User talk:Davidypan

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Davidypan, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Li Zhaoping have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:48, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Li Zhaoping

Hello Davidypan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Li Zhaoping for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

SITH (talk) 15:29, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Li Zhaoping has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Li Zhaoping. Thanks! — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 14:49, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Li Zhaoping has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Li Zhaoping. Thanks! — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:12, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Li Zhaoping has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Li Zhaoping. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:16, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Li Zhaoping has been accepted

Li Zhaoping, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 17:50, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: V1SH (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Draft cites an encyclopedia and one author.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:V1SH and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:V1SH, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses (talk page) (Contribs) Remember to notify me after replying off my talk page. 08:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Davidypan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! I dream of horses (talk page) (Contribs) Remember to notify me after replying off my talk page. 08:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Davidypan/sandbox

Hello, Davidypan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 14:59, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:V1SH has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:V1SH. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 09:00, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: V1SH (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

My main issue with this draft is that there's not really any evidence that this theory has gained any ground/traction. Sure, there are a ton of references, and some of the articles even reference Zhaoping's work, but the only articles to really mention "V1SH" are her own works (and being invited to a bunch of conferences to talk about your work doesn't automatically make the theory you're discussing notable); those other references support text/generic facts that aren't necessarily correlated to this hypothesis. As an unrelated note, please break up the prose; a huge single paragraph for each section is very difficult to read.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:V1SH and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:V1SH, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 01:42, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:V1SH

Hello, Davidypan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:V1SH, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:V1SH has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:V1SH. Thanks! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 21:30, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: V1SH (May 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Usedtobecool was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Intentionally or not, this draft employs all the tactics of WP:REFBOMBING. Fails core content policies:WP:V, WP:NOR and WP:NPOV.

Proposed by Li
, opinions started to change by a surprising piece of data
... this was counterintuitive
... more work was done
, supporting data emerged
from this
and that
... was included in a textbook
.

The hypothesis is not notable if the original proposer is the only one who's shown any significant interest in it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:V1SH and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:V1SH, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:V1SH has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:V1SH. Thanks! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 10:42, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:V1 Saliency Hypothesis has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:V1 Saliency Hypothesis. Thanks! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 07:55, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:V1 Saliency Hypothesis has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:V1 Saliency Hypothesis. Thanks! Eternal Shadow Talk 17:07, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: V1 Saliency Hypothesis has been accepted

V1 Saliency Hypothesis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Doric Loon (talk) 18:20, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Davidypan. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:31, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello, Davidypan, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:32, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Usedtobecool. Thanks for checking the my wiki page of V1SH. Just confirm to you that I only have one wiki account. Best Regards.