User talk:Nerdypunkkid

Speedy deletion of Dan Nainan

A tag has been placed on Dan Nainan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.

Speedy deletion of Dan Nainan

A tag has been placed on Dan Nainan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.

Speedy deletion of Dan Nainan

A tag has been placed on Dan Nainan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. CardinalDan (talk) 17:20, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dan Nainan

A tag has been placed on Dan Nainan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Drewhamilton (talk) 06:44, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this is the only article you make. Maybe it's time to stop? Drewhamilton (talk) 07:00, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Dan Nainan, you will be blocked from editing. Drewhamilton (talk) 07:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Dan nainan

A tag has been placed on Dan nainan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dan Nainan

A tag has been placed on Dan Nainan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Drewhamilton (talk) 20:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, as you did with Dan Nainan, you will be blocked from editing. Drewhamilton (talk) 20:28, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dan Nainan.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dan Nainan.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:10, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dan nainan

A tag has been placed on Dan nainan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Drewhamilton (talk) 08:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Dan nainan, you will be blocked from editing. - KrakatoaKatie 09:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism-only

This appears to be a single-purpose vandalism-only account. You have been warned several times and yet you ignore and continue. {{Indefblock}} Ian Cairns (talk) 11:06, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nerdypunkkid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been accused of using this web site for vandalism but i have not in any way used it for such purpose. I have used it to make a valuable contribution. I have written an article about indian comedian Dan nainan. Eventhough i'm an amature and not a pro at wikipedia i tried to follow the guild lines. I have cited my sources with referesnes and proved why he is a notable person worthy of an wikipedia article. I don't know why my article got delted and being up for sevral days. I would like to put it back up and continue to work on it. Can you please review my block and see that i'm not a vandale and can you tell me why my article was marked for deletion. 16:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You did not establish with citations to reliable sources why Mr. Nainan was notable. You can use the {{hangon}} template, as the speedy deletion notice indicated. You are not supposed to repeatedly recreate the article ... that's disruptive editing. You were issued warnings, which you disregarded. Any further explanation needed? You have committed several blockable offenses. — Daniel Case (talk) 17:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nerdypunkkid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please include the original unblock request.

Decline reason:

duplicate, see below. Mango juice^talk 15:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

First i want to appoligise for any trouble i caused you or wikipedia it was not intentional

I did continue to repost the article but each time i added more and more infomation to it. I cited sources. one from the NYtimes and one from a 3rd party web site. I beleive i showed why he was notable :performed at major theators i.e the apollo. I had sources that i cited and was working on getting more when my article was deleted. I want to finish the article and how can we make this possible without the past being repeated.

I lookward to hearing from you

Thanks

Will you agree to follow Wikipedia procedures on this? This needs to go through Wikipedia:Deletion review and you need to agree to abide by the outcome and not keep reposting the article if the community decides against it. Mango juice^talk 14:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nerdypunkkid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Below

Decline reason:

Also below — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 19:13, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Each time i reposted the article it was bigger and better than before. I will finish the article with all appropiate citations and then post it for review. Can you give me access to the sandbox and what ever else i would need to do this.

Thanks

PS: Sorry for any trouble i caused you

We will not unblock you unless you agree to abide by community procedure on this. No more drafts; after so many deletions, the community needs to consider whether this topic is appropriate for coverage, and you need to abide by its decision. Mango juice^talk 15:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please place a new unblock template up once you have responded. You may also want to look over our deletion policy, which outlines the purpose of deletion review and how it works. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 19:13, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{[[Template:unblock Understood i will abide by the procedures. No more drafts the next one that will go up will be the finished product with referenses and links

Could i get some tips - how does the review process work - how many referenses and sourses are considered a good amount - what type of external 3rd party links can i put what can't i put - how do i show that its notable - how do i learn why the article was delted in the past - how to i go about getting further help

Thanks|unblock Understood i will abide by the procedures. No more drafts the next one that will go up will be the finished product with referenses and links

Could i get some tips - how does the review process work - how many referenses and sourses are considered a good amount - what type of external 3rd party links can i put what can't i put - how do i show that its notable - how do i learn why the article was delted in the past - how to i go about getting further help

Thanks]]}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

You seem to understand what is wrong. I will try to help you do it right.

Request handled by: Jayron32.talk.contribs 00:06, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Jayron32.talk.contribs 00:06, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Starting new articles

First, some reading material:

OK. Lets go over a couple of things. First of all, there is the concept of notability. In Wikipedia terms, this means that the subject of an article has received:

extensive coverage in
multiple
reliable
and independant sources

Extensive means that it is more than just a trivial mention. What is trivial? Well, for a comedian, a notice in a newpaper arts section that merely notes when and where the comedian will be performing... well thats trivial. An multiple-paragraph review of his work, a biography, an interview, etc. would all be extensive coverage. We need more than just one or two of these... that's where the multiple comes in. Reliable means that the source exhibits editorial control. Things like major daily newspapers, magazines, peer-reviewed journals, trade journals, and books published by major publishing houses are all reliable, as are websites of major news organization. Unreliable sources would include things like blogs, forums, bulletin boards, myspace, facebook, youtube, etc. that is anything where anyone can write anything and it isn't checked. Independent means that the person who wrote it has NO connection to the subject itself. Thus, a biography of the comedian at his own website, while IMPORTANT, and likely containing useful information for the article cannot of itself be used to establish notability. Now, lets say that such sources do not exist. The subject should not have an article at Wikipedia. Its that simple. Our next lesson will be on how to properly work on a draft article in your userspace. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 00:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Creating a draft article in your user namespace

Wikipedia is divided into different "namespaces". This page, for example, is in the "User talk:" namespace. There's the "User:" namespace, which contains all of the userpages for different users. There's the "Help:" namespace, which contains manuals and tutorials for using the MediaWiki software. There's the "Wikipedia:" namespace, that contains all of the policies, procedures, and guidelines for using Wikipedia specifically, etc. There's also the article namespace (it has no prefix), which is where all of the articles themselves are kept. While Wikipedia has strict rules over what sorts of material should exist in the article namespace (see the last section on notability. Also WP:5P is a good guide to this as well). you are given much greater lee-way over the management of your user namespace.

In your user space, you can create subpages(see WP:SUBPAGE), which you could use to work on draft versions of articles. To create a subpage of your user space, go to your user page, and create the following link: [[/DRAFT]]. You could replace the word "draft" with anything you'd like. Then, click the link and create the page. This will create the page User:Nerdypunkkid/DRAFT. Since this is in your user space, you can use this subpage to work on an article before it is ready to go live as an article. This gives you time and leeway to make it meet all Wikipedia guidelines (see last section), and thus it won't keep getting instantly deleted. There are some restrictions even in your namespace. Any work done here should be at least tangentally related to building the encyclopedia. You should not us it to advertise or promote something or someone, you should not use it to attack or defame someone, you should not use your userspace as a place to simply goof off or chat with friends. However, since you plan on working on an article, you can clearly do that. Once the article is ready to go live, and be moved to the main space, drop me a note on my talk page, and I will look it over, and help you move it to the main space, if it is appropriate to do so. Hope this has been of some help. If you run into any more trouble, just drop a note on my talk page, and I'll see if I can help out! --Jayron32.talk.contribs 00:28, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source for Image:Neibich.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Neibich.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:02, 20 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 00:02, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Headshot.jpg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Headshot.jpg.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:03, 20 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 00:03, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:LaffDown4web.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:LaffDown4web.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:15, 31 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 16:15, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:LaffDown.jpg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LaffDown.jpg.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Dan Nainan, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:27, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orange Mike I read about the conflict of interest before writing the article and again just now. I am not a close friend of Dan Nainan but just a fan. In fact i never met him in person only attended his performances. Once the age became disputed between 28 and 48. I contacted Dan about it via his fan email. he eventioanlly got back to me and told me that the reader digest was a misprint and emailed me a copy of his passport. And asked me to make the change for him. Please to not block me. Please email me I will forward his passport photo. Thanks. email is nerdypunkkid@gmail.com

Nerdypunkkid (talk) 20:56, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Headshot Guy Viau 7.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Headshot Guy Viau 7.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:09, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dan Nainan.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dan Nainan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dan Nainan.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:53, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dan Nainan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Environmental, Bloomington, East Coast, 4s, Technical and Impressions

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Prince of Venice Beach, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Surf and Runaway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I mean wikipedia pages related to surfing and runaway as a kid who ran away from home Nerdypunkkid (talk) 20:07, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The message of you

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The message of you, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ï¿½ (talk) 19:05, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

That certainly was one of the reasons. Try reading Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:NPOV tutorial.Deb (talk) 19:18, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Comedy Bible, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Producers and Agents (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arise (musician), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bavarian, French and Spanish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dan Nainan concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dan Nainan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Books

You can try. Careful to not overdo it, or I'll have to trim it down again. DS (talk) 01:14, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Judy Carter, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Marie and Midnight Special (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dan Nainan

Hello Nerdypunkkid. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Dan Nainan".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dan Nainan}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:01, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My draft article

The reason its still up is because I have trouble deleting it. Can you please tell me how I can go about deleting a draft page or publishing a draft page. Thanks

Nerdypunkkid (talk) 21:36, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Books written by Blake Nelson

Category:Books written by Blake Nelson, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 03:26, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Caroline Klebl, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Diet, Ama and Lifestyle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nerdypunkkid. You have new messages at Mutt Lunker's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Caroline Klebl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashtanga Yoga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Destroy All Cars (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Love story, Optimist and Young adult

Gender Blender (novel) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Young adult

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Your recent editing history at Dan Nanian shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
you are continuing to violate BLP past warnings to stop, next stop is the 3rr board DesiBabe (talk) 04:57, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, why are you continually deleting these posts?

Desibabe maybe you should check out the talk sections of Nainan page, and you will understand why. What you add is both irrelevant and there many citations that state other wise.

check the talk page

Nerdypunkkid (talk) 05:13, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Neibich

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Joseph Neibich, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.ovguide.com/joseph-neibich-9202a8c04000641f8000000008eb02c2.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:15, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Nerdypunkkid/Dan Nainan

User:Nerdypunkkid/Dan Nainan, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nerdypunkkid/Dan Nainan and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Nerdypunkkid/Dan Nainan during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Orange Mike | Talk 22:08, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of highly promotional content and reference spam.

After looking at the history of Arise (musician), I can't help but notice that you have written a large number of very promotional, minimally sourced articles. In addition, you have been inserting commercial links into articles as references, always near the beginning, so they appear at the top of the ref-list. These links are for sites selling shipping containers, hand tools, boarding schools, beauty schools, insurance providers... What is the reason behind this edit? It doesn't support the sentence, and adds a link to a commercial beauty school for no good reason. This, and many other edits of yours like it... I can't see how it's anything other than WP:REFSPAM. These links add little or no value to the articles. Looking at your talk page, I can see that you've been banned in the past for promotional editing, so do you understand why this behavior is a problem? Please review WP:RS, and WP:NOTSOAP, and explain why you're doing this. Grayfell (talk) 05:54, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Homo Handbook for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Homo Handbook is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Homo Handbook until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Grayfell (talk) 21:10, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stand-up Comedy: The Book for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stand-up Comedy: The Book is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stand-up Comedy: The Book until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Grayfell (talk) 21:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Message of You for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Message of You is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Message of You until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Grayfell (talk) 21:13, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Comedy Bible for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Comedy Bible is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Comedy Bible until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Grayfell (talk) 21:15, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Nerdypunkkid. You have new messages at Grayfell's talk page.
Message added 21:16, 11 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Grayfell (talk) 21:16, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Nerdypunkkid. You have new messages at Grayfell's talk page.
Message added 21:56, 12 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Grayfell (talk) 21:56, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of We Recover Data

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on We Recover Data, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GILO A&E⇑ 21:37, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Response

The article was created in the sandbox and not submited to wikipedia yet. It was my understanding that the sand box is used for creating new article before submitting them sort of a scrap book. Anyway I moved the article and will work on it before submitting it.

Nerdypunkkid (talk) 21:57, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WeRecoverData, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Storage device and Private. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Automotive Dealership Institute, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Visas and Private. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Juggalo may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

===Juggalos Making A Difference (J.M.A.D.===

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:29, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Automotive Dealership Institute logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Automotive Dealership Institute logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:14, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Katie Balloons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newport. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ILana Martin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ILana Martin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 22:40, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, I'm Reify-tech. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to HVAC because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Reify-tech (talk) 19:41, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Garden furniture. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. I've kept your talk page on my watchlist because I'm still waiting for an explanation from the last time added a spam to bunch of articles. Now I see you are doing it again. Once again: why are you doing this? Please explain yourself. Grayfell (talk) 19:54, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added citation to articles that lacked citations and in the case of Garden Furniture and other has a banner attached to the page asking for a citation and to make improvements to the article. Nerdypunkkid (talk) 19:41, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your recent editing. The thread is Nerdypunkkid. Thank you.

Is there still a discussion about me titled Nerdypunkkid, I was not able to find it, in the current listing nor the archives. Please let me know. Thanks

19:43, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coffee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cultivation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Nainan

I recently made some minor changes to the wikipedia article of Dan Nainan. I made these changes to make the page look better and it did not involve a lot of content being deleted. Why did you revert my changes. Nerdypunkkid (talk) 18:17, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In the course of your changes you removed several sections of sourced content without an explanation. Why did you remove it? Regards, Yamaguchi先生 18:20, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not much was exactly removed a word here and word there. A citation was added and dead link removed. and two paragraphs were consolidated into another section but left unaltered. Do to the quickness of the actions I feel its safe to assume you did not actually review the edits made and just reverted to another work. This is unfair

Nerdypunkkid (talk) 19:20, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed the edits for a third time. You changed the birth year in the infobox from "1961" to "disputed", yet you changed the category from "1961" to "1981". You also removed sources from the article without an explanation. Please exercise greater caution with your edits going forward, thank you. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 20:58, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The National Dwarf Fashion Show

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The National Dwarf Fashion Show requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or an organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jd027 (talk) 19:55, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dwarf fashion show

Please place your comments on the article's talk page, not my talk page. You can hit the "contest this deletion" button to do that. Jd027 (talk) 20:25, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The National Dwarf Fashion Show for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The National Dwarf Fashion Show is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The National Dwarf Fashion Show until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jd027 (talk) 01:25, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The National Dwarf Fashion Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dwarf. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Nerdypunkkid/Dan Nainan

User:Nerdypunkkid/Dan Nainan, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nerdypunkkid/Dan Nainan (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Nerdypunkkid/Dan Nainan during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:39, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Arise (musician) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Arise (musician), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Arise (musician)

Hello, Nerdypunkkid. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Arise".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:The Prince of Venice Beach

Wikipedia:The Prince of Venice Beach, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:The Prince of Venice Beach and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:The Prince of Venice Beach during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 15:31, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Caroline Klebl for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caroline Klebl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Klebl until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edison (talk) 22:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nerdypunkkid. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Comedy Bible (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Comedy Bible and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Comedy Bible, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 09:22, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nerdypunkkid! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 09:22, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Comedy Bible concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Comedy Bible, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]