User talk:Djsourabh.bwd

Page move vandalism

Moving redirects to nonsense titles or adding plainly improper speedy deletion tags are not the way to move a page. MrOllie (talk) 17:04, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:db-reason-notice|Belagavi|header=1| This is an empty page. I want to create new article with same name.}} <span data-dtsignatureforswitching="1"></span> Djsourabh.bwd (talk) 17:06, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Belgaum

It appears that Belagavi is another name for Belgaum as shown in Draft:Belagavi. Wikipedia does not have two articles about the same topic. You should add to the Belgaum article rather than trying to create a duplicate. If the name is incorrect, and it may well be, then go to Wikipedia:Requested moves and follow the instructions. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:09, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Belagavi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Belagavi. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Belgaum. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Belgaum. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. MrOllie (talk) 17:09, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I declined the speedy as Belagavi looks like a valid redirect to Belgaum. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:17, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No it's not redirect. Kindly revert Djsourabh.bwd (talk) 17:31, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We already have an article on this city at Belgaum. You cannot create a second article about the same place. MrOllie (talk) 17:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please change the title from Belgaum to Belagavi. The Government of Karnataka has changed the city name as Belagavi on 1st November 2014 with approval of Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India.

Belgaum becomes Belagavi, as Centre clears name change plan

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/karnataka-belgaum-mysore-names-of-12-cities-changed-kannada-223614-2014-10-17 Djsourabh.bwd (talk) 17:48, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There was already a community discussion about this at Talk:Belgaum, which decided to leave the article at its current title. MrOllie (talk) 17:54, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No that doesn't workout well. All other platforms which use wikipedia as location source are showing wrong city name. For example Facebook doesn't have city name Belagavi. It has only Belgaum. Djsourabh.bwd (talk) 17:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook has nothing to do with us. MrOllie (talk) 17:59, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But, atleast respect & follow the Government's order. Djsourabh.bwd (talk) 18:06, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly follow the Government's official notification. Please use official names & not old names. For your reference I'm attaching here the Government of India's orders.

https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=113433

https://www.mha.gov.in/MHA1/Par2017/pdfs/par2014-pdfs/ls-161214/3797.pdf Djsourabh.bwd (talk) 18:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We follow our own rules (specifically WP:COMMONNAME), not the orders of governments. MrOllie (talk) 18:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Belagavi is the common name now. It has been 8 and half years. Please improve. Djsourabh.bwd (talk) 18:17, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. We're not changing the name until there is a consensus on the article's talk page that Belgaum is no longer the common name. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:20, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then kindly raise it for consensus. Djsourabh.bwd (talk) 18:25, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion was held last month, and the decision was to keep the article at Belgaum. It is too soon to start another discussion about the same issue. MrOllie (talk) 18:28, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When can you conduct next discussion? Kindly inform. Djsourabh.bwd (talk) 18:29, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Check back in a year or so. MrOllie (talk) 18:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Belagavi, you may be blocked from editing. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:29, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank a page, as you did with this edit to Belgaum. RPI2026F1 (talk) 17:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Belagavi Social Media

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Belagavi Social Media requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrOllie (talk) 18:26, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue attempting to circumvent consensus (creating Draft:Belagavi, the above now-deleted article, etc), you will be blocked from editing. I suggest you drop the stick and move on. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:29, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Belagavi (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Belgaum. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The redirect at Belagavi has been protected. Please discuss at Talk:Belgaum.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Belagavi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Djsourabh.bwd! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Prabhavati Mastmardi - Chavadi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Prabhavati Mastmardi - Chavadi. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 09:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prabhavati Mastmardi - Chavadi (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No evidence of notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prabhavati Mastmardi - Chavadi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:24, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prabhavati Mastmardi - Chavadi (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We need to see significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prabhavati Mastmardi - Chavadi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:35, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Belagavi

Hello, Djsourabh.bwd. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Belagavi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Prabhavati Mastmardi - Chavadi

Hello, Djsourabh.bwd. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Prabhavati Mastmardi - Chavadi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Belagavi

Hello, Djsourabh.bwd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Belagavi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:27, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Prabhavati Mastmardi - Chavadi

Hello, Djsourabh.bwd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Prabhavati Mastmardi - Chavadi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:30, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]