User talk:Deb/Archive 14

Company Stub Deleted

Hi Deb, I'm working on adding software companies to Wikipedia. It was marked as a stub and did not contain any advertisements or marketing. I'd like to know before I create another one and have someone delete that as well. What needs to be different? Detox1724 (talk) 18:26, 13 August 2013 (UTC) his own ego should be different, that means smaller. but, do not worry, that will never happen. DEB! Can I get the information I posted back? Detox1724 (talk) 14:08, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

The person I'm writing about is retired therefore there is no question of promotion or advertising.

Hi, Deb, I was hurt to see that you deleted my page 'Hanwnat lodha' because it was "promotional" and now I'm left without a backup of what I wrote. I request you to either edit it however you like, or if possible, give me a backup or a copy-paste of the article as it took me more than two hours just to collect the information, other than writing it and it definitely isn't about a business or a product, I read the other comments on this page and I do find it hard to not believe that they aren't promotional or advertising but the person i'm writing about is retired anyway - if you would check in the references, so there is no question of promotion or advertising. If you like I could mention that he is retired if you wish to display the article again. Thanks. hope you reply asap. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parvlodha (talk • contribs) 15:33, 12 August 2013 bah, you are blaming yourself for his actions? do not feel guilty, you achieved something. maybe not the greatest of the jobs, maybe not the best, but you were just unlucky: this guy here simply found the result of your work and simply found that it contradicts his overinflated ego. so, he simply deleted it, without any consideration for the effort that you did make. do not blame yourself, as nothing in this world (and i wonder even if god...) could stand against his ego. and his laziness. 'cause otherwise he would contribute.

Rebreather Forum 3=

This was a very important safety meeting held last May. It concerns a piece of diving equipment called a Rebreather. We had experts fly in from all over the world to attend and speak at this symposium. At the end of it, 16 safety points were agreed by the conference. These safety points and the proceedings will have a very long lived legacy with regard to rebreather safety, such as changing the ethos and culture of using check lists. The Conference Proceedings are currently being written up by a team of doctors (mix of PHd and MD). This is not a promotional page. This is an educational and safety page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tumc (talk • contribs) 12:12, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Please reinstate this page. This page is to be a resource page for divers to stop them from dying. RF3 was an education event. It was very important to the rebreather diving community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.47.105.206 (talk) 13:24, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Theodore Freeman may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• one E3, one E4) airman witnesses were never questioned or consulted during the crash investigation.{{fact|date=June 2013))

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:41, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Stephan Chase (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to West End and White Mischief

1934 in architecture (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Beaux Arts

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Well done!

This is a good edit! Leela Bratee (talk) 16:22, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Getting WP:WALES in the Signpost

Does Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Newsroom/WikiProject_desk/Interviews6 interest you? Bencherlite^Talk 11:52, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Wierdness

On User talk:Me bernstein, you posted a {{uw-advert}}, but you didn't subst the template. So, when I posted my next note, the username in the uw-advert template changed from yours to mine. I was very confused until I figured out why it did that! I've fixed it, but please remember to subst this template in the future. (Probably poor template design that causes that bug, too. I'll bring that up at the appropriate talk page.) WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:20, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks - I didn't realise it did that. I agree - poor design.Deb (talk) 14:24, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Deletion review

Hi. I was told on the help page that I should inform you that I will be applying for your speedy deletion of "Brigante Aviation" to be reinstated. I have cited that you missed that the aircraft design was of particular importance both scientifically and from an engineering point of view, the aircraft was rather unique. Although it could be considered promotion, the article was written in a non-promoting fashion and that fact that a company is involved usually does not stop important articles about aircraft manufacturers being deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MikeDutton (talk • contribs)

Deb? Why is my page being deleted?

I did everything correct I thought? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BodyofEvidenceB (talk • contribs) 15:05, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

No Soapbox Gimmicks here, Im a Stellar Nominee Artist in the genre so its not local. Please help me out Deb. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BodyofEvidenceB (talk • contribs) 15:10, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

I thought I was saving a draft - sorry! Using the Wizard now, so a lot of the basics should be covered. Like the subject, reflist and the Issue A7 which was cited. Also: wow you're fast. Please advise if I miss anything! --MiEhrynn (talk) 16:10, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

I read the regulations on Wikipedia which said that the introduction of a company is not allowed.However,I was confused why the IBM corporation may have created a page for themselves with everything relative to the company written on.Is that possible you hel me solve the problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kosun mmcl (talk • contribs) 09:26, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Block

The Colbert article had been labelled as hoax, which normally I would just delete. However, purely by chance, I deleted Squiddles, another hoax page, edited under another name, but obviously related. In fact, looking now, it's been edited by the same user under at least three accounts, mostly removing tags and the like. If I'd noticed that before, perhaps I should have indeffed for socking. If you think I've got it wrong, let me know, cheers, Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:18, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Deb

I'm just a Evangelist from Washington D.C. who is trying to add a Major Genre to wikipedia. Help a brother out please *on my knees* — Preceding unsigned comment added by BodyofEvidenceB (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Deb?

BodyofEvidenceB (talk) 15:44, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Hipset Network

Hi there, you deleted the stub I posted for Hipset Network - I'm a little confused, because the company clearly has notability as evidenced by the sources I found on the first page of a google results page. Obviously it's not the finished article (no pun intended) but it seems OK for a start. Help me out? Roguebluejay (talk) 14:11, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker) To Roguebluejay. I saw your comment which, contrary to normal practice, you have deleted from your user talk page, "what I've been trying to do is start articles which are only one or two lines …". This is a lethal approach. You should develop articles in your own user space, eg. User:Roguebluejay/sandbox until they stand a reasonable chance of surviving in that dangerous territory called the Wikipedia (article) namespace. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:12, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Advice on NPOV

Hi Deb, thank you for update http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Generation_Zero_(NZ_Group)&diff=561951762&oldid=561812167 I tried to address it, if you get a chance can you please revisit and give one example of how to improve. I tried to only use adjectives if uncontested and generally accepted but might still need to phrase differently. Regards Ruan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruanmalan (talk • contribs) 09:30, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

The Message of You

Was the message of you deleted because it had to many reviews 19:10, 30 June 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nerdypunkkid (talk • contribs)

LOL

Sorry, so focused on VisualEditor I had not realized I was using Italian language! --Elitre (WMF) (talk) 11:51, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

We as Human

I recreated this article because the EP and the LP charted on numerous charts and they have received significant press now that the LP has released.HotHat (talk) 15:49, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of my page

Hi Deb, I'd like to know why you deleted my article about Printing Industry in Tanzania! Geoffrey Ng'humba 00:24, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Deteltion of page 'The Flash Zone'.

Hey, Deb. Why did you delete my encyclopedia entry of the webstie The Flash Zone. Everything in my article was relevant to the subject, and everything i said was facts, not opinions or make-believe.

Please repost my article.

Deletion of Make a Hero Page

Hi Deb,

I saw that the contribution I made about the organization was deleted because it appeared promotional. I understand that this is not allowed, so I was wondering how specifically the page appeared promotional. At the very least, I would appreciate any and all feedback on how to create the page for Make a Hero so that it does not violate any of Wikipedia's terms. I believe that this non-profit should have a presence on Wikipedia. Thanks in advance for your help! Kbparker (talk) 21:21, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Townsed string theory

This is regarding http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dimension10#Townsed_string_theory. It is 'not' original reseach. It is something well-established in the early 1990s. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dimension10 (talk • contribs) 14:43, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

And yet no mention of it in any of the sources you quote.Deb (talk) 14:45, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

There are 4 se[parate sources in the reference. Instead of talking irrelavant things, why not actually learn some string theory? And no, I did not mean "Townsend". Townsed is the name of a physicist, after which this string theory is named. S o, please, know what string theory even is, before commenting nonsense. I have removed the templates with reasons in the edit summary.Dimension10 (talk) 15:16, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Please refer me to some information about this person supposedly named "Townsed". If you cannot do so, I will nominate this article for deletion. Deb (talk) 15:18, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Buh, so you are just stuck with the name. Its Paul Townsed. Dimension10 (talk) 15:20, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Oh, now I see what you are saying... You are pretty much talking about the name. It is Paul Townsend, yes you're right about the name (but wrong about everything else). I'll move the article. Dimension10 (talk) 15:22, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "2013 in British music". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 15:54, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Redirect from "Townsed string theory"

I see that you have deleted the redirect page Townsed string theory. However, as a few people (even though, not many) may have visited it before I moved it, the redirect page is necessary. It is not an implausible redirect. I have re - created the redirect page for now, please do not delete it again. Dimension10 (talk) 04:28, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

I have clearly stated that I meant people who visited the page before I moved it. Please stop deleting the page. Dimension10 (talk) 06:56, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Help Needed

You pointed out some issues in my article on page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Glick Please, Help me remove issues from this page In my defense, verification of all the info has been done directly from the artist, and about general notability guideline, this page has been created for a well known artist whose songs have also been featured on Tv and Movies — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jatin0194 (talk • contribs) 09:53, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Sorry Deb... here's more to help

Sorry Deb if you feel like there's a conflict of interest. I collect that info from various websites and also got that info from the artist though fan mails. Here's a link that can also be helpful http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/angry-mob-music-signs-four-stellar-indie-artists-its-growing-repertoire-musicians-1552090.htm

Work in progress

I understand that. I am new to this that's the reason it is taking some time. I'll add more references soon. Would IMBD Links help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jatin0194 (talk • contribs) 12:34, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

i added some more valid references to Jesse Glick ,let me know, what else you need to make this page work.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jatin0194 (talk • contribs) 17:21, 14 July 2013 (UTC) 

Deletion of my page on Lister Technologies

I wrote an article about an existing organization which has been around since 2001 and it specializes in the e-commerce,CRM, E-publishing etc. It employes close to 500 people in Chennai,India, one of the IT hubs of India. There is NO promotional stuff mentioned in the article. I guess it does meet the notability guidelines. I can provide more references if it is required. There are several organizations by name Lister and clarification on this particular organization could help. so,I don't understand the reason for it to be deleted. Karthik (talk) 13:53, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Deb, I have provided several references to support my article, so please review it again. Thanks.

Karthik (talk) 05:37, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

I have provided you a number of independent references. The only external link which I have provided is the company's official website, which seems to be norm in all other company wiki pages. Let me take each reference one by one:

   ^ http://www.dnb.co.in/ITSMEs2007/profile%5CLister%20Technologies%20(P)%20Limited.pdf

D&B is an internationally reputed organization which rates other companies. It is not an advertisement.

The below are references from various partner companies of Lister.

   ^ https://www.liferay.com/web/glenn.saler/blog/-/blogs/partner-visits-lister-technologies
   ^ http://www.xenogenix.com/about-us/our-partners/lister-technologies/
   ^ https://appexchange.salesforce.com/listingDetail?listingId=a0N30000001hUM6EAM&tab=r&revId=a0S300000018zFAEAY
   ^ http://www.actian.com/partners/partner-directory/reseller/lister-technologies

The below are references from the press and media websites

   ^ http://www.thehindubusinessline.in/2009/03/11/stories/2009031150791100.htm
   ^ http://www.enterpriseappstoday.com/business-intelligence/article.php/3923191/Lister-Technologies-Unveils-Business-Intelligence-for-Healthcare.htm
   ^ http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/lister-technologies-shares-best-practices-in-business-intelligence-for-hospitals-1501658.htm
   ^ http://www.biomedreports.com/2011020163118/lister-technologies-launches-hitam-healthcare-business-intelligence-solution.html

The below references are various B2B portals which explain about Lister

   ^ http://www.indiamart.com/lister-technologies/
   ^ http://www.ebharatbase.com/lister-technologies-p-ltd
   ^ http://www.insideview.com/directory/lister-technologies-pvt-ltd
   ^ http://www.blazelead.com/Lister-Technologies-Private-Limited/

I dont think anything promotional is mentioned in the article. I have just written about what the company does.So beyond this Can you please explain what else exactly you need? Karthik (talk) 05:02, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I have removed the references suggested by you.

Karthik (talk) 13:18, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Maynard's Foods

I put a link to their website on the page but you said that it wasn't (possibly) real. Here is the websiteMaynard's Food Centers Website . Please consider undoing your deletion. Thank you R.Z. Edwards (talk) 21:58, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

User:Dimension10

Hello. If I may I would like to notify you about this editor's misconduct: when asked about his latest edits (making controversial moves and inserting original research [1][2]), instead of giving a proper explanation he resorted to accusing me of being your sockpuppet (apparently because you had already opened a similar thread on his page). When I asked him again to provide sources backing up his claims about 'string theory'-related standard terminology he resorted to making even more dubious claims that lead other editors to thinking that the content he has inserted is validated by references, when in fact it is not. I replied to the latter by directly quoting the very texts he mentioned in order to establish the fact that they do not back up any of his claims; he then resorted again to borderline personal attacks [3][4], while still not providing sources. I would like your opinion on this, please. --Omnipaedista (talk) 14:49, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Again, making false claims that I had not put sources. Read carefully and stop making unjustified, baselss assumptions (in addition to personal attacks.) . Dimension10 (talk) 14:51, 17 July 2013 (UTC) .

A minor change to DRN

Hi there, you're getting this message as you are involved in a case at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard which is currently open. Today DRN has undergone a big move resulting in individual cases on subpages as opposed to all the content on one page. This is to inform you that your case is now back on the DRN board and you will be able to 'watch' the subpage it's located on. Thanks, Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 13:17, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Maynards (Reply)

Okay, Thanks anyways. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Al-Basel School

hi Deb , you have moved an page its name is Al-Basel School from "Al-Basel school for superiors (Aleppo)" I should to tell you that You have to move it again but to this title "Al-Basel School For Superiors (Aleppo)" because this is its official name. Thanks for your time --أبو بكر السوري (talk) 12:28, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Deb , this is the name of the school in Arabi مدرسة الباسل للمتفوقين .However , thank you--أبو بكر السوري (talk) 12:58, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Discussion on manual of style for Royal family Style and Titles

Hi Deb, there has been an ongoing discussion on how to present styles and articles for the royal family, specific with Prince George of Cambridge's page. As I point it out, we should be adhering to the precedent styles with other royals such as Elizabeth II, George V, Prince Harry of Wales et, al. And to present it in a bulleted style rather than prose/statement creates a much straighforward and direct presentation, as otherwise. Your thoughts will be appreciated Pseud 14 (talk) 00:23, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Oh hey, thanks for responding, I was referring to the 'Titles and Styles' subsection. As shown below:

• 22 July 2013 – present: His Royal Highness Prince George of Cambridge

Under letters patent issued by King George V in 1917 and Queen Elizabeth II in 2012, George is, from birth, a British prince and is entitled to the style of Royal Highness. As with other children born to royal dukes (as well as Princes of Wales), Prince George is referred to by a territorial designation taken from his father's title (as noted in media notes released by Buckingham Palace on 22 July 2013), in this case "Cambridge" from his father's title of Duke of Cambridge.

We are pointing out that it should follow the same bulleted format as with other prince and princess or members of the royal family, instead of being just being stated as simple a prose/statement. Pseud 14 (talk) 10:31, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for putting your inputs into the discussion that we have. I'd also like to invite if you can provide your inputs on our Dispute resolution at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Prince_George_of_Cambridge.23Title , given your extensive knowledge of Royal Nobility articles and experience in handling these. Pseud 14 (talk) 03:27, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

You deleted my page!

Come on, I worked for a while on that article! MatthewHoobin (talk) 18:58, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

I suggest the mod' move it to the user's userspace first.

1. neutral PadmaPhala (talk) 14:27, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

hey [merger]

how do you merge two articles, I think it is appropriate to merge two articles [one for history, the other for controversial u$-centric version of a history that was ROMAN/ITALIAN]

thanks

PadmaPhala (talk) 14:26, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Venom: Truth in Journalism

Please stop deleting my page. It is extremely inconvenient. Use Google and see the significance of something before getting trigger happy.--Cube b3 (talk) 11:47, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Seriously Deb? Here is a google search.

https://www.google.com/#sclient=psy-ab&q=Venom+truth+in+journalism&oq=Venom+truth+in+journalism&gs_l=hp.3...1091.11767.0.12089.36.26.2.8.9.0.111.1748.23j3.26.0....0...1c.1.23.psy-ab..7.29.1292.GOPDO5G6Xns&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=bv.50165853%2Cd.b2I%2Cpv.xjs.s.en_US.seW1cfrvSKg.O&fp=81bbfe24b99ff94c&biw=1600&bih=756

Can you see all the various sites reporting it? The video went on YouTube last night. I have a process, I write an article, section by section. I do a hundred small edits rather than a single big edit. See my contributions. This is my process. You have disrupted it and I won't be making the page again. I am not very social on Wikipedia, but there used to be a process here. We used to get time to fix an article. Have things changed? Will people like you immediately delete our work before we can finish it? I really do not appreciate, what you are doing.--Cube b3 (talk) 12:01, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Deb does not google. -- Stratoprutser (talk) 18:50, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

he doesn't google, because he considers that he himself does not need that. he feels like he alrready knows. e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g. he's way too clever to even move a finger and make an effort to improve. no, he's just the supreme being, acknowledging or rejecting other people's efforts. a kind of supreme judge. what i am saying? "a kind of"? no, that wouldn't make it past his ego. THE supreme judge. this is way better, isn't? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axeoth (talk • contribs) 08:25, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Robert Schuman Foundation (France)

(WP had signed me out earlier) - it is mentioned on Robert Schuman Foundation (European People's Party) and there is a French WP page [5]. Can the page be restored? Jackiespeel (talk) 15:25, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Apart from the French WP article there is [6] and a websearch shows Georgian, Polish and Romanian RSF websites (and probably others if I looked further).

There is an article in this somewhere - possibly one article on the RSF as a body, with subsections on the various country versions. Jackiespeel (talk) 15:49, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Do you think there should be one article (as above) or several? Jackiespeel (talk) 20:41, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Tags on Infinite Promotions

Can you advise me as to how any information on this new article reads as an advertisement? I used other professional wrestling articles as templates for the article that I created. I don't believe that any of the information on the article is written with a biased stance; it's written just as it would be on any other article of the same genre. Regards.

It's difficult to answer people who don't identify themselves! Deb (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Apologies. Not used to the etiquette of talk pages on this website. D1502825B (talk) 23:23, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Chanctonbury Ring redlink

Hello Deb, I unfortunately didn't see "new article" in the edit summary as an indication of an imminent arrival of said article, but maybe I should've. Good luck with the article, I look forward to seeing it. Rgds. Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 18:31, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Oqimta deleted...

Hi Deb,

you've just deleted my entey "Oqimta".

Please notice that the entry is about a new and free academic journal.

now, who should enter that entry to wikipedia if not the publisher himself?

could you reconsider it, (perhaps you would like to compose it yourself...)

Thank you, Oqimta (talk) 18:27, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Answer to the above:- No one should - it is not notable and therefore should not be included in wikipedia.Deb (talk) 18:38, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

No advertisement

I have authentic information about something to create the page that you have deleted even before it was completed by adding references. Funny. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.206.169.75 (talk) 05:59, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you Deb

I thank you for helping me improve my english by helping me improve my article about the Battle of Vittsjö

Have a nice day :-) (You can delete this if you dont want this on your page) SuecicaRex (talk) 12:44, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Deb, I was rather hurt to see that you'd deleted my page based on "promotional" content, especially considering how I'm left without a backup of what I'd written. I'd written about a business, sure, but not in any way that suggested others should buy their products. I believe that I was factual and without bias in creating this article. Could you offer any advice to avoid you deleting my work without warning in the future? Lexxbaker (talk) 20:15, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

New section

Hi, Deb, I was hurt to see that you deleted my page 'Hanwnat lodha' because it was "promotional" and now I'm left without a backup of what I wrote. I request you to either edit it however you like, or if possible, give me a backup or a copy-paste of the article as it took me more than two hours just to collect the information, other than writing it and it definitely isn't about a business or a product, I read the other comments on this page and I do find it hard to not believe that they aren't promotional or advertising but the person i'm writing about is retired anyway if you would check in the references so there is no question of promotion or advertising. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parvlodha (talk • contribs) 15:33, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Deb. I happened to notice the user's sad complaint on Jimbo's page. I've posted the article in Parvlodha's userspace, here, and explained on his talkpage that it can only stay there for 24 hours, as a courtesy to enable him to copy the text to his own computer. Bishonen | talk 17:37, 12 August 2013 (UTC).

Alexander Ashworth

Hi Deb, I am surprised by your speedy deletion as "he has been the subject of multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other and independent of the subject" and "has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his specific field." Could you make suggestions on how to improve the notability of this article? I am planning to add further articles on the UK brand industry where there are gaps. Thanks, John. Brandwatch uk (talk) 10:11, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Manifest Ltd

Thank you Deb. I think we should revert to the previous and long-established Manifest article in the meantime. John — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandwatch uk (talk • contribs) 10:42, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Deb, I think that's a very subjective view of the references. The previous article's history shows a continuous process of improvement by Wiki editors which does not support your claim that it somehow escaped notice. If you reinstate the old article I will work on the revised article to meet your suggested criteria. John Brandwatch uk (talk) 11:24, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Deb, not looking for a deal - just an objective consideration of criteria that you seem intent on ignoring. I had no idea Wikipedia was such a hostile and uncooperative space. If your intention was to crush my first attempts at becoming a contributor then you have succeeded admirably! John Brandwatch uk (talk) 12:12, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Animoto

Hi Deb!

I was working on the Animoto wiki page and was far from being done. Could you please undelete the page that I was working one? Also, any suggestions are welcome!

Thanks! Messier83 (talk) 23:21, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Messier83

Hi Deb!

It's me again! I am almost finished with the article. Could you review it before I submit it? I would like to know what I need to do to improve the page so it won't be deleted. Thanks!

Messier83 (talk) 17:55, 15 August 2013 (UTC)Messier83

Encrustation

FYI, the editor continues to recreate this content with the edit summary "it's ok". I have given them a warning and a final warning now on their talk page. If possible, I would suggest the page be salted to avoid it being recreated again. Cabe6403^{(Talk•Sign)} 13:04, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

...for your support. ```Buster Seven Talk 18:14, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Simonetta Agnello Hornby

Multiple award-winning Italian novelist. I don't understand the reason for deletion. --Peripatetic (talk) 11:57, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

• More references provided. --Peripatetic (talk) 12:01, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Surely it's better to have a stub that people can add to in time? I have created more than 800 articles on Wiki (99% of them still here) so I am aware of the notability guidelines. I don't like populating this place with trash any more than you do! Would kindly request you to ask me/have a bit more patience in future :-) Thanks. --Peripatetic (talk) 12:06, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
    • No, it's better not to experiment in article space. If you haven't got time to write the article properly, it's better to create the stub in your sandbox and move it later. Deb (talk) 12:56, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Sourov0000. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Portrait of Marchesa Brigida Spinola-Doria, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Sourov0000 (talk) 15:51, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Confused.com!Deb (talk) 16:52, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Conversation over deletion of Loucks Stadium at White Plains High School

• Hi Deb. I am wondering why this page was deleted. What was wrong with the content of the page? Kindly elaborate, and specify what is needed for the page to exist. Thank you. NYCWikiKid (talk) 16:36, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

• As several people have pointed out to you above, to demonstrate notability, you need to add independent references. A school sports stadium is unlikely to meet the criteria.Deb (talk) 16:42, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

• Hi Deb, the created page had information to direct links of the teams using the facility and it had external links to these teams showing evidence of its usage. Before deleting, you could have contacted me and simply asked to add more links. If no links were added, then delete. But you didn't even send a communication. I will once again attempt to place the page, with more information to satisfy the criteria. Nonetheless, I ask in fairness, to at least create a dialogue with me. I am very open to collaborating and improving Wikipedia. Thank you. NYCWikiKid (talk) 16:53, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
• You are mistaken. There were no independent references included in the article.Deb (talk) 17:12, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Oh, nearly forgot. Your latest article Hamden Hall Country Day School Field also has no independent references and has been tagged for a while. If you cannot provide the references, I will have to delete that one as well.Deb (talk) 17:14, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Also Dalling Field at Saint Joseph High School Field.Deb (talk) 17:15, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

• No, I am not "mistaken". I clearly placed external links, as well as internal links to the original article in question, before you deleted it without word. In regard to the next two you are randomly mentioning, these articles were created within the past couple of hours. It is impossible that they be tagged for "a while" as it would imply that the page was there for several days. Nonetheless, I have gone ahead and added a couple of references if that is the inconvenience. I again express, that if there is some particular detail needed in addition, do just amicably contact me, as I am very friendly and I will do my every effort to help. Thank you. NYCWikiKid (talk) 18:00, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

The article that was deleted contained two links. One consisted solely of directions to the field for the benefit of those playing there; the other was the school's own website. Neither of these are independent references that demonstrate notability. You actually tagged Hamden Hall Country Day School Field yourself when you created it, a couple of hours before I wrote the above. You are clearly familiar with the guidelines. As long as you abide by them, your articles won't get deleted. The only reason contributors sometimes get advance warning of speedy deletions is that most editors don't have the level of access required to delete articles so all they can do is give a warning. Don't expect this special treatment from administrators. Deb (talk) 20:15, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

• Deb, this back and forth over something that is easily fixed is really moot and passe. I am not interested in alleged privileges. I only constructively said that communication is preferable and ideal. This lends to users continuing to improve an article rather than discouragingly starting from scratch. I am currently expanding a few wiki pages. I'll eventually reintroduce the article we've spoken about and hopefully it will meet the basics. All the best NYCWikiKid

I hope you don't mind an uninvolved editor intruding, but it doesn't appear Loucks_Stadium_at_White_Plains_High_School would qualify for WP:CSD#A7.

An article about a real person, individual animal(s), organization, web content or organized event that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, with the exception of educational institutions.

I understand there's a discussion about applying A7 to buildings but I am not familiar with that being current policy. OSborn ^arf_contribs. 21:34, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Warning a user with no recent edits

I saw you added uw-advert1 to Stott.parker (talk · contribs)'s talk page today. As far as I can see, that user has not edited since

• 20:28, 19 March 2013 (diff | hist | all) . . (+244)‎ . . Douglass Parker ‎

and you did not revert that edit. Your warning was also unsigned. I thought I'd bring to your attention that you might have warned this editor in error. OSborn ^arf_contribs. 21:10, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

The warning was actually for an article I deleted: Tutto Theatre Company, which was clearly promotional. I used the "subst" template which added my user ID in the text of the warning. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that makes an additional signature superfluous - otherwise I'm sure the bot would have picked it up. Deb (talk) 07:27, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

I suspected there might have been a deleted contribution, but the template was about reverting a contribution so it looked out of place. I assumed we had a user warning template specifically for G11, but now that I look I don't see one. (Really weird - I really thought we had one.) As to the signature, it probably doesn't matter, like you said. OSborn ^arf_contribs. 13:06, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

About this whole thing...

Oh dear, what a fuddle. It's past midnight here in upside-down land, and I have to saddle up my kangaroo and go to work in the eucalyptus mines in about eight hours. I'm thinking of starting a userspace draft for the article after I've tidied up my editing session. Lets see how things go. Pete aka --Shirt58 (talk) 14:16, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Sourov0000. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Shiroi Tokyo, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Sourov0000 (talk) 14:51, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Constable of England

I wasn't the one that added the Constable of the Tower line..... You were

He was constable of England, not the Tower. But that doesn't take away from the fact of access.

I would had corrected it but I didn't want you you arguing about even more "facts".

--Rushton2010 (talk) 19:27, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Mea culpa - slip of the keyboard finger. Deb (talk) 19:34, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

I was wondering if you could userspace the article https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jerome_Mackey&action=edit&redlink=1 , Jerome Mackey. I was in the middle of updating the article. I saw you were the one who deleted it. 07:56, 18 August 2013 Deb (talk | contribs) deleted page Jerome Mackey (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) Also, I happened to see that there was a previous article. I was wondering if I could have access to it so that I can use the information on it. 09:17, 13 October 2010 StephenBuxton (talk | contribs) deleted page Jerome Mackey (A7: Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject) thank you

CrazyAces489 (talk) 15:18, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, Jerome Mackey was a pioneer of the Franchise System of Martial Arts schools. A la Tiger Schulmans. He was eventually shut down based on stock fraud. He is pretty big in the martial arts community. [7] I neither work for him nor am affiliated with him. I simply thought he was worthy enough for an article. I will keep improving it. CrazyAces489 (talk) 15:32, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Kiyoshi Shiina

How would I go about bringing this article to mainspace [8] CrazyAces489 (talk) 19:53, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank You

Thanks for the review on Wli Waterfalls --Enock4seth (talk) 17:22, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Save my templates

I find the long citation templates too much of a bother to use. So, I created the templates Rtr and Srs because they are easier to use, and I have been using them. However, somebody has been putting graffiti in them in the form of a “speedy deletion” request. I want to use my templates and I should have that option. My templates to me are more understandable and easier to use than other citation templates I’ve looked at.--Chicagoghosttown (talk) 21:05, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Deleting Kroto Innovation Centre page

you deleted my article relating to a University of Sheffield research facility suggesting that it was not worthy of noting. I probably set the page live without enough infomation. How can I get the page back and I will expand on the information provided. The facility was funded by the European Union Regional Development Fund and has a number of notable research projects including seimens wind power research. Sheffield Innovation (talk) 13:50, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Deleting One of Us European Citizens' initiative page

Hi, you deleted this page, I don't really know why, the reason was that there is no info about the group behind it, but it was clearly stated that two Europe's Parliment Memebers (Carlo Cassini and Jaime Mayor Oreja) are the creators of the initiative. Moreover there were references to the initiative web page, I know that the article was all but complete, but maybe rather than deleting it, it would be better to investigate and complete it. Jorgesro (talk) 14:21, 22 August 2013 (UTC) bay. it is a matter of deb's ego, that's all. and of laziness. do not lose your time. he does that because lack of real value, so he compensates with ego. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axeoth (talk • contribs) 08:10, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Yo

Un-delete the stub of T.J. Storm.

"Explanation of significance": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/T.J._Storm & http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0832622/ (like if it wasn't obvious).

--Niemti (talk) 14:17, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Btw: if you want to delete anything that is not vandalism, first ask. --Niemti (talk) 14:20, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion iss where you should go. Now undelete. --Niemti (talk) 14:48, 23 August 2013 (UTC) do you really hope reason to play any role against such inflated ego as deb's? nope. besides his ego there is no value, so he defends that ego at all costs, as is the only thing that he has. as if that would bring any value. he feels pleasure when he shots down other people efforts because he finally could say: "at least, nobody is achieving nothing. they're all like me. oh, god, i feel so good! thank you god for making me perfect!"; then, he calls that... self-modesty, because prising god. pity"

Mucha Mori

I noticed that you speedily deleted Mucha Mori. While I agree that user RenRen070193, whom I've been watching for some time, has been creating some dubious pages (she seems to want to create a page on every Japanese figure from sports or entertainment who is part Filipino), I don't agree that all her pages fit the criteria for speedy deletion. Mucha Mori, for instance, plays at the highest level of women's professional basketball in Japan and is a member of the national team ([9]). I would request that you recreate that page and, if you don't agree it is notable, nominate it for AfD. I can then present my case on the AfD. Michitaro (talk) 00:00, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for responding. If you restore the article, I will try to bring it up to snuff. I try to patrol new Japan-related articles and saw this, but while I was able to add a third-person ref, I did not have time to do much else. But I had seen enough to feel this did not deserve speedy deletion. FYI, the teams in the Women's Japan Basketball League are, like Japanese pro baseball teams, named after companies that own or sponsor them, so the name itself should not be taken as evidence of lack of notability. Michitaro (talk) 15:31, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

I recognise that - however, notable teams should be linked. Deb (talk) 15:54, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Unfortunately, much that is notable in the non-English world is underrepresented on the English Wikipedia, so even though there is a league page, none of the teams have a page here. I have, however, beefed up Mori's page. Michitaro (talk) 17:05, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Comments on your recent edit...

Your last edit at the protected Exhumation of Richard III of England page is being discussed on the talk page, btw - be interested in your views. Hchc2009 (talk) 18:08, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Berliner Tageszeitung

Hey, can you check to see if Berliner Tageszeitung is identical to how it was when you first deleted it earlier today? I noticed that it had been deleted, so I just wanted to check in. Thanks! — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 20:26, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Deletion Aye Formation

Hello, I changed the link Aye Formation to Aye formation in the 2 articles where I introduced it. So you can delete the first one. Cordially. Christian COGNEAUX (talk) 15:05, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. Christian COGNEAUX (talk) 15:28, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Frankly, what is advertisement about a compiler, besides a free compiler for a language? Why not delete the entire D programming language page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D_programming_language) while you are at it? Instead of deleting, you could have helped by writing two or three more lines on that page. Why not remove the entire LLVM page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Llvm)? Maybe remove Wikipedia entirely, what about that? It would just make way for zillions of pages, all of which would be just be perfect, since all blank. The LDC compiler is referenced from this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LDC, just go there and search for "LLVM D Compiler, D (programming language) compiler using LLVM backend", there is/was a page waiting for its creation. This is how you contribute? By deleting other's people work, and don't trying a bit to improve it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axeoth (talk • contribs) 15:11, 26 August 2013 (UTC) what about adding YOURSELF those references if you really care about contributing? other thing that your inflated ego do you have to share? blah, with guys like you, wikipedia would be really just perfect: a blank page. of course, with a reference towards those guidelines as an excuse to not move a finger. go and contribute something, not just plainly delete something. what about going at your workdesk and writing that page about the LLVM compiler? oh, that's work and you don't like it? just wait for somebody to do all the effort while you are just destroying his/her every effort? go and live up at the standards that you impose on others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axeoth (talk • contribs) 11:25, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

I'm so lazy I can't be bothered replying. Deb (talk) 11:46, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Mulayam Singh Yadav

Hello, you just deleted the article of Mulayam Singh Yadav. This person was probably among the most influential politicians in history, governing over 300 million people after being elected multiple times and doing things that affect every country on this world. Where is the AFD for this? Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 12:05, 27 August 2013 (UTC) frankly, don't bother, he seems to be too lazy to do anything more than pressing the "delete" button. although i would really like him to be even lazier, to not bother even about pushing that button.

• Hi! I get that you deleted this article for it being copyvio of various other sources. Of what you wrote in summary, http://www.ebharat.in/profile/mulayam-singh-yadav/biography is a mirror site which uses many of our info. There might be content copied and pasted from the other link you mention http://www.samajwadipartyindia.com/national_president.php. But the article has been on Wiki for quite a long and am sure there is a version in it's history present which can be restored to with no copyvios. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:07, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

I would expect so. Please share why you deleted this. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:09, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

I came by to ask the same question but see that it is being asked already. I don't see the foundational version (as of January 21, 2004, at 15:18 by User:Hemanshu as a copyvio; ebharat is a known mirror. The Samajwadi Party got their website after our article was started, so any copyvio is subsequent and the foundational text would therefore not be copyvio. At most this would need a copyright investigation and not an outright G12 deletion as it isn't obvious that the article is a copyvio. Please check the article history. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 17:47, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I can see that now and I've restored it. It's a mystery to me why the bot only just identified it as a copyvio when it had been in existence for so long. Deb (talk) 17:50, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, I will take it to through the copyvio cleanup process. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 18:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Link between a designation and a page

You have just changed the name of my new page RED ARMY CHOIR MVD to MVD Ensemble, and you have redirected this page to "RED ARMY CHOIR MVD.

How can I redirect my page from the designation " RED ARMY CHOIR "  ?? Because there are 2 Official Academic Ensemble (Alexandrov and MVD) named Red Army Choir, and at the moment only Alexandrov Ensemble is tied to the designation RED ARMY CHOIR... Thank for your answer.

Playzik 15:40, 27 August 2013 (UTC) but you are not so lazy to bother deleting, isn't? besides, you use a very lame excuse: you delete the article because it is, in your mind, UNAMBIGUOUS soapboax, then you give me another reason, that is because of lack of references. please, take a moment, make an effort to be too lazy too be lazy to delete, too lazy to stick on your own self-pride and harm. it will help many people. and, definitely, wikipedia too. i really hate your sheepish behaviour. you keep throwing reasons to justify your own wrong action just because you cannot admit that you are wrong.

And you are?

a contributor.

Hi This is Firas

Thanks for answer me so quickly .. can you give me some time to create it in good way .. in Arabic page i don't have problem, but it's little bet difficult here .. give me some time and i will learn how to do it good, i need to learn. Kind Regard Firasalbadri (talk) 13:32, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi This is Firas

Hi Deb it's my first time in English wiki, i have create many page in Arabic wiki and i want to make english version, so if you can help me to teach me how can i do it ? and how can i connect the two page ( Arabic & English ) pages .. kind regard . Firasalbadri (talk) 13:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

help to transfer photos to the articles Mustai Karim Kadir RakhimovichTimergazin a Russian version of the page

Good day! help to transfer photos to the articles Mustai Karim Kadir Rakhimovich Timergazin a Russian version of the page. The photos were overeat in the public domain by the authors of Russian versions. In the English version - they are not inserted (((

What the hell Deb?

You delete pages for no reason! What is this about promotion? I posted a wiki page about my project. I wrote completely neutrally about it I even included negative points. My wiki page has every right to be here as a software product. If you see my page as wrong then go take down the Microsoft Windows Wiki, the Mac OSX Wiki etc because I guess thats promotion as well, go to hell Deb! --brianmillar9 —Preceding undated comment added 23:23, 17 August 2013 (UTC) do not worry. pages are deleted because he finds that far more eaasier to do than to improve them. after wall, he likes very much destroying other people work, that boosts his ego and, besides, is far easier to do than to contribute. it does not even bother to ask or to suggest. all he knows is to delete, delete, delete. that action gives him a sense of power. is so pitfull...