User talk:Dissoxciate

Dissoxciate, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Dissoxciate! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Dissoxciate! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, help: notes, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Umngot River has been accepted

Umngot River, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 23:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thankyou! much obliged. Dissoxciate (talk) 00:08, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BLP

Hi Dissoxciate,

I have made a edit in Rahul Pandita & Vivek Agnihotri page about his self idenfication of his caste. There seems to be seem to be some confusion from my side regarding the same. Since the person has self identified himself which is in accordance to Wikipedia BLP Policy

Please refer the link mentioned for the same and it is not Original research

Could you please provide the reason for removing the same.

Thanks, Pranesh Ravikumar Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 12:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Even if a person has identified himself as belonging to a certain caste, you're not supposed to insert castes of people into Wikipedia unless WP:RS indicate that caste is important to their notability. A person might have several personal claims concerning himself, but that doesn't necessarily equal significance on Wikipedia. It's not Wikipedia's job to be sensationalist. Furthermore, biographies of living persons should be written with extra care and intricacy, therefore addition of content such as yours adds undue weight to those articles, WP:UNDUE. Please stop adding back the same edits over and over again. Thanks, Dissoxciate (talk) 13:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

With self-identification like that, it's highly likely that admins will see your reverts unfavorably. My suggestion would be to drop this. Hemantha (talk) 02:17, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. This topic is a huge mess, either way. Dissoxciate (talk) 03:12, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dissoxciate,

I have currently removed my two edits about self identification of their caste for further clarification. Based on your recent conversation with Hemanata i think we could proceed to add the same since it is self identified by the person itself.

Thanks Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 07:36, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics/Archive 49#Mentioning caste of Individuals — DaxServer (t · m · c) 11:12, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wei Sawdong Falls has been accepted

Wei Sawdong Falls, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RPSkokie (talk) 06:12, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for informing! Dissoxciate (talk) 06:18, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

Hello Dissoxciate:

Thank you for your contributions to veganism – or vegetarianism – related articles. I'd like to invite you to join WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a WikiProject to improve veganism and vegetarianism articles on Wikipedia and coverage of these topics.

If you would like to participate or join, please visit the project page for more information. Thanks! Rasnaboy (talk) 04:15, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

this seems interesting, just joined! thanks for the invite. Dissoxciate (talk) 14:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chenrezig Statue Cum Skywalk has been accepted

Chenrezig Statue Cum Skywalk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 00:59, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the info! cheers.Dissoxciate (talk) 05:27, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Changey Falls has been accepted

Changey Falls, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 00:28, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kagyu Thekchen Ling Monastery has been accepted

Kagyu Thekchen Ling Monastery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 07:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to Animal Rights Wikiproject

Hi. Hope you’re interested in contributing to Animal rights–related articles in Wikipedia. If so, I would like to invite you to add your name under the “Participants” section in Wikipedia:WikiProject Animal rights. Cheers. Bhagya sri113 (talk) 08:20, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yes, i'm interested to contribute. i'll join. thanks for the invite! Dissoxciate (talk) 09:11, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Singshore Bridge, Pelling has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Singshore Bridge, Pelling. Thanks! Gusfriend (talk) 02:04, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Gusfriend:, I checked your comment! So as far as I could find, to answer your first question; it appears that the bridge is primarily for pedestrians. However, light vehicles can cross the bridge as well. This reference^[1] discusses it, and a number of tourist reviews elsewhere state the same. For the second question, although there isn't any forthright statement addressing the question, from most references provided it can be made out that the bridge was constructed with the exact purpose of reducing the time and distance between the two gorges (and connecting those two hills), which implies there wasn't any lower bridge prior to its construction. I couldn't find any numbers for the third question, unfortunately. Although all references are consistent on the claim that the bridge attracts significant footfall, none provide any numbers.

There's also one discrepancy that has come to my attention, so I'd request you to review that. The reference(s) I've used in the article mention that the bridge was built 'in the early 2000s', but the aforementioned reference states that it was inaugurated in 1993. I'm not sure which to go by. Please address this. Thanks! Dissoxciate (talk) 08:22, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Dissoxciate! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Shortdesc helper, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Dissoxciate! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Articles for submission, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Dissoxciate! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Categories, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Singshore Bridge, Pelling has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Singshore Bridge, Pelling. Thanks! Dwaipayan (talk) 00:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @User:Dwaipayan. I checked your comment and it does turn out that the claim is dubious, I felt so too while writing the article. Although most reliable sources claim it is the second highest bridge in Asia, I can't seem to find any leads which specify if it's the second highest pedestrian bridge in the continent. Ergo, I've removed that part. Please check back and let me know! Thanks. Dissoxciate (talk) 07:59, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Singshore Bridge, Pelling has been accepted

Singshore Bridge, Pelling, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dwaipayan (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JetSetGo (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Promotional -- too much content about what they hope to do in the future. Not notable because the sources are not reliable for notability -- ee WP:NCORP -- interviews where the founder or the company are allowed to say whateverthey please about themselves are not reliable sources, but essentialy press releases.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:JetSetGo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 06:47, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

fair enough. thanks for the response! Dissoxciate (talk) 12:00, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC versus create direct

Authors with experience in creating articles may choose to not go through AfC, which has a backlog of drafts waiting for review. Risk for creating directly is that a person at new pages patrol may Speedy delete or start an AfD rather than just revert the article to draft if in their opinion not good enough to be accepted. David notMD (talk) 12:40, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this, David notMD. So far, I've only created articles using AfC (except i believe 3 on certain species). Since the procedure is fairly time-consuming (and since I've gained a certain level of experience on here), I decided to create an article directly (ofcourse, not before assessing its notability). But the risk, as you said, always remains. Which is why I wanted it to get reviewed, and hence, my inquiries.

Should I just leave the article as it is for now, then? Dissoxciate (talk) 12:46, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an AfC reviewer nor a NPP participant. David notMD (talk) 13:26, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

fair enough. Dissoxciate (talk) 15:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:JetSetGo

Hello, Dissoxciate. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:JetSetGo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:JetSetGo

Hello, Dissoxciate. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "JetSetGo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:56, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Santhal Family has been accepted

Santhal Family, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:33, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks! Dissoxciate (talk) 15:59, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Abraxas irrorata

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Abraxas irrorata, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:18, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioning caste in a "Biography of a Living Person"

Do not add caste in a WP:BLP article if it is not self-identified by the subject per WP:CASTEID policy period. Doesn't matter if you have 1001 sources where third-parties mention the subjects caste, they wouldn't be applicable. Failure to comply with the policy is disruptive editing/edit warring. But, you can add caste in articles of dead people, using a WP:RS ofcourse. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A fox for you!

Thank you so much for being a contributor. Your edits and pages are greatly appreciated! :-)

SomebodyNamedAlex (talk) 03:59, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SomebodyNamedAlex, thankyou for the fox! much appreciated :) Dissoxciate (talk) 12:02, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^ http://sikkimexpress.com/news-details/singshore-bridge-in-need-of-repair-closed-for-vehicular-movement

[1] ttp://sikkimexpress.com/news-details/singshore-bridge-in-need-of-repair-closed-for-vehicular-movement

[1]