User talk:De Administrando Imperio/Archive 5

Archives

no archives yet (create)

Hello

I have continued the discussion at the Invasion of Tibet (1950–1951) page. I don't know if you will wait for another person to revert before responding. Benjwong (talk) 21:07, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anjouan

I think we should move User:TheFEARgod/2008 invasion of Anjouan to 2008 invasion of Anjouan now and merge the content of Anjouan#African_Union_Invasion_of_Anjouan, before the section of that article grows too large... But I won't do it if you don't want to, after all, it's in your userspace and mostly your work. —Nightstallion 13:43, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No! :) The invasion hasn't yet began --TheFEARgod (Ч) 13:45, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's still a chance Bacar might surrender (as it usually happens) and there's no invasion. In that case, we could create an article 2007-2008 Anjouan crisis about the standoff and political crisis.--TheFEARgod (Ч) 13:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mh, actually, we probably SHOULD make the article 2007–2008 Anjouan crisis regardless of whether there's an invasion or not... What do you say? —Nightstallion 17:29, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

my vision is that the crisis WITHOUT the invasion is not notable enough to have its own article. Thus, I was thinking of a merger with Anjouan or History of Comoros. Or not?--TheFEARgod (Ч) 12:02, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's most certainly notable enough for an article whether there's an invasion or not; we've had articles on far less massive crises before... —Nightstallion 15:42, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your plan is to have two articles?--TheFEARgod (Ч) 13:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd prefer to have the article on the invasion expanded, but I could also live with two articles. What do you think? —Nightstallion 20:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

then let's expand the article :) --TheFEARgod (Ч) 23:10, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What a silly operation name. Like "Iraqi Freedom" --TheFEARgod (Ч) 13:21, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

True enough. "Liberation of Anjouan" would have been as positive and not so silly and seedy. —Nightstallion 14:13, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking of something with no connotations like "Morning Tides" or something lyrical like that. :) --TheFEARgod (Ч) 20:27, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That works, too. ;) —Nightstallion 20:50, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Basra

Procita mi misli sto se tice Basre, preduhitri me pre nego sto ja stigoh da zapocnem neki clanak u vezi bitke. Uzgred mogao bi da pogledas, posto sam ocekivao da ce se ovako nesto desiti sinoc sam napisao Siege of U.K. bases in Basra, da bi se videlo kako su stigli do ovde gde su sada. Dodao sam ga u kutijicu sa bitkama. Pozdrav.(Top Gun) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.116.170.203 (talk) 13:01, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mogao bi da pogledas dodao sam u Campaignbox 2008 Iraq Shi'a Unrest koji sam napravio. Takodje staio sam u kutijicu za Bitku u Basri stavio 8 poginulih policajaca i vojnika jer je za sada potvrdjeno 46 poginulih ukupno, od toga 30 militanata i bar 8 civila, pa valjda je bar 8 snage bezbednosti. Takodje dodao sam i jednog mrtvog britanskog vojnika, malocas su potvrdili da je poginuo u napadu.(Top Gun) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.116.170.203 (talk) 18:36, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Promenio sam naziv u 2008 Mahdi Army Revolt posto lako moze da se desi da se borbe produze u april. Jedva uspevam da pohvatam sve izvestaje borbi koji stizu sa juga zemlje i iz Bagdada. Stvarno se kolju, uspeo sam da potvrdim smrt preko 200 Iracana i 5 Amerikanaca (3 vojnika i 2 civila). Onog jednog Britanca ne racunam jer je poginuo u Bagdadu ne u Basri i to u raciji protiv Al Kaide a ne Mehdi Armije.(Top Gun)

People's Liberation Army operations in Tibet (1950–1951) page

Please vote here —Preceding unsigned comment added by Littlebutterfly (talk • contribs) 18:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:2001_Yugoslav_soldier.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:2001_Yugoslav_soldier.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MECU≈talk 14:59, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mass deleteing articles

I notice that you have been busy tagging a lot of articles for speedy delete. After looking a little closer it seems that you are deleting all of the articles that user langloisrg created, for what appears to be revenge. Although I agree with you that some of the minor operations probably are not needed I do not agree in deleting the Operation templates.--Kumioko (talk) 18:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Although I agree with you that some of them are unnecessary and that they are poorly written, being poorly written is not justification for deleting them from wikipedia. There are plenty of articles that need work.--Kumioko (talk) 18:16, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do believe people will vote merge --TheFEARgod (Ч) 18:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:50, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Sadr City

Zapoceo sam rad na Siege of Sadr City, proveri ako hoces da izvrsis neke ispravke ili da ubacis neke stvari.(Top Gun)

Domacinski sam doradio i preuredio Siege of Sadr City. Sad bih rekao da izgleda mnogo bolje nego sto je bio. (Top Gun)

2008 Mahdi Army revolt

Izgleda da sam bio u pravu, ponovo su poceli da se ubijaju juce u Bagdadu. Od juce u Bagdadu, 6 americkih vojnika, 9 militanata i 16 civila poginulo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.116.170.203 (talk) 20:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

budi oprezan! to je normal daily toll--TheFEARgod (Ч) 21:07, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ne, ne, ovo je bas u Sadr Sitiju, danas je Ministarstvo zdravlja potvrdilo da je 41 poginula osoba primljena u bolnicu u Sadr Sitiju od nedelje. Nego hteo sam da te pitam. Danas je Sadr otkazao sutrasnje demonstracije i pripretio da ce obustaviti prekid vatre. U tom slucaju. Ako u narednih par dana je obustavljen prekid vatre, da li bi onda trebali da ponovo vratimo nazad naziv onog clanka na 2008 Mahdi Army revolt i da nastavimo da ga doradjujemo? Posto bi onda okrsaji od 23.03. do 31.03. bili samo runda jedan. Kao ono sto je bilo u Mogadisuu u Somaliiji prosle godine. Mislim da su oni prosli kroz tri runde do kraja.

bravo što si se sjetio za Mogadišu. Ako al-Sadr obustavi prekid vatre ubaci second phase ili tako nekako. Ne revolt, najbolje bi ime bilo Iraq Spring Fighting of 2008 --TheFEARgod (Ч) 20:45, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dobar je naziv Iraq Spring Fighting of 2008. Doradio sam ga malo, posto trenutno se samo bore u Sadr Sitiju, u ostatku zemlje je jos mirno, za sada. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.116.170.203 (talk) 20:15, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invasion of Tibet

Someone has proposed a move back to the original title of this article. It would be great to have your input. Please chime in. Thanks. Yunfeng (talk) 20:06, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:2001 macedonia police.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:2001 macedonia police.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

The following images also have this problem:

Image:2006 Sadr City.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Wikiproject Terrorism Newsletter

The Terrorism WikiProject
April 2008 Newsletter

News

1984 Rajneeshee bioterror attack was made a Featured Article
Omar Khadr has an ongoing peer review as it begins the slow crawl towards Featured Article status

Trials have begun this month in the 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot, Benbrika affair and 2006 Toronto terrorism case, each article could use a good vetting, and the articles on specific alleged terrorists are desperately in need of some clean-up.
Associated Press photographer Bilal Hussein had his case overturned by the Iraqi courts and was ordered released, although the US military says they will not release him.
China announced that they had disrupted a plot targeting the 2008 Summer Olympics, while detractors claim it was fabricated.
The bail hearing for Abdullah Khadr, fighting extradition to the United States, is scheduled for April 29
Former Turkish Member of Parliament Leyla Zana is sentenced to two years imprisonment for praising Abdullah Öcalan.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guantanamo detainees missing from the official list needs votes on whether or not it should be kept on Wikipedia.

Archives • Discussion

Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 05:28, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History of Tibet

Someone has proposed editing the History of Tibet article up to Good Article status. However, so far he's only asked Chinese editors. Since you've been interested in editing the Invasion of Tibet article, your help would be warmly appreciated. Longchenpa (talk) 03:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Piracy in Somalia

Seeing that you have done an excellent job of editing the War in Somalia timelines, I though you would like to know that I recently created the page piracy in Somalia. The chronology section is in dire needs of expansion and this type of thing seems to be your cup of tea. Any help would be appreciated, but there's no rush, and if your not interested, no hard feelings. – Zntrip 22:51, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Somalija

Mozda bi trebalo da zapocnemo clanak nazvan Battle of Mogadishu (2008), posto imamo vec dva o onoj iz rane 2007.-e i onaj iz novembra 2007. Ova bitka je u stvari veca od one iz novembra. Sta mislis? Top Gun

Evo zapoceo sam ga, uglavnom sam copy pejstovao ono sto si ti vec bio izkucao i timelin-u rata za 2008, Battle of Mogadishu (2008). Top Gun

Okej. Top Gun

Bio u komsiluku pa da se javim.Top Gun

He,he. Doci ce red i na to. Navraticu jednom i u BiH. Dovraga moram, vucem korene odande od pre dve generacije. Il' tako nesto.Top Gun

Sri Lanka

Hvala na referenci.Top Gun —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.116.170.203 (talk) 22:18, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nije mi palo napamet Three-revert rule. Sada cu da pokusam nekako da izadjem na kraj sa njim u debati. Svi moji argumenti su validni, ali njemu nikako to da udje u glavu. Pa neznam sta da radim sa ovakvim tipom.Top Gun

Please respect the Sri Lanka Dispute Resolution Agreement

This is a friendly notice. You may have overlooked that the article Sri Lankan Civil War, which you reverted, is under the Sri Lanka Dispute Resolution Agreement subject to edit restrictions. This means, among other things, that it is not allowed to revert to the same version more than once a day. Since there was also an other account who performed the same reversions as you, please be advised that this restriction is on a per version basis, not on a per account basis. Please therefore best avoid reverting articles that are subject to this agreement. As the blue box specifies, please instead report any issues at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sri Lanka Reconciliation. Thank you for your understanding and future cooperation. --— Sebastian 08:11, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your confusion over UNITAF

In response to your confusion as to why UNITAF is regarded as a success, it may be helpful to read the "Results" section of the article. Additionally, your question is not new and was raised here as well. Hope that helps! BWH76 (talk) 15:20, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Insurgency-related page moves

I have reverted a few recent page moves which you performed:

2007 Lebanon conflict to Insurgency in Lebanon (2007) - see Talk:2007 Lebanon conflict for an explanation
Sa'dah conflict to Insurgency in Sa'dah
South Thailand insurgency to Insurgency in South Thailand

In the latter two cases, I was motivated by two factors. First, "X conflict" and "X insurgency" are generally much more commonly used than "Insurgency in X". Second, the topic of the article is not insurgency in South Thailand generally, but a single specific insurgency; thus, a title such as "South Thailand insurgency" is less generic and more clearly identifies the scope of the article. Black Falcon ^(Talk) 17:59, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Compare the results for "Insurgency in South Thailand with those for "South Thailand insurgency. The latter is usage is about 10 times more common. Similarly, "Sa'dah conflict" is much more common than "Insurgency in Sadah". The fact that other articles use "Insurgency in X" may just be an indication that they need to be renamed (since, again, none of the article consider the general topic of insurgency in a particular country, but rather cover a specific insurgency within a country). Black Falcon ^(Talk) 20:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did not say that everything should be "X insurgency" or "X wars", and I only raised the possibility that the three articles which you gave as examples (incidentally, I noticed that you either creator or moved all three to their current titles) ought to be renamed.

As for the Google numbers, according to Wikipedia:Naming conventions, "article naming should prefer what the greatest number of English speakers would most easily recognize". So, while Google numbers are never definitive, they ought to be considered.

Finally, as I've noted, "Insurgency in X" is an ambiguous title, since it does not clearly reflect the scope of an article. The article South Thailand insurgency is not an article about insurgency in South Thailand in general (as suggested by the alternate title of Insurgency in South Thailand), but is rather an article about a single, specific insurgency currently taking place there. Black Falcon ^(Talk) 20:29, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds good; and I won't move or re-move any additional articles until we've had more opportunity to discuss this and reach a consensus. I'll post a notice at Talk:Insurgency in Sa'dah to invite comment from other users. Cheers, Black Falcon ^(Talk) 20:32, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New article needed

... on this strike movement in Egypt which utilises Facebook? —Nightstallion 23:53, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

not an expert on strikes ;) --TheFEARgod (Ч) 11:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:27, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Shabab al-Muomineen

A tag has been placed on Shabab al-Muomineen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. – ThatWikiGuy (talk) 12:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2008 invasion of Anjouan

Your good article nomination for the article 2008 invasion of Anjouan has passed , see Talk:2008 invasion of Anjouan noting my passage of the article. Great work on it! Hello32020 (talk) 02:54, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thx very much :) --TheFEARgod (Ч) 07:15, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ofanziva

Izgleda da si u pravu. Izgleda da se odlucili konacno da krenu u juris u centar Sadr Sitija. Ovo mi mirise na jos jednu bitku u staljingradskom stilu s obzirom kako su se Amerikanci ekstra proveli samo na ivici distrikta.(Top Gun)

Somalia

Thanks for reminding me. I was trying to find the name of the town on the map and I completely forgot about it. That'll teach me to do more then one thing at a time. Furious Stormrage (talk) 14:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did have the source. But I was also busy gathering some evidence about HIV prevalance in Nigeria. I clicked submit and I knew I forgot to finish editing the Somali article and I thought I got it all when I did the two subsequent edits. I guess not.

By the way. The only part that seems to be the same has the May 8th casualty list is the IED in Baidoa. But the number of deaths and wounds are to different. I think It's safe to remove it since it was a Somali Soldier who said it. They aren't exactly known for telling the truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Furious Stormrage (talk • contribs) 15:36, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Liban

Hoces ti ili ja da zapocnem nesto u vezi ovoga sto se sad ubijaju po Libanu. Pet mrtvih javljaju.(Top Gun)

Evo uradio sam 2008 Beirut clashes.(Top Gun)

Pod policajac sam mislio clan snaga obezbedjenja parlamenta. Oni su eo vladinih snaga bezbednosti. U redu moze ovako da stavimo jedan mrtav pa u zagradi snage bezbednosti?(Top Gun)

Pogledaj talk page za kutijicu WoT.(Top Gun)

U redu u tom slucaju stavio sam dva vojnika koja su poginula u deo infobox-a u kome su civilne zrtve. Treba razlikovati koliko je civila a koliko oruzanih lica poginulo s obzirom kako libanska vlada non-stop prica da su ogromne civilne zrtve, ali kako pristizu podaci sve manje i manje u stvari ima mrtvih civila nego pripadnika paravojnih formacija.(Top Gun)

Stani malo, sto si izbacio 2008 unrest in Lebanon iz Campaignbox za Rat protiv terorizma. Nismo se jos nista dogovorili. Pa danas je izraelski predsednik izbacio optuzbe da su Iran i Sirija odgovorni za ovo sto se desava. Plus, stavise rekao je i da su oni odgovorni sto je Pojas Gaze pao u ruke Hamasa, a to smo povezali sa Ratom protiv terorizma. Predsednik je lepo rekao da nametanjem svog uticaja u Libanu i pojasu Gaze oni pokusavaju da strateski okruze Izrael. Sto vrlo logicno zvuci. Drugim recima pad pojasa Gaze i trenutna situacija u Libanu su povezani u jednom smislu reci.(Top Gun)

Uradio sam Timeline of the 2008 unrest in Lebanon, ispravi ako mislis da treba nesto da se ispravi ali ja mislim da je sasvim odgovarajuce.(Top Gun)

Proveri talk page za 2008 unrest in Lebanon. Lucias21 je pokrenuo vaznu raspravu. Ocigledno je da medju 38 osoba koje su poginule koje su zavedene kao civili, sigurno ima vise od 15 pripadnika pro-vladinih snaga. Izneo sam predlog tamo, na strainci za diskusije, pa mi reci ti sta mislis.(Top Gun)

synthesizing

The section about Ethiopia on Prees TV is synthesizing, and a violation of WP:OR which states "Synthesizing material occurs when an editor tries to demonstrate the validity of his or her own conclusions by citing sources that when put together serve to advance the editor's position". The section is also citing Press TV as a primary source to criticize Press TV, that is against the rules as well.--Sina111 (talk) 23:29, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you`re synthesizing. The Macleans source is an editorial and makes no mention of Somalia whatsoever. The other two "sources" are unreliable partisan pro-Ethiopian websites which fail WP:RS.--Sina111 (talk) 14:53, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sudan

Izvini sto ti ne odgovorih pre, nisam bio ni cuo za te borbe dok mi ti nisi rekao. Izgleda da su poprilicno jake borbe. Neki pricaju da ovo moze da izazove sveopsti gradjanski rat u Sudanu. Mislim da bi trebalo zapoceti neki clanak.(Top Gun)

Javljaju da su 22 vladina vojnika poginula tokom borbi. S obzirom da vlada ne odaje brojeve svojih poginulih tako lako i plus jos ovoliko da su priznali to znaci da je verovatno bas gadno.(Top Gun) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.216.83.39 (talk) 00:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1920 Haiyuan earthquake

Hi, I noticed that you moved 1920 Haiyuan earthquake to 1920 Gansu earthquake on May 25, 2008. I request to move it back to 1920 Haiyuan earthquake and gave my reasons at Talk:1920 Gansu earthquake on May 31. If you do not oppose, I will move it back. If you disagree, please leave your opinions at Talk:1920 Gansu earthquake. Thanks. --Neo-Jay (talk) 08:28, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)

The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:15, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent nonsense

Hello. May I ask you to have a look at The Independent Somali State? I'm assuming this is a good candidate for deletion. Biruitorul ^Talk 05:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Trsat

Hi - would you take a look at this article and my comments on its talk page? I can't read the sources except the English language one, and that doesn't say what the creator of the article says it does, so -- was there a siege? Or an ambush? Thanks. Doug Weller (talk) 12:01, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2008 South Africa riots

You've previously express interest in the renaming of this article. I'd like to gather some views on the matter now, so the page doesn't continue to languish with its current name. If you have a moment, can you pop into the talk page, please? Thanks. 9Nak (talk) 17:09, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ITN

On 12 June, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article(s) Gora Prai airstrike, which you created or substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--Banyan Tree 04:30, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gora Prai airstrike

Good start! Bearian (talk) 23:47, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Ras Doumeira border crisis

Just to let you know, some one has made this page: 2008 Ras Doumeira border crisis. You might want to find a way to integrate it with your Djiboutian-Eritrean War page. – Zntrip 04:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo

I am not overly familiar with Kosovo. Would you be able to explain why you are not in favour of the independence of Kosovo but seem to support so many other independence movements?Cillmore (talk) 19:00, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I feel compassion with many peoples without states (Kurds, American Indians) but I am against the independence of Kosovo because the Albanians already have Albania, because it was illegal under UN law, because it was a move pushed by the U.S. (I don't think you need explanations for that)--TheFEARgod (Ч) 19:43, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ITN

On 18 June, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article(s) Battle of Arghandab, which you created or substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--Pharos (talk) 21:58, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan

Izgleda da je pao u vodu mirovni dogovor izmedju Talibana i Pakistanaca. Pakistanska vojska je napala Talibanska uporišta oko Pešavara danas.(Top Gun)

Zrtve

Lista poginulih policajaca/vojnika koja je na icasualties.org je netacna proverio sam. Broj koji je izbacen kod njih je mozda samo polovina ili cak mozda samo trecina. Dosao sam do tog zakljucka jer pratim vesti iz Iraka koje izlaze na www.antiwar.com. Oni prijavljuju mnogo vise poginulih nego icasualties.org. U clanku koji pokriva zrtve Irackog rata sam u tabeli pod zrtve snaga obezbedjenja izvrsio pribliznu podelu poginulih pripadnika vojske i policije po godinama. I azuriram je po potrebi.(Top Gun) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.216.83.39 (talk) 16:45, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Wooden Leg

Hi. What was the reason behind your revert[1] of my edits to this article? You have provided no edit summary and no message on the talk page. -- Nudve (talk) 14:07, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response:) But that's my point exactly - It did not result in combat. It was a completely unilateral action. -- Nudve (talk) 18:05, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

bombing is combat...--TheFEARgod (Ч) 18:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll revert. Any idea where I could find a free map of that location? -- Nudve (talk) 12:14, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've added a map from UNdata. Hope it won't get deleted from commons. I was also wondering exactly why Operation Orchard was listed there... -- Nudve (talk) 12:37, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bombing

Ok, gotcha. OOODDD (talk) 09:41, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ITN

On 3 July, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article(s) 2008 Jerusalem bulldozer attack, which you created or substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--Banyan Tree 04:19, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Somalija i Kolumbija

Dodao sam u 2008 timeline of the War in Somalia link za Battle of Beledweyne (July 2008) koji sam uradio. Bitka je jos u toku. Za sada su pobunjenici u prednosti ali Etiopljani su u kontra napadu.Top Gun

Proveri i ove reference [2][3][4][5] pa mi reci da li bi trebali da pripojimo i rat u Kolumbiji od 2001. pa nadalje kao deo rata protiv terorizma kao sto smo i rat na Filipinima. Rat na Filipinima takodje traje jos od sezdesetih ali smo ga svrstali medju frontove WoT jer su Amerikanci posle 9/11 poslali vojne savetnike i oruzije, u Kolumbiji su posle 9/11 takodje povecali broj vojnih savetnika i posiljke oruzija. Od 9/11 2001. je poginulo 13 Amerikanaca u tom regionu, 8 vojnika i 5 privatnika.Top Gun

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)

The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:30, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ITN again

On 6 July, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article(s) Georgian-Ossetian conflict, which you created or substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--Banyan Tree 01:01, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Georgia-Russia

Template:Georgia-Russia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Россавиа ^Диалог 23:22, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where there's news, there's you

On July 7, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article(s) 2008 Indian embassy bombing in Kabul, which you created or substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

-- tariqabjotu 21:00, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Somalija

Po svemu sudeci Islamisti u Somaliji nacisto isprasise tur Etiopljanima i ovoj takozvanoj prelaznoj federalnoj vladi. Samo Baidoa i pola Mogadisua su jos uvek u rukama Etiopljana. Clan somalijskog parlamenta danas rekao da bilo kakva centralna vlada u Somaliji vise ne postoji. Amerikanci se previse bili orijentisali na Irak pa nacisto usrase motiku u Somaliji,Avganistanu i Libanu.Top Gun

Irak

I meni se tako cini. Jedva da jedan americki vojnik sada gine u deset dana, a iracka vlada je jako pritisla Amerikance da povuku vojsku do kraja sledece godine. Britanci vec potvrdili da ce njihov poslednji vojnik da ode do maja sledece godine. Steta, bas steta, a bio je tako dobar rat.Top Gun

U pravu si lako moze da se desi da se Siiti pobune ako napadnu Iran.Top Gun —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.198.253.27 (talk) 19:51, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo

Znam za tu bitku, citao sam o njoj u knjizi Drugi Kosovski boj od Drecuna. Kako je to covek opisao, znaci ko Hamburger hil je bila ta bitka.Top Gun

Pozdrav i tebi...

Pa ovako. Koristio sam materijal i iz albanskih i iz srpskih izvora, pošto tečno govorim i albanski jer sam do 1999 živeo u Prištini... Od srpskih knjigu Milovana Drecuna - Pakao Košara kao i istoimeni dokumentarac i ponešto iz filma Rat za Kosovo,sve ovo možeš naći na YouTube. Od albanskih dva dokumentarca jedan je na adresi http://youtube.com/watch?v=NZO_c4SGPfw i drugi koji je na adresi http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2758115057631390592&ei=Csl8SIbFIoeUjQLv6OWWCw&hl=en... Što se žrtava tiče koristio sam zvanične izvore i podatke što se srpskih žrtava tiče a što se tiča albanskih stranicu sa albasnke vikipedije Beteja e Koshares. Takođe sam i upućen u događanja pošto je moj rođeni brat bio aktivni učesnik istih.

Međutim nisam vičan ovom vikipedisanju,članak sam eto čisto sklepao uz prilično slabno znanje engleskog i slabo poznajem uređivanje i pisanje članaka na Vikipediji uopšte. Zamolio bih te da ako imaš vremena gramatički ispraviš ovo što sam napisao na engleskom i takođe članak napraviš čitkijim i razumljivijim. Što se citiranja tiče to ni sam ne znam kako da izvedem pa ako ti znaš kako navedi ove gorenavedene izvore.

Pozdrav iz Beograda

Unapred zahvalan

Žarko Damjanović —Preceding unsigned comment added by Damjanoviczarko (talk • contribs) 16:06, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA citations

Hi, a bot can do it eventually (you'll have to wait), but not really to the required standard since there are so many variables. The best way to get it right first time is to follow the instructions I left on the talk page.--Jackyd101 (talk) 15:46, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ITN redux

On 20 July, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article(s) 2008 Cambodian-Thai stand-off, which you created or substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--Banyan Tree 05:30, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On Second Tuareg Rebellion

You may note that mnj blogspot is the official press site for one of the two rebel groups, and as such is quoted in the press (Reuters, etc). It is therefore a valid source. Note also that the 70 figure is sorely out of date for Niger: Reuters has reported at least 6 confirmed military deaths since the first time they used the 70 figure in April Here. Amnesty international and MNJ figure provide much higher figure (which are probably incorrect as well) but the Niger government will not enumerate dead. This gives us competing figures, hence a range. Please take a second look at the refs in the article. Thanks, T L Miles (talk) 20:06, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not to beat the proverbial dead horse, but here's the first instance of Reuter's use of the 70 figure: April 8th. Note the wording, continued through present, "in the last year". As the current round of fighting began in February 2007, this is not the figure for the entire conflict. And it is always prefaced with "at least". T L Miles (talk) 20:15, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite right on both accounts: it's in DIRE need of an update (which would reorganise the timeline I imagine); and the Mali figure is quite low, especially given the two spikes in attacks over the last four months. I'm afraid I never get beyond the collecting references stage. Next time I do that, I'll create a user subpage and link link to it on Talk:Second Tuareg Rebellion. Hopefully I can clear the decks and work on it. I'll share whatever I find so you and others can keep updating it! Cheers, T L Miles (talk) 15:28, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, MUCH better titles for both articles, as there's no agreement on what constitutes the "First" such insurgency. T L Miles (talk) 15:40, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, --TheFEARgod (Ч) 19:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Somalija

Razumem te oko ove neutralnosti i upravu si.(Top Gun)

ITN returns

On 27 July, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article(s) 2008 Kunming bus bombings, which you created or substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--Banyan Tree 23:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited...

to join the Earthquakes Wiki! Any questions can be directed to my talk page. --Meldshal (§peak to me) 14:10, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aprilski rat

je postavljen na glasanje za skidanje zvezdice (objektivno, to sada vise i ne zasluzuje). Samo da ti javim, ako si rad da pomognes u sredjivanju. -- Bojan 18:08, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Solar System

I noticed your recent interest, and would like your contribution to the talk page on Talk:Solar_System#New_List. -HarryAlffa (talk) 22:13, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)

The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:06, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to know

Since you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Earthquakes, you may wish to know about this. --I'm an Editor of the wiki^{[citation needed]} 18:37, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Tskhinvali Map

I think you have added a map to the article. That is good, but kindly add a legend and also the disposition of Russian forces if you are able.

Sparten (talk) 11:42, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:USSR-Russia conflicts

Template:USSR-Russia conflicts has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Россавиа ^Диалог 15:32, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Somalija

Vazi, nema problema.Top Gun

Russo-Georgian War

Since i know from past experiance you are a reliable and respected wikipedian. I am wondering whether you would support the name Russo-Georgian War as the tite of the 2008 War in Ossetia article. Naming it as such would follow previous precident in history IE the Russo-Japanese War, Russo-Turkish Wars, Russo-Swedish Wars, Russo-Polish War, Russo-Persian Wars, Russo-Kazan Wars. XavierGreen (talk) 01:36, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Croatian holocaust denial

Hi, I see that you are interested in topics related to Holocaust of Serbs in WWII and the neonazism manifestations of pro-ustashe Croats in present day Croatia. I would like to draw your attention to persistent holocaust denial POV pushing going on some pages, like Jasenovac i Gradiska stara (removal of quotes, facts), or Ljubo Milos (removal of references) etc. It would be good if you could help resolve these issues that get maligned by some very persistent holocaust deniers/Croatian chauvinistic vandals/serbhaters. Mozart1783 (talk) 22:58, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This genius is our good old banned User:PaxEquilibrium which until now has created 60 puppets confirmed by checkuser. In my thinking he is having mental breakdown because I can't understand that somebody will write this to himself. If nothing else we now know many of his old puppets from 2005 or even 2003 (user:Joka)--Rjecina (talk) 23:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Tskhinvali

Cao, ne mogu da se uregistrujem da ti se javim jer bih bio blokiran, ali mogu da ti se javim ovako jer mi kablovska menja ip adresu svakih 4-5 dana. Evo ti jedan podatak koji bi mogao da dodas u Battle of Tskhinvali posto je tamo potrebno da budes registrovan da bi mogao da editujes. RIA Novosti su potvrdile da je 78 ruskih vojnika poginulo tokom bitke za grad. Evo je referenca [6]. Takodje danas je gruzijsko minstarstvo odbrane javilo da je 160 njihovih vojnika poginulo i 300 nestalo tokom rata. Evo je referenca [7]. Po tome bi znacilo da je bar 300 njihovih vojnika poginulo tokom bitke za Tskhinvali. Pozdrav!

tim brojkama je mjesto u članku o ratu. Nema smisla nagađati--TheFEARgod (Ч) 09:26, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mozda sto se tice ove brojke od 300, ali ovaj podatak da je 78 ruskih vojnika poginulo u bici za grad treba staviti u Battle of Tskhinvali infobox. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.216.235.26 (talk) 18:13, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you remember me

I edited at the 2008 Ossetian War article.

Join in here. It's time someone speaks out. Kostan1 (talk) 11:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's sad they didn't let him return, it's clearly political there. Anyway, at least we tried. Kostan1 (talk) 18:25, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Litani1978.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Litani1978.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 18:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Belligerent accusations

WP:GF In a recent edit summary, you blithely wrote: "bah it's the same. since you haven't done this needed change it's still vandalism." I recommend that you look at WP:VANDAL and tell me which kind of vandalism you think I was doing. There are two separate tags because there are two separate problems with citation and verification: one for article that have no source at all and another for articles that don't have enough sources. It seems clear to me that those are not the same, but substantively different. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:10, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you blatantly removed it, saying it's spurious: I didn't know the meaning of that word, and neither saw that the tag was in fact wrong. I felt deceived when the explanation from you arrived just after 2-3 reverts. --TheFEARgod (Ч) 09:17, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dodavanje nove kampanje u campaignbox War on terrorism

Proveri diskusiju koju sam pokrenuo kod Template:Campaignbox War on Terror da se doda jedna kampanja na listu. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.216.235.26 (talk) 00:42, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Kismayo article

Please don't copy and paste sentences directly from news articles. I had to rewrite some of it, and there may be more that needs to be fixed. Everyking (talk) 08:42, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Earthquakes Newsletter (August 2008)

The WikiProject Earthquakes Newsletter

Volume I - Issue 1	26 August 2008

Project News

Article Alerts

Since its creation, WikiProject Earthquakes has been functioning extremely well. The project would like to commend the following users for receiving the {{Earthquakes Barnstar}} this month: Editorofthewiki, congrats!

In other news, the project has been racking up good articles. So far, eleven have been amassed by WPQUAKE users. Keep up the good work!

The following articles may be in need of attention:

Featured Article candidates:

2002 Bou'in-Zahra earthquake

Good Article nominees:

Earthquakes Collaboration news

New WPQUAKE members

A new FA Taskforce has been created. Visit its page here.

Please welcome the following new members to WikiProject Earthquakes:

No new members this month. Always recommend helpful earthquake-article editors to the project!

Reboot progress report

Help Wanted

This newsletter is brand new. If you would like to add further suggestions, please do so at the WikiProject's talk page.

The WikiProject needs members that focus in specific areas. We are looking for users willing to the following:

Recruit new members
Writers
Newletter writers
Reviewers
Portal crew members
And more!
add on!

Editor's Notes

I want to thank everyone in the project for just signing up. It has been my dream to expand Wikipedia's coverage of earthquakes since two months after joining, and I stand here seeing them happen. You are all a pleasure to work with, and I hope that this project grows strong and comprehensive in the future. Let's get this started!

Newsletter delivery by --Lord ₪Sunday 20:10, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your map

Well, from my experience I can tell you that Wikipedia has problems with text written in Inkscape. I can only make you the following suggestions:

1. Delete the spaces you left before Vila Bianca. (Wikipedia is not recognising more than 1 space left between letters and any space before the first letters in a row)

2. Try to rewrite Vila rustica and Mali Brijun. (I am not 100% sure it will work but try doing this)

Remember that Wikipedia is only recognising two fonts: Times New Roman and Arial. Andrei nacu (talk) 10:05, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:51, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)

The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:32, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image talk:Tri prsta.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image talk:Tri prsta.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image talk:Tri prsta.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. O sama K^{Reply? on my talk page, please} 23:03, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of iraqi security forces fatalities

Skoro sam zavrsio listu poginulih policajaca i vojnika. U listu nisam uracunao pripadnike Awakening Councils ali moja neka procena onako od oka je da je mozda ih oko 600 poginulo u zadnjih godinu dana od kako su aktivni. Ostala mi je jos samo 2007.godina. U stvari vec sam imao podatke koliko ih je mozda poginulo te godine na osnovu izjava Ministarstva unutrasnjih poslova i Ministarstva odbrane, ali na osnovu antiwar.com sam zakljucio da su falsifikovali brojeve i umanjili ih za nekih 800 vojnika i policajaca zato cu morati na antiwar.com da pregledam svaki dan posebno.Guyver85 (talk) 17:24, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar from Bhadani

		The Special Barnstar
		Awarded for helping build the page: 2008 New Delhi bombings Bhadani (talk) 15:32, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

oh, thanks, that was nothing! --TheFEARgod (Ч) 15:33, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 September, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article(s) 2008 New Delhi bombings, which you created or substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦^C 18:39, 13 September 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:40, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guyver85 (talk) 17:51, 20 September 2008 (UTC)== Al Anbar campaign ==[reply]

Sastavio sam novi clanak Al Anbar campaign. Sta mislis? Treba li nesto da se doda?Guyver85 (talk) 19:51, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 19:48, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jemen

Da li nisi zapoceo clanak o napadu u Jemenu?

koji, covece? Trazi tu http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Terrorist_incidents_in_2008 --TheFEARgod (Ч) 19:20, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Islamabad Marriott Hotel bombing

In regards to you comment on the edit summaries. WP:Civility It's not what you say, it's how you say it. There is a proper way to say something. Lihaas (talk) 12:48, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, you saw the old version of my post here.

Just a heads up.

One more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Uw-english

Lihaas (talk) 12:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At least be gracious. It's only a heads up, for future reference.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islamabad_Marriott_Hotel_bombing&action=history

"12:27, 21 September 2008 TheFEARgod" Lihaas (talk) 12:58, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Islamabad Marriott Hotel bombing. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

I am being entirely cordial. I even removed the warning sticker, just put the notice that you are on the verge of 3 (already reached). But alright, ill not post.

If its violated then ill straight go to warning? Lihaas (talk) 13:10, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox War on Terror

Cuj, u redu u vezi operacije Orhideja, znam da smo vec raspravljali o njoj i odlucili da je ne stavljamo, ali mislio sam da je ipak dodam jer se na par mesta pominje povezana sa War on Terrorism i to ne samo na blogovima i clancima po netu nego i ovde na Vikipediji, ali u redu neka ti bude necu da je dodajem ponovo. Ali cuj ne mogu da se slozim sa tobom da izbacimo Saudijsku Arabiju, stavili smo je u kutijicu jos pre dve godine i ne razumem sto tek sada imas problem sa tim. Ne nije u klasicnom smislu gerilski rat vodjen u Saudijskoj Arabiji ali ti ne mozes da poredis to sto se desava u Saudijskoj Arabiji sa ovim napadima u Jemenu. U Jemenu se napad desi samo svake dve il' tako nesto godine. Dok se u Saudijskoj Arabiji u periodu 2003-2006 stvarno gerilski rat vodio, doduse niskog intenziteta ali stvarno gerilski rat. Nije se samo sastojao od teroristickih napada na inostrane mete. Tu su s vremena na vreme bili i napadi na policijske i vojne kontrolne punktove plus i vatreni okrsaji tokom policijskih i vojnih racija. U najmanju ruku treba kao posebna kampanja da bude jer je mnogo vise nego teroristicke kampanje niskog intenziteta u Jemenu ili Jordanu. Mozda je cak i veci konflikt od onog u Alziru.Guyver85 (talk) 22:17, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bio sam prisutan kad se debatovalo da se promeni naziv ali nisam imao potebu da ucestvujem jer sam se tada slagao da se treba promeniti naziv iz insurgency u terrorism in Saudi Arabia i vecina se vec slagala u vezi toga. Ali opet mislim da i dalje treba da ostane u kutijici WoT Saudijska Arabija jer je to potpuno poseban front u WoT i mnogo je vise nego samo saka teroristickih incidenata kao u Jemenu, Jordanu ili Egiptu. Ako vec hoces da isteras svoj cef da izbacis Saudijsku Arabiju onda ces morati i druge stvari da izbacis iz te kutijice jer po tebi u kutijicu treba da idu samo ratovi (vojni konflikti). U tom slucaju izbaci Operation Active Endeavour ili Alzir. Operation Active Endeavour jer je to samo patroliranje Mediteranom, nista vise, nikakav konflikt. A zasto kazem Alzir? Zato sto je Alzir 95 posto preslikana situacija u Saudijskoj Arabiji. Nema nikakvih zaseda ili borbi ili vojnih napada sto bi spadalo u kategoriju vojnog konflikta. Mozda jeste trenutna situacija u Alziru proizasla iz gradjanskog rata koji se zavrsio pre 6 godina ali situacija tamo je ista kao u Saudijskoj Arabiji. Svaka tri-cetiri meseca desi se masovni teroristicki napad, vojska i policija izvrse par racija i to je to. Mozda bi trebao da promenis naziv i Insurgency in the Maghreb u Terrorism in the Maghreb? I ja se ne oslanjam na blogove nego sam ih samo dao kao primer. Evo ti jedan izvor http://www.janes.com/extracts/extract/jwit/jwita023.html koji bi se mogao okarakterisati da stavlja Al Kaidu u Saudijskoj Arabiji u kategoriji gerile. Sto se tice orhideje, to mi je bio samo slucajni lapsus u prevodu, zafrknuo sam se i izvinjavam se. Daj bre covece ne budi takav. Valjda shvatas sta pokusavam da ti kazem.Guyver85 (talk) 04:51, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KLA

Ipak ne stoji bas na taj nacin. Nazalost, po mom misljenju, to bi moglo nekom da posluzi kao izgovor da obrise ceo odeljak (sto se vec desavalo), a da na neki nacin treba pomenuti, treba. Nikola (talk) 08:20, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:MV Faina.jpg

Image:MV Faina.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:MV Faina - pirates.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:MV Faina - pirates.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 05:37, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guyver85 (talk) 16:23, 3 October 2008 (UTC)==Orphaned non-free media (Image:GUj.jpg)== Thanks for uploading Image:GUj.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).[reply]

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

JUZNA OSETIJA

Da li bi trebali da dodamo u infobox 2008 South Ossetian war ovih sedam ruskih vojnika koji su poginuli danas u eksploziji kola-bombe ili ne posto infobox pokriva samo period od 7-12.avgusta. Mozda bi smo mogli da stavimo u zagradi pored datuma sporadic fighting continued until early October jer smo vec u infobox stavili 2 poginula gruzijska policajca koje su ruski vojnici ubili pre par nedelja. Sta mislis? Ja mislim da bi trebali da ih stavimo.Guyver85 (talk) 16:23, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

to nesmije ici u clanak o ratu. On je gotov-to se zna. Moze, medjutim ici u clanak Georgian-Ossetian conflict--TheFEARgod (Ч) 11:14, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

predlazem da nastavis kao anonimac--TheFEARgod (Ч) 11:15, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September Newsletter

The September version of the WikiProject Earthquakes newsletter has been posted! Be sure to check it out! — Ceran thor [Formerly LordSunday] 14:13, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Nomination

Hey man, your nominated article Abole_oil_field_raid currently says it is under review because I guess you accidentally posted something there? Maybe want to fix that because some people might go to review it then think that it is already under review. See ya. --Banime (talk) 17:02, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)

The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:03, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of attacks attributed to the PKK

Cuj da te nesto zamolis ako mozes da mi uradis. Posto me sad opet blokirase pa ne mogu da editujem kao registrovani korisnik, a potrebno je da budes registrovan da bi zapoceo neki clanak, mozes li da mi zapocnes jedan clanak pa cu ja da nastavim da ga doradjujem. Mislio sam da zapocnem List of attacks attributed to the PKK. Javi mi sta si uradio. Pozdrav! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.216.235.26 (talk) 00:01, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hvala. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.216.235.26 (talk) 09:47, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of attacks attributed to the PKK

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of attacks attributed to the PKK, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of attacks attributed to the PKK. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Debate 木 15:07, 8 October 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:Dubrovnik Airline.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Dubrovnik Airline.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 01:19, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iracki rat

Jeli? Da li bi mozda trebali da stavimo u Iraq war u infobox-u pod date (datum) tri razlicita perioda. Kao u Drugom cecenskom ratu gde ima tri perioda 1999-2000 (invasion), 2000-2004 (guerilla war), 2005-ongoing (sporadic fighting). S obzirom koliko se drasticno smirila situacija mozda bi to trebali isto ovde da uradimo. 2003 (invasion), 2004-May 2008 (guerilla war), June 2008-ongoing (sporadic fighting). Sta mislis?89.216.235.26 (talk) 11:10, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

napravi ali objasni na talk page--TheFEARgod (Ч) 11:17, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Ugh. I'm worked up now and not sleeping. Must... remember... XKCD. No hard feelings on the AFD, it looks like you're going to win on that one. Anyhow, I just wanted to say that I very much appreciate your willingness to assume good faith. Have a cookie. :-) Debate 木 15:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Debate 木 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

ha ha! Thanks! --TheFEARgod (Ч) 16:04, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]