User talk:Daani94

Welcome!

Hello, Daani94, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Walk on Walking (Thirty Seconds to Mars song), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ... discospinster _talk 20:28, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Walk on Walking (Thirty Seconds to Mars song)

The article Walk on Walking (Thirty Seconds to Mars song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I cannot find any sources verifying the existence of this song.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 20:28, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Your addition to Linkin Park has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Adding blatant copyright violation - FlightTime (open channel) 00:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Laziness is not an excuse for plagiarism. Please do not copy and paste text across Wikipedia as you did on the Chester Bennington page. You are free to paraphrase text and re-use reference, but please do not just blatantly copy text. -- StarScream1007 ►Talk 23:01, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Margot Robbie. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Per WP:CRYSTAL. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 13:41, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled the Joker and Harley Quinn film

Regarding the planned film Untitled the Joker and Harley Quinn film, please see WP:NFF: films that have not yet begun principal photography should not have their own articles. Rather, the name should redirect to a section of an appropriate article (e.g. DC Extended Universe#Untitled Harley Quinn and the Joker film). See for example the unreleased Gambit (upcoming film), which redirects to a succinct paragraph in X-Men (film series)#Gambit. You are free to work on the article as a Draft, e.g. Draft:Untitled Joker and Harley Quinn film. All the best, --Animalparty! (talk) 14:57, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gwilym Lee at Empire Awards 2017.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Gwilym Lee at Empire Awards 2017.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:31, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gwilym Lee.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Gwilym Lee.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Avicii - True Stories.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Avicii - True Stories.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:46, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:09, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Beautiful Trauma, you may be blocked from editing. livelikemusic talk! 12:47, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. -- StarScream1007 ►Talk 16:46, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thirty Seconds to Mars fifth studio album for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thirty Seconds to Mars fifth studio album is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thirty Seconds to Mars fifth studio album until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:15, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:59, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reflist|30em

30em is no longer necessary. "Reflist" on its own does it automatically depending on your screen size. --Jennica✿ / ^talk 20:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 01:00, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Josh McDermitt. You were just blocked for this. Please don't start adding unsourced content again. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:47, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Daani94. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Revival (Eminem album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Single (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Eminem. Rob van vee 05:41, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 20:06, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned and blocked for adding information without citing sources in the past. Once the block expires, you will be expected to refrain from adding content to Wikipedia unless you include a citation to a reliable source. If you choose not to do this and continue to add unsourced content, you may be blocked again – next time possibly without an expiration date. We take citations pretty seriously here, especially for content about living persons, since it is our way of proving to readers that what we're writing here is true. If you have any questions about how to cite sources, or editing Wikipedia in general, you have a wide variety of resources available to you, such as the Q&A board Wikipedia:Teahouse. You can also contact me directly on my talk page. Please do read help pages like Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/1. Best, Mz7 (talk) 20:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming Eminem ninth studio album listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Upcoming Eminem ninth studio album. Since you had some involvement with the Upcoming Eminem ninth studio album redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:59, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jared Leto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadline (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. You repeatedly have been told not to make unsourced changes and it's painfully obvious that you've ignored those warnings on purpose. Please desist. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:49, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: You have a long history of disruptive editing despite numerous warnings and blocks. If this continues I believe you are likely to be blocked indefinitely. I don't know what else to say that will get your attention. This simply must stop. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:22, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —C.Fred (talk) 03:19, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Last Witness 2017.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Last Witness 2017.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Last Witness 2017.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Last Witness 2017.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Last Witness 2017.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Last Witness 2017.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]