User talk:Pranesh Ravikumar

Hi there, Click here to Leave me a message

Welcome!

Hello, Pranesh Ravikumar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! SUN EYE 1 13:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important information

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Bishonen | tålk 13:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC).[reply]

May 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 18:00, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just added some columns to make it precise from distinguishing professional and bureaucrats. Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 18:03, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Was this due to continuous editing of the article Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 18:09, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have shown no regard for any of our policies and have indulged in BLP violations along with the use of multiple IP addresses to further your agenda editing. If this happens again after your block expires then your editing privileges will be revoked completely. —SpacemanSpiff 18:11, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

SUN EYE 1 13:20, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There was no indication of what edit you were reverting here, nor of where the "discussion" took place. How did the word "Genocide" enter the picture (as part of your edit)? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:15, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kautilya3,

The clarification regarding the Rahul Pandita edit was about is that Self identification of caste. Since in his Official twitter he has shared his part of story about what happened during Kashmir and also that he self identified himself as "Kashmir Pandit" due to this i just made the edit for the same. There was discussion after this made with other Wikipedia editors regarding whether it need to be considered or not. Please note that the term "Genocide" was not part of my edit but was made by a anonymous editor but during my revert of edit it just got added. Apologies from my side for not taking that part into account. The conversation regarding the same link is below,

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dissoxciate#BLP

Thanks Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 12:58, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, in future, please make sure that all content-related discussion takes place on the article talk pages. Also, the term "genocide" is being added by drive-by IP editors. As a Wikipedia regular, we would expect that you would revert such edits before you make further edits of your own. If you don't, you will make it harder for the rest of us to keep the Wikipedia neutral. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 13:26, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:50, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DaxServer,

Thanks for bringing it to my notice. There seems to be some clarification from my side needed regarding BLP. In case a person's caste is self identfied by themselves will that be a valid edit to proceed or is it invalid as per the new set of rules.

Thanks Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 21:05, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pranesh. You might want to read this: Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics/Archive 49#Mentioning caste of Individuals Cheers! — DaxServer (t · m · c) 11:07, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for expanding List of Brahmins taking consensus into consideration.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:59, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you source this section?. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:00, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure will do. Thanks for the Kitten Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 16:44, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at this. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:15, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

TonyBallioni (talk) 01:09, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Achievement Survey (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National Achievement Survey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:National Achievement Survey, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 11:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pranesh Ravikumar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 11:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Premiership of Narendra Modi. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 07:10, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Premiership of Narendra Modi. In Special:Diff/1107529784, your addition is nearly entirely unverifiable from the cited source (even quotes someone who isn't mentioned at all) and overall minimises the content in the section. This is blatant source misrepresentation. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 15:04, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

P.S, apparently this was a case of using a source without citing it and citing a different one instead, rather than OR/misrepresentation. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 19:11, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Premiership of Narendra Modi has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 19:12, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You are topic banned from the subjects of India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, broadly construed.

You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 15:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:National Achievement Survey

Hello, Pranesh Ravikumar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:National Achievement Survey, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently been editing the Arab–Israeli conflict which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;

follow editorial and behavioural best practice;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 14:52, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:National Achievement Survey

Hello, Pranesh Ravikumar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "National Achievement Survey".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:12, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Claim"

Please stop changing "claim" as in "claim him as a member" MOS:CLAIM does not apply to that usage. Selfstudier (talk) 13:38, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

Could you advise the reason for not changing th word "claim" since as per the MOS:CLAIM mentions below,

Said, stated, described, wrote, commented, and according to are almost always neutral and accurate

To say that someone asserted or claimed something can call their statement's credibility into question, by emphasizing any potential contradiction or implying disregard for evidence

Since the topic is part of contentious topic we could subsitute to words more neutrality like using said, stated or others. Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 16:24, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CLAIM refers to "Synonyms for said".

In the cases you are changing, the word claim is not being used as a synonym for said in the sense of someone claiming something, it is being used descriptively. Selfstudier (talk) 16:40, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Selfstudier, I did look into the subject about your comment. As far as I checked the synonyms for the verb "say" included "claim" in thesaurus.^[1]

Apart from this since you mentioned "claim" synonym and I have checked since the statement in the in the sense of allege we could use "state" instead of "claim" as synonym. ^[2]

In this kind of scenario as per MOS:CLAIM "To say that someone asserted or claimed something can call their statement's credibility into question, by emphasizing any potential contradiction or implying disregard for evidence". So we could provide an neutral word which can be "stated" as per the MOS:CLAIM Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 14:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2023

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2023, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:05, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.thesaurus.com/browse/say

[2] ttps://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english-thesaurus/claim

[1]

[2]