User talk:Csgir/Archive 9
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Csgir. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Unnamed Message
Hi, recently i created wikipedia page of young politician Tanuj Khatri, which is popular in Jharkhand and in print media and he is spokesperson of local party JMM, someone put my page in delete request just after i published that page.That person have not even searched about him and raised deleted request.
I request you to review all links including youtube videos that give proof that person is actually spokesperson of ruling party in jharkhand
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanuj_Khatri
(Ziyush (talk) 06:47, 14 July 2020 (UTC))
- Hello @Ziyush: Sorry for getting to this much late - was on a break due to family issues. I see that the article is already deleted at the AFD and rightfully so because the subject is not yet notable and does not pass notability guidelines for politicians as explained here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NPOL Have a great day. Csgir (talk) 06:23, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
August 2020 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 07:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
September Women in Red edithons
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Sarabha (film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarabha (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarabha (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi (talk) 21:53, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
October editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Mayank Pratap Singh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mayank Pratap Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayank Pratap Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nizil (talk) 05:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Digamber Hansda
On 21 November 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Digamber Hansda, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 22:38, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Protection For Page
Please Provide Protection To This Page List of current members of the Rajya Sabha Sir Atleast One Month
Many IP Address Accounts Are Doing False Edits
And Also Tell Me Where To Request For Page Protection Dev Adhi (talk) 09:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello editor. You can request page protection here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection - I would have requested the same but I am not so much politically inclined to understand if the edits on that page are in error or not. If you think they are in error by various IP's, feel free to request the protection. Thank you. Csgir (talk) 10:51, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
December with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
National Hand Touch Football League
https://handsfootball.wordpress.com/ It’s a real league I would like to Contest the speedy deletion. Demons24 (talk) 17:13, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- Demons24, Hi, please write your rationale against deletion in the specific page for other editors to review. Thank you. Csgir (talk) 17:15, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
I did contest it Demons24 (talk) 17:16, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
←Created page with 'National Hand Touch Football League The League currently a semi professional touch football league consists of three teams started in 2001 began with four team...' also some one elts created the page National Hand Touch Football League Demons24 (talk) 17:33, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- Demons24, Hi, kindly wait. Other editors will review the speedy delete notice. Since I added the notice, I cannot remove it - other qualified editors have to. Csgir (talk) 17:54, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Ok I just wanted to show that other people created the page Demons24 (talk) 17:55, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
New Page Patrol December Newsletter
Hello Csgir,
- Year in review
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
| Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DannyS712 bot III (talk) | 67,552 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 2 | Rosguill (talk) | 63,821 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 3 | John B123 (talk) | 21,697 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 4 | Onel5969 (talk) | 19,879 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 5 | JTtheOG (talk) | 12,901 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 6 | Mcampany (talk) | 9,103 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 7 | DragonflySixtyseven (talk) | 6,401 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 8 | Mccapra (talk) | 4,918 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 9 | Hughesdarren (talk) | 4,520 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 10 | Utopes (talk) | 3,958 | Patrol Page Curation |
- Reviewer of the Year
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
- NPP Technical Achievement Award
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
A New Year With Women in Red!
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
"BIR (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect BIR (upcoming film). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 5#BIR (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 14:21, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Headquarters v. Headquarter
Csgir Thanks for copy editing the page on Tirupattur. Minor point, but thought you'd appreciate the feedback since it looks like you do a lot of copy editing—it should be "is the headquarters" not "is the headquarter." The noun is always plural, but can take a singular or plural verb. I had to look it up myself:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/headquarters
If it sounds weird, "The town of Tirupathur serves as the headquarters for..." or "Tirupathur is the capital of..." also works, too.
Cheers, Fredlesaltique (talk) 05:39, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Fredlesaltique, Hi, thank you for the correction. Much appreciated! The article still needs a lot of work - on it. Csgir (talk) 11:05, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- No problem! I'll probably check it once more too, since the more eyes the better. Cheers, Fredlesaltique (talk) 00:26, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
February 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for January 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Jharkhand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ibrahim Khan.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Copypaste for Battle of Humera
Hello Csgir I'm a bit confused about how the article is copypasted
First of all, it marks "the Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF)" as copypasted even though that is literally the name of the armed group Ethiopia is fighting. The second one is "Tigray special forces had already" Tigray special forces is the name of a unit within the TPLF and had already is just a simple phrase. The third is "AK47s [assault rifles], machine guns, and snipers" This is just a listing of the militias' weaponry.
I also don't get how "the vicinity of the hospital compound", "at a camp near the", "Eritrea with heavy weaponry, but", "On the morning of November 9", and "The shelling continued into the evening" is considered copypasted.
The biggest one is: "One doctor said: "Civilians started arriving in the hospital with injuries to the abdomen, chest, head. We were at a loss ... People with no hands, people with their stomachs hanging out. This continued the whole day. I don’t know how he did it, but a young boy brought a woman to the hospital; her intestines were out. He had tried to tie a scarf around her waist. We somehow managed to stitch her up." But that is a quote so I don't see how that is copypasted.
The only copypasted text I could find is "mortar and tank fire came from Eritrea, killing and wounding civilians", "the staff, concerned that the hospital could be hit, took 50 injured people, including six", and "at soldiers crossing the Tekeze bridge from Eritrea into Ethiopia"
Thank you for your time. Wowzers122 (talk) 16:41, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Wowzers122, Hello, thank you for writing in & for creating the page. When I was reviewing the article, the copyvios tool showed a more than 50% similarity; hence, I added the tag to come back later and work on it, and for other editors stumbling upon the page in the meantime. From the Battle of Humera page, go to Page > Analysis > Copyright vio Detection option to view the similarities. Hope this helps. Csgir (talk) 05:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
March 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Regarding Undo on EaseMyTrip
The information which I added on the EaseMyTrip Wikipedia page was essential as users should know when the Company is planning for its Initial Public Offering which is going to be in the history of the company forever. It may be a mistake to add the information in the first paragraph but the information is crucial for the company page and the article deserves to be displayed on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.96.219.3 (talk) 08:37, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hello editor - your edit was not undone. It was copyedited and moved to the "History" section with the relevant news citation. Welcome to Wikipedia. Csgir (talk) 06:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
April editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Editing - please take care
Hallo, Thanks for your contributions, but there are a couple of points to note:
Please don't add the category Category:Women in Red 2021 or similar to articles, as you did to Hannah Barnett-Trager: it's a category for pages within the project structure. See Talk:Hannah Barnett-Trager for the WiR banner which has been there since the article was created.
Looking at your contributions, I spotted this. Please do not "correct" the spelling in a UK-based article to US spelling. For more information on the kind of differences to be aware of, see American and British English spelling differences and for Wikipedia policy see WP:ENGVAR.
There's a lot to learn about editing Wikipedia, but it's an interesting journey. Thanks. PamD 08:13, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- PamD, Hello, thank you for pointing these out. Have a great day. Csgir (talk) 09:57, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Deletion of important content
hi Why have you deleted several important content from the narayan dynasty — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaurav 3894 (talk • contribs) 04:11, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
- Gaurav 3894, Hello, read the article again. No important content was removed - the language was rewritten to make it encyclopedic.
- Statements like "HH Maharaja Sir Ishwari Prasad Narayan Singh ascended to Baikunth several months later" are unencyclopedic. He died - simple. Furthermore, uncited information and embellishments (like the quoted line above) are often deleted.
- I will be going ahead and reverting your reverts. The page was marked for copyediting and that's what I had done. If you have problem with it - discuss it on the Talk page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Narayan_dynasty - before reverting someone's work without giving any reason.
- Thanks & have a good day. Csgir (talk) 05:05, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions with User:Csgir. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |