User talk:DBD/Archive 32

Archives

Archive 1 (July 2005 – July 2006)
Archive 2 (August 2006)
Archive 3 (September – October 2006)
Archive 4 (November 2006 – Jan 2007)
Archive 5 (February – April 2007)
Archive 6 (May 2007)
Archive 7 (June – July 2007)
Archive 8 (August – December 2007)
Archive 9 (January – March 2008)
Archive 10 (April – June 2008)
Archive 11 (July – September 2008)
Archive 12 (October – November 2008)
Archive 13 (Dec 2008 – May 2009)
Archive 14 (June 2009 – May 2010)
Archive 15 (June 2010 – January 2011)
Archive 16 (February – July 2011)
Archive 17 (August – November 2011)
Archive 18 (Dec 2011 – January 2012)
Archive 19 (February – March 2012)
Archive 20 (April – July 2012)
Archive 21 (August – October 2012)
Archive 22 (Nov 2012 – March 2013)
Archive 23 (April – July 2013)
Archive 24 (August – November 2013)
Archive 25 (Dec 2013 – April 2014)
Archive 26 (May – October 2014)
Archive 27 (Nov 2014 – May 2015)
Archive 28 (June – October 2015)
Archive 29 (Nov 2015 – April 2016)
Archive 30 (May – November 2016)
Archive 31 (Dec 2016 – July 2017)
Archive 32 (August – October 2017)
Archive 33 (Nov 2017 – July 2018)
Archive 34 (August 2018 – May 2019)
Archive 35 (June – November 2019)
Archive 36 (Dec 2019 – June 2020)
Archive 37 (Sep 2020 – Aug 2021)
Archive 38 (Sep 2021 – June 2022)

August – October 2017

The Duchess of Cornwall listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Duchess of Cornwall. Since you had some involvement with the The Duchess of Cornwall redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé –selbert 17:46, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Duchess of Rothesay listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Duchess of Rothesay. Since you had some involvement with the The Duchess of Rothesay redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé –selbert 17:46, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Earl of Wessex listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Earl of Wessex. Since you had some involvement with the The Earl of Wessex redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé –selbert 17:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Duke of Gloucester listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Duke of Gloucester. Since you had some involvement with the The Duke of Gloucester redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé –selbert 17:53, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Duchess of Gloucester listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Duchess of Gloucester. Since you had some involvement with the The Duchess of Gloucester redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé –selbert 17:56, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HRH The Duchess of Rothesay listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HRH The Duchess of Rothesay. Since you had some involvement with the HRH The Duchess of Rothesay redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé –selbert 19:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HRH The Duchess of Cornwall listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HRH The Duchess of Cornwall. Since you had some involvement with the HRH The Duchess of Cornwall redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé –selbert 19:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HM The Duchess of Cornwall listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HM The Duchess of Cornwall. Since you had some involvement with the HM The Duchess of Cornwall redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé –selbert 19:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HRH The Duchess of Cambridge listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HRH The Duchess of Cambridge. Since you had some involvement with the HRH The Duchess of Cambridge redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé –selbert 19:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HRH The Duke of Cambridge listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HRH The Duke of Cambridge. Since you had some involvement with the HRH The Duke of Cambridge redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé –selbert 19:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HRH The Duchess of Gloucester listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HRH The Duchess of Gloucester. Since you had some involvement with the HRH The Duchess of Gloucester redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé –selbert 19:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HRH The Duchess of Kent listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HRH The Duchess of Kent. Since you had some involvement with the HRH The Duchess of Kent redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé –selbert 19:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HM The Duke of Cornwall listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HM The Duke of Cornwall. Since you had some involvement with the HM The Duke of Cornwall redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé –selbert 20:01, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Radford

Hi DBD, I didn't want to mess with your user subpages, so thought I'd just leave you a note that Andrew Radford is now a disambiguation page. It used to redirect to Andy Radford, the bishop. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 15:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. DBD 17:19, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello DBD, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.

Technology update:

Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.

General project update:

The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Orders of precedence in the United Kingdom/Royal family (women)

Hello, DBD. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Royal family (women)".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 02:57, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello DBD, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC) [reply]

New formatting for Infobox Christian leader

Hi DBD! Just to make you aware, the formatting of |honorific-prefix= and |honorific-suffix= of Infobox Christian leader have been adjusted so that they are now inline with other person infoboxes (IE small and not bold). That means the pre-nominal styles template is only needed if they have multiple titles and if used, needs to have size=100 set (otherwise it makes it very small!). I've been slowly making my way through various bishops etc to correct this, but there are a lot to go through! Any help you can give with this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 01:09, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, right. Thanks; I'll try to remember and amend this as I go along (which isn't frequently these days!) DBD 08:41, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard Blackburn (bishop), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Helens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:BRoy Sidebar-mini

Template:BRoy Sidebar-mini has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:26, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bishop of Sodor and Man (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Monarchy of Britain

John Lloyd (Bishop of Swansea) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Newport

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Who's Who links

Hi Dan, I did not know that when you leave the comma after a Who's Who link: http://www.ukwhoswho.com/view/article/oupww/whowaswho/U######, it makes it not work. From now on I will use the Template:Who's Who.
It's not what you know, its who you know All the best Basher Bashereyre (talk) 16:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello DBD, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.

Technology update:

Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.

General project update:

The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Forenames

e.g. Roy Sinker. Mate, I do the research on common names (and red link them in templates) so you don't have to. I find it incredibly frustrating when I then find you've reinserted an unused forename when I'd redlinked the common name for you! [1] Come on, mate. DBD 16:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry old pal

A Barnstar for putting up with me! PS Have found some more obscure ones. Will do my level best tofind the common name but newspapers before about 1950 don't usually give Bill's Pete's etcBashereyre (talk) 17:20, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, old fella. And if you can't find a common name, dw; it only really bothers me when I've already done the work and redlinked the subject from a list article or navbox :) DBD 19:46, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]