User talk:Dilas25

January 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Estonia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Põhja Konn (talk) 18:56, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Põhja Konn, this edit isn't vandalism by any stretch of the imagination. Please don't template editors whose edits you disagree with. Valenciano (talk) 20:20, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nation state

Your recent editing history at Nation state shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.

Please use the talk page to discuss the matter with Noraton. Edit summary is not for discussions and it will constitute an edit war. --lTopGunl (talk) 16:48, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Please start sourcing your edits to the articles, a lot of which seem to be to a large extent just opinions of yourself. See WP:VERIFIABILITY and WP:NPOV. Unsourced statements can and will be removed from articles without discussion. --Sander Säde 20:27, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]