Jump to content

User talk:Courcelles/Archive 127

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 120Archive 125Archive 126Archive 127Archive 128Archive 129Archive 130

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Courcelles. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

I have read your message that says "I'm fully complaint with the policy on access to non-public data". Sorry I am not a native speaker of English. What do you mean ?? (complying ??) --Wisdood (talk) 08:56, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Wisdood was pointing out a typo in your statement. Complaint/Compliant. Claudia (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Weird issue

Hey, @Courcelles:, I saw you just blocked GoldenSamurai. I was having a weird issue with him/her just now - they were saying I couldn't clean up portal project updates from my talk page? Is that a sitewide rule? It was a confusing conversation. I'm not a frequent Wiki user so I was just trying to understand the rules governing your own talkpage. Let me know what's going on there, if you know. Thank you! Ganesha811 (talk) 16:33, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

  • They're a long-term abusive editor so nothing they said should be believed. Feel free to clean-up, archive, etc. your talk page as you see fit, so long as you don't edit the content of other's comments. (You can archive or remove other people's comments, you just can't change their contents to make it look like they said something they didn't say) Courcelles (talk) 16:36, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Sock?

Might [1] be a sock of [2] that you blocked? Doug Weller talk 16:53, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Evlekis/Archive for brownfingers  :) ——SerialNumber54129 17:10, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #341

RFPP

Just to leave my appreciation for cleaning up the entire pack in one go.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:27, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

The article Denmark at the 1952 Winter Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Denmark at the 1952 Winter Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 16:21, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

The article Lebanon at the 1952 Winter Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lebanon at the 1952 Winter Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 16:21, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

The article Aruba at the 1996 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Aruba at the 1996 Summer Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 07:41, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

The article Mauritania at the 2000 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mauritania at the 2000 Summer Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 07:41, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

The article Sierra Leone at the 2000 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sierra Leone at the 2000 Summer Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 07:41, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

A question

Can it be pointed out what parts of the most recent attempt to edit the Thomas More College of Liberal Arts page were under copyright? I am just trying to give a fair representation of the College. Was the reason for the ECP because so much information was added at one time? Seeing as some of those involved with the removal of my additions (Ken Gallager) are also regular contributors to Thomas More's local competition North East Catholic College, to an outsider like me, this appears to be a conflict of interest. Especially because all of the text was written by myself, and nothing I posted was under any sort of copyright. Anything that was taken directly from the Thomas More site was either in quotations or reworked to avoid copyright.

Thank you for your time. Yours, Virgilisalive (talk)

  • Interesting. How does one avoid doing that? If the information is unbiased and well stated on a website, the only option is to rework the statement... I will see what I can do, but how do I know this take down war won't re-erupt once I try to make similar edits again. For example, the sections on the Center for the Restoration of Christian Culture, the Press, the High School Programs, etc. were not on the website at all. Nevertheless, they were all removed in a foul swoop! Virgilisalive (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:41, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
    • Close paraphrasing is perhaps one of the hardest concepts on WP. And, without looking back at the exact wording, I can say that oftentimes, once one contribution to a page is found to be copyright problematic, the rest of that user's edits to that page may be removed preemptively on the assumption they are also problematic. Also, sign your posts in the future, please, by placing four tildes at the end of a comment: ~~~~. Thanks. Courcelles (talk) 21:45, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

I just want to point out that I was not involved in the copyvio reverts, which is clear in the edit history. --Ken Gallager (talk) 13:14, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

The article Tonga at the 2000 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tonga at the 2000 Summer Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gonzo fan2007 -- Gonzo fan2007 (talk) 16:41, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

The article Comoros at the 2000 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Comoros at the 2000 Summer Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gonzo fan2007 -- Gonzo fan2007 (talk) 17:01, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Mexico at the 1994 Winter Olympics

On 2 December 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mexico at the 1994 Winter Olympics, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mexico was represented by a single athlete at the 1994 Winter Olympics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mexico at the 1994 Winter Olympics. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mexico at the 1994 Winter Olympics), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom Run

I'm disappointed that you haven't answered any of my questions to you regarding your candidacy. I'm hoping it was just an oversight. The other candidates have some very helpful answers to my questions. --David Tornheim (talk) 20:43, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! --David Tornheim (talk) 23:13, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
Done! At some point, I switched from answering top-down to answering bottom-up, and yours were just missed. Courcelles (talk) 05:58, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Makes sense. Thanks for doing them all. You now have my endorsement and my vote. I deleted the redundant question--sorry about that. Best of luck getting on. --David Tornheim (talk) 10:09, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, and sorry for the screwup! Courcelles (talk) 17:45, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

SPI

What'd you do today? Drink too much coffee? You have more energy than a 2-year-old whose toys have been taken away from him.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:31, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #342

17:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

The article British Honduras at the 1972 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:British Honduras at the 1972 Summer Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gonzo fan2007 -- Gonzo fan2007 (talk) 22:41, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

The article Belize at the 2000 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Belize at the 2000 Summer Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gonzo fan2007 -- Gonzo fan2007 (talk) 22:41, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

The article Belize at the 2004 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Belize at the 2004 Summer Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gonzo fan2007 -- Gonzo fan2007 (talk) 22:41, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Neutral buoyancy

Thanks for protecting Neutral buoyancy yesterday, which has resulted in extended discussion at Talk:Neutral buoyancy. I'm pretty certain that a good compromise has emerged. The other editor has now understood the issues we have with edit-warring and seems very unlikely to repeat that in future. If you have time, would you review that talk page and see if you feel it would now be appropriate to lift page protection from the article, please? There's no problem if you think it best to let the protection run its course: I'll just have to remember to incorporate the agreed text next week. Regards --RexxS (talk) 22:09, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Kudos on working it all out. Unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 22:55, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: November 2018





Headlines
  • Albania report: Wiki Photo Walk Albania 2018; Wiki Loves Monuments Albania
  • Armenia report: Singing Wikipedia; Photographs by Vahan Kochar
  • Brazil report: Diverse milestones for the Brazilian community
  • Denmark report: Intercontinental digitisation efforts
  • Estonia report: Making contacts both internationally and in Estonia
  • Finland report: Art and edit-a-thons
  • France report: Bibliothèque publique d’information; 3D museum collections on Wikimedia Commons
  • Indonesia report: Conserving and digitizing texts in West Sumatra
  • Macedonia report: Wiki Training at National and University Library "St. Clement of Ohrid"
  • New Zealand report: Equity, Wikidata, and the New York Times
  • Norway report: Collaboration with The National Archives of Norway
  • Philippines report: Wiki Loves Art
  • Poland report: Archival image uploads, student collaborations and international projects
  • Serbia report: Photo finish of the WIR's
  • Sweden report: The Swedish Performing Arts Agency; Library data starts to take shape; Learning Wikipedia at the Archives; Wikimedia Commons Data Roundtripping
  • UK report: Sum of All Astrolabes
  • USA report: Wikidata Workshop at Pratt School of Information; Wikidata Presentation for the New York Technical Services Librarians; Wikipedia Asian Month; Cleveland Park Wikipedia Edit-a-thon; Historic Ivy Hill Cemetery Workshop
  • Wikipedia Library report: Books & Bytes–Issue 31, October–November 2018
  • WMF GLAM report: Welcoming Satdeep Gill; Structured Data on Commons; WikiCite
  • Calendar: December's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Thanks

Hello, thanks for protecting Louisville Cardinals football. Can you do the same to Scott Satterfield and Appalachian State Mountaineers football for the same thing? Satterfield is supposedly a top candidate for UofL. Thanks, Corky 22:38, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi!

Hello! Would you mind looking at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mnair69 if possible? I am curious to see how the result of CheckUser comes up (though easily could be meatpuppeting as well instead of socking, but suspcicious actions are suspicious). Regards, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 15:14, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Semi until March 2019? Considering the activity there recently, that seems a bit too long (in fact, the day it got protected, there was only one or two unconstructive edits). Could you maybe consider shortening it to say at most a week or two, or possibly even lowering it to PC? March seems overkill considering there have been more constructive edits than vandalism. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:20, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Narutolovehinata5, I don't think you understand why the article was set to protect for that long. If you check the protection log, it becomes very clear. The article has been vandalized in the past; it is likely for vandalism to continue now that your request has been approved. Each new protection period is set to last longer than the previous period; at least, that's according to my understanding of the protection policy. The protection period preceding this one was 2 weeks; what's the point of reprotection if it's not gonna last longer than that?
NLH, please don't give trolls an opportunity to strike; you just reopened the gate to that possibility. Sk8erPrince (talk) 17:02, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

I would have seen the point if there had been a string of unconstructive edits before the protection was applied, but it was only one or two edits, and most of the edits before then were good faith, not vandalism. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 19:41, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Yeah, I knew PC1 was gonna be ineffective. Take a look at the diff here - the article's under attack again. Please reinstate semi-protection for the article. Sk8erPrince (talk) 22:38, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Onebad edit no one saw is not proof of anything, if you can raw any conclusions at all, it is thatPC1 did its job. Courcelles (talk) 14:44, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

20:34, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

GA Nomination: Lebanon national football team

Hi,

I have noticed that you have been active in nominating and reviewing football articles for GA nominations; would it be possible for you to take a look at my Lebanon national football team article nomination if you had time?

Thanks, Nehme1499 (talk) 15:04, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

December 19, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Fordham University's Lincoln Center campus in Manhattan, near Columbus Circle. Is there a project you'd like to share? A question you'd like answered? A Wiki* skill you'd like to learn? Let us know by adding it to the agenda.

We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming edit-a-thons, museum and library projects, education initiatives, and other outreach activities.

7:00pm - 9:00 pm at Fordham University's Lincoln Center campus (South Lounge) at 113 W 60th Street, Manhattan
(note this month we will be meeting in Manhattan, near Columbus Circle, not at Babycastles)

We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Wikimedia New York City Team 03:21, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Welcome back

Hi Courcelles. Congratulations on your success in the elections and welcome to the 2019 Arbitration Committee. Sorry to be a pain, but we'll need to go through the formalities.

Please use the EmailUser function to indicate:

  • the email address you'd like to use for ArbCom and functionary business

Over the coming days, you will receive a small of emails as part of the induction process. Please carefully read them. If they are registration emails, please follow any instructions in them to finalise registration. You can contact me or any other arbitrator directly if you have difficulty with any of these formalities.

Thank you for volunteering to serve on the committee. We very much look forward to introducing ourselves to you on the mailing list and to working with you this term.

For the Arbitration Committee,
WormTT(talk) 10:51, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Blocking a sock puppet?

Hi Courcelles. Thanks for handling the YoungDylan sock puppet case. I noticed you blocked one of the IPs, but not all of them. One of them (188.99.194.61) is still editing. Did you mean to block all of them? If not, what is the next appropriate step? Sportsfan77777 (talk) 08:24, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Merry

Happy Christmas!
Hello Courcelles,
Early in A Child's Christmas in Wales the young Dylan and his friend Jim Prothero witness smoke pouring from Jim's home. After the conflagration has been extinguished Dylan writes that

Nobody could have had a noisier Christmas Eve. And when the firemen turned off the hose and were standing in the wet, smoky room, Jim's Aunt, Miss. Prothero, came downstairs and peered in at them. Jim and I waited, very quietly, to hear what she would say to them. She said the right thing, always. She looked at the three tall firemen in their shining helmets, standing among the smoke and cinders and dissolving snowballs, and she said, "Would you like anything to read?"

My thanks to you for your efforts to keep the 'pedia readable in case the firemen chose one of our articles :-) Best wishes to you and yours and happy editing in 2019. MarnetteD|Talk 18:37, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #343

Books & Bytes, Issue 31

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 31, October – Novemeber 2018

  • OAWiki
  • Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
  • Global branches update
  • Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019 at Women in Red

January 2019, Volume 5, Issue 1, Numbers 104-108


Happy New Year from Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual editathons.

January events: Women of War and Peace Play!

January geofocus: Caucasus

New, year-long initiative: Suffrage

Continuing global initiative: #1day1woman2019

Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe

To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list
Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list
Image attribution: Nevit Dilmen (CC BY-SA 3.0)

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:40, 21 December 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Birmingham protection

You protected Birmingham a few weeks ago, but I think February was maybe a little much. It could be unprotected and if the vandalism happens again, it can be reinstated. IWI (chat) 17:46, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Courcelles, it looks like there's been a reply to your review here; can you please stop by and see where the review stands? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:03, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
Wishing you and your family a joyful and festive holiday season and a prosperous 2019! MWright96 (talk) 20:00, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Austral season's greetings
Tuck into this! We've made about three of these in the last few days for various festivities. Supermarkets are stuffed with cheap berries. Season's greetings! Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:44, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

International Bangladesh Hope School

Hi - a few weeks ago you kindly protected International Bangladesh Hope School. For reasons I don't understand, User:DumbBOT subsequently removed the page protection. Today there was a further attempt from an ip address to remove the information on Nibras Islam. This forms a pattern of those connected to the school, with or without declared COIs, seeking to remove the information as they think it has a negative impact on the school's image. I wonder if you'd be kind enough to reinstate the protection. Many thanks and Happy Christmas. KJP1 (talk) 10:53, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy 2019!

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message
Hope you will have a nice holiday and a happy 2019 in both ArbCom and editing Hhkohh (talk) 14:37, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #344

Request for article restore

Kindly restore article which probably you have closed afd, see this Discussion Thanks JogiAsad  Talk 03:57, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

I agree that, due in part to a well-received film based on her life, Nazo Dharejo should be considered notable. I did not take part in the earlier discussion, but I hope you can restore the article so that I can work on it and improve it based on RS such as The Guardian, the Express Tribune, and the BBC. Thanks! HouseOfChange (talk) 16:40, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Courcelles!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup!

Hello and Happy New Year!

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup, the competition begins today. If you have already joined, your submission page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and we will set up your submissions page. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2019, and which you have nominated this year, is eligible for points in the competition, the judges will be checking! Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2018).

Guideline and policy news

  1. G14 (new): Disambiguation pages that disambiguate only zero or one existing pages are now covered under the new G14 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-disambig}}; the text is unchanged and candidates may be found in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unnecessary disambiguation pages.
  2. R4 (new): Redirects in the file namespace (and no file links) that have the same name as a file or redirect at Commons are now covered under the new R4 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-redircom}}; the text is unchanged.
  3. G13 (expanded): Userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text are now covered under G13 along with other drafts (discussion). Such blank drafts are now eligible after six months rather than one year, and taggers continue to use {{db-blankdraft}}.

Technical news

  • Starting on December 13, the Wikimedia Foundation security team implemented new password policy and requirements. Privileged accounts (administrators, bureaucrats, checkusers, oversighters, interface administrators, bots, edit filter managers/helpers, template editors, et al.) must have a password at least 10 characters in length. All accounts must have a password:
  1. At least 8 characters in length
  2. Not in the 100,000 most popular passwords (defined by the Password Blacklist library)
  3. Different from their username
User accounts not meeting these requirements will be prompted to update their password accordingly. More information is available on MediaWiki.org.
  • Blocked administrators may now block the administrator that blocked them. This was done to mitigate the possibility that a compromised administrator account would block all other active administrators, complementing the removal of the ability to unblock oneself outside of self-imposed blocks. A request for comment is currently in progress to determine whether the blocking policy should be updated regarding this change.
  • {{Copyvio-revdel}} now has a link to open the history with the RevDel checkboxes already filled in.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Accounts continue to be compromised on a regular basis. Evidence shows this is entirely due to the accounts having the same password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately.
  • Around 22% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 20% in June 2018. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless of whether you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.

Wikidata weekly summary #345

FXCM is back

Please see User_talk:Formilds. Their "suggestions" are being added to the FXCM article by User:CNMall41 who just reverts anything that I add, with comments reminiscent of 1.5 years ago, e.g. that I am assuming bad faith. User:Spintendo had earlier declined to insert the suggestions.

This relates to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gouyoku/Archive where Lenticularphoto, Aglassofprosecco, and Lqdr (a declared paid editor) were blocked by you indefinitely as socks or meatpuppets. Goukoyu was not blocked. An anon 199.248.199.110 which traces back to the company was added too late (I guess) for any action. I haven't run into this situation before, but if one declared paid editor is blocked as a meatpuppet, don't other declared paid editors for the same company have the same meat-master?

I hope that Formilds is blocked as a meatpuppet, but would not be against them applying to AN to remove the block, provided that they promise not to remove (or even suggest removing) material in the article about the company's "fraudulent misrepresentation" to their customers.

I'll post something on this at WP:COIN and inform the parties. Smallbones(smalltalk) 17:40, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the ping, Smallbones. You really should look closer at the recent history and Spintendo declined the edits, but not because there was an issue in communication with the COI editor. You were asked to AGF as you made an accusation of whitewashing - against me - for removing two sentences of the article that are basically synth and are not about the company. There is also a discussion on the talk page and you were told that there is discussion - recent discussion - on the talk page. So far you haven't said anything there so I am wondering if this is a COI issue you are concerned with or a content dispute? --CNMall41 (talk) 18:02, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
If you want to accuse me of something take it to ANI or Arbcom. Smallbones(smalltalk) 18:05, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Sunday January 13: Wikipedia Day 2019 in NYC

You are invited to join us at Ace Hotel for Wikipedia Day 2019, a Wikipedia celebration and mini-conference as part of the project's global 18th birthday festivities. In addition to the party, the event features keynote presentations, panels, lightning talks, and, of course, open space sessions.

And there will be cake.

We also hope for the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.

9:30AM - 6:00PM at Ace Hotel, 20 West 29th Street in Manhattan

We especially encourage folks to add your 3-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Wikimedia New York City Team 20:34, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Wikidata weekly summary #346

18:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: December 2018





Headlines
  • Armenia report: Cooperation with Yerevan Drama Theatre Named After Hrachia Ghaplanian; Singing Wikipedia (continuation); Photographs by Vahan Kochar (continuation)
  • Australia report: 2019 Australia's Year of the Public Domain
  • Belgium report: Writing weeks German-speaking Community; End of year drink; Wiki Loves Heritage photo contest
  • Brazil report: Google Art and GLAM initiatives in Brazil
  • India report: Collaboration with RJVD Municipal Public Library
  • Italy report: Challenges and alliances with libraries, WLM and more
  • Macedonia report: Exhibition:"Poland through photographs" & Wikipedia lectures with children in social risk
  • Malaysia report: Technology Talk and Update on Wikipedia @ National Library of Malaysia
  • Portugal report: Glam Days '18 at the National Library of Portugal
  • Sweden report: Hats 🎩🧢👒🎓
  • UK report: Oxford
  • USA report: Holiday gatherings and visit to Internet Archive
  • Wikidata report: Wikidata reports
  • WMF GLAM report: Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons: pilot projects and multilingual captions
  • Calendar: January's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

SockPuppet Investigation

Good Morning, I had a question about the sockpuppet investigation about me that you reviewed. You mentioned "Their UA, a common one, is identical, though" I was curious what that meant. I honestly have no idea who is operating the MarkAGuinn account (though I also recognize me just saying that isn't a good argument from your perspective), but I don't know enough about the review to make a coherent defense. Aside from your concern on the investigation, the accusation rests primarily on MarkAGuinn having used a less sophisticated variant of my argument and Orientls dislike of that as an argument. I wanted to check with you to better understand what other reasoning led to the block. Anything you could offer would be appreciated. Squatch347 (talk) 14:19, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #347

17:54, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

File:British Railways Eastern Region timetable for Summer 1963.jpg

It was recently noticed by myself and others that the British Rail items were subject to Crown Copyright, which lasts 50 years. In 2013, this file entered public domain File:British Railways Eastern Region timetable for Summer 1963.jpg. It was uploaded with a higher resolution but shrunk due to copyright. User:Ww2censor told me an administrator could restore the old file prior to the reduction in resolution.--The Navigators (talk)-May British Rail Rest in Peace. 20:11, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

And perhaps also tag it as {{move to commons}}. ww2censor (talk) 22:25, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Deletion review for Nazo Dharejo

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Nazo Dharejo. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Zanhe (talk) 20:13, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Almost 9 years ago now, you put these pages full protection. I only noticed this today. After watching this video I searched "Gang Stalking" into the search bar, and was redirected to Stalking#Stalking by groups. I read up on the history behind the redirect. Ideally, this redirect (and Gang stalking) would lead to Stalking#False claims of stalking, "gang stalking" and delusions of persecution as that makes a bit more sense. Regardless, WP:GOLDLOCK seems a bit excessive now. ―Matthew J. Long -Talk- 04:17, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #348

20:34, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

mail

Hello, Courcelles. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Smallbones(smalltalk) 20:15, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

February 2019 at Women in Red

February 2019, Volume 5, Issue 2, Numbers 107-111


Happy February from Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual editathons.

February events: Social Workers Black Women

February geofocus: Ancient World

Continuing initiatives: Suffrage #1day1woman2019

Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe

Join the conversations on our talkpage:


Image attribution: Johntex (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Subscription options: English language opt-in International opt-in Unsubscribe
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:09, 26 January 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

mail

Hello, Courcelles. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Smallbones(smalltalk) 20:15, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

February 2019 at Women in Red

February 2019, Volume 5, Issue 2, Numbers 107-111


Happy February from Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual editathons.

February events: Social Workers Black Women

February geofocus: Ancient World

Continuing initiatives: Suffrage #1day1woman2019

Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe

Join the conversations on our talkpage:


Image attribution: Johntex (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Subscription options: English language opt-in International opt-in Unsubscribe
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:09, 26 January 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging