User talk:Crismorera18

Viking Age in the Faroe Islands moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Viking Age in the Faroe Islands. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:40, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Viking Age in the Faroe Islands has been accepted

Viking Age in the Faroe Islands, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:51, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thank you for the very helpful, clear and well-written translation of Connewitz; it's great to have it over on .en Klbrain (talk) 13:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Crismorera18 (talk) 13:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve History of radiation protection

Hello, Crismorera18,

Thank you for creating History of radiation protection.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This page is way, way too long and covers too many topics. It should be split up into multiple pages, and some parts may already be elsewhere. For instance, microwave radiation and smart phones don't belong in a page with a large focus on hard radiation (alpha/beta/gamma).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ldm1954 (talk) 23:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Crismorera18. Thank you for your work on History of radiation protection. Ldm1954, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

A good start, but this page has major issues. It covers too many different topics, and should be split into multiple sports pages. Some of these will remain, others such as the smart phone speculation belong as part of other pages -- and are probably already there.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 23:58, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Crismorera18. Thank you for your work on Lousberg. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Crismorera18. Thank you for your work on Amendingen (Memmingen). Broc, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice translation work. Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Broc (talk) 08:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Crismorera18. Thank you for your work on Bucciali TAV 12. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your translations from German

Hi there, Crismorena18. I have been looking though your translations from German, reviewing and assessing where necessary. As you can see, the result is impressive. Keep up the good work!--Ipigott (talk) 15:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I really appreciated :) Crismorera18 (talk) 16:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Your user page indicates that you are being paid to edit. However, you are not following our paid editing or conflict of interest guidelines. Paid editors should not directly create or edit articles in mainspace. Rather, proposed new articles should be created as a draft and reviewed by articles for creation, and proposed paid edits to existing articles should be made as edit requests, so that non-COI editors may review them. Please ensure to follow these requirements going forward, as continued violations of these requirements are likely to lead to a block from editing. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 04:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please note that you need to make your paid editing disclosure using {{paid}} for each article you were paid to edit. The disclosure on your user page is not sufficient. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 04:49, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you very much for the information. I went ahead and added the

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by {{{employer}}} for their contributions to Wikipedia.

template on my Talk page and I will add the

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by {{{employer}}} for their contributions to Wikipedia.

template on each article I create. I will now edit the articles and submit them as draft for revision.

Regards,

Crismorera18 Crismorera18 (talk) 12:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Castlereagh Canning duel

Hello, as I tried to publish my own translation of my article (I am the main author) today I was in a for a shock to see someone else already did that. Now I have to bear the consequences because I was intend to have it as my own work and then to guide it through the process of a nomination as a featured article - so I am not in the happiest of moods. Now, what is done is done. But I would like to ask you that you don't translate more of my articles, because I fully intend to do that on my own, now that I left the german wikipedia. Michael G. Lind (talk) 11:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Michael G. Lind,

As part of the OKA project, we are currently translating all featured and good articles from all Wikipedias into English. That's several thousands articles, most of which were several years old, which is why yours was picked up. I'm sorry that we translated an article that you were planning to translate yourself -- we were only trying to help expose the great quality content you published to more people. Could you provide us with a list of the articles you intend to translate? I'll then make sure to exclude these from our backlog 7804j (talk) 14:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have come across this exchange, Michael G. Lind, in connection with my interest in translations by those connected with OKA. I am fluent in German and appreciate the many contributions your have made to the German wiki. I should however bring to your attention that Wikipedia relies on wide collaboration. Articles created by any editor can be improved or translated by any other contributor. Under Wikipedia's terms of use, articles do not belong any individual. If you wish to improve the English translation of Castlereagh-Canning duel, you are of course free to do so but from your editing history on the English wiki, it does not appear that you have a record of B-class or higher achievement. May I suggest that instead you encourage the translation of your articles by OKA contributors so that English-language readers can benefit from your enterprising work. If you can subsequently come in and make further improvements, so much the better. And if you really do intend to work on improvements to the English version for GA nomination (or higher), please let me know. I might be able to help you along. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 16:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, since this is en.wiki in english: Now, after the process of cooling down, let's have a restart. So, I am fully aware that "my articles" do not belong to "me". I didn't know the project OKA (interesting and fascinating as it is, I absolutely love the idea). Maybe both of you are able to imagine that I was shell-shocked to find the translation I just wanted to publish. The work being done, I spent some hours with last weekend. Also I instantly saw some trouble on the horizon. Because in de.wiki I was the main author and of course I have the expertise to guide the article through the process of a candidacy here, but now - technically speaking - Crismorera18 is the main author and I am going to need his approval. You have my blessing to translate some of my articles, just ask beforehand and let us coordinate our efforts so my very own efforts are not abundant, okay? For instance, articles like Granita Deal / Midlothian-Kampagne / Stanley Baldwin shall be left out, I would love to do this all alone. Carlton-Club-Treffen 1922, Robert Stewart Viscount Castlereagh / Andrew Bonar Law / Anthony Eden / Harold Macmillan shall be yours. Concerning H.H. Asquith (imho my best one) I would advise you to be very careful, since the en.article is a huge work, indeed in some parts voluptuous. In my opinion one needs to thighten it up a bit to improve the article - which is not an enviable task, one needs to know the stuff. Happy editing!--Michael G. Lind (talk) 12:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We don't usually expand articles that already exist in English, as it is harder to reconcile with existing content. The 3 you mentioned (and the other ones listed after that) already have an EN version, so we were not planning to translate them. Therefore I don't expect there will be any other conflict with the articles you are planning to work on

We are of course happy to let you lead the candidacy process and give any approval you may need for it.7804j (talk) 14:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Feline hyperthyroidism has been accepted

Feline hyperthyroidism, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 16:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bienertmühle (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheTechie was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The lead cites no sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bienertmühle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 20:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for your message, I went ahead and added the sources to the article. Crismorera18 (talk) 16:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Crismorera18! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 20:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for your message, I went ahead and added the sources to the article. Crismorera18 (talk) 16:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baden thermal baths has been accepted

Baden thermal baths, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Theodor Mayer (historian) has been accepted

Theodor Mayer (historian), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Superboilles (talk) 20:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfred von Martin has been accepted

Alfred von Martin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 19:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alfred von Martin moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Alfred von Martin. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and too many of the "references" are not references. Remove them or make them notes. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. UtherSRG (talk) 19:54, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Marienaltar (Conrad von Soest) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Marienaltar (Conrad von Soest). Thanks! asilvering (talk) 21:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!, yes Marienaltar is indeed the common name for this subject in English. Regards! Crismorera18 (talk) 10:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to respond in the talk page of the draft, to make sure people can see your response 7804j (talk) 20:36, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! I will do so! Crismorera18 (talk) 09:55, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfred von Martin has been accepted

Alfred von Martin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 04:39, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bienertmühle has been accepted

Bienertmühle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rkieferbaum (talk) 11:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MTB-82 has been accepted

MTB-82, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 23:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marienaltar (Conrad von Soest) (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marienaltar (Conrad von Soest) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marienaltar (Conrad von Soest) has been accepted

Marienaltar (Conrad von Soest), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 12:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]