Jump to content

User talk:CopperKettle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cholesterol side chain cleavage page

[edit]

Hi, I have a question regarding an edit you made on the Cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme page under "Pathology". First as a note, I changed this to reflect that several examples of lipoid CAH caused by P450scc mutations do exist. Second, What do you mean by "More often but still rarely, the mutation may cause one of the subforms of congenital adrenal insufficiency."? Are you suggesting that you can have adrenal insufficiency due to a P450scc KO w/o any symptoms of lipoid CAH? Do you have a reference for this? Thanks, Skingski (talk) 16:35, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm terribly sorry, but feel dizzy and have some numbness in the left hand each time I try to think; have some strange attacks of some illness.. Going to the docs right now but no results yet.. I'll definitely look up the issue when I feel better, maybe in the evening. --CopperKettle 09:14, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First message

[edit]

Hello Copper Kettle,

I've read your post to the discussion page for the deletion of the Reelin hypothesis of schizophrenia and I must say you seem to have a marvelous ability to express yourself in English. Your writing is better than that of many of us who are native speakers. Thank you for your contributions to the English language Wikipedia.

Ande B. 19:25, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx, Ande! I wish you good health (seeing from your info that you're having a nerve disease). Get well soon. (0:

I hope to contribute some more. My wish is to adorn the reelin page with some graphics - photos of brain structure and drawings from scientific articles, but I'm at a loss yet concerning Wikipedia's policy on copyright.

--CopperKettle 04:18, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reelin and TLE

[edit]

Hi CopperKettle, I've been to the reelin page from the temporal lobe epilepsy page, and it does look like this might be a good link to TLE. I'll wait a day or two for feedback from some of the other editors, and then will start to add to and improve this. Do you have the pdfs of the original research you cite on this? If you do, would you mind sending them to edhubbard AT gmail DOT com (I've also posted this on the TLE talk page)? Edhubbard 14:10, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear that my work was useful, Edhubbard! I cite two papers, of which one is available only as an abstract: Reelin deficiency and displacement of mature neurons, but not neurogenesis, underlie the formation of granule cell dispersion in the epileptic hippocampus, the other has a free full text online:Role for Reelin in the Development of Granule Cell Dispersion in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
Alas, I have no PDF's of the articles.
I'm not much savvy in the area of epilepsy, so I haven't really burrowed into these findings.. Maybe one should try searching PubMed with keywords like "reelin granule cell dispersion" or "reelin epilepsy". I'll try to, don't know when however. Best regards, --CopperKettle 14:27, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reelin

[edit]

Hi, just wanted to say that you've done just a fantastic job on the reelin page! InvictaHOG 04:04, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I see you are a prodigious wikipedian too. (0: --CopperKettle 05:45, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hemosiderin

[edit]

I uploaded the image to the Commons as hemosiderin1.jpg. Happy Wikiing! InvictaHOG 15:03, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx Invicta! (0: --CopperKettle 15:21, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome/infoboxes

[edit]

And if you're interested in adding them to other pages, there is a wonderful tool which provides prepopulated text for the infobox available here. All you need is the HGNCID, which you can get here (from the URL after doing a search). --Arcadian 15:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanx for the info, Arcadian! I'll take a look. --CopperKettle 15:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I filed an Rfc regarding Mihai cartoaje's conduct and need another signature.

see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Mihai_cartoaje#Statement_of_the_dispute DPetersontalk 23:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hereby I confirm that: I support the proposed closure of the siberian wikipedia. --CopperKettle 15:09, 24 February 2007 (UTC) And I am the same person as CopperKettle registered at meta.wikipedia.org. --CopperKettle 15:17, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to neuron articles

[edit]

I just wanted to thank you for your recent edits to Betz cell and other neuroscience related articles. May I also encourage you to make a few big edits using preview rather than lots of little edit? I know that it is more work, and I have been known to use the microediting approach myself on occasion, but it makes it a lot easier for other editors to see your accomplishments and build on your contributions. -Selket Talk 17:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! I'll try to edit in bigger chunks. Thanx for the praise, Selket. --CopperKettle 00:02, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi, I followed the interwiki link you added to Player Piano (novel) (ru:Утопия-14), but I did not find anything about the novel. I don't understand. --Jtir 13:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. (0: CopperKettle 13:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! There doesn't seem to be a redirect from "Механическое пианино" to the article. --Jtir 14:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC) The redirect works fine. I had double quotes around the alternative title. --Jtir 14:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
O.K. I've added it actually. (0: CopperKettle 14:14, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just noticed that you added some material to your user page saying that you want to work on the Simon effect page. If you want some help with that, let me know. I don't have a ton of time right now, but my research into the SNARC effect (Spatial Numerical Association of Response Codes effect) relates to this, and I have read a large number of papers on this effect. Edhubbard 13:59, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for informing me; I really only seen the mentioning of this effect first time yesterday, while googling for a definition of POP task (which was mentioned in a Schizophrenia Research Forum article). If I will ever work on POP task\Simon effect, I'll know whom to consult. (0: Best regards, CopperKettle 17:02, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About your post (long long ago) on that page: I replied there. Basically I couldn't find any references that say that there are 5 isozymes in humans. :-/ - TwoOars 22:29, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. I've already forgot the topic, frankly. (0: Best regards, CopperKettle 07:16, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Mind Hacks comment

[edit]

I noticed that you wrote a note to Vaughan at Mind Hacks. You may also enjoy this article, which provides an in-depth review of the scholarly histories on the subject. Cheers, JTBurman 02:37, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx for a link, JTBurman! CopperKettle 07:15, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

[edit]

Hi CopperKettle, Thanks for the pointer on MH. Will inform Matt, our server genius! - Vaughan 08:53, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

protein box for reelin

[edit]

You might have already seen it, but just wanted to let you know that we've added the enhanced protein box for reelin, as you requested. Cheers, AndrewGNF 16:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Huge thanx, keep up the good work, comrades! (0: CopperKettle 16:21, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK - Yuri Nuller

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 20 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Yuri Nuller, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

ERcheck (talk) 04:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MTHFR

[edit]

Re: overuse of br Yes, you may be right - I've never done this before - I'm just a beginner! Thanks for the feedback!

You welcome. (0: Happy Wikying to you (more comfortable under some preposterous nickname than just an IP)! CopperKettle (talk) 03:36, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Превед! :)

[edit]

Я увидел тебя в процессе редактирования статью про войну в Осетии. Что ты, будучи спецом по психиатрии и нейрологии, скажешь об этом: http://project.megarulez.ru/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=77 ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poligraf (talkcontribs) 06:53, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Понятия не имею, первый раз вижу. Посмотрю, если будет время, спасибо за ссылку. --CopperKettle (talk) 06:56, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

named Guardian ref

[edit]

The reference should ideally be to the originally HRW report. Another media might be slanting its account of the original.Bdell555 (talk) 08:31, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just added the name; you may search for the original source if you like. --CopperKettle (talk) 08:33, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hypoxia

[edit]

Thanks very much for the link.

Good luck. Notpayingthepsychiatrist (talk) 09:24, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Use it wisely. (0: --CopperKettle (talk) 11:30, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you have a look at the sentence please - just delete anything unwise. Thanks again Steve Notpayingthepsychiatrist (talk) 04:52, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not into this just yet, but the edit seems O.K. The Hypoxia section itself might be bloated, why not start a Hypoxia and schizophrenia article, simiral to Scholarpedia's Dopamine and schizophrenia? --CopperKettle (talk) 12:03, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Protein box

[edit]

Not directly, you'll need to copy the Template:GNF Protein box for that gene (eg Template:PBB/4851 for NOTCH) onto the other Wiki and copy the images onto Commons. Tim Vickers (talk) 13:44, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx for the reply! So I guess I'll have anyway either to fill it by hand or use diberri's tool for creating the older-type box automatically.. --CopperKettle (talk) 13:47, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

[edit]

Thanks for the barnstar =) I do try to get good audio - it's something Wikipedia neglects a bit, but which is one of the things it can do really well, that print encyclopedias can't. =) Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 08:27, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And thank you for the hilarious song! --CopperKettle (talk) 15:30, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

Hi CopperKettle,

You've done a lot of quality work over a long time...Any interest in adminship? I'd be happy to nominate you. — Scientizzle 20:37, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the opinion and the offer, Scientizzle! I did not know what admins do exactly. So I've read the Wikipedia:Administrators.. and then the Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship and it seems that the admin is expected to be acquainted with the tools and to be willing to use them. That might distract me just now from building up the neuroscience\psychiatric-related content at the Russian Wikipedia (there's a lot to be done), and finally pushing the Reelin here to the "star status". But maybe sometimes I will self-nominate, because my bilingualism could be useful, not mentioning my sharp mind and... Well, I'll think of it, thank you again! --CopperKettle (talk) 04:27, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My pleasure. While your work to-date hasn't overlapped too much with the standard bureaucracy areas, you've got a long editing history that suggests you'd likely be a net gain to the project if you ever choose to try...I understand, however, the concern about it being a drain on content-building time. Keep up the good work, and let me know if you're ever interested because I'd be happy to help you out. Cheers, — Scientizzle 17:52, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
O.K, I'll let you know if the thought of adminship will tempt me. --CopperKettle 05:26, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fershampenuaz

[edit]

No, sorry, we don't have a relevant template for villages of Chelyabinsk Oblast (even those which are administrative centers). With over 1,200 villages in Chelyabinsk Oblast, you can imagine such a template would be quite long, not to mention useless :) I suppose we could create a template with all of the administrative centers of all districts, but, again, I don't see much practical use in it. If you have any other ideas, though, I'm open. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 21:45, January 20, 2009 (UTC)

Well, I'm not usually editing the place articles.. (0: Thanx for the reply! Best regards, --CopperKettle 21:48, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Oak of Mamre, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.orthodoxwiki.org/Oak_of_Mamre. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:45, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please expand it from the information in the source listed. As is, it doesn't really show notability. DGG (talk) 18:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm not against deletion. Just listened on the radio and overheard a talk with him. Thought that his readers would expand the page. --CopperKettle 01:19, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FA deletion

[edit]

I needed to delete the main page FA to clean up the history, so I created a temp copy with caps in the title, redirected the main page template to the copy, deleted the main article, restored it minus several revisions, and then reverted the template back to point to the restored main article. Only then did I delete the temp copy. Tim Vickers (talk) 03:19, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation, Tim, I understand that it must have been some glitch in the process of maintaining the Wiki! --CopperKettle 03:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Thanks for the gift and congratulations. It is great news. Best regards.--Garrondo (talk) 08:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bergmann glia

[edit]

hi Copper Kettle!

I have just joined this website, so not sure if this is the right place to leave a message.. please, excuse

you have posted a stunning picture of Bergmann glia in 7 day old mice, stained for GLAST ( or Slc1a3) antibody. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glutamate_aspartate_transporter

apparently on the GENSAT database.

I was wondering if you could direct me to the paper that published that. I am working in neuroscience reserach and was just looking for a good anti-GLAST antibody.

thank you very much.

i think email might be easier, not sure how messages work on here.

my email address is ilina.iordanova@googlemail.com

many thanks!!

best wishes,

Ilina —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iki20 (talkcontribs) 00:12, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've sent you a mail! Cheers, --CopperKettle 00:55, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

what is ?

[edit]

what is IMHO ? Earlypsychosis (talk) 08:18, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, ask Wikipedia. It has all the answers, IMHO. --CopperKettle 14:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MEG and sensor types

[edit]

I'd greatly appreciate you looking over Magnetoencephalography#Sensor_types and Gradiometer, which are sections I added. I am right at (or past) the limits of my knowledge, but I think this is really important stuff to get out.

dfrankow (talk) 16:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I really have no knowledge of MEG technology; the only edits I did were related to its possible diagnostic use in psychiatry.. sorry. --CopperKettle 01:24, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HSC vs IC

[edit]

I've commented on that editor's talkpage and on the article talkpage. If you have any further problems from that person please don't hesitate to get in touch, useful contributors such as yourself deserve better than having to deal with such rudeness. Tim Vickers (talk) 15:49, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise, I have also commented. You are an outstanding Wikipedian and it is a shame to see one who has contributed so much treated this way. Hopefully our comments will have a positive effect on this new editor. Cheers. Boghog2 (talk) 17:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you both for the attention! Best regards, --CopperKettle 12:49, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keratoconus

[edit]

Hi, you might find it necessary to re-examine the formatting and placement of the latest images: they're formatting really badly on my monitor at 1280×1024 px. With regards, —BillC talk 17:36, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can reformat them as it would suit you. Best regards, --CopperKettle 17:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think there may be more images in that section that it is able to contain. They're running on into the next section. —BillC talk 17:48, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've deleted the first one; in future they could be grouped. Best regards, --CopperKettle 17:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for responding. I also trimmed the captions slightly for a better fit. Best, —BillC talk 18:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

have you heard of this? there is a request for some assistance. thought you might know something. I've never heard of it. Earlypsychosis (talk) 20:27, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe User:Dmitri_Lytov could be able to intervene if he is not busy; he seems to know socionics well. I only heard that it is a kind of hodgepodge, probably pseudoscientifi, and the socionic tests are not reliable; but beyond that I know nothing about it. --CopperKettle 04:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
cheers Earlypsychosis (talk) 04:48, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reelin

[edit]

Hi, do you speak arabic?? how could you add to the article?? :-), and I deserve an award for that stub, right?? :-) I am gonna expand it in the near future, but I am currently busy with exams, wish me luck ;-) MaenK.A.Talk 22:19, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the wishes, and for the sweet cookie :-) MaenK.A.Talk 12:53, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have never seen so many articles of mind control and brainwashing programs conducted by American and Canadian psychiatrists, e.g. MKULTRA. They need to be translated into Russian to distinguish from Kandinsky-Clérambault syndrome. Psychiatrick (talk) 15:37, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for uploading the better version and pointing the articles to it. A friendly hint - try to add appropriate categories to images you upload to Commons so others can find them.. in this case, the existing image already had [[Category:BL 6 inch Gun Mk 7]] [[Category:Animals in World War I]] [[Category:Cruisers of Australia|Encounter]] [[Category:Challenger class cruiser]] so people could find it for multiple purposes and from multiple directions. Also, you can link versions of the same image in the image text e.g.
|other_versions=File:A cat on HMAS Encounter.jpg
regards, Rod (Sydney, Australia) Rcbutcher (talk) 08:50, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll try to be more thorough next time, Rod! --CopperKettle 09:00, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keratoconus talk page archived

[edit]

I've moved the older discussions from Talk:Keratoconus into a new archive. It was simplest to move everything, but you may want to restore some of the topics that you started so that they remain visible. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 13:42, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying, Delicious! --CopperKettle 14:04, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reelin query

[edit]

Hi there, I have a bit of an odd query here. If you can help me with your expertise in just a few minutes, I'd be very grateful. If not, don't worry about it... I'm searching for an example where a gene/protein article on WP contains information that is not yet contained in GO annotations by professional curators. I figured that given your clear depth of knowledge about reelin, you might be able to spot something. I've pasted the GO annotations below for reelin (both human and mouse). Do you see any missing functions that could be supported by a specific PubMed reference?

GO:0000904 cell morphogenesis involved in differentiation
GO:0001764 neuron migration
GO:0004712 protein serine/threonine/tyrosine kinase activity
GO:0005509 calcium ion binding
GO:0005515 protein binding
GO:0005576 extracellular region
GO:0005578 proteinaceous extracellular matrix
GO:0005615 extracellular space
GO:0005737 cytoplasm
GO:0007155 cell adhesion
GO:0007275 multicellular organismal development
GO:0007411 axon guidance
GO:0007417 central nervous system development
GO:0007420 brain development
GO:0007626 locomotory behavior
GO:0008233 peptidase activity
GO:0008236 serine-type peptidase activity
GO:0008270 zinc ion binding
GO:0010001 glial cell differentiation
GO:0016787 hydrolase activity
GO:0018108 peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylation
GO:0021511 spinal cord patterning
GO:0021800 cerebral cortex tangential migration
GO:0030425 dendrite
GO:0042403 thyroid hormone metabolic process
GO:0045860 positive regulation of protein kinase activity
GO:0046872 metal ion binding
GO:0048265 response to pain
GO:0051057 positive regulation of small GTPase mediated signal transduction

Again, please disregard the question if it would take you more than a few minutes to think of something. (BTW, I could have swore that I left a message here before telling you how awesome the reelin article is, but apparently not. It's always the example I show when I promote the Gene Wiki...) Cheers, AndrewGNF (talk) 20:36, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Seems to list a lot of functions, even the "response to pain".. Maybe.. "modulation of synaptic plasticity and memory"? (PMID 16102539 ; PMID 17359920) And.. regulation of NMDA-receptor development (subunit shift: PMID 15987942 PMID 17881522) and maintenance of NMDA-receptor subunit composition? (PMID 19430527) Thank you for judging the article so high. If another function suddenly comes up to me that is not mentioned, I'll let you know; on the other hand, some that I mentioned may easily go under "brain development" or some other name.. --CopperKettle 02:25, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
These are fantastic examples, thanks much. I may be pushing my luck here, but it would be even better if I could include another example where the referenced article was older, say before 2000. Any thoughts?
Just to give you a little context, these examples will go in a grant proposal to continue Gene Wiki development. I want to first illustrate cases where the references in the reelin article will help curators assign new GO functions, and the above examples will work perfectly for that. If they exist, I also want to illustrate cases where an expert in the field would find it 100% obvious from the older literature that a gene/protein as a certain function, but where the systematic annotation efforts have missed it because they've only started curating articles in the last 5-7 years. Anyway, thanks again for the examples above, and let me know if you have any other ideas. Cheers, AndrewGNF (talk) 04:24, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your efforts in keeping the project going! The RELN gene was only discovered in 1996.. but I'll try to remember or find examples dated earlier than 2000. Best regards, --CopperKettle 06:15, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Here's a couple of refs to reelin's role in regulating connections in hippocampus and entorhinal cortex: PMID 8985248 and PMID 9952412. The articles are published before 2000. However.. I've just added them, so unsure if that counts. Grant-proposal reading guys might object. Will look for more. (0: --CopperKettle 12:45, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely perfect... These examples will be excellent illustrations. Many thanks! Cheers, AndrewGNF (talk) 19:41, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The odds are low that

[edit]

you have any interest in women's basketball. However, the individuals in three articles I have contributed to, Tina Charles, Sue Bird, and Asjha Jones are competing in the 2009 UMMC Ekaterinburg International Invitational. (I know it started yesterday, I hope it is not just a one day event). Again, I know it is unlikely that you have interest, but I saw that you are in that city, and just had to say something.SPhilbrickT 23:19, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Hey, that reelin article is quite impressive. No, I don’t have a prayer of converting it to another language.
However, I do see that it has an impressive list of citations, which makes it quite a nice article, but also makes it difficult to edit with the seas of reference data interspersed with main article text. The new WP:LDR citation style moves much of that material down into the reference area. I’d like to take a stab at trying it, to see if it would be an improvement. If you are open to looking at it, I’ll do a couple sections in a user subpage, so it won’t affect the article itself. I’ll try this weekend, unless you are familiar with WP:LDR and have already decided against it. I do see you using a clever technique to separate the references from the text itself. Very nice, I hadn’t noticed that elsewhere. So one the one hand, you might decide the problem isn’t a big problem. On the other hand, you clever idea means you are interested in the separation, so you might want to see what I can do.
I also note some white space in the middle of the article, for example in section 5 (Function). I took a quick look and didn’t see why. I guess you want the text next to the relevant image, but I’m not sure that makes the appearance better. In any event, very impressive article, and I’d like to take a shot at making it better.SPhilbrickT 13:51, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Good evening, Sphilbrick! I looked and consider LDR style quite a great idea, thank you for notifying me of this. (0: If there is some awkwardness in the looks introduced by the free spaces, feel free to remove them. Best regards, --CopperKettle 14:24, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'll take a stab at converting a couple sections, and we'll see if you think the improvement is worthwhile. SPhilbrickT 14:58, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed change to Reelin

[edit]

I proposed a change to the citation style of the Reelin. I think it would make the article easier to navigate for editors (with virtually no change for readers). However, the effort to make the change is not trivial, so I would like to get feedback from editors before attempting a conversion. I've posting this message to editors who have a fair number of recent edits to that page. I've explained more details, along with a link to a test on the Talk Page --SPhilbrickT 21:20, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conversion done. Looks like I made an error on one ref that you picked up. I made a couple errors as I went through, but they usually manifested themselves as a redlink error - I fixed all those as I went along - not quite sure why I missed that one. Nice article, BTW, if I haven't said so before. This is a classic example of what makes WP a special project - more than enough information on the subject, in a coherent article, to educate a layperson on a subject, and plenty of references if you want to learn a lot more.SPhilbrickT 13:10, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your wonderful contribution! A virtual handshake from me. (0: Reelin caught my attention when I stubled upon a multimedia lecture by Erminio Costa (no longer online). I was amazed to know that there may exist some real clue into the pathogenesis of psychiatric disorders.. So the article was built from the scratch by the layperson (smile), as I was reading more and more about this and other proteins. (0: I do wish that some layperson gets really hooked, say, on DISC1 or NRG1; would be great to see common knowledge extended. (0: Thank you once more, best regards, --CopperKettle 17:17, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pitt-Hopkins

[edit]

In creating a stub for the Pitt-Hopkins syndrome, I noticed an inbound link from your user page. Given that genetic disorders are not my specialty, I welcome you to review the stub I created and correct or add anything as you see fit. Cheers, OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Jamie, I'll take a look! Cheers, --CopperKettle 16:45, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Inhibitory Control Test, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inhibitory Control Test. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. JFW | T@lk 00:08, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How are you?

[edit]

Hi CopperKettle,'I'm glad to tell you that the Dutch reelin article is still there and will maybe be improved further so that it is clearer. How are you doing, not too ill? Still problems working on a PC? I hope not. I will probably change my account name here on en:wiki soon. Greets, Solejheyen (talk) 08:50, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing problems with Oak of Mamre

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Oak of Mamre, please note that retroactively to November 1, 2008, Wikipedia can no longer accept text content that is only licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. Text content must be released under at least the CC-BY-SA license, and preferably the GFDL. Please see Wikipedia:Licensing update for more information. VernoWhitney (talk) 02:34, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Pelageya Khanova requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 03:33, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays!

[edit]
File:Nissen-2155 ubt.jpeg Seasons greetings and best wishes for 2011!
Boghog (talk) 16:15, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

[edit]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

  • This permission does not give you any special status or authority
  • Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
  • You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
  • If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:07, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Удалите меня из списка

[edit]

Здравствуйте, удалите меня, пожалуйста, из Ваших списков User:CopperKettle#Encyclopédistes и ru:Участник:CopperKettle#Энциклопедисты. Я никогда не был ни сторонником антипсихиатрии, ни сторонником саентологии, несмотря на глубоко опорочившие меня в профессиональной среде клятвенные заявления об этом, сделанные борцом за чистоту «истинной» православной веры бюрократом Wanderer и распространявшиеся им по всем закрытым каналам. О том же я написал в русской Вики, но её админы ввели режим премодерации всех моих сообщений, не позволяющий мне отмыться от того, в чём они меня обвинили. Psychiatrick (talk) 14:58, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • I will delete you but beleive me that the lists were meant just for my consumption and I've never really considered you a real antipsychiatrist, only using the description in a general way. Forgive me if this description has offended you. I deeply value your work at Wikipedia. Due to my bad physical condition (neurological muscle spasms and mental confusion while reading\writing\thinking, general weakness; a tumour in my left hemisphere may be a cause, or some neuro-endocrine malaise - I've had strange untypical diabetes for over 10 years now) I have no strenth now to investigate your case in full. Best regards, --CopperKettle 10:57, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article “ru:Базалья, Франко” and many other articles in the Russian and English Wikipedia stemmed and developed from stubs created by you. The Russian admins cherish your article “ru:Шизофрения” as the apple of their eye. Your informational influence on the Russian and English Wikipedia was considerable. Please include me back in your lists under the indication “human rights” if you want to watch my contributions. I don’t ask you to investigate my case but I think you should know that the Russian Wikipedia is under the admins and their banhammers beating users who describe political abuse of psychiatry and foreign mental health systems. I understand what means “a tumour in my left hemisphere.” This may cause bad physical condition, and this cause is much more probable than diabetes. Solutions: tomography and eradication of tumor. In addition, chemotherapy is often (but not always) used. You are needed for people… or God. Psychiatrick (talk) 15:30, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you very much, Psychiatrick! I shall restore you in my lists and will definitely follow your contributions. We often clash in opinions; hopefully there will be more clashes if I get better. (0: Thanks again for the kind words! --CopperKettle 13:23, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]

Hi CopperKettle, welcome back on WP! So your sight has finally healed? I'm glad to see! Greets (Solejheyen) The Wiki ghost (talk) 18:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reelin GA review

[edit]

Hi CK,

The Reelin article which you are by far the major contributor is currently undergoing a good article review. I will try to help out where I can, but the review could really use your expertise on this subject. Cheers. Boghog (talk) 23:28, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


TBR1

[edit]

Hi. My group and I have been editting the TBR1 page in wikipedia for our Neuroscience class. We noticed that you had edited it severaal times and would appreciate any advice you have on how to make it better. We are trying to make it a Good Article according to Wikipedia standards. Thanks.

JaimeeDavis (talk) 21:02, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

[edit]

--Psychiatrick (talk) 03:38, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

[edit]

Thank you for your article about keratocytes. I'm translating it because it is a good article with many references and I'm making articles on cells of ectodermal origin we need in our wikipedia. I will try to add some references in Galician or Spanish (the languages spoken here) and a close image (enlarged in a higher magnification) of a keratinocyte if I can get it. --Miguelferig (talk) 14:26, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DCDC2

[edit]

I've just replied to Talk:Dyslexia#DCDC2 and DCDC2 (gene) and thought I had better poke you since it is a late reply. --Mirokado (talk) 21:24, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Dear Author/CopperKettle

My name is Nuša Farič and I am a Health Psychology MSc student at the University College London (UCL). I am currently running a quantitative study entitled Who edits health-related Wikipedia pages and why? I am interested in the editorial experience of people who edit health-related Wikipedia pages. I am interested to learn more about the authors of health-related pages on Wikipedia and what motivations they have for doing so. I am currently contacting the authors of randomly selected articles and I noticed that someone at this address edited an article on Leukodystrophy. I would like to ask you a few questions about you and your experience of editing the above mentioned article and or other health-related articles. If you would like more information about the project, please visit my user page (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hydra_Rain) and if interested, please reply via my talk page or e-mail me on nusa.faric.11@ucl.ac.uk. Also, others interested in the study may contact me! If I do not hear back from you I will not contact this account again. Thank you very much in advance.Hydra Rain (talk) 15:38, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Splints, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interosseous ligament (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:24, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

[edit]

I wish you happiness, health and successes in life. Psychiatrick (talk) 00:16, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Muhiddin Kabiri
added a link pointing to Tajik
Zayd Saidov
added a link pointing to Tajik

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abdul-Halim Sadulayev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Argun. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Civility Barnstar
Thank you for fixing the misspelling of American on the Salafi movement page and politely letting me know that the references are within the body of the text. For some reason, that was not registering with me until you mentioned it, but now it makes so much sense to me. Emerald Evergreen 16:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Oh, thanks for the Barnstar, Emerald! (0: --CopperKettle 18:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge of RELN gene and Reelin Protein

[edit]

Hi! I just saw that you merged the items human protein Reelin (Q13561329) and the human gene RELN (Q414043) on Wikidata. The gene and protein items should not be merged, as they follow a well designed data structure [2]. What we are implementing here is to populate the GeneWiki info boxes exclusively from Wikidata, therefore we need Wikidata gene items attached to Wikipedia gene pages If you merged other gene items to protein items, I would ask you to undo the merge. Thank you!! Sebotic (talk) 07:48, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question on Myclonic Dystonia page

[edit]

Hi, I've been living with myclonic dystonia my entire life and have been looking into to different treatment options. My condition definitely responds with alcohol. I've also had many prescribed drugs that work alright but I don't like the idea of becoming dependent on a drug at age 21. I wanted to know where you got the video of the individual writing on the wiki page that was created for myclonic dystonia. I understand if it wasn't you as I am just trying to contact everyone who has edited the page and it looks like you started it back in 2009.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maetz015 (talkcontribs) 08:57, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reelin

[edit]

Hi Copperkettle, are you OK? Unfortunately I have to tell you that the page about reelin on the Dutch wiki I once created there on your wish has been deleted. Nobody did something to improve any eventual errors, I tried a little myself lately but they only kept on blaming me for in their view having translated without any knowledge of the subject. Maybe you make a new request on the Dutch wiki? Anyway, I for my part will not work on this anymore. Regards, The Wiki ghost (talk) 16:04, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:30, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:53, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, CopperKettle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, CopperKettle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1895 in Afghanistan for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1895 in Afghanistan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1895 in Afghanistan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bbb23 (talk) 18:55, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Marlene Laruelle has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jmertel23 (talk) 16:58, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, CopperKettle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, CopperKettle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of the article "2019 in Russia" in English Wikipedia

[edit]

Hello, CopperKettle. Happy New Year to you! 2019 is coming soon. Can you creat the article "2019 in Russia" in English Wikipedia? Thanks a lot!
123.150.182.180
16:16, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Changed my position. Am seeing sufficient sources for a stand alone article. Best :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:25, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Doc James! ))) --CopperKettle 14:38, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lead versus body of article

[edit]

Content mentioned in the Lead should be expanded upon in the body of the article. At Cerebral folate deficiency I am doing the revision. David notMD (talk) 21:02, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi CopperKettle! You created a thread called Is colon a kind of a special symbol? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Custom signature fix needed

[edit]

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error, specifically formatting tags that are in the wrong order.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
  3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
  4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Change the signature as show below, or make other edits to make the signature appear how you want it to appear.
  3. Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Current signature:
<font color="000066">[[User:CopperKettle|<b>C</b><font color="CC3300">opper</font><b>K</b><font color="CC0000">ettle</font>]]</font>

Fixed signature:
[[User:CopperKettle|<b><span style="color:#000066;">C</span></b><span style="color:#CC3300;">opper</span><b><span style="color:#000066;">K</span></b><span style="color:#CC0000;">ettle</span>]]

More information is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures or respond here. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This fix is still needed. Please take a moment to copy and paste the new signature into your preferences. Some of your recent edits added syntax errors to talk pages, which now need to be cleaned up by other editors. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:36, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oops! I'll fix it now. Thank you for reminding! --CopperKettle (talk) 13:40, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of people on the postage stamps of Mauritius is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people on the postage stamps of Mauritius until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 15:04, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Riboflavin

[edit]

In English Wikipedia, statements of fact require references that meet WP:MEDRS standards. For your rare conditions additions - which I reverted - you had provided Wikilinks. Content at those articles may be adequately referenced. You could then copy content and references as long as you make clear in your Edit summary attributions to the sources of the content. David notMD (talk) 16:40, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David! The first condition is called riboflavin-responsive exercise intolerance, it's self-evident that it is responsive to riboflavin. For the second condition I provided a reference with 13 cases and a review of literature. What else was needed? --CopperKettle (talk) 16:55, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Here: Riboflavin-responsive multiple Acyl-CoA dehydrogenation deficiency in 13 cases, and a literature review in mainland Chinese patients. Why did you delete it? --CopperKettle (talk) 16:58, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Quote from a 2008 review (Bruno et al., PMID 18769256):

Less severely affected patients might present with progressive muscle weakness and LSM mainly in adulthood and are responsive to riboflavin treatment (riboflavin-responsive MADD).

--CopperKettle (talk) 17:03, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If I add a ref to this 2008 review, will this count a proper reference? As for riboflavin-responsive exercise intolerance, there are no reviews yet, because it's rare and was only discovered in 2016. But the very nature of the disease is expressed in its name. --CopperKettle (talk) 17:06, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My opinion on this is that the references for rr-MADD justify adding that as a rare condition, but the evidence for RREI - a case study - does not meet MEDRS standards despite there being a Wikipedia article of that name. David notMD (talk) 12:29, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I see! I agree that the use of secondary sources is the golden standard. But the MEDRS standards were created to help weed out suspicious and unfounded facts. If a disease is rare, but in several case reports have been described as reacting drastically to treatment with riboflavin, to the extent that it was named "riboflavin-responsive", well, I think that's one good exception to the MERDS standards. Years may pass before enough cases accumulate to warrant a review (a secondary published source). --CopperKettle (talk) 13:21, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About your Wikidata conflict report

[edit]

Hello,

I invite you reading my answer to your report on Wikidata.

Sincerely yours,

2A02:2788:228:93D:9143:F8EC:53BF:D108 (talk) 17:52, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]