User talk:DJ Sturm

Hello, DJ Sturm! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Qmwne2 3 5 19:13, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

January 2009

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to History of Estonia, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. (Just some advice for newcomer.) Pan Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 18:07, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Estonian films

With Hundiseaduse aegu, is there a book or an ancient chronicle that you still plan to add? There needs to be a printed source for it to be in the table.

I realize that you saw Alexander Nevsky without a source. That is because when I added the Eisenstein, the sources for it were a little complicated, and I never got back to it.

But there are definitely sources, chronicles, for Eisenstein.

Thanks for adding the films,
Varlaam (talk) 03:53, 7 June 2009 (UTC) in Toronto[reply]

Malev

The funny thing is, I went to Northern Crusades just now to add Malev.

And it was already there. And I was thinking, I honestly do not remember adding that film there. But when I saw Hundiseaduse aegu without a source, I realized that someone else added those films. And that's great.

It's great that someone else has found something to contribute.

Varlaam (talk) 03:58, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging WikiProject Estonia articles

Thank you for tagging and assessing articles for WikiProject Estonia. However, please do not tag articles that have at best tangential relation to Estonia, such as Kylfings, Longship, Runic calendar, Trade route from the Varangians to the Greeks and Varangians - just because some item was in use in Estonia or the article mentions Estonia is no reason to include it to the WP. -- Sander Säde 07:52, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kylfings refers propably to the Votes, who are one of Estonian tribes. Runic calendars were very common in western Estonia from 16th to the 18th century. I think this is enough to tag those articles. Trade route from the Varangians to the Greeks (however, one of the main subjects in Lennart Meri's famous book Hõbevalge) and Varangians are tagged with WikiProject Belarus, but they seem to be far less related to Belarussian history than Estonian history. DJ Sturm (talk) 12:06, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

World War II films talk page

I responded to your comment over there. Please have a look.

I think we should just start a new page.

So maybe wait 1 week. If no one else says anything, then it's time to create a new page with the same structure as the old page. Then the data will actually exist somewhere.

Then people can decide what to do with the data over the long term, either a separate page, or a separate section on the first page.

And of course your deleted data is not really gone; it can be recovered from the history log, where it already has the correct format!!

Varlaam (talk) 05:36, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do some checking first

Make sure there is no other page. Try a simple search for:

dramatized documentary
dramatized documentaries
dramatised documentary
dramatised documentaries

The small differences probably do not matter, but if you are checking anyway ...
Then look at the List of Documentaries. Are d.d. films already being handled there in an organized way?
I personally am ok with d.d. being separate from documentary.
But DudeMan is active. You should wait for his opinion.
Varlaam (talk) 17:15, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

your deletion

has been reverted. As you have not given any reason and it was properly referenced I assume it was an accident. Regards --Dodo19 (talk) 14:42, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POV changes to Eastern Front, WWII

Please offer your thoughts at Talk:Eastern_Front_(World_War_II)#Suvorov_POV, regarding your changes to that article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 18:01, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Crusades

Curonians, Semigallians, Selonians, Latgallians and Livonians are the direct predecessors of the Latvian ethnic group/nation.

Livonians aren't Estonian. Check your sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.68.82.226 (talk) 16:21, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Livonians are definitely rather Estonian than Latvian, as defined by their language, culture, genetics, ancient religion, etc. In the context of 13th century, if we say 'Latvians', it would mean Latgallians. All those ethnic groups have been assimilated by Latvians later but in the 13th century, they shared a little if anything with Latgallians. DJ Sturm (talk) 16:31, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My dear friend, you're confusing two different things - tribal/linguistic groups and ethnic groups.

We're basically having an argument over whether it is acceptable to provide retrospective overview of events, which to me seems completely legitimate.

Yes, Livonians are Finnic, you have a point there, but in no way does that suggest that they aren't direct predecessors of the Latvian nation. Latvians are genetically as Finnic as Estonians are. Check the sampling data of N1c1 haplogroup.

In other words, when the proto-indoeuropeans migrated to Northern Europe, they were only a minority in comparison with the local, aboriginal populations. The same case applies to both the territory of Latvia and Estonia. They brought a new kind of social/economic organization, which was adopted by the Finnic people of modern Latvia/Estonia. Even though the Latvian-Finnic people slowly adopted the Baltic language (in contrast with Estonian-Finnic people), the genetic make up of the Latvian population is very similar to that of Estonia or Finland.

The Latvian nation started to form in 12th century due to mass migration triggered by the Christian invasion. The customs and languages of the Curonian, Semigallian, Selonian, Latigallian tribes were already very similar and mutually perfectly intelligible, so you're absolutely wrong when you claim that Curonians, Semigallians, Selonians are somehow "unLatvian".

As I said, I agree that the mention of Livonians under the name of Latvians is "retrospective", yet it provides a sense of general direction to the average reader, who probably hasn't heard about Livonians and doesn't know anything about them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.68.82.226 (talk) 19:49, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw that you added Curonians to the list of Estonian tribes. Is this some sort of a joke? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.68.82.226 (talk) 19:52, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with what you said about Livonians, but it doesn't mean that we can consider them as part of Latvians, and certainly we cannot do it when we are talking about the 13th century. Those tribes didn't feel that time that they had something common, nor were they all called with a general name 'Latvians'. For example, Chronicle of Henry of Livonia considers Estonians, Livonians, Curonians and Latvians-Latgallians all different nations. How things evolved later, has nothing to do with the time we're talking about. I removed 'Latvians', I hope you agree with status quo in the infobox. DJ Sturm (talk) 16:59, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Way Back ver2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Way Back ver2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RT

hello,

I see your a nationalist, but you shouldn't state your oppinion with not reliable sources, especially youtube. Thank you. Cheers.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 15:29, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. -- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 15:40, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The information I added in the RT article was backed by sources which were in Estonian, not my own personal analysis. It consisted of two facts (1. RT labeled the gathering as pro-Nazi; 2. the translation was false) and not any kind of judgement or POV. The YouTube link was the actual RT news clip. DJ Sturm (talk) 15:55, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but let this disruptive, nationalistic edits you made. Wikipedia should contain edits written in a npov, not your personal opinion, that are possibly used as a propaganda.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 16:02, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, what I wrote in the article were purely neutral facts. Facts are always NPOV, right? You may change the wording but not delete verified information. Please stop trolling. DJ Sturm (talk) 16:09, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you think I'm trolling, that's fine. However, about your edits:

The links are on estonian language or other languages, so english user are not able to read it.
Again, youtube is not reliable, find another source, e.g. on RT.com
The statements of the politicans may be invented, because it is on estonian.

-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 16:43, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This source: [1] has also summaries in English and Russian. Well, I can speak Estonian and that information is just the same what sources told. DJ Sturm (talk) 17:00, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alfons Rebane

Sorry to correct you but the unit Rebane was serving at the time her received the Knight's Cross and later the Oak Leaves was not considered a foreign unit. SS-Grenadier-Regiment 46 was Waffen-SS unit and not an Estonian independant unit. MisterBee1966 (talk) 15:04, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So the same would go about Léon Degrelle, am I right? DJ Sturm (talk) 17:06, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For the Knight's Cross yes. For the Oak Leaves no, because 5. SS-freiw. Sturm-Brigade "Wallonien" at the time was a Belgian unit. Confusing I know. MisterBee1966 (talk) 18:32, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, can you please explain how were 5. SS Brigade and 20. SS Division different then? DJ Sturm (talk) 19:45, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well I can make an attempt at it but to be honest I haven't fully understood it myself. The 20th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS (1st Estonian) in principle was a German SS Division, commanded by a German but its members were Estonian volunteers. Consequently all Estonian Knight's Cross recipients were listed as members of the Waffen-SS and not as recipients in the military of allies of the Third Reich, which are listed as foreign recipients. The 28th SS Volunteer Grenadier Division Wallonien on the other hand was a Belgian division under Belgian command which fought for Nazi Germany, therefore its Knight's Cross recipients are members of the military of allies of the Third Reich (foreign recipients). What I cannot explain is what political situation changed between the 20 February 1944 (date Degrelle received the Knight's Cross) and 27 August 1944 (date Degrelle received the Oak Leaves). Whatever changed here made the German authorities count the Knight's Cross bestowal as a non-foreign award but the Oak Leaves as a foreign award. I hope this helps a little. MisterBee1966 (talk) 08:32, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree. Both divisions were foreign Waffen-SS units (as it is reflected by their names). Nationality of the commander doesn't change anything. Officers of the Estonian Division were mostly Estonians. If Degrelle was a foreign recipient, then was Rebane too. DJ Sturm (talk) 14:55, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this is not for you or me to agree to. The OKW, Fellgiebel and Scherzer treated Degrelle and Rebane according to what I stated. If you think this is wrong, you may be right but the AKCR listed Rebane as the 875th Oak Leaves recipient while they list Degrelle as a foreign recipient. Right or wrong doesn't matter here. MisterBee1966 (talk) 18:26, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why to make OKW decider here? Mistakes are made everywhere. DJ Sturm (talk) 14:34, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warning about user Dilas25

Dilas25 is having a POV agenda against Estonia and everything Estonian. For example I reverted his POV "editions" (his/her own personal comments which are not the same with the sources he/she adds) about Russians in Estonia in the Nation State article. This user put it back it until finally a registered user reverted his POV editions for the time being. Could you check and if necessary warn this user, and that he/she does not add POV remarks that often contradict the sources he/she adds. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.254.133.114 (talk) 16:24, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Paul Löbe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heinrich Müller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Curonian Language

Curonia has its own unique history that's not exactly unform to the rest of Latvia, with all respect Livonians remained more dominant in Curonia, even after 1220 Indo-European influx Finnic speakers remained relatively isolated in the northern tip of Curonia! So lets leave it as Baltic or Finnic, because of the strong Finnic nature of the few linguistic examples found in Curonian history. Cadenas2008 (talk) 03:54, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, although we should consider Livonians and Curonians separate tribes. It is clear tho, that the evidence supporting the theory of Curonians being Finnic has at least equal weight compared to the evidence suggesting otherwise. DJ Sturm (talk) 19:04, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Science and technology in the Soviet Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pedology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mediate

As a participant in WikiProject Alternative Views I invite you to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sorcha Faal (2nd nomination)[2]. For an entity such as this who has gained global noterity to even be considered for deletion is beyond my understanding.Kmt885 (talk) 09:06, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Pro Patria Union/meta/color

A tag has been placed on Template:Pro Patria Union/meta/color requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Safiel (talk) 23:08, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Conservative People's Party of Estonia

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Conservative People's Party of Estonia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sunshineisles2 -- Sunshineisles2 (talk) 06:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Conservative People's Party of Estonia

The article Conservative People's Party of Estonia you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Conservative People's Party of Estonia for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sunshineisles2 -- Sunshineisles2 (talk) 19:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DJ Sturm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DJ Sturm. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DJ Sturm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DJ Sturm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about E2027

Hello, DJ Sturm

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Викидим and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect E2027, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 28 § E2027.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Викидим}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Викидим (talk) 22:56, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"E2019" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect E2019 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 5 § E2019 until a consensus is reached. Викидим (talk) 08:29, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"E2023" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect E2023 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 5 § E2023 until a consensus is reached. Викидим (talk) 08:34, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anastasia Servan-Schreiber for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anastasia Servan-Schreiber is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anastasia Servan-Schreiber until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

– Joe (talk) 13:30, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Estonia

added links pointing to Nordic, White nights, Seto, Dolomite, Valga, Pickle and Computerization

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]