User talk:DarkSide830

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, DarkSide830! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! 🐔 Chic dat ^ChickenDatabase 15:41, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source for storm strength?

Would you have a source for the definition of storm strength that you added here? Is it on Wikipedia somewhere? Having a "discussion" about this. Thanks Adakiko (talk) 02:27, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A previous revision had attempted to add a note as to the technicality of Danielle having had stronger winds but Alex still having the lowest pressure. I had added a note in manner set by precedent previously (most recently used in an Atlantic season in 2017). Technically speaking I referenced the most recent storm data via Danielle's infobox via the NHC. DarkSide830 (talk) 14:41, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking for an RS that makes that statement. Do you know of one? A meterological agency, maybe NOAA or some such? It would be a good idea to add it to that note so it doesn't look like wp:SYNTH. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 19:37, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, here.

Adakiko (talk) 19:41, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what to tell you. I was using the data from the box at the end of the page and for all intents and purposes sourcing the number I used from where said wind speed figure was gathered from. There is no source attached to the note used on the 2017 page and by the same token I did not directly link to a source. DarkSide830 (talk) 22:47, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I asked an admin who made a comment about it but didn't get a useful answer.

Thanks for your time! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 01:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uighur report

Hi. I'm disappointed with the IYN item, which *continues* to use the wishy-washy "may have" because the editors/writers of the blurb got excited about the term genocide. I agree heartily with your comment that the first Alt Blurb was best, because it focuses on what is definitive in the report, namely "serious human rights violations". I think the editors got carried away with extremism and wished the report had said 'genocide' so they opted for a maybe instead of definitively referring to human rights violations.

I tried to suggest something like this, but probably put it in the wrong place because I'm not familiar with correcting errors on the main page. As ModestGenius said, the report is not a court -- but the encyclopedia should reflect the report, not a *possible* accusation that editors wish had been made in a court.

IMO the discussion should not be closed if the item is still on the home page. I don't know who made that decision or why. Martindo (talk) 20:36, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do tend to agree with you on the protocols. There's a lot of dissonance between certain things that have longer time allowances and some that don't. I can't blame you for the displeasure for the situation. I certainly agree with you on the blurb, but I'm well familiar with the ITN Errors page and how quickly they want that page cleared off. Just glad the blurb got up in any form. DarkSide830 (talk) 23:30, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Community restrictions regarding the Russio-Ukrainian war

Hi DarkSide830,

I have noticed that you have recently edited pages related to the Russo-Ukrainian War. Please note that, due to community consensus documented at WP:GS/RUSUKR, only extended-confirmed editors may make such edits.

When in doubt, please assume that a topic is covered by this restriction. We call this "broadly construed". If this still leaves you unsure about whether a topic is affected by the restriction, feel free to ask on my talk page.

This is not widely announced to newcomers, so I'm not blaming or condemning you for not knowing about this. I'm also not saying that your editing has been problematic in any other way. Your edit may well have been perfectly fine in all other regards, yet may have been removed for this reason.

Additionally, Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee has recognized "Eastern Europe or the Balkans" as a generally contentious topic area. Don't worry: The restriction to extended-confirmed editors is about the Russo-Ukrainian War, not the entirety of Eastern Europe and the Balkans. The box below contains standardized advice for everyone.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This may be confusing, so I'll attempt to summarize it:

Only extended-confirmed editors may edit pages related to the Russo-Ukrainian War. Details and exceptions can be found at WP:GS/RUSUKR.
All edits about Eastern Europe and the Balkans, by all users, need to be done with extra care.

I hope this helps. Please let me know if there are any questions.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:06, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN nomination for 2022 Haitian crisis

Hey there! I've started a second discussion on the eligibility of the 2022 Haitian crisis article for ITN, and since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to provide your input. Thank you! —Matthew - (talk) 22:15, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Adam Zimmer

On 6 November 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Adam Zimmer, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 12:35, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mixmon (talk) 17:10, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Jon Kennedy (baseball)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jon Kennedy (baseball), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:55, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Shintaro Yokota

On 19 July 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Shintaro Yokota, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 04:22, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maersk Hangzhou has an RfC

Maersk Hangzhou has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.

Numbers

Players that are not on the 40-man roster do not get numbers in their infobox. Yankees10 17:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understandable. I wasn't able to find anything about how that works from a MOS perspective, but I can fix that. DarkSide830 (talk) 17:36, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I see you did that already. Thanks for the heads up! DarkSide830 (talk) 17:37, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]