1, 2). Both are newer accounts and both have almost exclusively been adding the links. Given the similarity of their usernames to authors on this paper, I assume they are involved in BacDive. I'm sure they mean well, and we could certainly use as many bacteriologists as we can get, but I think some discussion is in order before the link-adding continues (Ideally we could bring them into the fold rather than shout at them and scare them off). What do you think is the appropriate forum for this discussion? WP Microbiology would make some sense, but it's too quiet there and I fear a discussion there won't attract many opinions. Some guidance would be appreciated. Thanks! Ajpolino (talk) 02:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

User:Ajpolino agree with you completely. What they have is a database and there data would fit better in Wikidata rather than as an external link. I have left them both messages on their talk page.

And we have a discussion going here [13]

A few that were added as an IP may still require removal. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:51, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Ah, thanks! I hadn't noticed the discussion at WP:Med.Ajpolino (talk) 02:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Aspart_protamin

Hi, I came across this page during New Page Patrol. I'm not sure what you were trying to do - are you working on an article there? I didn't want to just tag it since you're not a new user obviously - just wanted to make sure you didn't forget about it! Intelligentsium 01:04, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks User:Intelligentsium fixed it. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:06, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Carole Seborovki

Hello Doc, can you please undelete Carole Seborovki? You've deleted it on grounds of G12, but only one sentence from the URL you gave in the summary is copyvio. I'm happy to rewrite that sentence immediately. Thanks, OnionRing (talk) 05:08, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

You can find the content here [14]. We delete copyright issues. Content must be paraphrased from the get go. Not added as a copy and paste and then paraphrased. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:09, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Have pasted below the none copied stuff User:OnionRing.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:11, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Extended content

[[File:FrontImageBig.jpg|thumb]] '''Carole Seborovski''' (born San Diego, California, 1960), Seborovski received her Bachelo of Fine Arts from the [[California College of the Arts]], Oakland, California in 1982.<ref name=nhaime>{{cite web|url=https://www.nohrahaimegallery.com/carole-seborovski.html|title=Carole Seborovski|publisher=Nohra Haime gallery|accessdate=21 May 2016}}</ref> From 1982-84 she studied at the [[New York Studio School]], and in 1987 she received her Masters in Fine Arts from [[Hunter College]] in New York.<ref name=nhaime/> ==References== {{reflist}} ==External links== *{{official|http://caroleseborovski.com/}}

Image is from http://caroleseborovski.com/ and the person who started it is a paid editor most likely. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:14, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Freewheelin' 1970s-1980s contribution edited out

Hello Doc James, It appears that my recent contribution to this article was edited out by you.

Please note that I am Wolf Ruck, the producer and copyright holder of the film FREEWHEELIN' as well as the writer of the quoted synopsis which was used in printed materials used to promote distribution of the film.

I have also posted a video copy of my film and the synopsis to my YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/user/WolfRuck/videos?view_as=public.

Kindly undo your delete of my contribution, or advise why it has been deleted.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.101.174.21 (talk) 06:31, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Hey Wolf if you own the video and release it under a CC BY SA license would be happy to put it on Wikipedia. If you change the youtube page to mention it is CC BY SA that should be all it will take. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:34, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello Doc James, Thank you for your reply, but the intention of my contribution was not to release, convey or share any material copyrights to the contents of the film FREEWHEELIN', as in giving permission to "Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format" and especially not to "Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially." Rather, the intention was to describe a publicly accessible resource (e.g. the film FREEWHEELIN' on YouTube) that depicts that time period in the development of Mountain Biking and thus help to complete the historical record as currently described in Wikipedia. If the YouTube link is problematic, by all means delete the link. If the text is an issue, please advise. Thank you again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.101.174.21 (talk) 07:17, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

We need reliable sources for text. For videos we do not. Therefore could add the video but not the text or the url to youtube. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:18, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello Doc James, Thank you for your reply. Kindly specify for what text in my contribution a "reliable source for text" is required, and what/who such a "reliable source" might be in this case? If the YouTube URL is a problem, kindly advise how/why this link is treated differently from the 2006 documentary "Klunkerz" which is currently available in this Wikipedia article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klunkerz:_A_Film_About_Mountain_Bikes). If necessary, the YT link can be deleted, although that may be an unusual inconvenience for web users and readers of Wikipedia who are accustomed to seeing and using cross-referencing links. If the quoted film synopsis is a problem, kindly specify. This synopsis has been public since FREEWHEELIN`s release in 1985 in the form of printed brochures, film library catalogues, TV broadcast guides, websites etc. It also was posted to YouTube in 2012 as part of the film`s description, and it resides there to this day. Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.101.174.21 (talk) 15:48, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

You added "Possibly the first and only film depicting the state of the sport in the 1980s is Wolf Ruck's lyrical 16mm film which was released in 1985 and posted to YouTube in 2012. The synopsis of that time reads: "They're called "Mountain Bikes" or "Fat Tire Flyers" by off-road enthusiasts and these dynamic human powered machines are at the leading edge of the bicycling revival sweeping the globe today. Action-packed and instructive, this film brings alive the new-found freedom, challenge and adventure which characterizes this exciting variation of self-propelled sport and recreation. Featuring expert bike handling and astounding trick riding skills, this film is pure motivational entertainment for youthful audiences and the young-at-heart of all ages."

Your wrote the text yourself. You have not provided an independent source. You have a conflict of interest. And it is very promotional text. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:58, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello Doc James, Thank you for your reply. Below are some comments and links to sources corroborating the substance of my contribution. They are posted in the description/information section of FREEWHEELIN' on YouTube. Feel free to add them as references if that serves to avoid the impression of self-serving conflict of interest. Thank you.

...............

Published on 1 Mar 2012

SUBJECT: Off-road Cycling Length: 15mins

They're called "Mountain Bikes" or "Fat Tire Flyers" by off-road enthusiasts and these dynamic human powered machines are at the leading edge of the bicycling revival sweeping the globe today.

Action-packed and instructive, this film brings alive the new-found freedom, challenge and adventure which characterizes this exciting variation of self-propelled sport and recreation.

Featuring expert bike handling and astounding trick riding skills, this film is pure motivational entertainment for youthful audiences and the young-at-heart of all ages.

BROADCASTS: CBC National & Local TV

COMMENTS & REVIEWS

Brian Vernor says: December 13, 2014 at 11:22 am

I put an email out to some friends calling this “the first” because i wanted people to think about film vs. documentation. This is the earliest composed film about mountain biking I have found. It aims to inspire people through the camera style, and the full composition of the film, sound, color, location, you know FILMMAKING. Not to discredit important images created prior to Freewheelin’ (of which I happily acknowledge there are many), I see this film as the first in it’s intent to use filmmaking to translate the feeling of riding a mountain bike.

As someone who is inspired to celebrate bike riding through photography, films, and occasionally writing, I see Freewheelin’ as a monument of creativity. It was aimed at an audience outside the experience of mountain biking while showing a truthful, celebratory version of the core riders at the time. Most of our media, whether printed or in films, succumbs to selling the products of the sport to the audience that is already committed. In my interview with Wolf Ruck, an Olympic athlete in an era of much lesser commercialization of the Olympics, he expressed dismay at corporate representations in sport. He was concerned with using film to translate the beauty of sport and its culture. For myself, that is what matters and I would like to see that matter to everyone else. Supporting the industry of cycling with our creativity is fine, but when our art and our commerce are indistinguishable I think there is a problem. Wolf Ruck’s Freewheelin’ inspires me with its pureness of intent. I hope discussions of this beautiful film will center on the intentions of its maker…And of course, socks, mustaches, fanny packs, chainstay length, riser bars, ders, trail poaching, toe straps, and high heels.

LINKS:

http://theradavist.com/2014/12/freewheelin-one-mtbs-first-videos/ http://www.thebicyclestory.com/2014/12/the-worlds-first-mountain-bike-film-probably/ http://www.thebicyclestory.com/2011/07/brian-vernor-santa-cruzs-adventurous-filmmaking-photo-taking-native-son/ http://trackosaurusrex.com/the-first-mountain-bike-video-ever-made/ http://www.bicycling.com/news/featured-stories/watch-first-known-mountain-bike-movie http://vernorfilm.tumblr.com/post/105041985258/hi-friends-this-has-been-a-long-time-coming-i http://www.bikehugger.com/post/view/freewheelin-mountain-bikes http://singletrackworld.com/2014/12/freewheelin/ http://www.chatderuelle.com/freewheelin/ http://girlbikelove.com/2014/12/freewheelin-film-wolf-ruck/ http://wayofthebicycle.tumblr.com/ https://www.facebook.com/RoskoCyclesInc/timeline http://www.teamdreambicyclingteam.com/page/2 http://pluradl.tumblr.com/ http://radpropaganda.org/2014/12/16/freewheelin/ http://www.bicikel.com/novice/11980/prvi_gorskokolesarski_film_freewheelin_na_voljo_za_ogled.html http://www.joelhynes.com/2014/12/watch-the-first-known-mountain-bike-movie/ Category Sports Licence Standard YouTube Licence

............ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.101.174.21 (talk) 17:39, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Freewheelin' 1970s-1980s contribution edited out

Hello Doc James, It appears that my recent contribution to this article was edited out by you.

Please note that I am Wolf Ruck, the producer and copyright holder of the film FREEWHEELIN' as well as the writer of the quoted synopsis which was used in printed materials used to promote distribution of the film.

I have also posted a video copy of my film and the synopsis to my YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/user/WolfRuck/videos?view_as=public.

Kindly undo your delete of my contribution, or advise why it has been deleted.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.101.174.21 (talk) 06:31, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Hey Wolf if you own the video and release it under a CC BY SA license would be happy to put it on Wikipedia. If you change the youtube page to mention it is CC BY SA that should be all it will take. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:34, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello Doc James, Thank you for your reply, but the intention of my contribution was not to release, convey or share any material copyrights to the contents of the film FREEWHEELIN', as in giving permission to "Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format" and especially not to "Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially." Rather, the intention was to describe a publicly accessible resource (e.g. the film FREEWHEELIN' on YouTube) that depicts that time period in the development of Mountain Biking and thus help to complete the historical record as currently described in Wikipedia. If the YouTube link is problematic, by all means delete the link. If the text is an issue, please advise. Thank you again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.101.174.21 (talk) 07:17, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

We need reliable sources for text. For videos we do not. Therefore could add the video but not the text or the url to youtube. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:18, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello Doc James, Thank you for your reply. Kindly specify for what text in my contribution a "reliable source for text" is required, and what/who such a "reliable source" might be in this case? If the YouTube URL is a problem, kindly advise how/why this link is treated differently from the 2006 documentary "Klunkerz" which is currently available in this Wikipedia article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klunkerz:_A_Film_About_Mountain_Bikes). If necessary, the YT link can be deleted, although that may be an unusual inconvenience for web users and readers of Wikipedia who are accustomed to seeing and using cross-referencing links. If the quoted film synopsis is a problem, kindly specify. This synopsis has been public since FREEWHEELIN`s release in 1985 in the form of printed brochures, film library catalogues, TV broadcast guides, websites etc. It also was posted to YouTube in 2012 as part of the film`s description, and it resides there to this day. Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.101.174.21 (talk) 15:48, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

You added "Possibly the first and only film depicting the state of the sport in the 1980s is Wolf Ruck's lyrical 16mm film which was released in 1985 and posted to YouTube in 2012. The synopsis of that time reads: "They're called "Mountain Bikes" or "Fat Tire Flyers" by off-road enthusiasts and these dynamic human powered machines are at the leading edge of the bicycling revival sweeping the globe today. Action-packed and instructive, this film brings alive the new-found freedom, challenge and adventure which characterizes this exciting variation of self-propelled sport and recreation. Featuring expert bike handling and astounding trick riding skills, this film is pure motivational entertainment for youthful audiences and the young-at-heart of all ages."

Your wrote the text yourself. You have not provided an independent source. You have a conflict of interest. And it is very promotional text. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:58, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello Doc James, Thank you for your reply. Below are some comments and links to sources corroborating the substance of my contribution. They are posted in the description/information section of FREEWHEELIN' on YouTube. Feel free to add them as references if that serves to avoid the impression of self-serving conflict of interest. Thank you.

...............

Published on 1 Mar 2012

SUBJECT: Off-road Cycling Length: 15mins

They're called "Mountain Bikes" or "Fat Tire Flyers" by off-road enthusiasts and these dynamic human powered machines are at the leading edge of the bicycling revival sweeping the globe today.

Action-packed and instructive, this film brings alive the new-found freedom, challenge and adventure which characterizes this exciting variation of self-propelled sport and recreation.

Featuring expert bike handling and astounding trick riding skills, this film is pure motivational entertainment for youthful audiences and the young-at-heart of all ages.

BROADCASTS: CBC National & Local TV

COMMENTS & REVIEWS

Brian Vernor says: December 13, 2014 at 11:22 am

I put an email out to some friends calling this “the first” because i wanted people to think about film vs. documentation. This is the earliest composed film about mountain biking I have found. It aims to inspire people through the camera style, and the full composition of the film, sound, color, location, you know FILMMAKING. Not to discredit important images created prior to Freewheelin’ (of which I happily acknowledge there are many), I see this film as the first in it’s intent to use filmmaking to translate the feeling of riding a mountain bike.

As someone who is inspired to celebrate bike riding through photography, films, and occasionally writing, I see Freewheelin’ as a monument of creativity. It was aimed at an audience outside the experience of mountain biking while showing a truthful, celebratory version of the core riders at the time. Most of our media, whether printed or in films, succumbs to selling the products of the sport to the audience that is already committed. In my interview with Wolf Ruck, an Olympic athlete in an era of much lesser commercialization of the Olympics, he expressed dismay at corporate representations in sport. He was concerned with using film to translate the beauty of sport and its culture. For myself, that is what matters and I would like to see that matter to everyone else. Supporting the industry of cycling with our creativity is fine, but when our art and our commerce are indistinguishable I think there is a problem. Wolf Ruck’s Freewheelin’ inspires me with its pureness of intent. I hope discussions of this beautiful film will center on the intentions of its maker…And of course, socks, mustaches, fanny packs, chainstay length, riser bars, ders, trail poaching, toe straps, and high heels.

LINKS:

http://theradavist.com/2014/12/freewheelin-one-mtbs-first-videos/ http://www.thebicyclestory.com/2014/12/the-worlds-first-mountain-bike-film-probably/ http://www.thebicyclestory.com/2011/07/brian-vernor-santa-cruzs-adventurous-filmmaking-photo-taking-native-son/ http://trackosaurusrex.com/the-first-mountain-bike-video-ever-made/ http://www.bicycling.com/news/featured-stories/watch-first-known-mountain-bike-movie http://vernorfilm.tumblr.com/post/105041985258/hi-friends-this-has-been-a-long-time-coming-i http://www.bikehugger.com/post/view/freewheelin-mountain-bikes http://singletrackworld.com/2014/12/freewheelin/ http://www.chatderuelle.com/freewheelin/ http://girlbikelove.com/2014/12/freewheelin-film-wolf-ruck/ http://wayofthebicycle.tumblr.com/ https://www.facebook.com/RoskoCyclesInc/timeline http://www.teamdreambicyclingteam.com/page/2 http://pluradl.tumblr.com/ http://radpropaganda.org/2014/12/16/freewheelin/ http://www.bicikel.com/novice/11980/prvi_gorskokolesarski_film_freewheelin_na_voljo_za_ogled.html http://www.joelhynes.com/2014/12/watch-the-first-known-mountain-bike-movie/ Category Sports Licence Standard YouTube Licence

............ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.101.174.21 (talk) 17:39, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello Doc James,

What is the status of my contribution to this Wikipedia topic? It is still absent from the original page and there appears to be no reply from you to my submission above. Please advise. Thank you. 70.49.184.92 (talk) 04:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

We are not linking to your video on Youtube. Apologies. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:07, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Japanese Castle Pages

Hi there Doc James. Thanks for the heads up - I am basing the castle pages on some castle page sites, however I am paraphrasing, not straight copying. I'll try to paraphrase more extensively, and mix in more materail from other sites. I'm still working on all of them. Deathlibrarian (talk) 08:08, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Okay thanks User:Deathlibrarian. You should never use the copy and paste button. Copying into WP and then paraphrasing after is not allowed. Please fix your prior articles before creating new ones. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Cool, I didn't realise that. I assumed as long as you paraphrased and changed the content after, it would then not be a copyright issue. Thanks for the heads up. I've re written half the articles, finishing off the rest today. Cheers Deathlibrarian (talk) 22:35, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

I did a pass through Prothrombin G20210A

…but would ask you to see if there is anyone in haematology to take a thorough look at it. In trying to ensure peace, I wrote the primary editor at length, here, explaining my concerns, which also appear in the article talk page (in short, use of stats without sufficient detail to be accurate—failure to delineate homo/heterozygous in prevalence statements, lack of sensitivity in description to the populations on which the source stats were based [general healthy population vs DVT or other diseased], etc.—as well as some datedness of sources [I've already removed the article's inline citations to Wikipedia], and a failure to derive preponderant perspectives by looking at several reviews). For instance, as I state at the contributing editor's Talk page, a 2013 review is great, but if it only cites a single 1998 primary source to draw broad conclusions, we need to look further to see if that conclusion also appears in other up-to-date reviews and book chapters. There is also a degree of copyediting needed, because the Risk section appears to be written by a non-native speaker.

Bottom line, I think the article needs a careful going over by an English speaker, a haematologist or GP familiar with the thrombophilia genetics literature. Bringing it to your attention, because if you ask someone, I will sit back and let them do their thing. Cheers. Le Prof 50.129.227.141 (talk) 10:01, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Hey Le Prof

Generally if the conclusions we include are well paraphrased from a 2013 review I have no concerns, even if that review only sites a 199 primary source. The authors of that review and the peer reviewers should have a good understanding of the rest of the literature and therefore feel that point is congruent with the rest of the literature.

Thanks for the heads up and will try to take a closer look. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:45, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Made a few adjustments. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

UChicago History Page

Hi Doc James, Thanks for pointing out the mistake about the University of Chicago article. I paraphrased the information and re-included it. Let me know if you believe this new edit still does not meet Wikipedia's standards. Best wishes, Khlatrommi (talk) 13:03, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Perfect. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:30, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

You have edited out a lot of my work, and my property, and labelled it as copyrighted??

I own the attributions on these coins as all these coins are mine. All photos of the coins are now my property, including all changes made to them since I have owned them. I listed all this here for the public. The attributions are matter of public record and are part of the numismatic hobby. Are you a numismatist? I spent a great deal of time placing these images and information to enlighten the public about the history behind some of these topics. Can you please tell me your credentials when it comes to this topic? EttuBruta (talk) 19:02, 21 May 2016 (UTC)ettabruta

Okay thanks for getting back to me User:EttuBruta. I work on copyright issues. The issue here is who wrote the text you have been adding?

For example here who wrote "The unusual elephant headdress worn by Demetrius recalls that of Alexander the Great on early tetradrachms of Ptolemaic Egypt, referring to his conquests in northern India. Demetrius campaigned in India while serving a long apprenticeship under his father, Euthydemus I, as recorded on a dedicatory stone recently discovered north of Ai Khanoum in Afghanistan. After succeeding to the throne, he launched an invasion of Northern India that extended Greek control into modern Pakistan."?

If it was yourself than what we need as it has been previously published you to send a letter to WP:OTRS

With respect to the pictures, did you take them? Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:05, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Those historic descriptions are part of the lot description. They are created, modified and recycled across dealers and catalogs. I can find you a dozen other references across a dozen dealers that say the same thing, but I did not realize that this was going to create the issue. I don't want to argue with you on that. I wanted to enlighten the public about the history of coinage. If you want to strip out info which the numismatic community considers "common", then so be it. Remove it if that is the sticking point.....However, I thought the reasonable thing would be to ask first. This is not an ER, you can ask questions before coding a patient. The photos are mine. Also the attribution info is both descriptive and pubic domain. As far as I know you can't copyright the weight of an object, the wording in the fields or the description. Your editing may be the reason numismatists don't bother contributing more that a photo on Wiki, if that. Hours of work, shot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EttuBruta (talk • contribs) 19:23, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

If you previous publish pictures such as you did here [15] in 2008

And than upload the pictures 8 years latter [16]

You should understand that we need to verify that the picture is actually yours to protect the author.

You must email permissions-commons at wikimedia.org with the permission to allow those pictures to remain.

I realize it is a little more complicated for previously published content. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:31, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

I have asked User:Pigsonthewing to provide you some guidance. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:01, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

• Associated IP 2600:1000:B11A:9C57:1DDB:B98D:547:3837 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:05, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

I find the messaging system here to be pretty primitive. It took awhile for me to find your responses here and address them. As I said earlier, the proper way for you to address this would have been to have first asked me for clarification, before you undid hours worth of work. I spent time formatting the photos, cleaning up attributions and editing the wiki pages. It took you about a minute to undo all of my work. I don't know how you can't understand that your rash behavior has created a cascade of additional work for me. Photos have now been removed from Wiki Commons. I have spent time trying to prove to you I own the objects in question and the photos and the descriptions. I just received your form to submit permissions. A bit too late. I came to Wiki to contribute in an area pretty deficient on most Wiki historical pages (numismatics-currency). Instead I wasted a weekend. I am not going to re-do all this work. The policy here is to shoot first and ask questions later. A glaringly backward approach. Everything I have experienced here, since deciding to contribute, has been a disappointment. When I read some of the comments others have made after they were edited, I can see that I am not alone in my frustration and dismay. I know the editors are volunteers, but fast fingers on the undo button is not editing. I am throwing my hands up and walking away. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EttuBruta (talk • contribs) 13:21, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

User:EttuBruta I mentioned that we need proof of ownership of the images send to OTRS. That advice was already provided here [17]. You made no indication that you were planning to send this confirmation.

You have said you do not own the text you added. Yes text is copyrightable so you need to paraphrase. You copied and pasted from sources which did not take you any longer than me removing it.

If you have a large collection of images of coins and you own those images and want to release them under an open license I am happy to help arrange a mass upload to commons to make things easier for you. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:31, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

@EttuBruta: You have been given good advice, and Doc James was correct to remove questionable material - your edits are all in the article history (and your images archived in Commons' database) and can be restored once they satisfy the necessary criteria. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Gender-Based Price Discrimination

Hello,

Thank you for your comments on the gender-based price discrimination page. If you would like me to work on the paraphrasing I would be more than happy to do so. When you are describing studies there is really only so many ways to go about paraphrasing it. Would you have any suggestions?

As far as the picture is concerned, I uploaded the picture to wikipedia and included the URL when I uploaded it. I also put a proper citation underneath in the caption of the photo. Please let me know how I would go about remedying the issue if there still remains one.

Thank you,

FPizzo (talk) 19:44, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

You need to fully paraphrase. User:FPizzo There is a lot of ways one can write about a topic.

You cannot re release copyrighted images without the owners permission. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:48, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

I used the special wikipedia image uploader. I thought that was supposed to remedy the issue. I can remove the image. Please understand that this page is for a grade in my course that is due tomorrow. I cannot edit the issue as of now since you have flagged my page. If I cannot edit the page I will fail my course. I will remedy the situation immediately if you give me the opportunity to do so.

FPizzo (talk) 19:52, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Please reach out to WikiEd. They are supporting your class. We run Turnitin on Wikipedia edits and your was picked up. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:56, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

What is an effective way to reach out to WikiED. I did not find my paraphrasing to be offensive. It is properly cited. It is just the results of a study.

FPizzo (talk) 19:59, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Per here User_talk:FPizzo#Paraphrasing IMO it was not enough. In some sentences you only changed a word or two. You did not significantly change the grammar. See WP:Close paraphrasing

The key bit is "Close paraphrasing without in-text attribution may constitute plagiarism, and when extensive (with or without in-text attribution) may also violate Wikipedia's copyright policy, which forbids Wikipedia contributors from copying material directly from other sources." Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:03, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Well can I use quotations? Will that remedy the issue? If you can just rewrite or give me an example on how you would paraphrase that would also be helpful. But it seems as though you have no suggestions.

FPizzo (talk) 20:09, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

No you MUST put content in your own words. Never use the copy and paste buttons when editing. Read the text. Understand the text. Than summarise the text in your own words. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:11, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, but I never used the copy and paste buttons. As a law student at the University of Chicago I surely know better than to copy and paste. I have spoken with my course instructor and accurately citing after the sentence should remedy any issues. Do you have the ability to please un-flag my page? If so please do so.

FPizzo (talk) 20:34, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Just because you attribute your source does not mean close paraphrasing is permitted. I am happy to request a second opinion for you. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:36, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

You do understand that I am being graded on this page right? And that it is due tomorrow. FPizzo (talk) 20:47, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

If your instructor is grading you on your WP work "sticking" please have your teacher contact the the Wikipedia Education program (Wikipedia:Education program); instructors are advised never to do that as it puts their students in a conflict of interest situation that makes editing untenable. Please recognize that you have a conflict of interest here. Please also know that your teacher can see the changes you proposed in the article history (unless the edit is deleted from the history for violating copyright - those get permanently deleted)

Finally please know that you are a Wikipedia editor and you are subject to Wikipedia's policies; if you edit war you will be blocked. Jytdog (talk) 21:18, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

@FPizzo: "Review the brochures on citations, references, and on how to avoid plagiarism. Make sure your article does not copy the structure of any articles or books you are referencing or use inappropriate close paraphrasing." is an explicit instruction in your course materials for what is due tomorrow) DMacks (talk) 21:24, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

So this WikiEDU project is obviously very important to me. I tried to rephrase the sentences that you pointed out by editing the page. I am still not sure if I did it properly. I really want to prevent the page from being deleted. I am very new to Wikipedia, clearly.. Is there any way you can look at my edits and let me know what you think I can do to avoid deletion? I would really appreciate it. I am just trying to make Wikipedia more inclusive to women's issues. I apologize for any heated arguments that we may have had previously regarding this article. I was really enjoying creating this article up until this point and it was disheartening that I was not given the opportunity to amend the issue, unlike others.

FPizzo (talk) 22:33, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Daniel Power of God

Thanks, but in any case DNA Tribes isn't a reliable source. And I'm so tired of people trying to use the Hawass BMJ article to make a point when the article isn't about the genetics of Egypy or the ANE. Doug Weller talk 20:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Yes User:Doug Weller have been picking up concerns here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EranBot/Copyright/rc

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:30, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

I didn't know that was working, but it doesn't seem to have picked up the stuff I've reverted today from this editor. Doug Weller talk 20:41, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

User:Doug Weller I was just about to delete it when you beat me too it :-)

Archive it as I deal with it [18] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:45, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Rose'Sidgwick

Dear Doc James, you were right. The text was too close to the text of one of my sources. Hopefully it is fine now. But I do not understand the comments on 'health'. best regards, Henriduvent (talk) 21:21, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Replied on your talk. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Media Expres page deleted

Very nice experience I got with you Doc James and the other editor David.moreno72. In 24 hours I found more about contributing than in years from reading pages! In adition I understand why information on so many items is rather scarce on Wikipedia... Tough job! See ya around Mihai Pavelescu 21:34, 21 May 2016 (UTC)Mihai pavelescu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mihai pavelescu (talk • contribs)

User:Mihai pavelescu yes it was copied and pasted from the source. And none of the sources were independent of the subject in question. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:50, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

HIV and AIDS section

Hello, A very exciting line of research indicates a key role for inflammation in HIV pathogenesis. I wonder on what basis did you decide to trim this segment contribution from the article. Thank you and have a nice day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:CDAC:8260:E4BF:5614:3B05:9828 (talk) 00:32, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

It was copied from the source in question. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:40, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi, The source of the text was peer-reviewed papers, and it was cited accordingly. I am a senior author in numerous of these cited studies, which were conducted at UCSF. A new study by Akiko Iwasaki from Yale just published in Science indicating for a similar inflammation-induced pathogenesis during influenza infection.

I understand the reason for being cautious, but this timely and relevant line of research should be considered to appear in this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.218.200.38 (talk) 01:11, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Let me look

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:13, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Okay thanks, please let me know if you have any questions. I am the senior author of many of these cited papers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.218.200.38 (talk) 01:25, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Okay so here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Inflammation&type=revision&diff=721425073&oldid=720557630

• this text added "Infection with HIV is characterized not only by development of profound immunodeficiency but also by sustained inflammation and immune activation." "Chronic inflammation likely plays a role as a critical driver of immune dysfunction, the premature appearance of aging-related diseases, and the emergence of immune deficiency."
• ref says "Infection with HIV is characterized not only by development of profound immunodeficiency but also by sustained inflammation and immune activation" "Chronic inflammation likely plays a role as a critical driver of immune dysfunction, the premature appearance of aging-related diseases, and the emergence of immune deficiency"

Source is from Mar 9, 2016 http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/science/article/pii/S1931312816300531 Fully copyrighted by ELsevier in 2016 https://s100.copyright.com/AppDispatchServlet?publisherName=ELS&contentID=S1931312816300531&orderBeanReset=true The authors are not even allowed to reuse their own words with Elsevier. The issue is we at Wikipedia do not want to infringe upon ELsevier's copyright so I removed the text. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:27, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Okay this is helpful. Can I send you a revised text, so you could look and approve it before adding it to the article? I can do it in 24hours.

We run copyright detection software. Feel free to rewrite it and I will be notified if problems are found. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:25, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I uploaded an updated text, where these sentences have been revised. Please let me know if the segment is now acceptable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.218.200.38 (talk) 18:40, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Still a few issues

Extended content

"It has long been recognized that infection with HIV is characterized not only by development of profound immunodeficiency but also by sustained inflammation and immune activation. A substantial body of evidence implicates chronic inflammation as a critical driver of immune dysfunction, premature appearance of aging-related diseases, and immune deficiency. Many now regard HIV infection not only as an evolving virus-induced immunodeficiency but also as chronic inflammatory disease. Even after the introduction of effective antiretroviral therapy, chronic inflammation persists. Animal studies also support the relationship between immune activation and progressive cellular immune deficiency: SIVsm infection of its natural nonhuman primate hosts, the sooty mangabey, causes high-level viral replication but limited evidence of disease. This lack of pathogenicity is accompanied by a lack of inflammation, immune activation and cellular proliferation. In sharp contrast, experimental SIVsm infection of rhesus macaque produces immune activation and AIDS-like disease with many parallels to human HIV infection. Delineating how CD4 T cells are depleted and how chronic inflammation and immune activation are induced lies at the heart of understanding HIV pathogenesis––one of the top priorities for HIV research by the OAR (Office of AIDS Research, National Institutes of Health). Recent studies demonstrated that caspase-1-mediated pyroptosis, a highly inflammatory form of programmed cell death, drives CD4 T-cell depletion and inflammation by HIV. These are the two signature events that propel HIV disease progression to AIDS. Pyroptosis appears to create a pathogenic vicious cycle in which dying CD4 T cells release inflammatory signals that attract more cells into the infected lymphoid tissues to die and to produce chronic inflammation and tissue injury. Identifying pyroptosis as the predominant mechanism that causes CD4 T-cell depletion and chronic inflammation, provides novel therapeutic opportunities, namely caspase-1 which controls the pyroptotic pathway. In this regard, pyroptosis of CD4 T cells and secretion of secretion of pro-inflmammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-18 can be blocked in HIV-infected human lymphoid tissues by addition of the caspase-1 inhibitor VX-765, which has already proven to be safe and well tolerated in phase II human clinical trials. These agents could form a new and exciting ‘anti-AIDS’ therapy for HIV-infected subjects in which the treatment targets the host instead of the virus." References

The last line is word for word from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4047036/ "These agents could form a new and exciting “anti-AIDS” therapy for HIV-infected subjects where the treatment targets the host instead of the virus."

"dying CD4 T cells release inflammatory signals that attract more cells into the infected lymphoid tissue to die and to produce more inflammation"

You must write entirely new text not simply closely paraphrase. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for the note. I edited the text, and inserted the revised paragraphs. Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.230.76.4 (talk) 22:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Bahari ibaadat

' we are trying to find more sources for our model and miss Afghanistan this is tuition for media for again female it's really hard nowadays but as soon as are the publishing we will be adding it to her Wikipedia page here is one

http://vikchohan.com/2016/05/dil-las-vegas-fundraising-gala-vik-chohan-photography/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haroonazizi (talk • contribs) 03:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Okay Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:07, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you can you pls take the deleting message of the page because we want people to know this is her wiki page so everyone can help in. Editing the right article Haroonazizi (talk) 03:22, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for the typos in my first message as I said the media and Afghanistan is not that good for female model but we are working hard to add more sources Haroonazizi (talk) 03:23, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

We need good sources. This is an article about her yes but it is not her wiki page. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:24, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Yes sorry I meant article about her Haroonazizi (talk) 03:24, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

We will be adding the sources as soon as they are getting published Haroonazizi (talk) 03:25, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

K

That notice may bring more people to look for sources. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:32, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Mention of Conflict of Interest

Hello Mr. Doc James, I'm Aravind R Menon. I understand that you have mentioned my name on the Conflict of Interest Noticeboard, in relation to the edits that I have made to the wikipedia pages 1.Ishan Institute of Management & Technology and 2. Ishan Institute of Architecture and Planning.

I would like to clarify that I have not stated that I work for the Ishan Educational Institutions, but merely that I have been authorised by the same to curate and update the pages, as the information given on the pages are mostly obsolete and inaccurate.

Therefore, I request that you revert the mention of conflict of interest, as I am not employed by the Ishan Educational Institutions. Hope to hear from you soon. Thank you, Regards, Aravind R Menon (talk) 04:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC) Aravind R Menon

Okay can you clarify the relationship you have with the organization in question? User:Aravind R Menon

The initial issue was that you were copy and pasting content from their website into Wikipedia. It was removed as we have not verified that you have authorization yet to release that material under a CC BY SA license. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:49, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello Mr. Doc James, I thank you for taking the time to look into my predicament and I am much obliged for your guidance and advice. To answer your question, I would like to clarify that I am not employed by the Ishan Educational Institutions. I am a student who aspired to join the Ishan Institute Of Management and Technology. I had read up on the institute, on wikipedia, among other platforms, before visiting the campus. It was very evident to me that the information given on wikipedia was inaccurate and obsolete in many respects, as there were many changes to the courses, infrastructures, facilities etc. I conveyed the same to the office staff and sought their approval and permission to edit the information on wikipedia. They were impressed with my enthusiasm and pro-activeness, and gave me the relevant content.

I also want to make it clear that I didn't join the institute, due to personal reasons. I understand that my comment that "I am authorised......etc." is a the reason for the mention of conflict of interest. I hope that it is now clear that it is not the case and that this is a case of miscommunication and misunderstanding. Hence I urge you to withdraw the mention of conflict of interest.

Moreover, I understand that it was a mistake on my part to copy and paste content from the webpage and other material(brochures, prospectus etc.) available on the same page, without the appropriate citations. I hope that the issue of copyright can be resolved if I were to give the necessary citations.

I hope that I have been able to convince you that my edits on wikipedia page were not due to any personal attachment to the institute but was the result of a personal experience of having visited the same and seen the discrepancies. I hope that you will have no further objections and I request you to convey the same to your peers who have also reviewed the page.

Thank you for your time. Aravind R Menon (talk) 17:58, 23 May 2016 (UTC) Aravind R Menon

The question is do you have permission to release the content of their website under a CC BY SA license? We would need a statement from them saying it is okay. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:08, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

I have contacted the Ishan Educational Institutions and they are okay with me using content from their website and are willing to give a statement saying the same. Please advice on how and to whom they should convey the same. Aravind R Menon (talk) 06:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC) Aravind R Menon

Please read WP:OTRS. If they mark the license of their webpage as CC BY SA that would make it easier. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:19, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

File:We.R.play Official Logo.png

Hi, why did you delete File:We.R.play Official Logo.png as F5 less than three hours after I added {{subst:orfud}}? The box added by that template showed "the image will be deleted after Saturday, 28 May 2016". --Redrose64 (talk) 07:33, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks User:Redrose64. Overly hasty. Have restored. Users text contributions were copyright violations. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:36, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you --Redrose64 (talk) 21:11, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Response on Talk:Schizophrenia

Hi. I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I hope you can respond to my question on Talk:Schizophrenia. Also, there is new information, as I have started the page basic symptoms of schizophrenia, which is related to that thread.--Beneficii (talk) 07:53, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Made a few small adjustments to the article in question Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:00, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

I see also that you added the link to the main schizophrenia article. It looks great! Thanks for your help!--Beneficii (talk) 22:36, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

School article

Why my page , with the name , "Jinnah Jam-e School and College" has been deleted? Wikipedia has deleted it several time! C'mon! If it contained copyright material then that stuff should be deleted, why the entire article , my entire hard-work.I need that article back ! Jamian 08:57, 22 May 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oneofjamians (talk • contribs)

Yes so you first created it as User:Officialkmi and than as User: Oneofjamians

You are associated with the school in question? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:38, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I did because for the first time when I created article , it was deleted and lame excuse was my username i.e officialkmi so I created again with another username i.e oneofjamians . Now, I want my article back...Pls! Jamian 17:50, 22 May 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oneofjamians (talk • contribs)

You did not mention your association with the school? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:51, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

User:Oneofjamians you are a new editor and yes figuring out Wikipedia is hard. If you read the advice given in WP:Your first article, you will see that it suggests creating the article as a draft and submitting it through our articles for creations process so you can get help getting it ready to be published, instead of just creating it directly in what we call "main space". Please read WP:Your first article and follow the links there to create the article as a draft. Good luck. Jytdog (talk) 17:55, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

I'm a senior student of this college and been studying here for about 5 years... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oneofjamians (talk • contribs) 17:57, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

The best thing for you to do is go here: Articles for Creation -read the brief intro and then click the big button to get started. I understand how it feels unfair that your new article got pounded on - it really was just a draft. If you create it as a draft via Articles for Creation you will have peace to work on it until it is ready to be published. Jytdog (talk) 18:02, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

You must paraphrase and you must not copy from sources. Generally you also need independent sources. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:22, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your MOS edit

Hi, re. this edit, has there been a consensus on this? Thanks to point out. Regards, — kashmiri <sup>TALK</sup> 14:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

I summarized it from the discussion here [19]

We could have a RfC about its inclusion if you wish. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:57, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, discussion was a bit short but I agree with your MOS edit and won't press for RfC - we would likely end up with the same editors giving the same opinions. — kashmiri <sup>TALK</sup> 22:27, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

CDT

why not just paraphrase or summarize? [20]Happy monsoon day 20:59, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

User:Happy monsoon day You are welcome to. We have between 100 and 200 copyright concerns coming in a day here

Expectations is that the person who added the "copy and pasted" text will paraphrase. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Re: Copy & Paste

Hi, I edited Sarangani about a week ago and got the resources from our government website there were instances of power interruption that's why I wasn't able to put the reference. I work for the Provincial Government of Sarangani and only wanted to add more information about our province. Lys (talk) 14:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

User:Lysberith You would need to get the websites license changed to CC BY SA for you to be able to copy from this website http://www.sarangani.gov.ph/index.php/tourism/tourism-spot

Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Removal of article on Byron Good

Hello Doc James,

I would like to revise and report any parts of the content of the page on Byron J. Good which you deemed problematic and removed the entire page. This is an important entry for medical anthropology and I had spent a good amount of time on that. Will you please let me know1) where and how I can access the page so I can make revisions; and 2) what parts of the content you thought are breeching copyrights, so that I can address the issue.

Thank you for your help with Wikipedia, and thanks in advance for your response. Please note that I am faculty in the department of global health and social medicine at Harvard, where some of the text may have been copy-pasted from Byron Good's public page. I was assuming first that those are public content and do not have copyright on them, and also that since I am in that department myself I do have the right to copy and paste segments. But in either case, this should be a very simple issue to resolve. Please let me know where I can access the content so that I can edit any problematic text.

Thanks again!

--Engelisi

Engelisi (talk) 15:05, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

As mentioned on your talk page some of the content was copied from here [21]

At bottom of that page you will note the text "© 2016 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College"

If that was changed to CC BY SA than you could use it on Wikipedia. Else you can send a release from the president to WP:OTRS

Basically all text since 1923 has copyright on it except the work of the US federal government. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:23, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Next issue is that the text is rather promotional and as you are associated with the person you have a bit of a WP:COI

Some of the concerning text include "is a world-renowned scholar", "recognition of his outstanding research"

Another issue that there were no inline references to independent sources. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Byron good

Looks like Byron good was recreated again under this name this time. Wgolf (talk) 01:36, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Brought up at WP:COIN. Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Eran bot

Curious how Eran bot works and how you make it run manually, or where it flags things it finds automatically. I'd like to be able to use it, seems that Earwig bot isn't working very well right now...the page is gibberish to me... this makes no sense at all and I only see about five articles on it...? Montanabw<sup>(talk)</sup> 02:27, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

User:Montanabw The page you are wanting is this one. Basically it tests all new edits to EN WP over a certain size. There is no option to use it manually at this point in time. We would love help with reviewing edits. There are basically only two of us doing it right now and we get about 100 to 200 flagged concerns per day with a true positive of 60% and false positive of 40%. Will be speaking about the project at Wikimania. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:10, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

That is rather confusing, the only way I can find the "batches" is via the navbox, which it appears you update manually after it's done? Is the plagiabot interface (here) what generates your "batches?"Montanabw<sup>(talk)</sup> 06:57, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

User:Montanabw That is the next version of the tool which is not live yet. The current version is the one I linked to. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

If the script is required, I have never figured out how to use scripts, I imported one once and I still have no clue how to make it go... do you have a "for Dummies" version of how to use the script? ;-) Montanabw<sup>(talk)</sup> 16:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Script is not required for basic functioning :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Ivabradine in sepsis

I agree this is not a good source[22] but have a look at doi:10.1001/jama.2013.278477. Yes, I found the concept a bit hair-raising as well. JFW | T@lk 13:12, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Wow. Have not seen that. Beta blockers in sepsis gah brave Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:16, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

What about my article jinnah Jam-e school and college ? I won't copy and paste from sources. Now, the ban or deletion should be undone Jamian 17:18, 25 May 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oneofjamians (talk • contribs)

you are not banned but the content is deleted, User:Anthony Appleyard was previous involved, will ask his opinion Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:25, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

76.126.119.46

• 76.126.119.46 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)

Can you please revert the IP's edits and revoke talkpage access? Thanks! 172.58.41.254 (talk) 03:56, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Reverted Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:07, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Copyright re: RSPCA NSW

Hi James,

Apologies, I thought if the lines were directly attributed to the source site it was ok.

Would it make a difference if quotation marks were inserted? Have all my edits now been lost or suspended?

I am brand new to editing Wikipedia, so any pointers would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Jessica — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessicaaconway88 (talk • contribs) 07:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

No quotation marks are not typically sufficient. You must put content in your own words. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

HTML comments

Please see here Why did you insert these? Please use {{Ping}} if you respond here. Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

User:Koavf we commonly use these tags in the leads of our medical articles. I personally find them useful. Not sure what this means "not needed with dab in title". Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:21, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Dab I was referring to the hatnote: if an article has a dab in the title, it's generally not necessary to have a hatnote. I have to be honest that I don't see the value in the HTML comments but it's hardly worth fighting over and if it helps someone, then that's good. Thanks, James. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Agree with you with respect to the hatnote / dab. Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Joseph T. Fuhrmann

Today I started an article on Joseph T. Fuhrmann, and added four references within a few hours, there is also an entry in the Spanish Wikipedia. Then you came up. The article was gone within 6 hours, although it says it needs at least one reliable source which could be the Mary Washington University, is not it? If that is not a reliable source than Wikipedia went crazy in my point of view. I never saw the page you are referecing to. A new example that most people on Wikipedia are more interested in deleting than in improving. Your bot did not tell me where to look, which is unacceptable and nobody had a chance to improve it! I am not particularly interested in Fuhrmann, but some other people might be. He is an academic, one cannot change much in a account of universities he visited. Wikipedia became unacademic or should we say stupid?Taksen (talk) 18:19, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

You added "Joseph Theodore Fuhrmann (1940-) is since 2010 Emeritus Professor of History at Murray State University in Kentucky. Having majored in Russian history, language and literature at Emory University (BA, 1962), he went on to earn a Ph.D. from Indiana University (1968) and was an exchange student at Moscow University (1965-1966). Since gaining access to previously closed Soviet archives, he has worked from 1991 in Russian repositories and studied a host of unpublished documents and edited Nicholas and Alexandra's wartime correspondence."

Ref says "JOSEPH T. FUHRMANN, Emeritus Professor of History at Murray State University in Kentucky, received his PhD from Indiana University, one of the leading centers for Russian studies. He attended Moscow University from 1965 to 1966. His first biography of Rasputin, Rasputin: A Life, was regarded as the best book on the subject. Since gaining access to previously closed Soviet archives, he has worked from 1991 in Russian repositories and studied a host of unpublished documents. The first biography inspired documentaries on A&E and the History Channel. He has appeared in three programs as an interviewed guest and as script consultant for two of them. [23]

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:46, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

This sentence "Having majored in Russian history, language and literature at Emory University (BA, 1962), he went on to earn a Ph.D. from Indiana University (1968) and was an exchange student at Moscow University (1965-1966)." appears to be from https://vimeo.com/64753055 Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:52, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

the article has only three sentences and nobody bothers to change a few verbs? An example that most people on Wikipedia are more interested in deleting than in improving.

Sorry, @Taksen: but that statement suggests a lack of understanding of copyright issues. "change a few verbs" does not cure a copyright problem, it creates a close paraphrase which is arguably worse, as it is still a copyright violation, but harder to detect. Removal of copyright violation is not optional, and the person detecting such violations has no obligation to take the considerable time to rewrite an article in an acceptable way.--S Philbrick(Talk) 14:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Kashmir Reader

https://www.linkedin.com/company/kashmir-reader

This account also belongs to Kashmir Reader. Please don't delete it again. I am adding this link too in the page— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mussa S Hassan (talk • contribs) 16:22, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

User:Mussa S Hassan not sure what you mean? You cannot copy copyright content into Wikipedia. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:28, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Edinburgh City F.C. (1928)

Why on earth did you delete the whole article? That's a ridiculous over-reaction. Please restore it immediately. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 16:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

We take copyright issue seriously. It contained copyright issues and as you were the only author I deleted it. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Your reaction is absurd. Why not tag the article and point out what needs correcting? I don't understand what was wrong with the article I created. Most of it is sourced to offline material (a 1990 book by Bob Crampsey). Jmorrison230582 (talk) 17:51, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

It is copied and pasted. Do not copy and paste it again. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:53, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

I'm going to create the article again because it's clear you are not being constructive. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 17:55, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

User:Jmorrison230582 was the content moved from another Wikipedia page? Because you did not state this in your first edit to create the article. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:03, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Yes, what I have done (or am trying to do) is to effectively split the Edinburgh City F.C. article in two. It had previously outlined the whole history of both football clubs that have used that name. It appears some of the old article was in copyright violation, without anyone previously picking up on this. I hope the version of the new article I have created now should address your concerns. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 18:08, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

When you move content from one article to another you MUST state were you moved it from in the edit summary to give attribution and comply with CC BY SA. This is also important for copyright follow up.

To tell you the truth I am not sure if the original was copied or not? Or if these people are copying from us http://edinburghcityfc.net/welcome/our%20history.html Will need to look more closely. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:10, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Personal attacks

On Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring, you said 88.10.64.44 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)/83.51.146.54 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) broke 4 reverts first. Looks like we have the pot calling the kettle black. That claim was utterly untrue. I asked you to provide any evidence that you thought supported your assertion and you didn't respond. I regard your edit as a personal attack and suggest you explicitly withdraw it and apologise for it. 88.10.64.44 (talk) 17:18, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

• 1st [24]
• 2nd [25]
• 3rd [26]
• 4th [27]

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:51, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

And now you're just being dishonest. The first diff represents my original edit to the article, which obviously is not a revert. Now, either provide evidence for the mythical fourth revert you believe I made, or withdraw and apologise for your attack on me. 88.10.64.44 (talk) 17:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

That is how the counting works actually. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Four. No doubt about it. IP has probably had too much sangria. -Roxy the dog™ woof 18:06, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Nope, that's not how it's counted. Good night, trolls. 88.10.64.44 (talk) 23:23, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2016

• News and notes: Upcoming Wikimedia conferences in the US and India; May Metrics and Activities Meeting

• Special report: Compensation paid to Sue Gardner increased by almost 50 percent after she stepped down as executive director

• In the media: The perils of Wikipedia's monopoly; Wikipedians' fragility; Street Sharks hoax

• Featured content: Eight articles, three lists and five pictures

• Op-ed: Journey of a Wikipedian

• Arbitration report: Gamaliel resigns from the arbitration committee

• Recent research: English as Wikipedia's Lingua Franca; deletion rationales; schizophrenia controversies

• Traffic report: Splitting (musical) airs / Slow Ride

• Blog: Freely licensed magic at Eurovision

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Medical Nutrition

Medical Nutrition appears to be a paid job by the sock of an indeffed user. Before I take further action, I wanted to get your evaluation of the article. Is there anything there that isn't a coatrack for dubious refspamming? - Brianhe (talk) 13:35, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Have just proposed merging to Medical nutrition therapy. I guess my question about what to do with Medical Nutrition goes to what qualifies as MEDRS; this is not something I'm super familiar with. For instance sharecare.com which is used in several places on Wikipedia. I just did some cleanup on an article that looked pretty promotional and used this site. - Brianhe (talk) 02:11, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

This is definately not a reliable source https://www.sharecare.com/health/nutrition-diet/what-is-medical-nutrition Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:00, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Followup, another non-RS in my humble opinion: Medgadget.com. Opened RSN discussion here. They openly invite SEO material for medical products. - Brianhe (talk) 10:32, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Need to make edits to Nely Galan Wikipedia page

Hello,

We are trying to make necessary edits to Nely Galan's wikipedia page. It says that you reverted our edits. Can you please explain? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ldsinder (talk • contribs) 22:40, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

The issue is you copied and pasted from the source in question despite the request for you not to. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:10, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks you for the award!!! I am taking up the work/pleasure of editing in wikipedia (en español/spanish) and I found The Cure Award. It's very motivating, now I will put more effort to continue in this knowledge sharing adventure. I'm studying now to validate my doctor of medicine degree in USA, and editing Wikipedia is part of my studying routine. Thanks again, greetings,--Behemot leviatan (talk) 02:09, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

User:Behemot leviatan thank you for your efforts :-) If you have any questions feel free to drop me a note. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:42, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

An Information

I received your message on my talk page and the link you gave me clearly states that it has its information derived from wikipedia. People now and then paste wikipedia's information on online forums. How can they own the copyright then ? The 'so called' copyright information by you was added in wikipedia long time ago before that was copied from wikipedia and pasted on that site the link of which you gave me on my talk page. I spent so much time in giving reliable links for introductory in Himachal Pradesh introductory. But you straightaway removed all that information along with references. That site doesn't own the copyright of the information. That information earlier given in introductory of this article was originally posted in wikipedia. I don't know by whom but what I did was only adding reliable links. If you realize that you made a blunder by removing important parts of introductory section, then please revert your edits yourself and restore the article to its previous version. You will see that many different sites or blogs may have uploaded the same information by copying it from wikipedia. Please take a notice of this. I would have reverted your edits myself after giving my explanation but I don't want to be engaged in an edit war. So, check yourself and then decide what to do. Please do message me for reply.Vibhss (talk) 07:58, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Proof

To consolidate what I am saying in relation to article Himachal Pradesh, this link (you must have gone through this completely) http://post-card-diary.blogspot.ca/2015/08/in-lap-of-himalayas.html clearly mentions in the end that its information has been copied from wikipedia. They does not own its copyright. I added good references to support the claims in introductory all of which are being published by reputed portals like Hindustan Times, Deccan Herald and so many. If you were so keen, you could change the wordings and sentences in the introductory keeping the links intact. Similar issue is with Tourism section of the same article which you removed mindlessly along with all the good references. People copy wikipedia's information to post on their forums. By doing this, they do not own its copyright. There are so many forums which follow the idea of "copy from wikipedia, paste on site". Don't take me wrong and check this yourself. I have reverted your edits but I will change the sentences so that they don't exactly match that given in your link. But please understand that the info is wikipedia's original and not pasted from anywhere. But many sites have pasted this information from wikipedia. Please after reading this message, notify me about your views.Vibhss (talk) 08:21, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks User:Vibhss you are indeed correct that the blog post mentions it is from WP. Apologies as I had missed that.

Looking at the edit in question [28]. You added the following content on May 31, 2016.

Extended content

Himachal Pradesh is famous for its abundant natural beauty with Himalayan landscapes. The economy of Himachal Pradesh is currently the third-fastest growing economy in India. Himachal Pradesh has been ranked fourth in the list of the highest per capita incomes of Indian states. This has made it one of the most wealthy places in entire South Asia. Abundance of perennial rivers enables Himachal to sell hydroelectricity to other states such as Delhi, Punjab, and Rajasthan. The economy of the state is highly dependent on three sources: hydroelectric power, tourism, and agriculture. Himachal Pradesh is spread across valleys, and 90% of the population lives in rural areas. However, the state has achieved 100% hygiene and practically no single house is without a toilet. The villages are well connected to roads, public health centers, and now with Lokmitra kendra using high-speed broadband. Shimla district has maximum urban population of 25%. The hill stations of the state are among the most visited places in the country. The government has successfully imposed environmental protection and tourism development, meeting European standards, and it is the only state which forbids the use of polyethylene and tobacco products. References

The initial edit summary only says "added links with desirable info...". It does not say which Wikipedia article this was copied from. Our license is CC "By Attribution" Share Alike. The "By attribution" means you need to state in the edit summary when moving content around which page it was from. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

It was copied from an earlier version of page about five-six months old version.Vibhss (talk) 09:22, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Okay just say that in the edit summary Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:37, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Word of THANKS and further...

Thank you so much for considering my explanation. I hold the same explanation for tourism section of the article which you removed. The link http://ramansh.com/pages/Destinations.html has also perhaps copied it from wikipedia. I am thinking of adding the tourism section again but with modified lines and same links. Can you assist me ?Vibhss (talk) 09:19, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

User:Vibhss if we can figure out which other Wikipedia (Wikivoyage) page it came from than happy to see it returned :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:36, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Fair

Well it is no more necessary since I have modified the content of Tourism section of Himachal Pradesh to a large extent along with references. It will not bear any copyright problems anymore.Vibhss (talk) 10:00, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Okay sounds good. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:02, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Diana Wall history logs / archive version

Hi. Is it possible to get either an archived version of Diana Wall, or an history log of editors? I'm hoping that the reflist and infobox are salvageable to write a new article from scratch. Thanks for anything that's possible T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)<sup>talk</sup> 10:26, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Sure will email it to you. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:28, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

The original was copied from http://sustainability.colostate.edu/content/soges-director-leaves-21st-research-season-antarctica and the new addition increased the issues. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:34, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Colombian constitution

Not sure what brings you to say that it was copied word for word when it clearly wasn't (it was paraphrased), and the parts copied verbatim were clearly indicated by sourced quotations. How else do you recommend thoroughly citing a constitution's provisions?

Extremely frustrating to see hours of my work and edits made in good will, with good intentions, questioned as if I was some plagiarist. --Petrovic-Njegos (talk) 15:18, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

In this edit you added:

"The declaration of a state of foreign war may be made only once the Senate has approved a declaration of war, except if the President judges it necessary to repel the aggression forthwith."

"During the state of foreign war, the Congress continues to enjoy all its constitutional and legal powers and receives periodical reports from the presidency on the decrees adopted and the evolution of circumstances. The President may issue legislative decrees suspending laws incompatible with the state of foreign war, remaining in force until they expire and/or normal conditions are deemed to have been restored."

Ref says:

"The declaration of a state of foreign war may be made only when the Senate shall have approved the declaration of war, except when in the judgment of the President, it was necessary to repel the aggression [forthwith]."

"While the state of war continues, Congress shall use all its constitutional and legal powers and the government shall report to it, giving reasons periodically for the decrees that it has issued and the evolution of events."

The paraphrasing was a little close. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:55, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Sure, perhaps that was one case of a close paraphrase. That can be easily edited to be phrased differently. Yet, I really doubt that's a reason to delete the entire section and question the hours of effort I put into that page. Besides, it still doesn't address the issue of how you can thoroughly explain constitutional provisions without, at one point or another, using quasi-identical language. I welcome your comments. --Petrovic-Njegos (talk) 16:24, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

We typically remove "close paraphrasing" when we see it. All you need to do is summarize it. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:26, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

User:PEarley (WMF) Already submitted my reply. Additionally I provided some text feedback here Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:56, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Copyright edits on Wikipedia page

Hello,

I just got a hold of my messages and I want to apologize for copy-pasting information from a website into a Wikipedia article. My intention was not to steal information from said source but to inform users on Wikipedia about the school system at IDEA Public Schools. I will take more precaution when editing this article and any article from now on.

Raul1798 (talk) 16:18, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. By the way what is your relationship with the school in question? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Well, I happen to be a student from one of the schools that operates within the IDEA district. I just graduated a week ago and simply wanted to edit the article to inform people of the accomplishments and other news that is mentioned from them. I was not paid in any way or form to edit, I simply volunteer my time to improve and update the article, since the grammar on here is not well-written. Again, apologies for copy-pasting info on here. Also, my username changed, so I am the same person. (Raul1798)

De88 (talk) 19:48, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savills

Hi James, With regard to the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savills which you reverted here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Savills&diff=next&oldid=723301317 I did actually paraphrase everything and condensed everything to encyclopedia facts except the first sentence "The Savills family came to England soon after the Norman Conquest of 1066, to farm the lands of northern Essex" which the bot probably picked up, unfortunately. Can my version be used without that sentence? Or is it too detailed? AFAIK it is properly referenced and DEFINITELY not the source text. In particular I noticed AUSTRALIA (where I live) was not mentioned in the article which I thought VERY POOR. This is a huge global company but the wiki information skeletal, almost stub class. I don't think they are secretive, just hopeless. They are a rather conservative company it appears and tend to stay out of the media by choice. The material from the history was from the official site of a 300 year old firm so in my judgement ostensibly factual. Do I need to get further refs to establish authenticity? The founder of the firm has a wiki page. Could you give me some guidance please on how to make the edit Wiki-suitable? Robertwhyteus (talk) 21:35, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

The primary edit of concern is this one [29]. Changing a verb or two is not sufficient when it comes to paraphrasing. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:58, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

James that link just takes me to the page I referred to above, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Savills&diff=next&oldid=723301317 which is the accumulations of several iterations over time, can you be more specific. I want to work on the page, can you point me exactly what needs changing to follow Wikipedia conventions? Robertwhyteus (talk) 04:29, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Text was more or less word for word from http://www.savills.co.nz/about-savills/history.aspx#1990s as mentioned Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:32, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

You added

"The Savills family came to England soon after the Norman Conquest of 1066, to farm the lands of northern Essex. In 1855 Alfred Savill first set up business at 27 Rood Lane, London, as 'Savill and Son'. In 1870 the business moved to St Helen's Place. Around this time Alfred was retained as professional adviser to a number of Essex nobles. His sons Alfred, Edwin and (Henry) Norman, were already firmly established in partnership by the time of Alfred's death in 1905. Although located in the City, the firm's practice was largely agricultural. At the outbreak of World War 1, Edwin Savill was appointed by the War Office to assess compensation to landowners in Essex and Suffolk for loss of or damage to properties. In the 1920s the firm moved to Lincoln's Inn Fields.

At the time of the Second World War Norman Savill went to Wimborne in Dorset, securing vital records there. The firm’s architects worked from the Woking office. Norman Savill aside, the remaining partners stayed at the Lincoln’s Inn Field office. After the War In the 1950s the firm merged with Rees-Reynold and Hunt. In the 1960s 63 Lincoln's Inn Fields became the firm's headquarters and many new young partners were admitted. By the 70s, the firm was re-branded as Savills, having 58 partners in head office and 15 more country offices in England and Wales. Savills became a limited company in 1988 and obtained a full listing on the London Stock Exchange. In the 1990s Savills consolidated its growing presence in Asia by joining forces with First Pacific Davies Limited to become FPD Savills in 1997. Following this merger, Savills acquired a majority shareholding in the Spanish, German and French companies previously trading as Weatherall Green & Smith. "

Ref says

"The Savills family came to England soon after the Norman Conquest of 1066, to farm the lands of northern Essex." "Alfred Savill (1829 - 1905) set up business at 27 Rood Lane, EC3, in 1855 as 'Savill and Son'."

...

"Savills consolidated its growing presence in Asia by joining forces with First Pacific Davies Limited to become FPD Savills in 1997. Savills acquired a majority shareholding in the Spanish, German and French companies previously trading as Weatherall Green & Smith."

So it was basically all copied and pasted. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:45, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your advice, I will have another go at it. Robertwhyteus (talk) 05:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)