User talk:Dekai Averett

Welcome!

Hello, Dekai Averett, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Space Zombies, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 01:41, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Space Zombies

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Space Zombies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 01:41, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Emo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 07:58, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Easycore

Why isn't Easycore allowed to be created, there are plenty of resources on the internet and the sound is specific enough to warrant it's own page. Dekai Averett (talk) 02:22, 26 September 2017 (UTC) Copied from Talk:Easycore – wbm1058 (talk) 11:58, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easycore (3rd nomination) and two earlier discussions, and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 February 2#Easycore, the consensus was to delete the page. It strikes me that there is no consensus on what "easycore" is, as different people have different ideas on what the term means. We need to find sufficient coverage in WP:reliable sources to form a definition for the word.

There are articles on the topic in French Wikipedia and Spanish Wikipedia. If you can translate those (see Google Translate) perhaps they have more sources that could establish the topic's notability.

You might try defining the word in Wikimedia's sister dictionary wiki, Wiktionary, by creating the page wikt:easycore. If you can get that to stick, then you may ask me to put a link to that on Wikipedia, using {{Wiktionary redirect}}. That would be a start. However, the Urban dictionary definition hints that this is slang, and I can't find any mainstream online dictionary that defines the word. Not Dictionary.com, Merriam-Webster, Cambridge or Oxford Dictionaries, Collins English Dictionary or The Free Dictionary. None of them define the word. – wbm1058 (talk) 11:58, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Pierce the Veil, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 23:22, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Pop punk, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 03:43, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Undo applied to unregistered user

After I reverted an edit at Punk rock made by an unregistered user, I noticed that the edit history message said that I reverted your Emo edit. I don't know why the system made that mistake—the words I typed in come right after that added message. The reversion was made to the unregistered editor, not you. I agree with your edit. Just wanted to let you know. Thanks. Garagepunk66 (talk) 02:10, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Melvins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Oasis (band). Rob van vee 13:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Math metal

Hello and thank you for producing the disambiguation page Math metal. Please can you help out by fixing the articles which link to that page and should link to one of the three articles instead? The main priority is Template:Experimental music genres, which appears on 49 pages, but there are plenty of other articles: list here. I expect most of them should go to Mathcore but I don't know the subject well enough to be sure. Thanks, Certes (talk) 00:08, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Robvanvee in view of the previous message, which I just noticed. Can these genres be fixed without causing disruption? Certes (talk) 00:13, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Indie emo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Indie emo. Since you had some involvement with the Indie emo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PamD 14:40, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Boarding House Reach, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Ss112 22:58, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ss112 They were all sourced in the source I gave for progressive rock. Did you read it?

April 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Total Xanarchy, you may be blocked from editing. Ss112 00:24, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ss112 the album was literally hip hop, he is a rapper, that isn't disruptive editing, that's common sense, if you want a source it would literally take no time to find one. I think there are bigger fish to fry then this.

It's not my responsibility to source material other editors, including you, add; make yourself aware of WP:BURDEN. You're also acting like rappers always make hip hop albums, like they can't do anything else. It might be "common sense" to you, but it's not a given—rappers can make albums in other genres. It's not obvious. I reverted you then warned you in maybe about 30 seconds; that's not spending a lot of time on your addition of unsourced content or not having "bigger fish to fry". If you don't understand that content you add to Wikipedia needs to be sourced regardless of how "common sense" you think it is, then just so you know, you will most likely continue to receive warnings and may be blocked. Ss112 03:36, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Naked City (band). Rob van vee 05:41, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies Robvanvee, I sincerely thought that the edit was constructive and it was made in good faith. I will try to refrain from doing so from this point onward.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dekai Averett. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dekai Averett. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your usage of "You Don't Need Maps" as a reliable source

I recently noted that you added references to the blog "You Don't Need Maps" here and here. The source is self-published and just like every other source on Wikipedia needs to meet certain guidelines such as having "a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" and other details noted at WP:V, but in particular self-published sources "are largely not acceptable as sources" unless there reliability can be thoroughly established. From the description given on the homepage for the blog it appears that the blog is run by a single person who is a fan of punk rock music, not any one particularly recognizable or notable on the the subject of music genres, not to say that their opinions are incorrect, only that they cannot be easily taken as reliable. I would encourage to find better sources such as this one which contain similar or the same information but are more reliable. —T.E.A. (Talk•Edits) 02:32, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I understand, thank you. Dekai Averett (talk), 24 Febuary 2019 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Scene-kids-hair-330x440.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Scene-kids-hair-330x440.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:51, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! StaticVapor message me! 18:58, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to make unconstructive edits, as you did at Scene (subculture), you may be blocked from editing. 53zodiac (talk) 17:57, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Skins (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trap (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Kanye West edit and other genre-warring in the past

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Kanye West. Piotr Jr. (talk) 19:38, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]